Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 06:24:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 »
701  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: October 14, 2013, 07:01:19 PM
Who runs cryptostocks?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=41776
702  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] CIPHERMINE-PT - Industrial Mining & High Performance Computing on: October 14, 2013, 04:40:25 PM
Any word on our KnCs?

Not really. Our orders have order id #4442 and #5119. AFox maintains a list with order ids, dates and shipping time and looks like this whole range is still not yet shipped. The clock is ticking though.. Wink

Quote from: KnCMiner
All current paid orders will be shipped no later than October 15th.

https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-33
703  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] CIPHERMINE-PT - Industrial Mining & High Performance Computing on: October 14, 2013, 02:05:51 PM
I would suggest increase the interval of dividend payments as too much small transections will incure fees to the receiver.

Actually that's fine, I think. The last transaction fee was 0.0002 BTC and transported a value of 0.27857587 BTC, that's less than 0.1 % and the dividend should go higher for the next weeks also. Wink
704  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] CIPHERMINE-PT - Industrial Mining & High Performance Computing on: October 14, 2013, 07:05:37 AM
This weeks dividend

We received 19.00723618 LTC dividend for 5369 shares. This results in 0.27807587 BTC dividend for this pass-through, given an exchange rate of 0.0154 LTC/BTC and a 0.95036181 LTC fee. I will initiate the payout within approximately four hours, when I'm back at home.

Message from Kate to CIPHERMINE shareholders:

Quote from: Kate
Dear Shareholders,

Our first seven BitFuries arrived towards the end of last week and have been happily mining since. As a result revenues this week were €2,370, and a profit of €1,225, so a dividend of 389 LTC. €1,030 is going to the hardware reinvestment fund taking our total to €6,160. There is a debate as to what our reinvestment strategy should be going forwards here. You can see our BTC hashrate on the BTC Guild team rankings page (we're currently about 12th). I'm anticipating that revenues for the coming week will be over €5k.


Edit:

Dividend sent: cbf3ac5a1df7bef659dd668aa23fed19381176a2f5a812064b114d369be62edd
705  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: October 14, 2013, 06:42:01 AM
No coins were confiscated.

Hi Burnside, could you comment on that?

October 13 Update

Monday we will start deploying the first batch of finalized hardware, amounting for 10 TH/S.
According to our estimations, we will reach 3 TH/s on monday, and about 5 TH/s  within Saturday.
Within Saturday 19, full hashing speed of the first batch will be deployed. a
We will receive more batches of hardware in the following weeks and deploy it accordingly.

This week dividends deposit on btct.co has been "confiscated" by Burnside, thus we were unable to push it to shareholders.
Given recent developments at bitfunder we are again looking for a platform to move our shares.

Good to see your back

Can you go into detail about how it was confiscated?

Transaction https://blockchain.info/pl/tx/3f22c73e677709ce39dfba1b23d6f5e1923238e7566d25dc806812af4e72856f never showed up on btct wallet.



Quote
bitcoind@somehostname:~$ bitcoind getbalance XXXlabcoinXXX
5.20508040


Methinks they should hit the refresh button on the wallet page before making silly unfounded accusations.  (no, the account is not really XXXlabcoinXXX.)  Smiley
706  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 14, 2013, 06:38:08 AM
...of the solo mining only. It's useless to watch it daily, and it's now useless to watch at all, as the growth is in franchising and sales.

+ the immersion cooling data center.
707  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] CoinTerra [coint] on: October 13, 2013, 06:36:21 PM
Can you get a CT team member here to confirm this listing?

Push.

This stuff is live and trading. If it's scam, it needs to get delisted ASAP and if it's none, now is a good time to end the rumors. Wink
708  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: MalwareBytes Messages (Bitcoin Wallets) on: October 13, 2013, 01:47:57 PM
I think there are some nodes, which IPs are tagged as malicious by MalewareBytes. This message pops up many times, when using Torrent, too.
709  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: October 12, 2013, 09:07:29 PM
Where are you right now, Sam?
710  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: October 12, 2013, 05:30:41 PM
711  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] CIPHERMINE-PT - Industrial Mining & High Performance Computing on: October 12, 2013, 12:25:21 AM


2.8 TH/s (stock) out of 12.5 TH/s hashing

Quote from: Kate
Dear All,

Our next four BitFuries arrived this afternoon! Smiley Simon and Ross are both away this weekend but I certainly didn't want those babies to be sitting idle so I've been busily building them this evening. We've now got 6/7 running and we're nipping at Avalon's heels on the BTC Guild team rankings!

