|
agswinner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1375
Merit: 1010
|
|
September 28, 2014, 03:16:27 PM |
|
Hello Andrea,
Thank you for contacting Cryptsy.
Thank you so much for giving us this information.
Please let me know if you need further assistance.
Sincerely, Michelle Cryptsy.com
|
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 28, 2014, 03:49:37 PM Last edit: September 28, 2014, 04:25:21 PM by coinflow |
|
... if they need a linux wallet I can deliver a compiled one.
Since the latest Linux-mooncoind-version is still the one deaconboogie has created, they could get it here: https://github.com/realmooncoin/mooncoinAnd compile it easily themselves from that repository. I don't think, they'd use a precompiled one on their servers anyway, since every Linux-system is different and a wallet compiled on one distro would most probably not work on another without errors. That's what made me wonder in the first place, why they would set the wallet in maintenance-mode at all ... Edit: As an additional information: I've compiled several wallets from that code and it works flawlessly, if you have installed all needed dependencies (described there on GitHub) and on my Linux-version use make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- USE_IPV6=1 USE_QRCODE=1instead of make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=1 USE_IPV6=1 USE_QRCODE=1
|
|
|
|
agswinner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1375
Merit: 1010
|
|
September 28, 2014, 04:45:34 PM |
|
@MooncoinItalia: @cryptsy mooncoin wallet mainteinance https://t.co/VEHVJCynug
|
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 28, 2014, 05:40:58 PM |
|
Could you inform them also, that this page on their site is severely outdated: https://www.cryptsy.com/currencies/view/105The blockexplorer-link there is leading to nonsense and the values shown on that page seem to stem from the old explorer on mooncoin.info, which is - as we all know - offline since weeks now. Maybe they just did not realize, that we have a new block explorer: http://moonchain.netSo you should send them that link, too.
|
|
|
|
agswinner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1375
Merit: 1010
|
|
September 28, 2014, 06:21:11 PM |
|
@MooncoinItalia: @cryptsy your mooncoin info severely outdated! new block Explorer is here http://t.co/a6yOPkvk1U
|
|
|
|
gogota
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
September 29, 2014, 02:15:38 AM |
|
hi mr coinflow my financial consultant : try to compile this file using "gcc test.c" and you will understand C a bit #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int a = 3; if (a <= 1) printf("a is maller than 2\n"); else if (a <= 4) printf ("a is smaller than 5\n"); else printf("a is 5 or above\n"); return 0; } you can change the value of a and play with it. I think the checkpoint file has nothing to do with the rewards here you can study C : http://www.nongnu.org/c-prog-book/online/my thinking : Do nothing with the main.cpp. the rewards going to be static at block 384401 anyway.. Let the multipool pump all they can. They will commit suicide after they knew how much this coin can climb.
|
|
|
|
gogota
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
September 29, 2014, 02:22:26 AM |
|
11 lithoshi.............. wow !
|
|
|
|
virtual_miner
|
|
September 29, 2014, 03:46:17 AM |
|
11 lithoshi.............. wow !
Still very low. 12 litosh must be minimum for this low production.
|
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2014, 07:24:00 AM Last edit: September 29, 2014, 08:27:35 AM by coinflow |
|
hi mr coinflow my financial consultant : try to compile this file using "gcc test.c" and you will understand C a bit #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int a = 3; if (a <= 1) printf("a is maller than 2\n"); else if (a <= 4) printf ("a is smaller than 5\n"); else printf("a is 5 or above\n"); return 0; } you can change the value of a and play with it. I think the checkpoint file has nothing to do with the rewards here you can study C : http://www.nongnu.org/c-prog-book/online/my thinking : Do nothing with the main.cpp. the rewards going to be static at block 384401 anyway.. Let the multipool pump all they can. They will commit suicide after they knew how much this coin can climb. What does this file have to do with the rewarding scheme and/or hardforking? Can you elaborate on that? Any further information on the checkpointing? And regarding main.cpp: the problem is not anymore, that multipools or someone else is pumping masses of coins into the market (That is only what led to the current low price). The problem is, that the smaller miners don't get what belong to them AND transactions are not confirmed in the timeframe as they should, because if the big rigs go away for a time - since they don't like to mine the small rewarded blocks - the small miners still have to deal with the high difficulty and therefore sometimes it takes very long to solve the block. I have observed this in the blockchain from time to time, when it took up to 45 minutes to find the next (small rewarded) block and directly after that in a timeframe of 1 minute 5-10 highly rewarded blocks were found immediately. So the honest miners do much more work AND moreover are poorly rewarded for that, too. THAT is the problem. It's simply unfair. So even if the coin climbs superhigh (which it definitely will, if we maintain it further), the honest miners still were rewarded unfair and got a much smaller portion of what they should. And that is NOT OK. That's why Dogecoin changed from random to static rewards long ago, too.
|
|
|
|
gogota
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
September 29, 2014, 07:42:56 AM |
|
Mr coinflow :
current setting is :
Block rewards:
Blocks 1-100,000: 0-2,000,000 MOON Blocks 100,001-200,000: 0-1,000,000 MOON Blocks 200,001-250,000: 0-600,000 MOON Blocks 250,001-300,000: 0-350,000 MOON Blocks 300,001-350,000: 0-175,000 MOON Blocks 350,001-375,000: 0-100,000 MOON Blocks 375,001-384,400: 0-50,000 MOON
All future blocks are a fixed 29531 MOON.
new setting :
Blocks 1-100,000: 0-2,000,000 MOON Blocks 100,001-200,000: 0-1,000,000 MOON Blocks 200,001-250,000: 0-600,000 MOON Blocks 250,001-300,000: 0-350,000 MOON Blocks 300,001-350,000: 87,500 MOON Blocks 350,001-375,000: 50,000 MOON Blocks 375,001-384,400: 25,000 MOON
is that correct ? just my idea...
