the up trend is nuts! I think BigVern is pumping the coin. No 2 hottest coin on cryptsy ltc market now
He's already doing that alone by not opening the wallet on Cryptsy again. Because all the mining-rewards are not flowing into the market that way. From www.cryptmarketcap.com: Daily Top Gainers Cryptobuck +121.01% Mooncoin +28.20% Batcoin +15.38% Pesetacoin +11.83% Unobtanium +10.75% |
|
|
|
this would be the new changed source code in main.cpp if we start the switch to static block reward with block 250001:
if(nHeight <= 100000) {
nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 1999999)) * COIN;
} else if(nHeight > 193076 && nHeight < 203158) {
nSubsidy = 2519841 * COIN; // for _roughly_ one week, the cost of the Apollo program will be paid back -- 25.4bn MOON!
} else if(nHeight <= 203518) {
nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 999999)) * COIN;
} else if(nHeight <= 250000) {
nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 599999)) * COIN;
} else if(nHeight <= 300000) {
nSubsidy = 175000;
} else if(nHeight <= 350000) {
nSubsidy = 87500;
} else if(nHeight <= 375000) {
nSubsidy = 50000;
} else if(nHeight <= 384400) {
nSubsidy = 25000;
}
I'd support that, definitely. |
|
|
|
|
11 Litoshis gone on Cryptsy. Sell-wall at 12 building up ...
|
|
|
|
Mr coinflow :
current setting is :
Block rewards:
Blocks 1-100,000: 0-2,000,000 MOON
Blocks 100,001-200,000: 0-1,000,000 MOON
Blocks 200,001-250,000: 0-600,000 MOON
Blocks 250,001-300,000: 0-350,000 MOON
Blocks 300,001-350,000: 0-175,000 MOON
Blocks 350,001-375,000: 0-100,000 MOON
Blocks 375,001-384,400: 0-50,000 MOON
All future blocks are a fixed 29531 MOON.
new setting :
Blocks 1-100,000: 0-2,000,000 MOON
Blocks 100,001-200,000: 0-1,000,000 MOON
Blocks 200,001-250,000: 0-600,000 MOON
Blocks 250,001-300,000: 0-350,000 MOON
Blocks 300,001-350,000: 87,500 MOON
Blocks 350,001-375,000: 50,000 MOON
Blocks 375,001-384,400: 25,000 MOON
is that correct ? just my idea...
think carefully first, this is big decision.
That would be correct. But it's really a not so big decision. The number of coins rewarded per found block is the same. Only not spread via random algorithm, but statically. So EVERY block is rewarded with the exact identical amount of coins, that with the old algo would have been (theoretically) distributed also, but only by averaging out over a certain amount of time. Since miners can cheat by using a script to only switch into mining MOON, when a highly rewarded block is enticing, the random-scheme is flawed, as sad as it is. So at the end the sum of coins rewarded is staying exactly the same, only distributed evenly to all miners with no chance to cheat anymore for the ones with big rigs and dark intentions. Edit: Typos Edit 2: This: "All future blocks are a fixed 29531 MOON." would stay the same in the static-rewarded variant, of course. |
|
|
|
hi mr coinflow my financial consultant : try to compile this file using "gcc test.c" and you will understand C a bit #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int a = 3; if (a <= 1) printf("a is maller than 2\n"); else if (a <= 4) printf ("a is smaller than 5\n"); else printf("a is 5 or above\n"); return 0; } you can change the value of a and play with it. I think the checkpoint file has nothing to do with the rewards here you can study C : http://www.nongnu.org/c-prog-book/online/my thinking : Do nothing with the main.cpp. the rewards going to be static at block 384401 anyway.. Let the multipool pump all they can. They will commit suicide after they knew how much this coin can climb. What does this file have to do with the rewarding scheme and/or hardforking? Can you elaborate on that? Any further information on the checkpointing? And regarding main.cpp: the problem is not anymore, that multipools or someone else is pumping masses of coins into the market (That is only what led to the current low price). The problem is, that the smaller miners don't get what belong to them AND transactions are not confirmed in the timeframe as they should, because if the big rigs go away for a time - since they don't like to mine the small rewarded blocks - the small miners still have to deal with the high difficulty and therefore sometimes it takes very long to solve the block. I have observed this in the blockchain from time to time, when it took up to 45 minutes to find the next (small rewarded) block and directly after that in a timeframe of 1 minute 5-10 highly rewarded blocks were found immediately. So the honest miners do much more work AND moreover are poorly rewarded for that, too. THAT is the problem. It's simply unfair. So even if the coin climbs superhigh (which it definitely will, if we maintain it further), the honest miners still were rewarded unfair and got a much smaller portion of what they should. And that is NOT OK. That's why Dogecoin changed from random to static rewards long ago, too. |
|
|
|
Could you inform them also, that this page on their site is severely outdated: https://www.cryptsy.com/currencies/view/105The blockexplorer-link there is leading to nonsense and the values shown on that page seem to stem from the old explorer on mooncoin.info, which is - as we all know - offline since weeks now. Maybe they just did not realize, that we have a new block explorer: http://moonchain.netSo you should send them that link, too. |
|
|
|
... if they need a linux wallet I can deliver a compiled one.