In case you're curious, the BitFuries are very power efficient, as expected. I'm getting 1,120 Watts at the plug for three 400 GHs units (48 boards in total, including three fans - Seasonic 1,250W PSUs), and most of the units are doing about 450 GH/s rather than the billed rate. That makes it an impressive 0.83 Watts/GHs.

I'll hopefully have the final miner operational tonight too. Probably going to have to canabalise one of our GPU for spare PSU rigs but its not running ay the moment anyway.

One of the six live miners is misbehaving a bit (sitting at 300 GH/s not 450 like the rest) but Giles will sort it out tomorrow so we're getting the full goodness; diagnosing these units beyond re-seating boards is a bit beyond me I'm afraid!

Kate.

https://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,4582.msg49290.html#msg49290

Quote from: Kate
Including FPGAs our total paid-for hashrate is about 12.5 TH/s. We've currently got 2.8 TH/s (officially - its actually running at a good 10% more than that) so we've still got 78% to come. Smiley

We need to decide where to spend more cash on hardware too. Please see the Where to invest next? thread.

Kate.

https://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,6354.0.html

Where to invest next?

Quote from: Kate
This is for CipherMine shareholders. We currently have about €4,500 in the hardware reinvestment fund and it is about to start growing quite rapidly now that the BitFuries have started arriving; probably at least another €1k by the end of this week.

I would value your collective input on where we should invest those funds. I plan to share with you all my updated economics-based forecast of difficulty which suggests that we will be able to maintain fairly healthy profits of €30-40k/month by continuing to invest in the ever-cheaper ASIC mining gear on the market then switching to scrypt GPGPUs when they become a reality. However, there are some permutations we could do instead. Some options:

1) For now put all the reinvestment fund into SHA256 ASICs as per the current plan. This is probably the most obvious course of action for now. If we do stick with this the question is which vendor? BitFury are the most expensive per GHs, but they are delivering and their gear seems pretty stable (though we've only been running it for a day). KNC are reportedly having capacitor explosion issues which doesn't inspire confidence. I like HashFast since their CEO is a mate of a mate and I think their Miner Protection Program is pretty good, but they are looking expensive now compared to CoinTerra. I was skeptical about CT but having done a lot of digging and speaking to people I think they are legit, but spending money now on stuff that won't arrive until January makes me twitchy, even at their amazing prices.

2) Put some or all of the fund into more GPU rigs. This has the benefit that they will have residual value, but to be frank GPU rigs are proving to be a bit of a nightmare. That said, our new rackable design should help - we're moving to 4 GPUs/rig due to the constant issues we've been facing. However, with LTC diff over 1,100 (and other scrypt coins only offering 10-20% above that) their profitability is getting quite slim.

3) We save up for GPGPUs so we can splash out €10-€30k once they become available and really get the full advantage of that first wave.

4) Use the fund to pay off some of CIPHERMINE.B1 (the bond) early.

There are other options too. As previously mentioned I'm using the Avalon refund to help with setting up a new exchange, hopefully buying Burnside's code. We could "go large" on that and put the h/w fund into that new venture if we feel the outlook for mining is just not good enough; in that scenario you'd all get a larger share of the new venture as CIPHERMINE shareholders.

Equally, we could switch to 100% profit mode. This would double dividends in the short-term but we'd effectively become a perpetual mining bond. Our revenues would steadily decline and in the longer term my models suggest that this would be less profitable than continuing to invest. It is very contingent on GPGPUs becoming a reality though.

Anyway, just wanted to float this out there and get your collective feedback. I'll post a new public version of the business model at the weekend.

Kate.

PS. 4 BTC in the last 24 hours with just 10% of our expected total hashrate - we're cooking on gas now! Cheesy

https://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,6354.0.html

If you have anything to add, I'll forward your opinion. Smiley
712  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] CIPHERMINE-PT - Industrial Mining & High Performance Computing on: October 11, 2013, 12:48:33 PM
First direct dividend issued

Kate sent out some test payments to test the the direct dividend payout. We received 11.13140127 LTC, which equal 0.16390988 BTC, given an exchange rate of 0.0155 LTC/BTC and a 0.556570302 LTC fee. I initiated a payout of 0.16390988 BTC for 5369* shares. You should receive approximately 0.000030415 BTC x amount of shares you hold. Please contact me, if something went wrong.

* Due to the minimum transaction amount of 5430 satoshi I doubled the share amount for this payout for four user, which only hold one share, thus the dividend was technically distributed to 5373 shares. This was only a work-around and I don't intend to do something similar again in the future.

