Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 04:21:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 256 »
901  Other / Meta / Re: Report flagged as bad by mistake? on: November 12, 2020, 11:46:47 AM
Report is marked as "Good" so that means mods deleted it, from the 2nd try, but at least post is gone now.

Thank you for the help, Rikafip.

However, my report appears now as deleted (having the strikethrough font), but it's still flagged as Bad. Why?



Can it be changed to Good by the mod who handled it? Or by hilariousandco, given the fact that he is Global Moderator...? Maybe a mod can't change the status of a handled report though... but maybe hilarious is able to do that...

If the post was deleted it won't change the report if it's already been handled. Only admins can change the status of the report but I wouldn't bother them with it as nobody is going to care about one report. In fact, you could even argue that the report was correctly marked bad as if the local rules of the thread aren't stated with the creation of the thread then they shouldn't be enforced. Either way I wouldn't care about it.
902  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: [ BOXING ]: Fury vs Wilder III in Las Vegas on 18th July 2020 !!! on: November 11, 2020, 08:27:23 PM
Wilder Taking Fury To Mediation in Attempt To Force a Third Fight

Quote
Former heavyweight world titlist Deontay Wilder is taking world champion Tyson Fury to mediation in an effort to force what Wilder’s team believes is his contractual right to a third fight with Fury next, Wilder co-manager Shelly Finkel told BoxingScene on Tuesday.

Finkel said their contract calls for mediation to resolve any differences and if that does not work the issue would go to binding arbitration.

“In our contract, if there is a dispute it goes to mediation and that’s what’s going to happen,” Finkel said. “And (then) binding arbitration if mediation is unsuccessful.”

He said the mediation “should begin” this week but declined to say exactly when the video conference with representatives from the Fury side and the mediator would take place.

https://www.boxingscene.com/wilder-taking-fury-mediation-attempt-force-third-fight--153168

So now Wilder is chasing Fury for the trilogy, huh? I don't he doesn't want none of Fury, but it seems his team are going to a third party mediation to make the fight happen. So let's just wait for this mediation, everyone is hoping for the trilogy, but it won't happen this year for sure.


Mediation is the best step. They're in a tricky situation legally. Fury was contractually obligated to fight him but obviously that couldn't really happen during covid but the time frame has elapsed so Fury technically might be free, though you could probably argue it's in bad faith. It's in both their interests to make this fight in my opinion.

Deontay Wilder is really forcing this trilogy fight now and most people knows that he would only lose again.

Well that's why you have the fights in the first place to find out. Wilder would be stupid not to try get this fight going. It's going to the biggest payday he can get right now and maybe his last and he also has a chance to win his belts back. Neither of them are going to be fighting anyone worthwhile for about a year so they should just get this fight done and out of the way so they both can move on and Fury already has the AJ fights lined up. The build up would be insane for the trilogy as fights are usually better when there's bad blood or a grudge between them.
903  Other / Meta / Re: Report flagged as bad by mistake? on: November 11, 2020, 08:16:56 PM
I didn't handle it but if you want to have a local rule it needs to be in place before you create the thread as doing it retroactively isn't fair. Personally I think these sorts of issues would be best handled with self-modded threads and you can mod them how you like as mods shouldn't really have to mod someone else's thread and keep up with the rules that person has set. Also, regarding that thread the OP should edit the title to give more info as stating share good movies is very vague and of course is going to lead to people sharing any movies when it's not stipulated in the title. Kinda wish theymos would implement something where you can sticky a message in the first post of every thread or the first post is there at the top like is on some forums as a reminder. Would help to keep things on topic and not let them stray too far off topic.
904  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Premier League Prediction Thread 2020/2021 on: November 11, 2020, 11:23:13 AM
There's no way he's going back to Real that's for sure.
Unless Zidane is no longer the manager of the team and Bale overall performance dropping with spurs.

Can't see Zidane going anywhere anytime soon, and it's not just Zidane but the fans who have unfairly seemed to dislike him for a long time and for no good reason.

so they might as well try recoup some of the ludicrous wages they're paying him to keep the bench warm or play golf.
Let me fix it h&co: "keep the bench warm while trolling and mocking his teammates or playing golf".
His attitude was rude but Real Madrid was in fault too... Hope he can find his skills again in soccer and not forgetting how to play golf at the same time --->Roll Eyes<---

I think he had every right to be frustrated or give the attitude he did. It could have been much worse. It was quite lighthearted really.

