|
how much would shipping to germany cost?
|
|
|
|
I am curious to know how much whywefight paid for this account and the amount he sold it for.
as stated in the signed message i posted from ruggedman_dan's account i bought it for 0.23 and "sold" it to ruggedman_dan for 0.23 |
|
|
|
1D21VbzEakD5sdTPajcXDBkj9Ev3Uqxnic
--BEGIN SIGNED MESSAGE--
3/5/16
I have purchased this account back from whywefight. I am the original owner who earned all of the feedback. Thanks whywefight.
--END SIGNED MESSAGE--
G/C3pwR6v4Mf86k7rbsdSuNDLa5vk2XjaFq+Br4SErL9BDZpXybvDc1+gLJ/5nY7ezr5+sjbvoC2Z64TErfGQvU=
glad to see this! verfied using electrum |
|
|
|
ill take the Aluminum Casascius  |
|
|
|
|
oh guys i totaly missed it, will update this in a few hours, thx for the reminder.
|
|
|
|
i just handed it over to its real/old owner just a few minutes ago.
Confirmed. Bought the account back from whywefight. He is a good guy. I never asked him to get the account back and sell it to me. He took it upon himself to do so. I appreciate it. I will sign a message to prove this is my account once again. Thanks again whywefight. Top notch community member. you are welcome |
|
|
|
|
i just handed it over to its real/old owner just a few minutes ago.
|
|
|
|
Desensitization: "defined as the diminished emotional responsiveness to a negative or aversive stimulus after repeated exposure to" (look it up). So, moron (since we like calling each other fun names) that means, in this case, people are going to see red trusts on every profile sooner or later based on how you guys tag. Therefore meaning NO ONE will trust it anymore!
Why won't they? Because, read the text above once more. This will result in more people getting scammed. How? Because they will no longer care for the trust system so they can't tell if the user they want to trade with will be a scammer. This will make them have not rely on trustworthy members to report back but rather they're own judgement.
This means you're not being a trusted forum member and thus should be ashamed for the dishonest hypocrisy. You should all be tagged with a negative but I don't give a shit like you do.
That aside, what happens if I do not give a shit about if others are being ripped off? This forum is just to communicate, not to take major advice. So if you win the lottery won day (hypothetical here) and spent it all on a house and went bankrupt the next day, I don't give a shit. I am not your mom, your nanny or your fascist leader that is trying to tell you what to do. I couldn't care less whether someone burns all their money on a scam. Not my issue.
Your feedback for me says: This user posts negative feedback on everyone's profile if they post at least once in the investor-based games, claiming you are dragging people into ponzis when it shouldn't matter what I say, people will do whatever they want.
while my refference links to a page where you wrote: SNavy, I love you!
I have been paid multiple times, and every time they were payments to recover what I lost in other ponzis. Now I am currently doubling.
I have actually watched the Bitcoin market and as the price went up, so did my percentages. When it kept on going up, as you said, it paused. When it went down then up again it rose as usual. The fact that it's been running for almost (or over) a year now is incredible. Look at shit like Flexybit, they could only keep their scam open for like a month while Doublebot has been utilizing the market to double everyone's btc for almost a year.
A ponzi would've surely collapsed by now. Thank you SNavy for the service. The ONLY service I trust to legitimately double my btc!
