Account: cinaro18. Copy-pasted text from two sources. Copy:This project looks serious and strong enough to interest investors include me. I think this project will successfully. The support service in the project is at a high level. The questions arising in the process of studying the project are solved qualitatively and in a timely manner.
( Archive) Original:This project looks serious and strong enough to interest investors include me ; I think this project will successfully !! looking the mission it's different from another project !! good luck !!
( Archive) The support service in the project is at a high level. The questions arising in the process of studying the project are solved qualitatively and in a timely manner. There is no doubt that the project #photochain will take the leading place in the crypto community
( Archive) |
|
|
|
12-13 Accounts connected Tuyul Gupies <- can't tag covered his tracks, prass tyo, Mbah Tyo, yunita, rizkyaza, stevano, mamaita, han emily, andaresta, hellen xaveria, alberto hiro, Berita Anyar, Nembe Ngerti. <...> Some other connected profiles were discovered in the last year. <...> Accounts Connected:farharhadi, CROYA86, stevano, mamaita, DIAH PERMATASARI, zoelhack, Mbah Tyo, RENATA612Proof:This address has received LOT of MONACO token deposits... https://etherscan.io/address/0x14c0f433b2eda890ca9dcbb39bde9d138e71fe97#tokentxns When we search on MONACO blog/media, signature, and twitter sheet, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XMYFUomHmRGvdCwJa2sZr9XlN2xL3Elcih11ovge_60/edit#gid=2043407156 we found these names... #BLOG/MEDIA SHEET farharhadi 0xe976cc6de5a3939dff39852fa6f1630965edd957 #50 CROYA86 0xac9aa01846e5f2b5a24bdc981d6ffdd5d82f590b #9 stevano 0x5489f45c44f0a189c89e0f24c04fddaad2158f44 #8 mamaita 0x73a6e296a2b493e0ab733f0c4b1adfdac4153ed8 #52 #SIGNATURE SHEET stevano 0x21b18948a0d29634f322c0b18688b47d83f7a952 #193 DIAH PERMATASARI 0xeac14bd54cc94d815c770bd91efd8fec0572e52b #252 zoelhack 0x258aa6b1a771b641db6ac85c70f8c05ebb32336c #253 #TWITTER SHEET Mbah Tyo 0x0c16c76f44280509adafb860767bd75bd99502ff #466 RENATA612 0x83b4be3ddb8e19d5cab8eee0d2b0fd81cefccf7d #464 Related Addresses:0xe976cc6de5a3939dff39852fa6f1630965edd957
0xac9aa01846e5f2b5a24bdc981d6ffdd5d82f590b
0x5489f45c44f0a189c89e0f24c04fddaad2158f44
0x73a6e296a2b493e0ab733f0c4b1adfdac4153ed8
0x21b18948a0d29634f322c0b18688b47d83f7a952
0xeac14bd54cc94d815c770bd91efd8fec0572e52b
0x258aa6b1a771b641db6ac85c70f8c05ebb32336c
0x0c16c76f44280509adafb860767bd75bd99502ff
0x83b4be3ddb8e19d5cab8eee0d2b0fd81cefccf7d |
|
|
|
...
You can make an appeal, but at first you need to name your other accounts that were banned. |
|
|
|
soarez, your previous account Nezar Ayach was banned because you have violated the forum rule #25. Ban evasion. I have banned because I did not know forum rules please, can you take a look at my topics and give me a merit point if you deserve it
25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.
~ If you get banned (temporarily or permanently) and create a new account to continue posting / sending PMs, it's considered ban evasion. The only exception is creating a thread in Meta about your ban.
|
|
|
|
Please correct me if there are more ways. Also I cannot see how would this effect the modlog.
Along with permanent autobans, there are also manual bans which are available only for administrators (you can learn more from the quote below). I suppose, manual bans may not be shown in the modlog. There are 2 types of bans.
Autobans. Isn't what it sounds like, it means someone pressed the ban button, but it's automatically carried out, as opposed to be manually entered. Though there is a mod or two running scripts because of the spammers. This results in the message You were banned by a forum moderator, email xxx. Both global mods and admins use this, so it isn't a guarantee it was a moderator, just more likely. I use autoban instead of manual bans for permanent bans because it's faster and more efficient. All bans in the modlog are autobans, and permanent.
Autobans ban the account involved only, you can still log in and do everything normally, just can't post or pm. It also adds units of evil to the IPs used, a new account created using these IPs will need to pay a fee. Units of evil increase with additional bans. Nuking is essentially an autoban+deletion of posts.
Manual bans are only available to admins, and are generally configured the same way as above, though it's possible to increase the scope of the ban to include things like registering from certain emails/providers, ips, subnets, hostnames, etc. Can also add multiple accounts to the same ban. It's also possible to prevent banned users from logging in at all using the banned account, this will prevent them from being able to read the forum and access pm's too though, so I rarely use it. These result in the customized reason for the ban+duration, insubstantial posts or whatever.