Without Bale, Real Madrid would have not won 2 Champions league trophies and Zizou would have not gotten his 3 trophies in a row and become the first manager did it in Champions League.

I don't think Bale was detrimental to them winning it bit he sure did help. People seem to forget he scored two great goals in the CL final and the overhead kick is probably one of the greatest CL final goals ever scored if not the greatest. He really has been treated unfairly at Madrid but hopefully the Spurs fans will give him the respect he deserves.
905  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: [ BOXING ]: Fury vs Wilder III in Las Vegas on 18th July 2020 !!! on: November 11, 2020, 11:17:45 AM
Wilder looked well beaten before the towel was thrown so am not too sure how that would have affected the outcome as it seemed inevitable Fury would win.

Well he was on his last legs towards the end but anything can happen in boxing. Nobody expected Fury to get up from his knock-down but he did miraculously.

I do agree with you that Fury and Wilder should have had the third and final fight but as it stands Fury beat Wilder and took the heavyweight title from him and Wilder well he never beat Fury so in that scenario one is clearly better than the other.

I think Wilder could beat Fury, though my money would always be on Fury. As I said above most people don't get up from the knock-down Fury received so there's no reason why that couldn't happen again even though Fury did dominate the rematch quite comfortably.

From the television interview I saw it seemed clear Fury wanted the third fight but it never worked out so better for Wilder to retire or to start working out route to fighting some good fighters to then become mandatory contender for a chance to become a champion again.

It's easy for Fury to say that now but it might have been a different story behind the scenes. I'm sure both parties took advantage of the situation to delay it for their own personal reasons.

As for Fury, he and his manager should go out of their way to make the Joshua fight happen and Joshua and his team should be chasing Fury to ensure the most lucrative fight in heavyweight boxing history can happen.


The AJ fights are already happening next year unless maybe AJ gets beaten in his upcoming fight which could delay them. They'd still probably make them happen though even though the belts might not be on the line it's still something fans want to see. I'm sure AJ has a rematch clause also.
906  Other / Meta / Re: Does anyone want a "I'm in the area lets hangout board" on: November 11, 2020, 11:05:17 AM
I could have sworn I saw a "Kidnap and Covid missed connections" listed under the special boards. Smiley

I wonder if anyone will ever be a target at one of these organised crypto meet ups. I think trying to rob someone of their crypto would probably be easier and safer to do than with the money in their bank. When you've got a load of high-net worth guests like Vitalik Buterin etc turning up to some of these speaking events I imagine they would be an easy hit. Do those guys have security? Crypto meet ups have even been done on cruise ships. I believe John McAfee, Bobby Lee, Roger Ver and Brock Pierce were all on the 2018 CoinsBank Blockchain Cruise. I'm sure there's a good heist film idea there  Grin.

Subject kind of says it all. One of the other boards I am on setup a section like it a couple of years ago and it seems to have been somewhat popular.
Not like the "meetup section" that we have now for been meets but more 1 on 1.

Something along the lines of, "I'm going to be in the Zion National Park area for a couple of days next week, anyone want to grab a beer and a burger?"

I know we are a bit more privacy focused then a lot of online places, just wondering if anyone would be into it.

-Dave


Why not, I think that would be quite interesting.
A few years ago, in the Croatian part of the forum, we arranged our offline meetup through the forum and it was great, one of the best meetings in my life.  Grin
It’s really nice to meet people you’ve been in communication with for a long time.


I think DaveF is asking for a board more suited to one-on-ones or a casual hang out sub. Group meetings are for more likely to happen (and safer) but I still don't think the meet up board is even that active for group meet-ups, though what he's requesting can obviously also be organised in there.
907  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: UEFA Champions League Discussion Thread on: November 10, 2020, 06:24:20 PM
The current odds to become champion of Europe. What do you think, who will win the trophy?

It looks like they are determining the odds from the results from the legs that have already played. That's the only reason I can find for Man City being second even though they have never won the title.

