They're not "nutildah and perfect money" together but separate searches. I guess buying bitcoin with perfect money must be a popular option and people will be searching nutildah for the reasons below (though I'm surprised it's that high).


The first non-bitcointalk mention of nutlidah is this reddit thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/comments/fzs4bm/nutildah_the_troll_that_made_the_scam_thread/


I believe the PC term is 'cryptocurrency enthusiasts'  .

Man City or United what? To win the league? City. I don't think United are strong enough and will drop in form soon enough. Maybe I'm not giving them their dues but they haven't really played any tough teams recently except for City and Leicester where the managed draws. They're playing Liverpool on the 17th so that should be good.


They shouldn't have given him the job anyway. ex-Players should have to prove their worth managing other clubs instead of being a shoe-ins for big clubs. Always annoys me when people brandish managers great and their first jobs were managing Barca or PSG or something and then move on to another huge club who always win. Go manage an average team and they see how well they do. Managers are usually only as good as their teams.

Looks like we've got another unique yellow cap winner with famLFC coming out on top. He only won it by 0.5 though and just beat out tomahawk9 and jayce.

What the hell is happening to Liverpool? I didn't watch the game but are they bottling it? I thought going for 1-1 was risky but didn't expect them to lose. Only one person backed the home win and even got the score right. Looks like City is gonna run away with it this year. They practically had their b-team out against Chelsea and still managed to stuff them.


I kinda liked having the lots of games over the Christmas/New Year period. Always something to watch. The 12th seems a long way away now. Really don't care for the domestic cups these days. They probably should have scrapped them this year with covid.

The trouble with disliking a post is it will just lead to abuse as people will auto-dislike the posts of a user they don't like. They could even use bots and multiple accounts to do this just to get the post reported. If a post is bad then it should just be brought to the attention of the mod via reporting it. As for a 'like' button I wouldn't be against it but that's kinda what the merit function is for, though I know not everyone has a lot of merit and sometimes you can like a post for being funny or whatnot without wanting to merit it. I would just encourage users to reports posts they think are spam or bad, but I also think we should still crack down on poorly run campaigns that are paying them to make the mess in the first place which would cut down on a lot of rubbish. Some perks for people who make a high volume of accurate reports would also be beneficial as a reward for reporting as currently it's a thankless task so most people probably don't bother. More people would probably report things if there was some advantage for doing so.

Well I have suggested that before but there's already a captcha and the bots are getting past that and I think they can get past the other more complex ones so it's a case of how annoying it is to genuine users vs how many bots it potentially stops. Captchas can be very annoying to new users, especially when they take repeated efforts to pass like they do with tor whereas a bot doesn't care and it will keep trying until it gets past it somehow or like you said they'll pay people to solve them which can be done very cheaply. Maybe we could require a captcha if the new user makes a post that contains an url or the first handful of posts a new user makes containing an url need to be approved by a mod before they go live (they could still appear as posted to the user essentially being shadowbanned until verified).

This is only going to penalise genuine users whilst giving advantage to bots who can automate the process. Theymos is never going to do anything that is this restrictive so we need ways that only effect the bots. I think we should look at ways at stopping all these bots though as there's masses of them right now and it's only going to get worse. Shadowbanning would at least stop the spam from being an eyesore to everyone and genuine users won't know any different.


I doubt forum funds will be used for things like that, but I'm sure you could get people to contribute to it. Things like seasteads are easier said than done though and usually will end in tears or deaths as they inevitable turn into cults or megalomaniacs take them over via their leadership.

If support easily deactivates 2fa then it's mostly useless anyway. 2 factor apps should probably require finger print unlocks. You're not going to forget your fingerprint and someone needs access to your device for that. Sadly, there's always going to be times when 2fs will need to be reset or removed and that's where the weakness is.


I wouldn't believe everything anonymous twitter accounts say. I'm not saying this hasn't happened and we shouldn't downplay the threat of it but I'm sure a lot of accounts will just be trolling or spreading fud and sim swapping is still quite rare. Phone providers probably should make the process more secure though and there must be ways that they can prevent the wrong person from getting the sims.