1. you stated you have been paid multiple times. Means people will think "oh look its paying!" 2. You make doublebot looking more legit by comparing it to other ponzis which failed. by doing so you admit you know exactly what doublebot is: a ponzi. 3. You stated that a ponzis nature is to fail, hence you advertising this one in the same sentence. Now, please explain me how this is not advertising? i didnt look it up, but i am sure you posted more than once in that thread. Thanks for delivering a great example like this. It clearly shows you dont give a fuck about others while you think you are right. That's total bullshit. This is why users like you cannot be trusted at all, hence my feedback. Where is your damn proof that Doublebot is a ponzi? I don't see it. I really should start a business selling dictionaries this is stupid. Anyway, definition of a ponzi: "A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation where the operator, an individual or organization, pays returns to its investors from new capital paid to the operators by new investors, rather than from profit earned by the operator." Wow that was long. Anyway something like Cryptoboost or Flexybit (remember those?) were ponzis. You have no evidence that Doublebot is a ponzi! Here's my evidence it's not: I've analyzed the percentages, whenever the price per btc goes down then back up, as it does everyday, the percentages go up. Nothing happens if otherwise. It's not strong evidence, but it is. I still have btc in there that is pending and I believe that it will pay me out. You're little friends also cannot red tag me for saying this because Doublebot has not scammed a single individual thus far! They are consistently paying out - not a single satoshi scammed yet you can't wrap that around your head, can you? Finally, to end it off, you're right. I don't give a fuck about others. If they want to put their money somewhere they will get scammed, it's their right and I couldn't care less. But where you're wrong is when you say I think I am right. I don't just think, I know.td;lr: my feedback on you is accurate on 100% correct. thanks for the proof! |
|
|
|
Bitcoin was created to be a open source away from the prying eyes of the government and banks. So when you see people policing a bitcoin forum I personally have to wonder if the one aspect that brings me to bitcoin is still valid.
Are we going to turn this forum into a nanny state where we hold your hand as long as you play ball or we going to go back to the roots?
If we need to coddle people to this extent then its game over and bitcoin will dance down the path till its 1984!
We either let people figure out how life is or you shut it down and establish group thinking and group thinking seems to be winning at the moment.
The whole idea you need to kiss ass,shows that some people have got to big for their own good and need to be brought down a peg. Never submit to some one in life because it is the easier path,you will always pay in some form.
This^ You people are recreating the wheel here again with Bitcoin, simply transplanting the old broken system you are used to into a new format totally ignoring its intent to be a p2p platform free from interference of 3rd parties. Criminals are doing crimes. What argument do you think you're making with that oft-used Straw-Man? So, Bitcoin is a decentralised p2p network. Please explain how Bitcoin has anything to do with the dishonest practices demonstrated throughout a social forum community? Let's just try, for shits and giggles, applying this absurd, "But, but, bitcoin safe from prying eyes so, you know, no consequences allowed!!!1!!1!!!1!1!" perspective. "Hi I'm Mark Karpeles" "Mark, I'm going to write an article about your dishonest behaviour so that everybody knows you are an untrustworthy scumbag" "You can't do that" "Why? "Because Bitcoin is a decentralised p2p libertarian utopia. There should be no consequences for what I've done and if you tell people what I've done then that will result in me being held to account for my dishonesty so, you know, BITCOIN!!!!1!1!1!!!elebenty!!!!"!1" ^^^ That is the crux of your argument. No, not really, that is the crux of your opinion of my argument. I have a hard time believing you even know what the definition of a straw man is. I explained in detail how the your actions affect this forum in your futile attempts at playing mall cop but I am sure you are unwilling or unable to read it. It is understandable though, after all going around the internet screaming "ACHTUNG YOUR PAPERS SCHNELL!" at people takes up a lot of your time and effort I am sure. Its not about the www its about this forum BTW: It would be "IHRE PAPIERE, SOFORT!" |
|
|
|
|
my wife has a full cupboard of clothes she doesnt wear anymore and i am sure half of it has never been worn and some stuff even has hangtags on it... i dont think no one would buy two used t-shirts...
|
|
|
|
Desensitization: "defined as the diminished emotional responsiveness to a negative or aversive stimulus after repeated exposure to" (look it up). So, moron (since we like calling each other fun names) that means, in this case, people are going to see red trusts on every profile sooner or later based on how you guys tag. Therefore meaning NO ONE will trust it anymore!
Why won't they? Because, read the text above once more. This will result in more people getting scammed. How? Because they will no longer care for the trust system so they can't tell if the user they want to trade with will be a scammer. This will make them have not rely on trustworthy members to report back but rather they're own judgement.