It's way too early to predict who will win the title, though Bayern and Barcelona are favorites again, I would've added Liverpool but I don't think they can make it that far without van Dijk playing.

My money wouldn't be on Barca. Their team has been decimated this season. Got rid of half their players. They've also lost two games and drawn two out of their last five. Bayern and City should be up there. Still not sure I have faith in City and they're off to a shaky start in the PL. Bayern would be my top pick but anything can happen in the Champion's League.

Current odds from Skybet:

Bayern Munich 11/4
Manchester City 4/1
Liverpool 6/1
Barcelona 12/1
PSG 14/1
Juventus 16/1
Real Madrid 16/1
908  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Sportsbet.io's English Premier League Football Pool Discussion Thread on: November 10, 2020, 06:15:24 PM
I finished 9th place for the week and I'm 9th on the overall leaderboard as well, tied points with Buyawtress (I guess).

It's another week on the on sideline for club sides football, I foresee a boring weekend  Sad

I prefer domestics but there's often at least a game or two I'm interested in from the internationals. Belgium are playing England. Belgium probably have one of the best teams on paper but haven't lived up to that yet but I'm hoping they will at some point.

9th place, sounds so far away but at least I'm not any longer in the bottom table, just in the bottom half now at 29th place;) But still, improving every week and if you see distance from me to 10th place is only 9 points, which is 10.5 points away from 1st place. 20 points to the top, but one good yellow cap week and that can all be changed. Tough, so tough!

The table is always pretty close as there's not much difference in points between a correct score and outcome. That's one criticism I have of superbru. I think getting a correct score should get you more than 3 points. Maybe 5. I think back when we used the BBC site first they gave 10 points for a correct outcome and 40 or 50 for the exact score which is better in my opinion. That gives you some boost in getting the correct score right whilst it's only marginal with 3 points compared to 1 or 1.5 for the outcome.

9th place, sounds so far away but at least I'm not any longer in the bottom table, just in the bottom half now at 29th place;) But still, improving every week and if you see distance from me to 10th place is only 9 points, which is 10.5 points away from 1st place. 20 points to the top, but one good yellow cap week and that can all be changed. Tough, so tough!

It’s still so early in the season, the table really doesn’t matter atm. The season before the last one I was in the middle at Christmas but still won it. Anything less than 30 points from 1st place atm can still win the pool.
You don’t have to win any way though, there are prizes all the way down to 10th.

Yep. I wouldn't concern yourself too much with placement right now just aim for consistency and that yellow cap. I was mid table for most of last season, then crept up gradually to take the fifth place spot for the last few rounds then lost it on the last match day and ended up eighth.
909  Other / Meta / Re: Does anyone want a "I'm in the area lets hangout board" on: November 10, 2020, 05:53:44 PM
Well in that case you're still meeting a random person but who is just interested in bitcoin. If people just want to meet random people who are into bitcoin then sure, but I wouldn't want to just meet up with any randomer and I'm sure most others won't either.
I would definitely not either. I've discussed Bitcoin with a couple of people IRL whom I met on some other platform (preferably one where my identity is already known; the part which I choose to show). Bitcointalk on the other hand is more privacy centered and I would rather not link my personal profile to my online identity on the forum.
Some people may have built strong relationships which has gone beyond the forum, but imo, this should only be between a handful of people at most. Meeting "random" members who just wish to hang out and who I do not know beyond their pseudo username bears some level of risk as you're trusting them with that information.

Fully agree. That's one thing I forgot to mention as well about the safety aspects of meeting up with a newbie. They could be the alt of someone you don't like that much or even someone who has a grudge with you. That could actually be very dangerous especially when in most cases you don't know what people look like here so that could be exploited very easily. I have nothing against people if they want to meet up with randomers or users of any rank but for multiple reasons I think it's better keeping meet-ups private or with users who you and friendly or familiar with. I really wouldn't advise people meet lower ranked members one on one. Groups are always best and meetings in public places. You can always choose to meet people you get along with from those at a later date.
910  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Premier League Prediction Thread 2020/2021 on: November 10, 2020, 05:40:13 PM
Tottenham and Mourinho have been escalating their progress to make a permanent transfer for Bale from Real Madrid. The bad performance of Lucas Moura and Delle Alli since this season's beginning and the efforts and positive mentality of Bale make them think Bale 9 will be a good player for Spurs. Bale slowly gets his fitness back and I wish he will get in a good form soon.



https://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/transfer-news/bale-tottenham-transfer-madrid-latest-19251430

Great player but his age, wages & struggles to keep fit make him an unattractive PERMANENT transfer. He’s great to have on loan for a season though.