I honestly can't remember but pretty sure it was more than 3 years ago. Maybe they only saved the address they were given consent to do so, or the addresses leaked were ones from more recently.


I think I had those notifications turned off, or at the least they were blocked by my email provider so I don't think I ever got them.

Yeah, people are just looking for the new Khabib or to drum up some rivalry between him and McGregor. McNugget's fights are always better when there's some beef between them.


I don't think McGregor VS Poirier will be that great. As much as I'd like to see him fight again this will probably be a disappointment. It would be an ok warm up fight for McGregor if he's for sure going to continue fighting on after it but if he's just going to bounce straight after he collects his pay check or 'retire' again then I don't really care.


I'd like to see them fight again, but Khabib really doesn't seem into it. That money might come in handy for his own UFC promotion thing he's doing though so why not go all out for his 30th fight. The McGregor/Poirier fight shouldn't be for a belt. Neither of them deserve it right now. Maybe the winner could fight Khabib for it if Dana can manage to persuade him to return (though Khabib beat Poirier in 2019).

Money doesn't last forever. It could be used to make further developments to the forum or maybe even for other worthwhile projects the community deems important, but we could even give the money to charity which would be a win-win in my opinion. We already have Copper Member with some very small benefits so why not offer Silver and Gold memberships etc. I think they would be very popular. Sure, some people would want them just for the apparent prestige or name but there are lots of benefits to more donator ranks in my opinion. If they came with benefits like bigger signatures and whatnot it would essentially make farming or hacking accounts worthless. Higher donator ranks could be given the option to change their name which if often requested but is seldom done and a lot of times there's good reasons for it. At least that would cut out the middle man of staff getting involved and most requests go unanswered anyway. It's also very difficult to rise through the ranks with the merit system and I don't think letting users bypass that by buying a Membership is a big deal. You can already essentially do that by buying an account anyway.

Twitter is one of the worst places on the internet. A Load of trolls and snowflakes battling it out to see who is more stupid. They're all just screaming into the void either way. If people can't handle criticism they shouldn't be using it to blast out opinions, or at least they shouldn't be reading the comments or replies. You're absolutely not made out to be a pundit if you can't take this sort of stuff as it is going to happen every week. People need to learn to ignore it.


I went for a draw. Chelsea should have done better but got walked all over. City practically had their B team out as well. Hadn't even heard of  quarter of their players. How long is it until Lampard is sacked? Werner accidentally kicking the corner flag and then going down like he's injured was pathetic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOJT8u8S3Io



I've gone for the draw. Liverpool should win but I don't trust them right now and Southampton have been playing surprisingly strong losing to only the two Manchester teams and those were close.

Well I got the result right with a draw. Just a shame I picked 0-0. I've gone for another risky draw on the West Brom game. Arsenal should win but I don't trust them yet. West Brom got slaughtered by Leeds last game but I don't think the same will happen and I'm hoping Arsenal go back to their shit form like they were a few rounds a go. Need a draw from this game for my 4-fold acca as well for £80. Not hopeful though.


Lol. Didn't you win last season? Why quit when there's a $50 bet every week. Users can quickly jump up the board as we have seen several times.


Pundits are fine to dish it but can't take criticism. Besides, it's their plebby fans being plebby tweeting abuse that was the problem.

On the subject of Leeds, did anyone see the Spurs penalty they got? The contact/foul was quite clearly outside the box but the body was probably in, but VAR gave it as a penalty. Not sure of the rules on that but they didn't take long to examine it.

What is going on with Liverpool? Told you I didn't really trust them. Only one person got the draw and two people went for the Newcastle home win.

Looks like we have another unique round winner with Hhampuz. Maybe things would have been different without the cancelled games. No games until new years day now.


Well they probably got it the same way everyone else does. Would have been quite easy to pick it up over the xmas period seeing friends and whatnot. I still don't trust those tests either unless they have symptoms. Most of the positive tests seem to come along asymptomatic.

I think it's a good idea. The rules need to be more prominent or easy to find, especially for new users. I've even suggested before that we put some of the most important ones as warnings at the top of certain sub boards so they get drilled into users, which are maybe only shown to newbies or can be turned off once you're a Junior or a Member or something.