Since the latest Linux-mooncoind-version is still the one deaconboogie has created, they could get it here: https://github.com/realmooncoin/mooncoinAnd compile it easily themselves from that repository. I don't think, they'd use a precompiled one on their servers anyway, since every Linux-system is different and a wallet compiled on one distro would most probably not work on another without errors. That's what made me wonder in the first place, why they would set the wallet in maintenance-mode at all ...  Edit: As an additional information: I've compiled several wallets from that code and it works flawlessly, if you have installed all needed dependencies (described there on GitHub) and on my Linux-version use make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- USE_IPV6=1 USE_QRCODE=1instead of make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=1 USE_IPV6=1 USE_QRCODE=1 |
|
|
|
Coinflow, i sent link mooncoin.rock to cryptsy....
Caution: It is mooncoin.rock s --> With an s !! |
|
|
|
Hello Andrea,
My apologies for the inconvenience.
MOON is down for maintenance and upgrades. We are still working on the issues with our wallet and expect it to return soon.
Unfortunately, there is no specific time frame as to when our technical team will complete the fix. However, they are doing everything they can to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.
We appreciate your patience on this matter.
Sincerely,
Stephanie
Cryptsy.com
So, in other words: F^&# OFF and wait to the end of the world. Not nice.. Maybe we should move over to SwissCEx, until they decide to open their wallet again, so that they are not allowed by us to dump into a higher price.  --> https://www.swisscex.com/market/MOON_LTCAndrea, could you send them the link to pemes posting above and the link to http://mooncoin.rocks, so that they see that we are working on the wallet and they are able to download the wallet, if they need to? |
|
|
|
Hi Guys, This is getting do be very important to have an active Dev. The Cryptsy wallet has been in maintenance for two weeks. I contacted Cryptsy support and they tell me they are waiting to here back from the coin Dev. As they need the Coin Dev to help them out. .... now what do we do?  What I don't understand: why does Cryptsy have their wallet in maintenance, when nobody else has problems with the Mooncoin-wallet? Do they know something, that we don't know? Or are they waiting for a "good" moment to dump the accumulated coins? |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the getpeerinfo. Deleted the whole blockchain and am resyncing. Hopefully it works now.
|
|
|
|
Just sent you 1.000.000 to 2RenaZu3wxyK2fsXC5yGKaWa5fW68Mq8TP, in order to get it going again. |
|
|
|
Where is the dev? Is this coin dead?
Just beat loose, it is as dead as can be. That's why it has risen from 3 Litoshis to 8/9 in the last weeks ... |
|
|
|
Hello miners, if you'd like to sell your coins, do it here: https://www.swisscex.com/market/MOON_LTC ... as Cryptsy's wallet is still in maintenance. FYI: The price on Swisscex has just risen to 9 Litoshi, so better than Cryptsy anyway ...  Edit: Difficulty: >18 at the moment ... See here: www.moonchain.net |
|
|
|
so if you want to do the hardforking at block 300,000, just change the line from :
else if(nHeight <= 300000) {
nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 349999)) * COIN;
to :
else if(nHeight <= 300000) {
nSubsidy = 300000;
Hi gogota/chinatuakong, nice to see you here again. But a question: Doesn't this change mean, that the hardforking takes places already at block 250000? Because the if-statement relates to all blocks below 300000 and the previous if-statement is relating to all blocks lower than 250000. --> https://github.com/mooncoin-project/mooncoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1099
and don't change anything on top of it
Shouldn't we change the following if-statements also to change from random to static/fixed rewards? Otherwise it would go back to spreading rewards randomly after block 300000 ... What about checkpoints? --> https://github.com/mooncoin-project/mooncoin/blob/master/src/checkpoints.cpp |
|
|
|
No sell-orders at 8 Litoshi on Cryptsy anymore ... Edit: Now 80 LTC again at 8. Seems, as if someone does not like MOON to be above 7 Litoshi ... Edit 2: But on Swisscex it now has gone up to 8 on the bid-side.  |
|
|
|
Nevertheless I will try to change the random reward in source code. And I will not wait until price is falling to 1 Litoshi.
