Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:35:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 61 »
81  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: August 09, 2016, 04:05:46 AM
I am not attempting to take any kind of revenge against Lauda, nor do I have any personal issue with Lauda.


You also said you weren't an escrow scammer turned out you lied
You also said you were banned turned out you lied
You also said numerous times you were never coming back turned out you lied
You claimed to not be the OP gorgon666 turned out you lied
You claimed you are not attempting to take any kind of revenge against Lauda, turned out you lied

Is there a pattern here?


~BCX~
82  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 30, 2016, 02:05:13 PM
@OP


So after 13 pages and several months, not a single shred of tangible evidence was posted that Lauda was actually trying to extort anyone....

AND

in these 13 pages not a single reason as to why Lauda should not be a mod.


I agree it's time to lock this thread.



~BCX~
83  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 27, 2016, 03:18:51 AM
So theymos  is okay with having a staff member on his team that extorts people?

i dont think this could be possible.

i have left him a message few days ago.... and  i still wait an answer from him yet.

i sincerly woudnt believe theymos is refusing to take any action against lauda for attempting to extort me....   so, let's wait and see..


There won't be any action because there was no attempt by Lauda to extort you.



~BCX~
84  Other / Meta / Re: Question about Forum finances on: July 24, 2016, 03:46:32 PM


If you haven't donated why is this anyone's business much less concern?


~BCX~
85  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 20, 2016, 03:09:22 AM
You're a proven Escrow Scammer that Vod outted a long time ago.

I think it was me, actually.  Wink

In any case, people should know that gorgon666 (the OP) is an alt of Quickseller.  defcon23 is not.


I stand corrected that it was you that busted Quickseller.




~BCX~
86  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Coinbase is silently tracking how you spend you coins on: July 16, 2016, 12:58:50 PM

All you have to do is transfer your BTC from Coinbase to another wallet and send from there.

Jeez how simple is that?


~BCX~

That's assuming they won't track that as well.


They're not tracking anything that doesn't leave a Coinbase wallet.

As mentioned above, try funding a terrorist organization or even funding an unregulated gambling site from your CC or bank account, see what happens.

Imagine that, authorities get a little touchy about funding illegal activities.

Privacy and the ability to commit crime anonymously are two separate things.



~BCX~
87  Other / Off-topic / Re: Can Bitcoin be used for God? on: July 16, 2016, 05:05:51 AM
Let's hear how you'd help Jesus with Bitcoin.

Don't know about your fake god, but Bitcoin helps with Vod.

If you want your life to improve, pray to me and donate to the address in my signature.

Otherwise, when you die I send you to newbie hell, where you never advance in rank, and all your conversations deal with questions already asked in the FAQ!


Dude WTF?

Jesus is the son of a fake God...

Get your facts straight.


~BCX~

"facts".  That's a good one.   Wink


Yeah I get a little bit feisty when people start dissin' SkyDaddy and his Hipster Son.


~BCX~
88  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Coinbase is silently tracking how you spend you coins on: July 16, 2016, 05:00:14 AM

All you have to do is transfer your BTC from Coinbase to another wallet and send from there.

Jeez how simple is that?


~BCX~
89  Other / Off-topic / Re: Can Bitcoin be used for God? on: July 16, 2016, 03:09:43 AM
Let's hear how you'd help Jesus with Bitcoin.

Don't know about your fake god, but Bitcoin helps with Vod.

If you want your life to improve, pray to me and donate to the address in my signature.

Otherwise, when you die I send you to newbie hell, where you never advance in rank, and all your conversations deal with questions already asked in the FAQ!


Dude WTF?

Jesus is the son of a fake God...

Get your facts straight.


~BCX~
90  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 16, 2016, 02:30:42 AM
Before I say anything,  I would first like to say that it'd be best to tone your retaliating responses down a little.  By that,  I mean please stop using offensive words\acronyms like LOL,  indicating you're laughing in his face which is considered disrespectful.  Or saying things like "outted" and "scammer". It's just rude. If you wanna be respected,  you need to give it.


As for your commentary when putting aside the obvious rude behavior,  I have to agree. Quickseller's creditability is temporarily unavailable. Not to defend him or anything, but sometimes actions and behaviors can become misunderstood or completely executed poorly. Lauda is definitely an abusive character who usually contradicts themself and always seems to kiss up to people higher than them. Hearing that information from someone who isn't in any better shape just won't help the case though.  I suggest making a second account at this point and just putting everything behind you.  No rule book saying you can't start off fresh.  That's what I did,  and now I have a hero account with neutral trust for trading and whatnot.  


@TheGr33k

While I certainly do have an appreciation for your rational demeanor, it isn't my nature to show a proven scammers any respect at all.

Quickseller ripped off Bitcoin newbies that didn't know any better.

Whether Lauda is abusive or not, I have no idea or really care as I am on a mission.

Lauda is a productive staff member.

and Yes QuickSeller/Defcon23/gorgon666/Panthers52/Jhanzo/Bipolarbob/PistolPete/Grumpster AND MANY OTHERS ARE ALL THE SAME PERSON


~BCX~
91  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 16, 2016, 02:07:11 AM
Explain LOL

You're a proven Escrow Scammer that Vod outted a long time ago.

PROVEN...

How is that NOT relevant to you calling anyone a scammer?

Just answer the question,

Have you ever been caught decieving anyone in escrow?

If the answer is not no, then you have no credibility in calling anyone out.


