Well of course it is if you want to have some back room deals and back handers to collude and except only your pals. There needs to be a transparent system of selection.

Why is first come first served ludicrous if each member meets the posting quality threshold and not a scammer? Anything else seems like it would require far more work than you are willing to put in. On top of that you could argue only the MOST brilliant people could be campaign managers. I mean how are you to assess post quality above your level of understanding?

Therefore you need to set a threshold that you can cope with and ensure people meet that and are not scammers. After that WHY are you fiddling around picking and choosing in a non transparent way?

If you were not hiding anything and were reasonable you would be explaining YOUR CURRENT selection process because from here it looks like you cream off the best spots for your "pals" and DT members. Most of them are garbage posters (with bags of merit) who will not even offer their best original thought inspiring posts for analysis because they know they are not capable of making and original thought inspiring posts.

@lafu  are you  part of this cryptopia exit scam? don't think hhampuz would want you on this thread.

Please keep your 3rd world trash feltching false accusations to yourself.

Here is a challenge for you bitch.

Present now anything related to scamming this person has done to deserve a scam tag or you will be called out as a liar in future.

Also I can present outright scamming from lauda and it does not have a tag.

Lauda tags people and encourages her eurotrash gang/alts to tag persons presenting observable instances of her wrong doing. She is trying to silence whilstleblowers which of course facilitates scamming.

RED trust is for scammers or those you can present STRONG case have scammed. Get that into your undeveloped thick skull.

Now present the evidence to substantiate your claims or retract them.

You are proliferating FALSE information that facilitates scamming.

It is undeniable that the intial poster is correct SOME DT use red trust to silence people mentioning observable instances in their post history they want to remain hidden.  Other DT members do not do that themselves but support those that do. ALL are facilitating scammers.

We know you are only here to spam your sig for as high rates as possible gobble on as much cock as required to do so. Disgusting fool.

I am not focusing on QS. This is something that MUST be established for all campaign managers concerning the acceptance/denial of all applicants. Once this is fixed the red trust abuse and merit cycling is irrelevant to large number of people here so free speech will have a greater chance.
These concepts seems fairly simple. We have no idea why people are not able to see this for themselves.

It is not a matter of "YOU OWING" an explanation to a specific person. There must be transparent fair rules that are applied equally to all persons. What is hard to see about this. Anything else leaves you open to legitimate criticism regarding corruption and other shady practices.

It is not that hard. You need a threshold of posting quality and NOT to be a scammer. Those meet those criteria are accepted on first come first served basis.

If you can when called on it present a case and say look this persons posts are poor quality or look he has scammed that is different. That means you are doing your job fairly and people can see it is a first come first served basis or that all persons are given equally stringent criteria to be selected.

NO PROJECT wants to be accused of hiring someone to game the distribution of new tokens among colluders or be abusing their position or taking back handers from certain people to assure they get on to the campaigns. I mean there are many accusations that could be leveled at a project that hires a community manager that is not able to present a case that stands up to sensible reasonable scrutiny for their selection process.

There is no reason NOT to be transparent other than if you are shady.  Then if you dropped QS and said he was saying things that reflected poorly upon the sponsor this could be examined and verified (if it were true). Of course though you would need to demonstrate what he was saying was NOT the truth. Hiding the truth is very untrustworthy as is punishing someone for speaking the truth.

We are not specifically targeting you. Although your meriting of OG dox seems again to align you with a shady bunch many of whom are wearing sigs from your campaigns. This looks bad for YOU and your projects.

We believe that yahoo91328749 is even worse but we have not look at him yet. ALL campaign managers must be transparent over their decisions or ALL projects that use them are going to be wide open to legitimate criticism. It is just a matter of applying the correct pressure to the correct spots to force projects to be more careful in their manager selection. It is better if all of that could be avoided and you guys just get transparent of your own volition.

All those fighting against transparent fair rules that applied equally to all members must be removed in time. That is the only acceptable way forward.  All members should have a fair chance to say what they want without fear of their incomes being targeted and trashed.

If theymos removes all sigs and allows projects to ONLY advertise directly with the board that could be far more sensible if campaign managers do not makes sure they are being fair.

Well tell them to pull in their false accusations then.