This means you're not being a trusted forum member and thus should be ashamed for the dishonest hypocrisy. You should all be tagged with a negative but I don't give a shit like you do.
That aside, what happens if I do not give a shit about if others are being ripped off? This forum is just to communicate, not to take major advice. So if you win the lottery won day (hypothetical here) and spent it all on a house and went bankrupt the next day, I don't give a shit. I am not your mom, your nanny or your fascist leader that is trying to tell you what to do. I couldn't care less whether someone burns all their money on a scam. Not my issue.
Your feedback for me says: This user posts negative feedback on everyone's profile if they post at least once in the investor-based games, claiming you are dragging people into ponzis when it shouldn't matter what I say, people will do whatever they want.
while my refference links to a page where you wrote: SNavy, I love you!
I have been paid multiple times, and every time they were payments to recover what I lost in other ponzis. Now I am currently doubling.
I have actually watched the Bitcoin market and as the price went up, so did my percentages. When it kept on going up, as you said, it paused. When it went down then up again it rose as usual. The fact that it's been running for almost (or over) a year now is incredible. Look at shit like Flexybit, they could only keep their scam open for like a month while Doublebot has been utilizing the market to double everyone's btc for almost a year.
A ponzi would've surely collapsed by now. Thank you SNavy for the service. The ONLY service I trust to legitimately double my btc!
1. you stated you have been paid multiple times. Means people will think "oh look its paying!" 2. You make doublebot looking more legit by comparing it to other ponzis which failed. by doing so you admit you know exactly what doublebot is: a ponzi. 3. You stated that a ponzis nature is to fail, hence you advertising this one in the same sentence. Now, please explain me how this is not advertising? i didnt look it up, but i am sure you posted more than once in that thread. Thanks for delivering a great example like this. It clearly shows you dont give a fuck about others while you think you are right. |
|
|
|
I've been told that plenty of people have taken him seriously and his precence has been an issue on a number of fronts and to a number of people. There is evidence that was the case, not just interpretation or supposition.
My complete objection to his ability to promote hate by brandishing a hate image and tagline that states his support to take over is sufficient evidence that one or more people are affected by him.
It's easy to say he is harmless when you have zero evidence to the contrary.
I'm pissed because a core member of our dev team walked away from a years worth of work because of this harmless ISIS avatar. So execuse me if i disagree with your view that it has no impact.
I had him on ignore for months. But ignoring cancer doesn't work. Turning a blind eye lets the cancer grow.
Fuck his rights to quietly brandish hate and support the destruction of thousands of years of historical artefacts and world heritage sites because the sysmbols on those historic buildings showed images that they disagreed with. They take images seriously, but we should not?
Yeah, fuck that.I don't trust him. Neg'd the fucker so others know he is a cancer and not to be trusted.
Countrys like USA, UK or Germany (just to name a few) killed more people for their belives than ISIS ever will. I dont see you moan about YPII (sorry mate i cant recall another member with a flag). Why not blame the USA, arent we in this situation because they messed up? EDIT: I am not supporting that guy, its just what came up my mind. Not saying i dont care about it. |
|
|
|
See people like whywefight, Lutpin, Cryptodevil and who ever else read CAREFULLY every single post and will twist your words to make you seem like a scammer and then will try and justify a negative. I am sure that in the past month negatives that have been sent have increased by like 1000%.
If you do something shady, i dont need to twist your words and i never did. Feel free to revies my feedbacks and bring up those who are wrong by your point of view. i am open to talk about it. No need to say this will never happen as people just cry about getting caught while fucking things up. Looking at the sections, things getting better. I dont say what i do is the best way, at least it is one way. Feel free to join, argue with me or just step out of the way. Its your choice. |
|
|
|
Proof of ownership:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am whywefight from bitcointalk.org, today is 05/03/2016. This account is currently under my control as i bought it from its last owner. This account will be handed over to its real owner in the next 24h.
