|
83.8% for a GTX 750 Ti and the worst is 59.3% for a GTX 970.
Too bad the 1xxx series doesn't support showing Asic quality.
But then again, this doesn't mean much, if anything; that 59.3% card can do the same OC as the rest of the ~70% cards.
|
|
|
|
so, this is not open for retail order & only target big fish like genesis & mining farm unless they buy bulk quantity.right? I'd say it is available for retail: http://shop1.heiprotec.de/PC-Hardware-Komponente/Grafikkarten-NVIDIA/Palit-GTX1060-P106-100-6GB-Mining-EDITION::2092.htmlBut I'm not sure if it is a good choice for a private mining. If you set up a farm with 1000 rigs with, lets say 6 cards each, you'll end up configuring 6000 cards. Do this with a rx 470/480 or 570/580 you are going to end up doing bios upgrades that take you like, lets say 10 minutes per card, so this would be 60'000 minutes. Or in other words 4 months of 8h workdays if you work every day. But if you can just plug this card into your rig and hit the play button, well that would be a big + for farms. For my private use I'm going to stick with my rx 470 or the upcoming Vega as I can take my time for each card to run the best setup on it AND sell it to a gamer after I'm done using it. If a farm is done using the GP106-100 it will probably go to into a recycling bin. That's a terrible price as well. You could get a proper 1060 for 2/3 the price. |
|
|
|
The world nor the Crypto World does not operate like that and we all know it.
You know nothing of crypto and this is nothing but a poor attempt at scamming people. |
|
|
|
It claims to be decentralized, not the wild west.
Control is centralized, e.g. not a trustless network. Similar as to a coin having a massive premine. Therefore utterly useless imo. |
|
|
|
That's only true if the difficulty is fixed for everyone (no vardiff).
Oh okay I had not heard of that term before today. So is it feasible that his difficulty is so much higher that this is a reasonable number of shares for his computing power? Yes, difficulty is basically the complexity of a job (share) that is expected by the pool. Low difficulty (compared to your mining speed) is easy to solve so you'll be solving shares too fast and stressing the pool with all the constant data. If it's too high then you'll miss out on solving shares in time. Difficulty can be fixed or it can be variable (vardiff) which keeps adjusting the difficulty periodically for each miner so they all submit their shares at the same frequenty regardless of their speed. I have no idea if the pool he's using (eth.f2pool.com) uses vardiff but that pool likely uses a different difficulty than ethermine.org - but than again I'm not familiar with those pools and CBA to check myself. |
|
|
|
Okay everyone i did a little math based on my assumption that 4 shares was way too low for this hashrate.
i took the top two miners on ethermine.org and compared their hashrate to mine to try and find an average number of shares found per hour per GH
#1 miner 73.9 GH, reporting 64256 shares found in the last hour, which equals about 868.8 shares found per hour per gigahash.
#2 miner 53.9 GH, reporting 49652 shares found last hour, = 921.18 shares per hour per gigahash
#3(me) .094 GH, reporting 77 shares found in last hour = 819.14 shares per hour per gigahash
As you can see, it seems we all fall into this standard rate of on average around 850-875 shares per gigahash PER HOUR
This equates to (850/60 = 14.16 shares per gigahash PER MINUTE )
His rate of 1.342 GH should have found around 38 shares in that amount of time(14.16 * 1.342 = 19.01 shares per minute, 2 x 19.01 = 38.02 shares in 2 minutes)
This makes me really think that this machine reporting 4 shares found in 2 minutes is not real.
That's only true if the difficulty is fixed for everyone (no vardiff). |
|
|
|
Yup that has to be it, if the image is indeed real. That screen shot is super sketchy. Doesn't make any sense for the miner to see each cluster as just one GPU. You can't just share work like that easily and more importantly it would be utterly pointless to do so. And it's trivial to modify a miner to show whatever hashrate you want it to show. There's also this video floating around: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGEuxwKHp5Q |
|
|
|
|
How was this admin power they have not found in the source code?
Or is it closed source?
And why did people get into it if it is?
What keeps them from cooking the books?
|
|
|
|
What a sight to see, the only person who can calculate correctly is Flomess it seems. Look Guy's if you read the words without jumping straight down my throat you'd see and should know what we want done will not be cheap. I don't have how much money to throw at that out my own money and I'm sure you won't either so we made a choice to do that. Instead of moaning how about actually get involved and then you'll see what is going on. Why has this site gone down like this  I've had inboxes too which is great to me. from ann's to people actually interested so come on guy's we ain't all doom and gloom. Because you are delusional and have zero idea how a cryptocurrency should work. It should be decentralized but you have all the funds. It should be trustless but you have all the funds to crush the market anytime you chose. Miners should be incentivized to mine, not just earn dust compared to what you have. If you can't invest in your own project, it's probably a shit project to begin with and even you don't have much hopes for it to risk your own money. |
|
|
|
premine is 0.2% of total coin supply which is 50 Billion (It won't be cheap)
Block 101 - 500 = 5,000 Per Block
Block 501 - 5,000 = 2,500 Per Block
Block 5,001 - 25,000 = 1,250 Per Block
Block 25,001 - 50,000 = 675 Per Block
What a load of bullshit. 55 million coins in all of the 50k PoW blocks while the dev has 50 billion. You got that wrong i belive, it's 0.2% of 50 bil... only 100 Mil, or 2x of all the PoW combined. Still ridiculous. if(pindexBest->nHeight < 100)
{
nSubsidy = 1000000000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 500)
{
nSubsidy = 5000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5000)
{
nSubsidy = 2500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 25000)
{
nSubsidy = 1250 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 50000)
{
nSubsidy = 675 * COIN;
}
The dev has 1 billion coins for each of the first 100 blocks. The fact that some people even consider mining it is utterly ridiculous. |
|
|
|
premine is 0.2% of total coin supply which is 50 Billion (It won't be cheap)
Block 101 - 500 = 5,000 Per Block
Block 501 - 5,000 = 2,500 Per Block
Block 5,001 - 25,000 = 1,250 Per Block
Block 25,001 - 50,000 = 675 Per Block
What a load of bullshit. 55 million coins in all of the 50k PoW blocks while the dev has 50 billion. |
|
|
|
try to set nodes in the config files that are online since very long, you can find them in the masternode tab of your wallet. So that you aren't connected only to a cluster somewhere.
Can you give me a few please? I can't even sync to the correct fork now from a backup whatever nodes I try. Assuming http://178.254.23.111/~pub/DN/DN_masternode_payments_stats.html is on the right chain. |
|
|
|
|
Aaaand I forked again. Thought we were past this unstable phase.
|
|
|
|
|
Entirely depends on the model.
Some fans last forever while some go to shit in a dusty environment within months.
I get replacement fans from ebay. Just make sure the specs (amperage) and cables are correct.
|
|
|
|
|
I keep getting forked every couple of days.
|
|
|
|
|
I think nvidia's finger is not on the pulse of GPU mining; these cards are slow/offer poor densitiy, 90-day warranty is a joke and will be likely hard to come by.
And realistically, the success of GPU mining stems from everyone having GPUs. If, in a few years cheap mining-only GPUs push regular GPUs out of the mining market then we'll have the same centralized nonsense as with ASICs.
Personally I hope this will be a flop - which so far it looks like it will - and they stop.
|
|
|
|
We could
This is how every bitcoin discussion starts... and also ends. We could do a lot of things except agreeing on the same things. |
|
|
|
The last block was from a year and a half ago. Edit: nevermind, it's working if I search for something, only the main page is stuck. |
|
|
|
|
Is there a working block explorer?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