think carefully first, this is big decision.
|
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2014, 07:57:00 AM Last edit: September 29, 2014, 08:10:19 AM by coinflow |
|
Mr coinflow :
current setting is :
Block rewards:
Blocks 1-100,000: 0-2,000,000 MOON Blocks 100,001-200,000: 0-1,000,000 MOON Blocks 200,001-250,000: 0-600,000 MOON Blocks 250,001-300,000: 0-350,000 MOON Blocks 300,001-350,000: 0-175,000 MOON Blocks 350,001-375,000: 0-100,000 MOON Blocks 375,001-384,400: 0-50,000 MOON
All future blocks are a fixed 29531 MOON.
new setting :
Blocks 1-100,000: 0-2,000,000 MOON Blocks 100,001-200,000: 0-1,000,000 MOON Blocks 200,001-250,000: 0-600,000 MOON Blocks 250,001-300,000: 0-350,000 MOON Blocks 300,001-350,000: 87,500 MOON Blocks 350,001-375,000: 50,000 MOON Blocks 375,001-384,400: 25,000 MOON
is that correct ? just my idea...
think carefully first, this is big decision.
That would be correct. But it's really a not so big decision. The number of coins rewarded per found block is the same. Only not spread via random algorithm, but statically. So EVERY block is rewarded with the exact identical amount of coins, that with the old algo would have been (theoretically) distributed also, but only by averaging out over a certain amount of time. Since miners can cheat by using a script to only switch into mining MOON, when a highly rewarded block is enticing, the random-scheme is flawed, as sad as it is. So at the end the sum of coins rewarded is staying exactly the same, only distributed evenly to all miners with no chance to cheat anymore for the ones with big rigs and dark intentions. Edit: Typos Edit 2: This: "All future blocks are a fixed 29531 MOON." would stay the same in the static-rewarded variant, of course.
|
|
|
|
peme
|
|
September 29, 2014, 08:43:40 AM |
|
this would be the new changed source code in main.cpp if we start the switch to static block reward with block 250001:
if(nHeight <= 100000) { nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 1999999)) * COIN; } else if(nHeight > 193076 && nHeight < 203158) { nSubsidy = 2519841 * COIN; // for _roughly_ one week, the cost of the Apollo program will be paid back -- 25.4bn MOON! } else if(nHeight <= 203518) { nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 999999)) * COIN; } else if(nHeight <= 250000) { nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 599999)) * COIN; } else if(nHeight <= 300000) { nSubsidy = 175000; } else if(nHeight <= 350000) { nSubsidy = 87500; } else if(nHeight <= 375000) { nSubsidy = 50000; } else if(nHeight <= 384400) { nSubsidy = 25000; }
|
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2014, 08:47:39 AM |
|
11 Litoshis gone on Cryptsy. Sell-wall at 12 building up ...
|
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2014, 09:07:34 AM |
|
this would be the new changed source code in main.cpp if we start the switch to static block reward with block 250001:
if(nHeight <= 100000) { nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 1999999)) * COIN; } else if(nHeight > 193076 && nHeight < 203158) { nSubsidy = 2519841 * COIN; // for _roughly_ one week, the cost of the Apollo program will be paid back -- 25.4bn MOON! } else if(nHeight <= 203518) { nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 999999)) * COIN; } else if(nHeight <= 250000) { nSubsidy = (1 + generateMTRandom(seed, 599999)) * COIN; } else if(nHeight <= 300000) { nSubsidy = 175000; } else if(nHeight <= 350000) { nSubsidy = 87500; } else if(nHeight <= 375000) { nSubsidy = 50000; } else if(nHeight <= 384400) { nSubsidy = 25000; }
I'd support that, definitely.
|
|
|
|
gogota
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
September 29, 2014, 09:20:53 AM |
|
the up trend is nuts! I think BigVern is pumping the coin. No 2 hottest coin on cryptsy ltc market now
|
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2014, 09:28:16 AM |
|
the up trend is nuts! I think BigVern is pumping the coin. No 2 hottest coin on cryptsy ltc market now
He's already doing that alone by not opening the wallet on Cryptsy again. Because all the mining-rewards are not flowing into the market that way. From www.cryptmarketcap.com: Daily Top Gainers Cryptobuck +121.01% Mooncoin +28.20% Batcoin +15.38% Pesetacoin +11.83% Unobtanium +10.75%
|
|
|
|
redjedievolution
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1045
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2014, 09:56:33 AM |
|
the up trend is nuts! I think BigVern is pumping the coin. No 2 hottest coin on cryptsy ltc market now
somebody has ate the 160LTCS at 12 !!!!!!!!
|
All is an illusion, there is only energy flowing
|
|
|
bwowd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:17:15 AM |
|
the up trend is nuts! I think BigVern is pumping the coin. No 2 hottest coin on cryptsy ltc market now
somebody has ate the 160LTCS at 12 !!!!!!!! Thats fair pump? I'm afraid coin will falling again..
|
|
|
|
redjedievolution
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1045
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:21:50 AM |
|
In my opinion we will see 20-25 in next days and a fall again to maybe 6. After it, we will see again 11-12 and we stabilize there. I hope we'll not see again this "cryptsy wallet maintenance" Cheers and enjoy the way, the real goal is at least 60 litoshi in the next months the up trend is nuts! I think BigVern is pumping the coin. No 2 hottest coin on cryptsy ltc market now
somebody has ate the 160LTCS at 12 !!!!!!!! Thats fair pump? I'm afraid coin will falling again..
|
All is an illusion, there is only energy flowing
|
|
|
|