If someone lets their kids watch them while they are gambling online, they should at least educate them so they will understand. Of course, curiosity will play a big factor, and if they aren't guided, they may be misled. That's how simple it is.

Gambling can have both positive and negative effects on individuals. However, if you are an irresponsible gambler, it can significantly impact your life in a negative way, particularly by endangering your financial stability and potentially leading to bankruptcy. This is why gambling operators always emphasize the importance of gambling responsibly, recognizing the addictive nature of gambling. Those who lack discipline are at a high risk of developing gambling addictions.

Conversely, if you are consistently winning in gambling, life can become financially easier, as the process of making money through gambling can be quite instantaneous.

The AML policy has came into effect in later years after the KYC procedures have been required. When you sign up for a gambling site, you are typically required to provide certain information, which is considered KYC already. The specifics of KYC can vary from site to site. Some may be satisfied with basic information, while others may request documents to verify the accuracy of the information provided. Many sites currently do not require document verification, instead opting for information input. However, it's possible that they may introduce document verification in the future, so it's a good idea to be prepared for that possibility.

The size of your wager can indeed be a significant factor. If you consistently lose, sites may not be as concerned with KYC. But if you are winning, which means you are receiving funds from the gambling site, that's when they might implement more stringent KYC requirements.

Thanks for clarifying it as regular users like me would not understand it, and yeah I clearly I understand it now.




While educating yourself is an essential and fundamental step, it alone may not suffice. If you truly want to thrive, you need to focus on being profitable, similar to a game where winning each battle is crucial. Surviving isn't the ultimate goal; it's about achieving success and profitability.

Wow! I'm a bit skeptical when I hear the word 'transparent.' It makes me want to research more about the project. Could you provide additional information about the project so that we can verify if such a claim is truly realistic?

Bitcoin halving has consistently proven itself as a profitable event for me.

I wasn't an early investor, but I'm grateful that my first experience with halving in 2016 brought me substantial profits that came in 2017, allowing me to enjoy significant gains from a small capital investment. That year, not only did Bitcoin perform well, but altcoins also saw remarkable price increases. So, my strategy has been simple: follow the trend until it shows signs of breaking.

Clearly, there's no guarantee that a casino will continue operating as a non-KYC platform, as government policies can change over time. Perhaps there's a specific threshold of funds that would trigger KYC requirements, and yet casinos may not make this information readily available to potential gamblers to avoid discouraging them. Instead, this requirement is often buried in the Terms of Service (TOS), and many gamblers simply click the 'Sign Up' button without reading the full TOS, remaining unaware of the KYC conditions.

I would love to live in a country where taxes are effectively utilized. Personally, I don't mind paying taxes or any new taxes they might implement because I'm confident that I, along with future generations, will benefit from them. However, in some other countries, the situation is different. The government is often controlled by oligarchs—wealthy businessmen who run major businesses in the country. Consequently, their personal interests tend to take precedence in all matters.

More experience in gambling can lead to greater maturity. Whether you gamble on the streets, in a casino, or online, there's no difference in the platform; what matters is the lessons a gambler can learn from their experiences. These lessons can help them improve their chances of winning or mature into a more disciplined gambler.

It's not automatic that a good gambler wins, as the majority of gamblers lose money. Being good at gambling means knowing how to manage your losses and maintain discipline every time you gamble. Discipline in this context means not losing control.

Is this an idiomatic expression?

Sorry mate but can you explain further this statement of yours, I don't quite get it.


Obviously, because if we are intol investing in business, we should consider both risk and reward as it does not guarantee easy money.
Those who would it is, surely is uneducated about bitcoin.

Perhaps in other countries with strict taxation laws, especially regarding gambling, they have a well-defined system for compliance. However, in my case, I haven't heard of gamblers in our country being required to pay taxes on their winnings. Therefore, I don't pay taxes on my winnings. Though, in reality, I'm not really winning overall, so it feels like a double loss on my part – losing while paying taxes.

If they were to require it, I believe making casinos withholding tax agents would ensure that gamblers pay what is due to the government.

It's not going to happen, mate. Newbies often end up scamming their lenders when they don't have collateral to offer. Keep in mind that only high-ranking members are given the opportunity to borrow without collateral, as they have a reputation to lose if they mess up.

That could be a mixing but not in a deeper level, but your transactions can be traceable, especially if a particular exchange is obligated to disclose your transaction information on their platform. We have a government agency that oversees this, known as the Anti-Money Laundering Council. So, if you simply desire privacy for mixing and haven't engaged in any illegal activities, that should be sufficient to achieve your purpose.

That's why there's a contract. If Lillard doesn't violate his contract by sitting out the whole season, then he cannot be held liable for any damages. The Blazers should have already anticipated events like this, as similar situations have occurred in other teams in the past. So, if they choose to keep Lillard but he refuses to play, I think the better solution would be to trade him. In the end, it's not personal; it's all about business and should aim to be a win-win situation for both parties. And if there are losses involved in the decision-making process, at least they can work on minimizing them.

If it's useless, then it shouldn't have been created.

You are in charge of your own strategy. If you believe that certain technical indicators are not necessary for your success, then they are indeed useless to you. However, take a look around and study how successful traders operate. They use technical indicators and analyze them effectively, which is why I would say they are very useful for achieving profitability.

Merit will come easily if your primary purpose for posting is to help. We have many merit sources here, and I believe they are adept at finding organic posts that are helpful to the community. You may encounter difficulties if you prioritize merit over the quality of your posts, as this could lead to disappointment if your expectations are not met. Most merit hunters are often participants in signature campaigns or aspire to be accepted into them. However, as I mentioned, merits will naturally come your way as long as you consistently create organic and helpful posts.

Usually, it's easier to earn merits on local boards, but only if the merit sources in that board are genuinely helpful to their members in ranking up. In my opinion, while merits shouldn't be the primary focus, based on my observation, when a member receives merits for their posts, they become more inspired to create valuable content. I believe we can encourage this behavior within our local community. Having more active members on the forum is beneficial as it leads to a greater exchange of ideas, which ultimately benefits all of us.

Even if the refund process is slow, it is still expected that people will panic, as they believe that over time, the price will drop. However, as long as the refund process is ongoing, the price is likely to slowly rise. I actually view this as positive news for the market. It may have a temporary negative impact on the price, but the fact that a major exchange from the past is in the process of issuing refunds should increase confidence among traders and potential investors.

So, if there is a price drop, always consider it an opportunity, as it is likely to be short-lived.

I voted for Stevenson to win via decision. Although his last fight was won via TKO, I still believe that Stevenson is not aggressive enough to go for a KO. Instead, he will play it safe, as is his usual strategy, to ensure a win. If De Los Santos were to recklessly attack Stevenson, then maybe we might see a KO. However, if he also plays smart, this fight will likely go to the judges' scorecards, with another unanimous win for Stevenson.

A good casino should also know how to handle jokes, LOL.

Well, if they have an ANN thread here, they can report to the mods if they think that the post violates the forum rules, or they can make it self-moderated. Jokes nowadays are already normal; we all know that new casinos are hoping to be successful, and every casino starts as a newbie in the gambling world, right? But that's the challenge there; they can't dictate what people think or say about them, so they have to address all of that in a professional manner.

When we say jokes, it affects our emotions, but casinos don't address things emotionally, so that's nothing.

You won't be able to continue the service, but a fair exchange should allow you to withdraw your funds. They cannot confiscate your balance as they don't own it. However, there might be exchanges that would do so. It's better to be safe than sorry; just comply if you can. If not, consider trading on a Decentralized Exchange.