Also if you stop refusing to be transparent then we can leave you to go about your business in peace. There is no need to look shady if you are not shady is there? Why not be transparent if you have nothing to hide.

Any person you refuse should be able to receive a transparent answer that stands up to scrutiny. You can not just hide behind your friends red trust and their gaming of the merit system and defer responsibility to them.

YOU are paid to find the best posters that are NOT scammers. Not just use gamed metrics to ensure your pals get the best spots.

First come first served, unless you can demonstrate they do not meet the threshold of being a good enough poster or they are a scammer. Anything else is discrimination and open to gaming and corruption. It is not difficult to see that asking for transparent fair rules for everyone so that each person is treated equally is the ONLY acceptable way to go.

So here we see 0 examples provided. Just a bunch of meaningless crap.

Bring me an example of some BULLSHIT that you can demonstrate is BULLSHIT. How hard can it be. Yes, I have far more bitcoin than you. So stop worrying whether or not I'm a bitcoiner.

Bring me an EXAMPLE of something we have posted that is incorrect and you can demonstrate it is bullshit.  

Here you got a merit from your pal for essentially failing my challenge. Have another try.

Watch this challenge.


BRING SOME EXAMPLES OF BULLSHIT AND PRESENT THEM NOW.

Watch nothing happen or just some more stupid memes


I have no care for your opinion until I see some evidence you have the capacity to form something based up on observable instances that makes some kind of sense. You appear to be some noob ass kisser to scammers and their feltchers.

Play human centipede with your pals elsewhere.

Can you point to some off topic nonsense  you think should be deleted in your opinion?

RED TAGGED users that have been given red tags for presenting observable instances of wrong doing. Obviously you forgot to mention that. Those are the most trustworthy persons on the entire board.

Future campaigns will find ALL hhampuz related threads and read if they are sensible. Censoring this thread would look more shady. Of course where you are from shady shit may pay off but here in the 1st world it catches up with  you.

The real take away from this thread is hhampuz refuses to be transparent about his actions. That is shady.

If hhampuz said

" I will review peoples posts and will review peoples trust history MYSELF and make a decision that if when called to explain my actions I will be able to present it for public scrutiny" that would be fine.

He seems to be saying. I will add and remove who I like based upon some hidden agenda that I am unwilling to present for public scrutiny.
That is shady and opens him and the project up to a  lot of  criticism. Rightly so.

LOL say marlboroza haha  ... another one of your pet bitches like LFC bitch coward here.

I mean lauda you are an observable liar and scammer yourself so that is a bit rich coming from you.

Stopping this thread? how are you intending on stopping this thread exactly? what other bitches do you have in your pocket?

hhampuz refuses to be transparent regarding his rules and the upholding of those rules. I view him as suspect. I view you as a scammer since you are one. LFC and moronbozo are just your bitches.

The evidence must stand on its own merits regardless of what attacks you are launching on the person presenting the observable instances. HHampuz may as yet be able to supply a sensible response as to this particular issue anyway. So best not to make it look worse by becoming involved lauda. Scammers sticking up for others can make them look more shady even if it is not the case.

Everyone should be held to the same standards and rules.  Once you allow double standards then corruption has already taken over.

The aim should be a transparent fair environment where ALL members are treated equally. Anything less is not acceptable.

Pharmacist is a complicit scammer support. He admitted in public to cryptohunter that he does not know if lauda is guilty of shady escrow dealings or not but will support him anyway out of loyalty.  He is there in the lauda extortion thread protecting him, he will be found kissing laudas ass in most threads that detail observable instances of shady or blatant lying and scamming of lauda.

If you want someone applies transparent and fair rules equally to all members you can strike the pharmacist off of your list.

If ANY account selling is SHOULD be tagged Nutildah MUST be tagged. He is the most untrustworthy of all since he CLAIMS that any account seller is facilitating scams and is EVIL for selling their accounts. Seems to not give one shit about that when he wants his 0.3BTC.
You can't ask for an example of someone LESS trustworthy than that by their OWN admission.

Bring me the incoherent paranoid schizo bullshit so we can analyse it. That's a challenge right there. Because presenting observable instances is nothing like that. You are lying are you not dip shit?