I think the loan deal they got him on was ludicrous and was practically a transfer in all but name. It wasn't a good deal at all. They should have waited for his contract to expire and got him for free though I get the feeling Mourhinio doesn't have time to waste. I certainly don't think they should be paying anything to sign him permanently when they can get him for free if they wait. There's no way he's going back to Real that's for sure.

Do any of you think that Bale has somewhat become worse in recent years? He scored about a dozen goals in almost each season during 2013-2018. Suddenly he's putting out only 2 goals last year, which sounds like the reason Real sent him on loan in the first place. I don't think this is the kind of player that Spurs wants to keep forever.

How can you score goals when he didn't even make the bench half of the time? Real Madrid were foolish to not utilise him when he was fit and Zidane not even having him on the bench when he was available was silly. They only loaned him out because Zidane made it publicly clear he wasn't in his plans so they might as well try recoup some of the ludicrous wages they're paying him to keep the bench warm or play golf.
911  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Can escrow service on bitcointalk be trusted? on: November 10, 2020, 05:16:40 PM
Hi,

Can anyone share your experience of using the escrow service of bitcointalk here?

Can it be trusted or scams still exists? And how exactly does the escrow work?

Thanks a lot!

Anyone can scam you at any point. You could be the most trustworthy member/escrow on the forum and that person could run off with your money at any time. In fact, there has been at least once case that I recall where a fairly trusted escrow did run off with people's money. Using a trusted escrow is certainly more safe that just trusting a random person on the internet with your money but I would do your research on them and weigh up the odds of them scamming you. If a user has held thousands of dollars of other people's money then they're unlikely to scam you and ruin their account for $100 or $1000, but at the same time you don't know what sorts of financial trouble they're in or if their account has been compromised but there are ways to verify this. Maybe someone's sole intention was to become trustworthy here to pull off a long con further down the line and that's something you can never know until it happens. At the end of the day you are responsible for your own money and I would do your own research to find out who you can judge or not but there will likely never be a 100% guarantee of safety.
912  Other / Meta / Re: Does anyone want a "I'm in the area lets hangout board" on: November 10, 2020, 05:02:37 PM
I'm sure most people wouldn't want to meet with a newbie, and if you're just wanting to hang out with a random person off the internet then there are apps and websites for this.
You are not meeting some random person, you are meeting a fellow Bitcoiner. Whether he is a Newbie, Member or Legendary shouldn't matter. If you want to meet only users of a certain rank, put that as a condition in your post. Smiley

I still think all this can be done from the meetup section and doesn't require a brand new board that will have just a couple of threads in it.   

Well in that case you're still meeting a random person but who is just interested in bitcoin. If people just want to meet random people who are into bitcoin then sure, but I wouldn't want to just meet up with any randomer and I'm sure most others won't either. People usually only want to meet someone if they get along or at least have had some sort of rapport. The level that people have any interest in bitcoin here is going to very greatly as well. Probably 50% of the users are here only because it's profitable for them. I'm sure many don't really care about bitcoin that much other than that.
913  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: [ BOXING ]: Fury vs Wilder III in Las Vegas on 18th July 2020 !!! on: November 10, 2020, 12:39:57 PM
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/boxing/13144878/tyson-fury-anthony-joshua-boxing-wbc/

Quote
Tyson Fury given green light to fight Anthony Joshua as WBC confirm he can dodge mandatory defence for undisputed bout

Seems likely this will be the next fight for Fury now unless Wilder pursues legal action. I still think he should fight Wilder first and then on to AJ. AJ still has his fight coming up I believe. Maybe he doesn't want to risk anything with another Wilder match though, but I don't think he would have a problem. It would be the biggest payday he'll get until the AJ bouts though.