New accounts do not face any automatic restrictions beyond units of evil, a human needs to verify it. IPs alone are generally not conclusive evidence. <...> |
|
|
|
<...> Года два назад создавал тему, где хотел взять кредит...начали писать как обычно, мол удали...не успел закрыть тему, как мне воткнули отрицательное доверие. <...>
Отрицательный траст вам выдали не сразу, а после того как вы три дня подряд пытались взять в долг у форумчанина yogg. Первое ваше предложение о долге было размещено 2 мая 2017, где вы просили 2,7 биткоинов для торговли на форекс, обещая вернуть 5 биткоинов через два месяца. Hello, sir. - Loan amount : 2.7 BTC - Repayment amount : 5 BTC - Length: 60 days - Collateral or reason : Developed trading systems for trading on Forex. Below is an example: https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/sasha111/1929853I calculated all the risks and profitability, I do not only have this amount on deposit, to increase it, return it and trade for the remaining amount. - BTC address : 1PQEZuSsNN994sB3JAPE6cM9bHaarrqzmB На следующий день вы продолжили просить в долг у того же пользователя и получили однозначный отказ. I wrote that I will send you my trading strategies, there some indicators are more expensive and all together priceless.
Plus my documents and a receipt on the loan. I do not come back on my decision : denied. You still do not offer proper collateral. Please check these threads : - The Rule of "No Collateral, No Loan"- EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN LENDING TO USERS!"Please submit a loan with a proper collateral. That would be 3.2BTC worth of a stable altcoin. (120% of loan amount) If you don't have that, there's no point in begging to get a $3000 loan. Наконец, 4 мая, когда вы стали преследовать yogg в личных сообщениях, он отправил вам негативный отзыв. <...> Please stop PMing me about this ! How many times do we need to say "denied" for you to understand ?
2017-05-04 | Begging for a 2.7BTC loan without proper collateral, for several days.
|
|
|
|
Modlog only shows new bans, and they do appear on there. In the past 24 hours, 36 accounts have been banned.
I've noticed that from time to time modlog isn't showing the recent bans, and some of the banned profiles remain with signatures. Perhaps this is due to the fact that forum staff are using the different methods for bans. |
|
|
|
Merit abuse, anyone? 125 Merit to 3 people in 3 transactions?
One of the receivers has created a topic in Meta a week ago: 50 Merits for bounty threads. |
|
|
|
I can't find myself in the OP, can it really be right? I'm not completely sure so figured I should at least ask first.
Following from the BPIP, you have received 813 merit and sent 496 merit: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=HhampuzOP includes members to the list according to the "Generosity" parameter which is calculated by formula: GENEROSITY = SENT_MERITS - ceil(RECEIVED_MERITS / 2) Therefore, your "Generosity" = 496 - ceil(813/2) = 496 - 407 = 89, which is not enough to get into the list. |
|
|
|
Moreover, it also happens that the data about bans doesn't appear in Moderators Log, and consequently on BPIP site. |
|
|
|
The BPIP and LoyceV websites are often used by people when they want to know if Bitcointalk profile is banned. However, many banned users shown as active there. [...] If they were processed before I started parsing the security log, then BPIP wouldn't have recorded them. There is no all time security log I can download.
ProblemUnlike Mods, users can't see if someone is banned. It's a waste of everyone's time to report plagiarism or other abuse if the user is banned already. [...] IncompleteUnfortunately, I don't have a complete list of all banned accounts. If a data dump becomes available, I'll use that. |
|
|
|
~ I will look more on the ring for ace4549.