Did THEY threaten to make you eat unclean ass for a year if you did not post that?
You do realize now we have confirmation that you are Laudas Feltching Clown that your public brown nosing of laudas known gang associates just makes you look more pathetic and weak LOL

It also does nothing to refute the fact that hhampuz seems to be removing persons without giving transparent fair explanation. He looks corrupt and dirty by failing to set of rules for everyone and making them apply equally to every member. This is called corruption and is untrustworthy.

What part of that is difficult to understand for you Laudas Favorite Cumguzzler?

Well that should have changed your opinion then quite drastically on those that gave the DOX merit.

It has EVERYTHING to do with lauda. As per the quote YOU posted. He is supporting scammers and liars and trust abusers like lauda. If is someone is guilty of KNOWINGLY supporting scammers and liars. Then the scammers who they are supporting must be mentioned so that people can validate this.

You are trying to win the favor of a few 2nd layer DT who are not core gang members but support them since they perceive this as currently the smart play. These ass kissing dregs will not step out of line with lauda so you are wasting your time.

You must have missed the part where they are his masters but he still abuses trust by his own choice too. So he's not just complicit he is actively abusing.

LFC is on top of this a full out fucking retard. I asked him to present some of his best original thought inspiring post. He did not produce anything. Most of his pre 2017 are one liner spam crap speculation posts that most people would be busted for now.

Pathetic little coward who you confirmed is a scared pussy of "THEM". So yes the THEM here is VERY on topic and relevant. What is the point of saying this guy robbed a bank and then refusing to mention what bank or when so people can check it out for themselves? Or this person is scared of and supports scammers and liars and then refusing to give the read the details of the scammers  so that they may verify for themselves..

The reader should be privy to ALL relevant details so they may verify and validate all claims made.

The options are not favorable either way

1. He is a scared shitless pussy who is essentially a feltching puppet of lauda and gangs (against his will) but still likes to trust abuse others
2. He likes to support liars, scammers and trust abusers and if pretending to be scared of them to look better to some people.

either way unsuitable for DT, get him out.



ALL THESE I LOVE LFC BITCOIN anecdotal bullshit replies mean nothing with regards refuting the observable instances he is a trust abuser and a feltching coward and supporter of scammers and liars. Also a shit poster that can not offer up any original thought inspiring posts worth looking at.  Absolute pathetic punked DIRT.

I thought Jeff D was awesome that spag bol was the most tasty I ever had. Jeff's got cool hair. The trunk in Jeffs car is real comfy. LOL who gives a shit about this anecdotal crap. Here is evidence demonstrating clearly LFC is a lying scammers little bitch. Deal with that. Trust abusing scumbag of his own choosing.

Seems they do still exist on that list even though theymos deletes them.

Thanks.

4th person to merit it appears to have been..

coinlocket$  another one we notices licking a lot of gang ass lately. Not surprising then.

Funny another untrustworthy person coming here to support hhampuz non transparent and dubious looking actions.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

I will leave this post to demonstrate what kind of low functioning dregs we have here supporting each others shady actions.

There is no attempt at a rebuttal or refutation of the observable instances of LFC supporting scammers and taking orders from THEM because he is scared of them.

This person seems to be boasting about being a "faggot" so not too sure who mentally stable it is either.

These are the types of people vouching for Laudas Feltching Clown.

Please make this your last post here that does not tackle the observable instances provided in this thread. They will be deleted like the other noise and nonsense.

Stick to discussing the observable instances and you will be fine.

WRONG and totally foolish. Those that support scammers and their trust abuse are not victims. Also he is trust abusing himself.  Those that are getting trust abused by his scamming masters and himself are the victims.

These are clear observable instances.

You as I have said before are likely no better. You will concoct any foolish nonsense like strange argument  to win back some favor.

Sucking back up to scammers and their supporters is one sure way to degrade yourself further.  Just know lauda marked you now and any thoughts of REALLY getting back on side there with the core gang are over for good.

The worst lauda and his gang could have done to him is red trust him and remove him from DT. Why so scared about that laudas feltching clown? just tell lauda to fuck off and you will not do what he says.

His trust abuse is a disgrace.

Same for this thread. There is no tackling of the observable instances there is just a few pals saying well he was okay to me so fuck what his other actions are. These are not the behaviors of DT members of whom the entire board rely on.