Hmm... seems Fury might fight in December, but I can't see that happening as it's less than a month away:

Quote
Joshua holds the WBO, WBA and IBF titles, while Fury is the WBC king.

On December 5 Fury is expected to have a homecoming fight at London's Royal Albert Hall, but an opponent is still to be named and it's not known whether his belt will be on the line.

The following weekend AJ will defend his world titles against Kubrat Pulev.

Provided both men get through these tests, it could set up the Battle of Britain for next year.

And WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman has confirmed he wouldn't push for Fury to fight their mandatory challenger, which will be the winner of the Dillian Whyte versus Alexander Povetkin rematch.

If he's going to fight at all it should be Wilder, assuming Wilder actually wants the fight and isn't just blowing smoke.

Wilder's coach has also just commented on the accusations he made against him:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing/article-8933177/Wilders-ex-trainer-bemused-accusation-spiked-Bronze-Bombers-water-Fury-defeat.html

Quote
I have NEVER seen the things I'm seeing': Deontay Wilder's former trainer Mark Breland left bemused by Bronze Bomber's accusation that he spiked his water during defeat by Tyson Fury... as he refuses to be drawn into war of words with ex-WBC champ
914  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: The UFC Info and Prediction Thread on: November 09, 2020, 01:06:10 PM
Only fight I watched was the Claudia Gadelha one. Thought the decision was very harsh. Are the other fights worth watching?

@hilariousetc. Claudia Gadelha has big stomach like 3 months pregnant lady sometimes hehehe.


Wat? I'm sure you wouldn't kick her out of bed.



Anyone who watched last UFC event could see how easy is to lose your ear if you are mma fighter  Shocked
I am talking about fight Max Griffin vs Ramiz Brahimaj, and Max Griffin's elbow ripped off Ramiz ear with blood coming out all over.
He was dominating and deserved to win, but I hope doctors will patch Ramiz ear.

I was not expecting main even to finish like this with Glover Teixeira win, but that is why mma is so interesting.
Giga Chikadze won like I expected and received a bonus for best performance of the night.




Nasty. Reminds me of the times where people got their Cauliflower ear punched out:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQZ6w2XpjPg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZSnctp1fp0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jA3XoELM1mg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3L0tlyISmQ&
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eczmWfQk8Ig

UFC Fight Night: Makhachev vs. dos Anjos





Makhachev Vs El Chapo.


P.S. how I hate when ufc.com uses black and white photos of athletes. Makes me feel this persons is no longer alive.

RIP.
915  Other / Meta / Re: Does anyone want a "I'm in the area lets hangout board" on: November 09, 2020, 11:24:31 AM
So just a section of kind of what I said. "I'm here anyone want to meet?" (and no @hilariousandco not tinder) then hangout for a few hours and leave. If nobody responds so be it

Just do that in the Meet-up section. As with all new sub boards they're created if there's a demand for them so if the meet-up board turns into some sort of hook-up or lets hang out board then maybe theymos will create a sub for them. I think you would be less likely to get interest for one-on-one meet-ups or smaller gatherings though and if people get friendly here or want to meet up it will probably be done through PMs etc like I know it has before. I'd also bet 99% of the people who have showed interest in this here wouldn't meet up with a random person even if they were in the same city.



The point is not just for "Hey Dave I'm going to be in your area" but also "I'm on vacation hiking in Utah anyone else here?" or "Stuck at this lame ass 3CX training seminar in Jersey anyone local?" That kind of thing. I would think a lot of us are showing up to the same conventions / meets / seminars but never have any contact.

Just a thought.

-Dave

Sounds like you really need Tinder  Grin.

This is a welcome development but quite unfortunate the forum is more interested in the privacy of its users even in the local boards people care more about their privacy  they don't talk about who they are and where they live I think the creation of a " hook up board" won't be a bad idea, it would create more unity among the members of the forum, there are so many members who contributed much, spend years on this forum and passed away without meeting anybody in real life from the forum maybe we should uncover the masks sometimes it would mean alot to some persons.
If you want to meet crypto enthusiasts but don't want there to be a connection between your online profile and your real identity just make an alt account and suggest a meetup. Say where you will be and that you would like to meet like-minded people. It might even be interesting, like a blind date. You don't know who is coming, but it is not important. Both parties will be there as crypto fans, and that is the only thing that matters. Friendships can be formed this way if you both hit it off. 