I bought this account for 0.23BTC https://blockchain.info/tx/fd6990b8cc4c48b2ef7ed9967c896610335699a3ff456fe3120c9ab1fa0b6495 and it will be handed over for the same amount.
As there was no signed message available, because a new one wasnt staked, i am posting this. In case there are any doubts, an trusted member choosen by the community can review my mails and PMs with the last owner.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
18fZyjcEiP856yYHb1K3r2uKVe3t4ysSdJ
IKjDy8CEfCF8IZ6tB9fhygm7v6TEQw9gpkliYiGB4ZnPDaU3/tea3LgIXaTwRk+fdfwwbrLicTmc/xqFLyyPTG8=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Confirmed! |
|
|
|
|
At most customs you will have a problem getting them in afaik
|
|
|
|
I need to know what negative trust ratings are for To my knowledge, negative trust is left on the accounts of those who are scammers or those that the person leaving the trust think that are scammers but I have been seeing people leave negative trust for reasons that have nothing to do with scamming, just their opinion When I look on the trust page, I see the following, Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.
If a person leaves negative trust for none of the above reasons, is it not abuse of the system? I see what you did there. Giving an ISIS supporter who uses his avatar to subliminally promote violence is something that should be defended. So what if there is no way of stopping him from brandishing hate as long as he doesn't post anything promoting hate? So everyone around him just has to shut the fuck up because he has the right to support an illegal terrorist organisation that many countries are currently at war with. Fuck the people who died in Paris. Fuck the people who drown each day escaping the terrorists. Fuck the people who get their heads cut off because it's cheaper than raising money for advertising. Let him brandish hate in peace. But, wait. If he is allowed to be involved with profiting from a currency project, won't he use that profit to fund terrorist activities? Go head, defend his fucking rights. Yeah, I don't trust someone who is actively promoting taking over the world by means of violence. Even if it is just a fucking avatar. It stands for something and innocent people die each day for what that avatar stands for. So get me fucking banned for giving a terrorist supporter negative trust. That would be so ironic, but as long as it sits well with your moral compass. Let's just finish that thought off with a question as to why r/btc exists? Rules can be broken, but not when it comes to letting terrorist supporters spread their cancer among us. If you think he is a scammer and you strongly belive it, -ve him. its that easy. If you cant stand other people support things you dont like, you are to weak for the world. |
|
|
|
Public Service Announcement! Do not participate in this ponzi scam. Any profit you are hoping to make is that which is stolen from later users who will lose their money when the scheme collapses, which it will, as they ALL do.
Your decision to participate in these schemes in full knowledge that the operators are taking deposits from other users and sharing some of it with you, makes you an accomplice to fraud and theft.
This marks you as untrustworthy and, as a result, your forum account will be marked as such.
You have been warned.
Someone should report this retard to admins, since this is pretty sick guy, which actually affects regular investors making money from projects. Your sig says "Investing & Earning in Bitcoin World since 2010" while you throw your money on one of the worst made ponzi site ever. Now tell me who is the "retard" |
|
|
|
Lutpin never gives negative feedback for no reason. Reasons are rock solid every time
You seems to be selling a ponzi script which is used for scam purpose. OK
You then gave fake feedback to support your point with your others account. Isn't that bad in your opinion ?
Misleading users thought with fake reviews is not a right behavior mate and will surely results in negative trust
LOL, do your research before posting or you'll end up looking stupid, luptin has had to change his feedback multiple times in the past two weeks because his his reasoning was off I'm not against Lutpin by any means, but I agree that xinzark's comment just smacks of clique-ee-ness and brown nosing. And I find that weird, given that Lutpin isn't even a hero member yet. No one's judgement is that good. But I'm tired of all this drama--the altcoin section has been quite interesting, so I'll be hanging out on the street corner in that neighborhood for a while.  you dont need to be a hero member to catch people doing something wrong I'm saying that he doesn't have a very long track record here. That was my point. But I have no beef with him. Not going to kiss ass either. ah okay, i got it the other way around  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