ace4549 is connected with the several profiles which sent merit to each other. All of them have changed passwords within 12 minutes. 6/13/2018 9:27:02 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] s31joemhar ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:29:03 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] Jombrangs ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:30:56 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] loof99 ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:31:37 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] ace4549 ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:34:25 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] harbin556/13/2018 9:34:41 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] mabell943 ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:34:56 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] lance04 ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:35:18 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] Lannie256/13/2018 9:37:12 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] Genosx6/13/2018 9:37:28 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] BlasterS ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:37:54 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] Glydel1999 ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:38:09 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] Joemzz31 ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:38:21 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] RakknRoll ( banned) 6/13/2018 9:38:36 PM | password changed | [ BPIP] Sean25pogi |
|
|
|
Две недели назад отправлен репорт на профиль korner об уклонении от бана. Репорт был отмечен как "Хороший", тем не менее данный пользователь продолжает комментировать на форуме. Пост, о котором сообщено модераторам, уже удалён, поэтому приводится архивная копия. <...> Как классно я повеселился и поугарал с вас изображая "wex.nz". Даже Бальтазар поверил. Вот это смехатура была
Сотни влошенецев умоляли и рыдали мне в л/c чтобы им вернули деньги. Боже мой какие вы все таки отвратительные ждуны, готовы были унижаться ниже некуда перед воображаемым админом. Даже пытались звонить, когда я вам подусунул телефон Вольнова в качестве техподдержки WEX. Вот это кора была <...>
( Архив) Дополнительно в репорте прилагалась ссылка на совпадающие даты смены паролей в аккаунте "korner" и забаненной учётной записи "wex.nz": На днях korner подтвердил, что ему принадлежат забаненные аккаунты WEX-UNOFFICIAL и wex.nz, и о том, что он целенаправленно троллит пользователей форума. Какой же все таки я великий комбинатор и гений! Я, получается, единственный кому удалось развести и поиздеваться над Пеньком за всю историю BTC-E/WEX. Вы не представляете как Пенек рвал и метал после того как узнал что он поставил 89 меритов троллям: Пруфы: Пенек лишился 50 меритов https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=WEX-UNOFFICIALПенек лишился 39 меритов https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=wex.nzПенек буквально рвал волосы на своей лысеющей макушке - когда все вскрылось. А мерит нынче трудно заработать. Пенек заслуживал изощренного наказания - он его получил. Потому-что месть всегда подается холодной Теперь рассказываю секрет как удалось втереться в доверие к Пеньку, чтобы потом над ним поиздеваться! Помните когда вся эта байда начиналась - то начинали появлаться всякие фишинговые сайты (wex.mn, wex.ac итд). Я активно выступал против этих фэйковых сайтов и синим шрифтом активно предостерегал пользователей от этого. Пенек на это купился и реально признал фэйкового админа за родного, хотя все ему в чате и на форуме говорили что админ фэйковый. Ну помните как он топил за фэйкового админа вначале? Так что я получил огромное удовольствие от этого квеста. Ни одна компьютерная игра не обеспечит такой уровень интерактивности. <...> ( Архив) <...> Сам WEX-OFFICIAL меня умолял на задних лапках как послушная собачка о том чтобы фэйковый админ тут не писал. Те кому надо поднимите архивы (Прошерстите все посты от WEX-OFFICIAL за 2017 год). Мы переписывались в л/c с WEX-OFFICIAL, кажется это была Оксана (в общем какая-то девушка). Вероятно ее туда тупо посадили отшпехиваться. Естественно на форуме у нее не было навыков общения, троллинга и опыта. Она тупо написала мне слезно и просила чтобы фэйковый админ тут не писал. Эту сотрудницу конечно жалко было, я ее пожалел и не обсирал WEX, но когда случился последний скам - тут уже отвращение к WEX перевесило все таки - и мною были опять инициированы бурления говн против WEX <...>
( Архив) Список учётных записей korner'а находится по ссылке: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg49809561#msg49809561 |
|
|
|
Trolling - probably not. I don't even know if an enforceable definition of trolling exists here on this forum, much less anyone getting banned for that.
There is a definition of trolling on the Bitcointalk rules page. Q: Do you moderate/delete (possible) FUD, accusations and untrue information?
A: No. We don't have enough time to check every single piece of information and verify the validity of the sources. Also, just like scams - too much room for bias and abuse.
However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense ("obviously false nonsense" to an outsider, NOT to someone who follows or is involved in the discussion) just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).
Trolling (тpoллинг, п. 3) is indicated as one of the ban reasons for some members in the Russian locale: gagik, tor676, Uvajaemy_Kit. |
|
|
|
These are retweets. People are reposting messages from other twitter users. |
|
|
|
Mods can't unban the accounts only theymos can <...>
Administrator Cyrus and Global moderators ( Mr. Big, hilariousandco and mprep) are also able to unban profiles. ~ I unbanned it. Please make sure you leave a note and source at the top or bottom that it has been published elsewhere in future.
I unbanned the account. It does look like it could be a mistake and since no others can be found I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
I unbanned it.
|
|
|
|
~ Hmm this one seems false positive to me. Not the same thread, not the same typo, not the whole message... I think I just happened to have written something identical to somebody else. Maybe it's a coincidence, but your message has a line break at the same place and begins with a small letter. You have also copypasted posts from Reddit without citing the source. Copy: It would probably have to be an incident where Japan provokes China near the Senkaku islands, as both these countries have strong honor codes.
Original: It would probably have to be an incident where Japan provokes China near the Senkaku islands, as both these countries have strong honor codes.
Copy: Such a senseless tragedy... What absurd reason can any human conjure up to calmly descend into the nearest mountain with 150 innocent souls on board without so much as a verbal justification or sigh of relief?
Original: Such a senseless tragedy... What absurd reason can any human conjure up to calmly descend into the nearest mountain with 150 innocent souls on board without so much as a verbal justification or sigh of relief?
But one offense is enough for definitive ban if I remember correctly?
There is an admin's comment on your question. <...> Nobody is banned strictly because of "the rules"; it's always handled case-by-case, but almost always, plagiarists deserve to be permabanned.
If you think that a ban should be ended, make your case in a new topic from a "good for the forum as a whole" perspective.
It should be noted that there was no rule about plagiarism on Bitcointalk until 2016, according to web-archive. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