That's because you are an imbecile and do not realize that only happens of self modded threads. Where do these noobs come from.

I self modded the other thread because I knew an army of idiots like yourself would not come and debate the observable instances presented they would only come and fill the page with their ass kissing anecdotal crap that does not even attempt to discuss those instances at all.

I was correct.

Now stay on topic and discuss those that merited OG's dox by vod.

@owlcatz  I thought this  cryptohunter?  now quickseller and cryptohunter? or just switch between the 2 as it suits DT members at the time?

stop it please, lauda is not going to let you slip back in to the gangs favored now... he said you're done and you are.

You post is also a pile of trash 2 things are clear.

1. LFC will do what scammers tell him to do. He is a coward.
2. LFC is a trust abuser who tries to give scam tags to those presenting observable instances of wrong doing.
3. He tries to use those FAKE tags to discredit the observable instances presented. It will not work.

He is a coward, and a supporter of observable scammers.


Micgoosens is to thick to understand we are ONLY wishing for a thread that can

 discredit the information we presented and give a sensible rebuttal. There is no point in saying we like him, hes our pal. That does not change the observable instances we have presented in that that that is why your pointless post was deleted.

You need to refute that lauda is a scammer, you need to refute LFC bitcoin does what lauda and his gang tells him, You need to demonstate that LFC does not leave scammer tags to non scammers to silence the truth being presented about them.

You failed on all 3. Your post was noise. Too much noise clouds the observable instances which are important and not just opinions.

Lots of people likely could tell you Jeffrey Dahmer was a great fun guy that made a fantastic spag bol. Perhaps he was fun, perhaps he did have access to prime cuts of meat ..so what? I'm sure the court was not interested in hearing that after all the other evidence was presented.

SO what if LFC has been okay to you guys. Does not mean he is fit for DT based on the observable instances of his behaviors towards others.

No more off topic nonsense or it will be reported. Were you the 4th one to merit it?

Or are you just more of an extortionist??

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

also heard you were not happy about your dox being posted so perhaps be more understanding when it happens to others scumbag.

A wet nose hey, yes that's very likely wet and brown, fresh from laudas ass pipe.

Here is something vital to have on someones rep thread if you want the TRUTH

quoted from our own thread regarding his real character and history.

"Here is a message the weak little bitch lfc bitcoin sent to his "friend" that lauda ordered him to remove from DT because that "friend" dared to stand up to VOD (another untrustworthy piece of shit trust abuser and doxxer of trustworthy established members ) - this is how scammers like lauda operate they find weak little bitches like LFC bitcoin to back their untrustworthy actions and to game and dominate this broken DT system)

Proving he just does anything lauda tells him to because he is scared of lauda and his DT red trusting gang of abusers. He has been placed on DT as another of their pathetic puppets.

Relevant PM I received :



So we see, not only does Laudas Feltching Clown with the fresh wet brown nose will do or say whatever lauda tells it to. That LFC voted on to DT by these same gang of DT's that  abuse trust to silence whistle blowers. they are lying, scamming, probably extorting other members?  then bunches of ass kissing fools like LFC back them up and do whatever they tell them to do to remain in DT.

Also if you want to check out LFC post history prior to 2017 you will note 1000's of 1 liner BTC speculation junk.

How this dumb coward is a merit source and DT is a joke. Untrustworthy and weak.

IGNORE ALL ANECDOTAL BULLSHIT AND OPINION FROM HIS PUPPETS AND PALS ON THIS THREAD. THEY ARE UNABLE TO ALTER THE EVIDENCE THAT IS CLEARLY PRESENTED

Simply investigate the truth for yourselves.

1. Lauda is observably dirty, it can be clearly demonstrated he lies and scams. LFC does what lauda's gang tells him to do.

2. They all merit each other all vote each other on to DT and band together to protect and shout down others that call them on their shady deeds

3. They red trust whilstle blowers with a SCAM TAG. They then adopt the argument you can not trust what these people tell you because they have lots of red trust ( WE HAVE GIVEN THEM). Just like LFC has tried to do in the initial post.

Lauda is dirty ( this is demonstrated without doubt) if you want evidence then ask.  LFC is his bitch (this is clear now too) he admits he is afraid of THEM. There is no place for scammers, and their weak cowardly supporters on DT or as merit sources.