~BCX~


Added: How come when I click on the bottom two quotes I never made they go nowhere but the top one goes to an actual quote I made?

hint: You a noob at posting fake quotes, you're better at Escrow Scamming


92  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 16, 2016, 01:56:08 AM
If you don't like Lauda, I suggest putting her on ignore like I did. The moderators kind of have their own personal clique here, so.  


Don't fight it.  Just ignore it.  It's not that big of a deal. On my other hero account,  I also have her ignored so just block her on any secondaries you have, and block others you have issues with. No need to make a public thread.  Thank you.


Oh jeez, why throw out a common sense solution on this forum

 Wink Wink Wink


~BCX~
Another reason why people should just take my highly recommend and reasonable offer....


The moderators keep refusing to take me up on it because they just want to keep their abusive or aggitating behavior noticed like this guy right here


Please consider my offer.  Please.  100% free.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1550911.0


Do you have Vod on ignore presently?

~BCX~
93  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 16, 2016, 01:52:43 AM
Defcon lives over 4,000 miles from where I live. I have no idea who gorgon666 is, however he is not me. This claim is nothing but an attempt to distract from the issue at hand.

I have no idea how effective Lauda is in moderating, however this does not matter because he cannot be trusted after attempting to extort someone out of a physical cryptocoin.


I can post 20 quotes in similiar fashion as above of you making the same kind of denial in being an escrow scammer also.

Only when you were cornered, proven to be an escrow scammer, kicked off the DT did you even admit it.

You are Defcon, you are the Op and I am not sure what your issue with Lauda is but I can assure nothing screams BS like a proven scammer trying to attack the credibility of a trusted staff member.

You're best bet is to simply move on and go play with your PD buddies.

I can't believe Stunna has scrapped the barrel so low as to make you a part of Primedice.


~BCX~
94  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 16, 2016, 01:11:56 AM
If you don't like Lauda, I suggest putting her on ignore like I did. The moderators kind of have their own personal clique here, so.  


Don't fight it.  Just ignore it.  It's not that big of a deal. On my other hero account,  I also have her ignored so just block her on any secondaries you have, and block others you have issues with. No need to make a public thread.  Thank you.


Oh jeez, why throw out a common sense solution on this forum

 Wink Wink Wink


~BCX~
95  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Does WAVES copy NXT? on: July 16, 2016, 01:07:28 AM
I must summon Spoetnik

You do not "summon" a Deity, that would be just plain rude and would likely annoy the Deity in question.

You might "invite" the Deity to be present or request their presence, but summoning one would be a bad idea.

That is particularly true with the Spoetnik. He can be a very uncomfortable Deity to work with and the lessons he teaches can be painful.


Youngster, I'm suspecting that you know very little about Spoetnik right now.

Perhaps you should do some more research about him.

In particular I'd suggest reading the story of the battle between Spoetnik and iGotspots to see how he reacts when not treated with the utmost respect.

Praise be to Spoetnik, his highest.

With respect


~BCX~





96  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 16, 2016, 12:51:47 AM
Maybe Quickseller can go ahead and lock this thread, at least temporarily, while these guys cool off and discuss privately.
I think pretty much everyone involved is aware of that right now.
I am not sure what you are trying to say. I am not the OP, I am not defcon23, and I am not anyone that has vouched for defcon23 in this thread. Sounds like you are trying to distract from the issue that you tried to extort someone out of property worth ~$250



For those that do not know the OP gorgon666, defcon23 and Quickseller are one in the same.

Lauda has been a proactive staff member here doing his best to keep this place in order.

Quickseller is a confirmed and caught in the act escrow scammer.


Who you going to believe.


~BCX~
97  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 15, 2016, 01:38:52 AM
]You failed to mention that as part of that "fucking around" that Lauda said she would leave negative trust if defcon23 sold the coin to someone else, and thrn subsequently left negative trust when defcon23 sold the coin to someone else.


So Lauda does what he says.

Sounds like great Global Mod material to me.

Lauda is QS endorsed!


~BCX~
98  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 14, 2016, 02:04:11 AM
So Lauda has associated with some shady people...

So he "Aggressively Post" and just so happens to have a Sig


Who the eff cares in regards to being a Moderator?

Like it or not Lauda is going to eventually be a Global Mod.

In my five plus years of being here, I have never been wrong in naming mods.

Lauda will eventually become a Global.



So if he is as shady and backstabbing as you guys claim

Better watch dafuq out ROFL.


 Grin Grin Grin


~BCX~



@Theymos

Lauda passed the BCX extreme tolerance test  Wink
99  Other / Meta / Re: wtf i get banned ?! on: July 13, 2016, 03:32:51 AM
I'm thinking Hilariousandco is possibly the new "Badbear" in the making!


~BCX~


#RIPBadbear
100  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 13, 2016, 03:25:32 AM
What a day for Lauda!

Lauda advertises for a company she knows to be shady, get publicly called out about this, waits for her payment and then removes her signature. Not exactly a beacon of ethics if you ask me.

Now Lauda is asking 2BTC per month for her signature and is proactively denying any consequences of advertising for a future shady company: "[...]can not be held accountable for any misdoings by the client"

Anyone that follows Lauda's posts knows that she does not keep an open mind


So he's a shady sig spamming staff member.

Still would be a great mod.

I'm serious, sig spamming etc.... has zero to do with moderating.


~BCX~
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 61 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!