This could also protect you in the event a forum user tries to meet a famous Bitcointalk user to rob/blackmail him. Have your pocket knife with you just in case. Cool


I'm sure most people wouldn't want to meet with a newbie, and if you're just wanting to hang out with a random person off the internet then there are apps and websites for this.
916  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Sportsbet.io's English Premier League Football Pool Discussion Thread on: November 09, 2020, 11:14:59 AM
Aston Villa eventually got a deserving  goal, they should have been about 2 or 3 goals up already, Arsenal have had their own fair chances as well , imo, Aston Villa deserves at least a point. Arsenal having been pressing and making more goal threats in the 2nd half. Only 2 user had Aston Villa to win in the pool, though.

EDIT: LOL! Aston Villa are 3 goals up, 2 goals within a very short time! That's surely 3 points in the bag..

Arsenal got demolished. Not surprising only two people went for the away win. At least they didn't really effect my position at the table. Up 15 places this round and only 17.5 points behind first place. Considering I was dead bottom 2 or 3 rounds ago it shows you you shouldn't worry too much about your current position. I'm sure I'll be down another 15 places next round  Grin.

Congrats for the yellow cap yaty! I was there at the top before the two last games so I can say thank you very much to City and Arsenal for doing what they are expected to do (and what I did not think would happen hehe),,, and yes on VAR goal. If neither team is protesting can we just allow it please? Technology is frustrating supposed to help not harm.

VAR is good technology, it’s just being used by incompetent people. At times I think I would he better at getting the correct decisions on VAR than the officials in charge of it.

They need to clarify the rules more or even change them. It was meant to be for clear and obvious errors and it should be used when called upon, not check every goal to try find something. It's delaying the game too much when players have to wait for a pointless VAR check to be over before they can kick off again. It's taking the fun out of players celebrating as well as half of the time they're expecting a VAR decision. I'm sure they will do something about it at the end of the season. Far too many legit goals are getting ruled out now like the Leeds one and countless others.
917  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Sportsbet.io's English Premier League Football Pool Discussion Thread on: November 08, 2020, 07:25:49 PM
Pretty close for the yellow cap this week. I'm only 0.5 points behind the current leader and if my prediction of 2-0 comes in I'll probably take it. Villa just had a goal disallowed within the first minute as well. Took VAR 4 minutes to decide that it was offside. They really need to stop going looking for reasons to disallow goals as nearly 5 minutes to decide to cancel a goal that nobody was seemingly protesting is ridiculous.
918  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Sportsbet.io's English Premier League Football Pool Discussion Thread on: November 08, 2020, 12:43:51 PM
Abysmal results from Leeds yet again, I didn't watch the game live, but the statistics I'm wondering how they had over 65 percent of the ball possession and still lost by 4 goals.

The score line didn't represent the game really. I thought Leeds were the better team and had far more possession and attacks. Palace just got lucky on their attempts and there were two own goals, one of them was bizarre. As others have said, the Leeds equaliser should have never been disallowed either. No idea what VAR is playing at. Not a single Palace player protested and every commentator and pundit seemed to disagree with it. Even the ex ref they had as a consultant seemed to disagree with it.

Freaking double standards! From all I've know it's only an offside of any part of that can score a legitimate goal is involved, does a goal stands if a player scores with his elbow ??! The shit gets rather ridiculous by the day when there is no clearcut rule as a guideline or are the rules just too complicated for only certain cases ? I've fully supported that offside should be called when measurable, even if it's by a whisker, but then this is totally wrong!
Is it confirmed it was given for the elbow? I did not see it live and when I saw this picture I immediately thought the line was drawn based on his head position which although very marginal would be according to the rules. His hand looks like good half of a meter in the offside.

You are right, only parts of the body which are allowed to touch the ball are taken into consideration for the offside call.