Addresses to keep an eye one

Dividends issued by CipherMine go to this Litecoin address:

LKvW3g9EQyuk8B3GjYqqfFTAAQGshJYVj6

I will distribute the Bitcoin nominated dividend from this address:

1CiPhERsFPjVS1DyBUgFjndaigUGKbErXD

Cheers! Wink
713  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER Speculation Thread on: October 11, 2013, 12:22:27 PM
Actually the numbers match, so he does seem to hold all shares:

https://bitfunder.com/asset/G.ASICMINER-PT#pane_divs
http://blockchain.info/address/124pXdLYTZtAQ95gHdL43fTofaS5bHqAFi
714  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER Speculation Thread on: October 11, 2013, 09:08:49 AM
Do you assume that from Ukyo beeing MIA or do you have specific information?

Two speculative reasons:

1. I asked several times when he cleary was around and very likely read the question. It seems he doesn't want to answer. The export question is probably #1 question in the BF.AM thread anyway. Though there is a minimal chance, that he "just missed it" ...

2. TAT declines to accept BF.AM (full) shares. This is not a new situation and nothing special-post-BF-closure-for-US issue.

That said, Ukyo never declined it, but neither ever confirmed it.

Ukyo MIA?

<+gribble> ukyo was last seen in #bitfunder 11 hours, 51 minutes, and 36 seconds ago: <Ukyo> cool
715  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER Speculation Thread on: October 11, 2013, 08:51:46 AM
So far it seems like Ukyo won't export AM shares from BF. This will probably result in even lower prices. Therefore BF.AM shares are inferior. Keep this in mind when you see some crazy stuff.



Always remember:

The cat has a plan. Wink
716  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 11, 2013, 05:47:51 AM
havelock still hasn't paid this weeks divs?

I received the divdent on HL on 2013-10-09 20:01 UTC.
717  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / [bitcoind] [brainwallet.org] Verify message, different results for same message on: October 11, 2013, 03:54:13 AM
A user in #bitcoin-assets mentioned that the message and signature he generated resolves to another address on brainwallet.org as it was intended to. I tried to pin down the problem and this is what I found out:

A message with the very special char ’ + more than 249 other (normal) chars resolves to different Bitcoin addresses when bitcoind and brainwallet.org is used.

1. ’ + 249 other chars:

Message:

Code:
’XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Signature generated by brainwallet.org:

Code:
HAeEUZHzDgDOZSLakU0TahyaZX6Wb5ViMUJByFqOrVHPE1lNK8XTu3FPMYDAP7erqf7IuHECBKIB3h5ymVfKHjA=

brainwallet.org output:

Code:
Verified to: 17mDAmveV5wBwxajBsY7g1trbMW1DVWcgL

bitcoind "verify message" for 17mDAmveV5wBwxajBsY7g1trbMW1DVWcgL:

Code:
Message verfied.

2. ’ + 250 other chars:

Code:
’XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Signature generated by brainwallet.org:

Code:
HBHMfRLvk0aMj4B9mAY5RRJcweTaYh1q/74/rh3nzv36ytjhgOGumBJwvi0KTv7XhzZdr+wQ05egf05dN3mo5O8=

brainwallet.org output:

Code:
Verified to: 17mDAmveV5wBwxajBsY7g1trbMW1DVWcgL

bitcoind "verify message" for 17mDAmveV5wBwxajBsY7g1trbMW1DVWcgL:

Code:
Message verification failed.

bitcoind "verify message" for 1Cza7rVEy928uJjC5p2oBZAKgTr2c2tFuy:

Code:
Message verified.


While ’ seems to be a very special character, it's a strange behaviour which I can't explain.
718  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] CIPHERMINE-PT - Industrial Mining & High Performance Computing on: October 10, 2013, 04:52:06 PM
First three BitFuries received!

CipherMine has received the first three BitFuries today. Four more should be delivered very soon, as well as the KnCMiners.



BTC Guild team ranking, here we come!

CipherMine is currently hashing at BTC Guild, which is verifiable via the team ranking:

https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=rankings&section=teams

Kate said further:

Quote from: Kate
Giles and I have been rather distracted by sorting out how we're going to keep the security liquid and tradeable post-LTCG close down, and Ross and Simon have had to rebuild three of the GPU rigs recently (two randomly melted their main motherboard connectors - still not 100% sure why - and another has an as-yet undiagnosed fault), so we've not had time to sort out live hashrates for the GPU rigs yet (sorry!). Things are actually looking quite positive on the new exchange front and I'll have more news soon; there are a number of options being explored, and we will continue to pay dividends regardless.
719  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTCT.CO] [IPO-cancelled] BTCGARDEN MINER---Eyes to the horizon on: October 10, 2013, 03:39:15 PM
I don't want to be mean, but I feel like this advertisement here has nothing to do with "securities".
720  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 10, 2013, 03:27:58 PM
May I ask what happened to http://erpao.info/?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!