|
C3MBDeTwqS5FRANvyWaSLz4vvuMU2qMYXy
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
2CBpQRoxG76CH38AHkwV9hECJteJaezHCD
Thanks!!
|
|
|
|
Just jumped on board for 7 shares (my gal's lucky number). Looking forward to what the upcoming weeks/months bring.
Just be ready to sell if they don't deliver or never return to the forum. Its only 7 shares... $2. I assumed you would have detected the sarcasm. |
|
|
|
Just jumped on board for 7 shares (my gal's lucky number). Looking forward to what the upcoming weeks/months bring.
Just be ready to sell if they don't deliver or never return to the forum. |
|
|
|
First time I'm comfortable to hold my Labcoin shares. Is it a good sign ?
No news is good news? |
|
|
|
So three days from hashing... When will we really see the pictures
They always wait until a panic sell off to post news updates. Should not be much longer. |
|
|
|
Warrants served at Labcoin HQ. Five arrests made. This thing is over and I told you so! Sell while you still can...  Do you mean like this Ytt? That's about as believable as Labcoin posting status updates. |
|
|
|
I told the mrs someone would fall for it and buy. I was wrong no malice intended
No malice intended other than to trick somebody into doing something on completely fabricated information? What a guy you are, permanently ignored. Agreed, inconsiderate prick. |
|
|
|
I'm curious about the legal issues with handling money in USA - is btcQuick already registred (or regulated or whatever, I'm not familiar with the rules in US) or are they just under the radar for now?
This is a concern of mine as well. Does btcquick have a legal team? Yes we do. Marco Santori, he is the Chairman of the Bitcoin Foundation’s Regulatory Affairs Committee. Thank you Ascension. This looks to be one of the best offerings available right now, I am in. |
|
|
|
The "you should not be investing" twits can stick it. There is no reason investors should be kept in the dark like this and you know it.
I think the point they're trying to make is: Listen, this is what you have communication and transparency wise - for better or worse. If you don't feel that adequate, then perhaps you should invest elsewhere. It really is as simple as that. Blah, blah. Some evidence that they are following through would be adequate, this should not even be an issue. |
|
|
|
I'm curious about the legal issues with handling money in USA - is btcQuick already registred (or regulated or whatever, I'm not familiar with the rules in US) or are they just under the radar for now?
This is a concern of mine as well. Does btcquick have a legal team? |
|
|
|
That's why people aren't sweating this share locking thing - if you don't feel comfortable with these people you shouldn't be investing your money with them (Unless you're running the numbers and estimating the probability they'll rip you off and figuring that into the share price)
The "you should not be investing" twits can stick it. There is no reason investors should be kept in the dark like this and you know it. |
|
|
|
Exactly. And since they have nothing to show there options are limited. Easiest way too scam would not locking shares and slowly selling them while giving some vague updates that keeps the bids up. Oh wait that is exactly what is happening.  Unfortunately, it is highly likely this is the case. I hope I am proved wrong. I am willing to take side bets on Labcoin not being a scam. Please PM me if interested. I already bet that LC is not a scam, I bought shares. Post some updates LC end this scam theory now. |
|
|
|
Exactly. And since they have nothing to show there options are limited. Easiest way too scam would not locking shares and slowly selling them while giving some vague updates that keeps the bids up. Oh wait that is exactly what is happening. Unfortunately, it is highly likely this is the case. I hope I am proved wrong. |
|
|
|
You are assuming that they actually have the hardware, and to this point there is no evidence that there is. But they will be on CNN soon! More shady by the day...
Good 'ol limbaugh with the FUD bombs. Love you, buddy  Hey, you would not hear a peep from me if LC would post some meaningful progress updates. Why is this so hard for them? |
|
|
|
Because there are a million ways they could scam us and that is by far the least profitable way to do it.
The most obvious way to scam us would simply be to sell hardware out the back door and not include that income as company revenues.
You are assuming that they actually have the hardware, and to this point there is no evidence that there is. But they will be on CNN soon! More shady by the day... |
|
|
|
I greatly prefer LC, as I think the risk/reward profile at this point is far better, but LC is not doing themselves any favors. If management hasn't sold their shares then keeping their word and offering proof should be a no-brainer. Why has this not happened and why doesn't it seem to bother anyone else?
Of course it does. LC has not followed through on many promises. |
|
|
|
It doesn't work both ways. The fact that you think it does is a good indication that investing in this kind of thing isn't for you.
There is no evidence just hype and your support for LC is purely based on faith. And those that do not share your faith should not be investing? What an arrogant prick. |
|
|
|
Big dump. Labcoin liquidating shares before the 10th?
1/10. Lacks any originality. Would not panic. OK, so a week until hashing starts and the vague updates have you convinced that everything is A-OK? Will you alert us when it is time to panic? |
|
|
|
|
Big dump. Labcoin liquidating shares before the 10th?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