The vertical lines they draw on are the parts of the body that are claimed to be offside, but you're right it does look like the elbow which means it shouldn't be offside. Also, if they had a camera straight down the line or one from above I reckon someone would have been playing his elbow onside anyway and unless you have those sorts of angles you can never be sure on calls like this as bodyparts are obscuring the line. I think Bamford has had 3 or 4 goals disallowed now. I'd rather them just get rid of VAR at this point or at the very least they should only be checking things if the ref or opposing team requests it. Checking every goal and going looking for something is just silly an delaying the game even more.
919  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Sportsbet.io's English Premier League Football Pool Discussion Thread on: November 06, 2020, 04:47:42 PM
Just a reminder that Premier League resumes tomorrow with two games so make those picks. 

I'm currently sitting in #8; let's see if my luck continues  Wink




Gone for both draws on these two early games. Really looking forward to Everton Vs Man United and City/Liverpool this week. Will watch the Leeds game as well. 4 people still need to do their picks but I know a couple people like to leave theirs late but a couple of users have also missed them the last round. Most will still have a lot of their default picks left though.



Fatigue prolly starting to set in at Leeds.  They've been going at it since the start, giving their opponents a hard time.  But I think the Wolves showed a sort of strategy to beat them.  Fall back and score a goal on the break which Crystal Palace could do with Zaha and Batshuayi.

I still pick Leeds to win but this coming match could be a test if they're running out of steam.

I'm not sure I buy into the fatigue reasoning but we'll see. Leicester are a great team right now, arguably one of the best and they could go top this weekend. Villa are playing fairly well but also lost to Wolves last week like Leeds did so I think I'll go for a draw on this one, especially as it's at Villa.
920  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: [ BOXING ]: Fury vs Wilder III in Las Vegas on 18th July 2020 !!! on: November 06, 2020, 04:36:17 PM
Fury has settled on a new opponent - Agit Kabayel. Kabayel has only fought at the European level so he should be a massive underdog. Unlike Fury's recent opponents, Kabayel is not very tall and will have a 6 inch disadvantage in height. Fury should dominate this fight and I do not see him having any problems like he did with Otto Wallin.


I don't know why Fury is taking fights like these. Surely there can't be that much money in this match up nor do I think others will care too much to watch it. He should have just taken the Wilder fight as that's the one everyone wants to see before the Joshua double.

@hilariousetc Spot on, the pandemic has pushed the fight and the contract time frame might have passed and so is the reason Deontay Wilder is indirectly pleading to be a man and follow the rematch clause as they could not win if they drag that to the court  Cheesy. On top of that the level of excuse for his loss is adding up by the day.


Fury said in a recent video response to Wilder's bullshit that he will fight The Big Dosser Grin again, but didn't say when. I think they should fight asap, Fury will probably win, then there's no disputing it and he's free to move on to either the AJ fight or whatever mandatory he has. AJ is fighting behind closed doors so there's no reason why Fury can't do the same with Wilder. The fight will probably do insane PPV numbers anyway or maybe just do it in a country that allows fans.

The delay might be the promoters of Wilder as they do not want the fight to take place behind closed doors as the major share of the live gate belongs to the promoter and hence the delay and Fury is now not interested to fight him and he is going to fight another opponent. Another fight with Fury and the career of Wilder as a big PPV attraction will be over Grin.


It's usually the promoters that get greedy. I commented a month or so ago in here that Frank Warren did an interview alongside Fury and he stated there was no way the fight could go on behind closed doors... then immediately followed up with something like well, not unless some rich country wants to pay us to host it... basically saying that if Saudi Arabia want to throw them a load of money they'll do it there. Sure, they would lose a few million in gate receipts but I'm sure the fight would make the same back in extra pay per view buys.

It goes without say Fury really did give Wilder a boxing master class when he demolished him in the second fight and let us not forget even though the first fight was officially a draw it was clear most neutrals would say Fury won it on points but it was awarded as a draw. Fury has nothing to prove to Wilder and I am sure he will out box Joshua if that fight ever happened.

There's always something to prove. Unless the fight ends in a KO then there's always unfinished business  in my opinion. Obviously Fury was the better fighter in the second fight but he almost didn't finish the first one which ended in a draw and things could have been different had Wilder's coach not thrown in the towel. Personally I think Fury should take the trilogy fight, finish Wilder off so there's no excuses then and then move onto AJ.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 256 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!