There's plenty of staff that could do this, though only admins have access to the news feed but I don't think it would be difficult to give access to certain ones (though maybe theymos doesn't want to as potential security risk but that would be low). I think more workload should be delegated amongst staff as things tend not to get done or get delayed for ages and put on the backburner when there's probably a good chunk of things some of the other current mods could do.

I don't think there's rules about it but maybe they should be moved to the alt coin section if they involve coins other than bitcoin. You could quite easily abuse it if this became commonplace. Mention bitcoin even somewhat cursory then shill whatever shitcoin you want as an apparent after-thought. I've seen people do something similar in Meta. Create a thread about something vaguely forum related then start whining about something completely irrelevant that's annoyed them in the same post.


I think any mod can edit a post as long as they have jurisdiction in that subsection. Sometimes editing something out is preferential rather than trashing the whole thing. The alt coin talk could certainly be edited out in this instance, or the post moved to the alt section.

West Brom are shit, that's what happened lol. First goal was a brilliant own goal from 20+ meters out haha. Leeds just dominated. They had 76% of possession. 82% in the second half. I didn't expect it as I went for a 0-1 win and I even thought that was risky. Leeds are so inconsistent.

One thing that is really starting to piss me off is after giving away a free kick the player who's just committed the foul picks up the ball and runs off with it so they can't take it quickly. How petty and pathetic. It's becoming very common and Harry Maguire did it in the Wolves game with about five minutes to go even though it was 0-0 at that point. They should start booking players for that. It's pure timewasting and it's the same as kicking the ball away which earns you a card so so should that. Leave the ball where it is and fuck off.


The entire team doesn't have it just a few players. They'll just quarantine them and make sure the others stay safe and test them a before they play.

Glad to finally get one. It would be nice if it could be won by unique people every week but this won't last forever and I'd certainly like to win another or two  .


VAR would be alright if they stuck to only checking if for clear and obvious errors (like it's meant to be used), but even then the idiots in VAR still get it wrong. Arsenal really shouldn't have had a penalty against Chelsea. In play it looked like an obvious one and the ref had made the right decision, but on the replays you can see he just went down looking for it. VAR should have picked this up but nah, penalty stays.


I didn't watch it but what happened? I had them down to win 5-0 lol. Nobody backed a draw or loss. The game away to Newcastle could be tetchy. I've gone for a Liverpool win but maybe they could lose more points at St James.


Well it would be funny if Liverpool lose 3-0 now. I could see them losing the way they've been playing but probably not 3-0.

A few people still need to make their picks.


I am. Probably the only game I'll watch today. Gone for a 2-2 draw on it. Anything could happen in this game though and they're both battling it out for second place. Still don't trust United to win especially away, but not sure Leicester are strong enough for the win and United have been playing pretty good recently hence the draw. 10 people have gone for the draw, seven for the home win and everyone else the United away win (which I'm surprised is the majority).

If you're going to remove them from one section then you may as well remove them from all boards as this doesn't solve the problem at all. All it will do is push the spam onto other subs where they can monetise it, thus making the forum overall worse. I'd rather the spam be in there than everywhere else but even the spam in the alt coin section would be better tackled by alternative means. If someone is paying them to do this then they should face repercussions along with the users making the mess. People would soon get the idea if there was recursions for this behaviour but if we don't crack down on it and let campaigns largely police themselves then they will continue to be lazy and abuse the system.

They might have been older reports. When you asked before I think there was still some unhandled reports against you in the queue so they might have just been handled.


Well they might not see them. If someone just reports yours or maybe one or two others then they probably won't go looking for other users posts to remove unless they see them when they handle your reported ones.


No. Like I said before it's someone who goes on reporting sprees reporting lots of these sorts of posts so I don't think you should take it personal as annoying as it may be.

Did you PM an admin? Moderators can remove them, they just likely won't without very good reason. Even then your best bet is just to remove them yourself if it's urgent. It might take a while but many users have done this in the past. You can't of course delete posts of yours that others have quoted but if there's posts of yours that contain personal information you can try report them to be edited or deleted as appropriate.