That's what I would recommend, too. Could you work on the code in GitHub, please? So that I could add there, too? Because we need to change the right-click link to the explorer in the wallet, too. At the moment it leads to mooncoin.info/abe/... which does not work anymore. Furthermore we should release the new wallet with the latest OpenSSL-version, to overcome possible problems related to the Heartbleed-bug. Just send me your GitHub-account-name, and I'll add you to https://github.com/mooncoin-project/mooncoin, which is the official wallet code - forked to a new branch, so we can work on that publicly. Edit: That way, we have the chance to get help from other developers, too, who could issue pull requests then, to add to the code. Edit 2: Since some of the languages are not complete, translators could also add their work there. --> https://github.com/mooncoin-project/mooncoin/tree/master/src/qt/locale |
|
|
|
mined over 120 blocks just now, all TX fees I received confirmed and are available to spend so I'm going to stop mining. Only need 10-15 confirms to swap. As always, PM me if you need the chain mined.
Could you post the output of getpeerinfo here? So that we can take these as addnodes? I still don't get a connection in V1 with the above mentioned IP-addresses ...  |
|
|
|
...aggregated rewards being sent to another address ( 2LKFcMY6Uk3qYqA4NYbgDS274ei2kx3BNf ), which I suppose is Cryptsy's, because when I observed it over a certain timeframe, exactly those amounts were some minutes later sold on Cryptsy. We cannot countercheck this at the moment, because Cryptsy's wallet is under maintenance. But I'm sure, as soon as Cryptsy reopens the wallet, all the summed amounts from over the last days will be sold there and after that we can see transfers like linked above being sold there again, too. If you check those blocks, where the aggregated amounts are transferred from that address in question, you'll most probably never see any single amount below 200000 being sent from there ...
I'm not wise in the world of trading but [read: clueless BS to follow] If someone has been plucking the sweet rewards only to dump on Cryptsy AND Cryptsy's mooncoin wallet is under maintenance so they haven't been able to dump yet AND we keep pushing the price up via buy walls, isn't that a bad thing? Would it not make sense for everyone to pull back their buys to 1 litoshi now, then when the "player" dumps we ("the faithful") can pick up the fruits of his labor cheaply, afterward re-establishing the price at 5,6,7 litoshi? Right now it would appear that "we" have just made it much more profitable for him to dump then it was a week ago. Again, I write code not trade currencies so please explain why I don't understand. If the price falls, so will the difficulty, hence the same profitability for the miner(s) and problem as before, only at a lower price-level. Edit: The only thing that would help was, if all other miners except the cheating one(s) would stop mining. So they could not only mine the highly-rewarded blocks, but had to mine the other ones also. Edit 2: If you'd like to check the profitability of Mooncoin in comparison to other coins, see here: http://cointweak.com/ (... omits Cryptsy at the moment for all coins, but the owner of the site is working on a solution) But keep in mind, that the profitability is only valid for the average numbers coin mined over a certain time regarding the random-scheme of rewards (and therefore only if nobody cheats and does not get all the good blocks only). Edit 3: In one thing you're right: It would be funny, if the price was only 1 Litoshi in exactly that moment, when Cryptsy's wallet is open again and his coins are going to the market.  But as we don't know WHEN that will be and we most probably cannot reach every bidder on Cryptsy, this scenario will presumably not be realistic ... Furthermore a coin is in danger of being delisted, if there is no trading-volume on the exchange anymore and/or the price is as low. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
