I don't know about whales but all the technical indicators are pointing towards a nice recovery. Weekly trend changing is huge, it hasn't happened since 2017. The daily trend looking stronger than ever and good volume behind it, the sentiment also seems to be changing and look at the recent ICO's held by Binance or Bittrex, sold out in minutes if not seconds.
The technicals are inconclusive at this time. We can be facing a selloff to confirm the bottom again, a smaller one to confirm the higher lows at 4,8k or something different. Historically, the beginning of a bitcoin bull market played very similar to what we are seeing now, but was followed with a drop to a third of the previous gain before the uptrend was confirmed and continued up. We could be facing 4,5k before we establish a new permanent support and go up. One thing that this asset has taught me over the years is not to be sure of anything. Although the chances of 3k or lower are slim, they still exist. If I were to make a prediction, I'd say we'll be going up from here with or without a small short-term drop. 6k in Summer. Breaking the weekly lower high pattern that lasted 1 year and a half is a pretty strong and clear indicator mate, you can't get any better than that really. |
|
|
|
I'm not letting it go badecker. You have to admit you were proven wrong, otherwise it's pointless to debate with you if you never admit defeat. You said that scientists have no proof because ''OTHERWISE THEY WOULD HAVE'' blasted the proof all over the headlines. I showed you the headlines, therefore you were wrong, admit it, stop being a delusional prick.
Look. In the Book of Ester in the Bible, it talks about "the law of the Medes and Persians." This law was a very strong law. It said that when the king made an edict to which he affixed the seal from his signet ring, that edict could not be changed. This law is talked about in the book of Daniel, as well. So, in Esther, when a Medes-and-Persians edict was made to kill all the Jews, how did they get around it? Not by changing the edict. They couldn't do that. It was against the law. They did it by making another edict that was stronger and longer lasting. The second edict outlasted the first. Why is this important to the whole universe? When God finally settled His physics laws in place, they couldn't be changed thereafter. Satan knew how this worked, so he tricked people into using the laws of physics in a wrong way so that they would die. Because of what God is and does, even He couldn't change something (laws of physics) that He had put His strength into making. So He did something to go around it all, just like in Esther. God sent Jesus to take the punishment for all people. This means that God will-make/is-making a New Universe, with new physics, to take His people to. Why? Because this universe is being destroyed through the trick that Satan pulled that is actually destroying this universe. This way God doesn't break the physics of this universe. But He gets the results that He wants... just like in Esther. God has shown me the way around what you are doing. He showed me this, and I already showed it to you. It lies in the fact that headlines don't prove anything except that they exist. I'm sure you are feeling a bit like Satan did when He found out that he had duped himself.  That has nothing to do with what we were talking about, you were proven wrong and you can't admit it even if it's a simple thing like it was, it shows your inability to accept when you are wrong, which you clearly can't. This leads to you not accepting anything, ever, unless you think it's the right thing. Well, thanks for proving me wrong. I thought that I was wrong. But since you have proven me wrong, I am right. Two major reason why Evolution has not been proven true are: 1. Nobody can track the DNA of plants or animals over the many thousands of years it would take to see if even one of them changed into another, and probably, nobody will ever be able to; 2. We can date pottery back to between 4500 and 5000 years. But back beyond that we don't know for a fact that the methods we use are the methods that will work on things back then. Math, itself, might have been different back beyond 5000 years, as might have been the physics of the universe. Everything we use as proof might have acted differently back then. We simply don't know. When we don't know, and know that we don't know, yet say that we do know, that's when the hoax comes into being. Evolution is a hoax. You forgot to add: 3. Nobody can time travel therefore anything that happened in the past cannot be proven ever (unless it's the claim that god existed and performed miracles in which case, yes, it can somehow be proven) 2. How would math be different 20.000 years ago, you are just talking nonsense, if that's your argument, then everything could have been different at any given time, then we might as well just give up. |
|
|
|
^^^ Another fish flapping around on dry land.
Heh, you know you have nothing mate, you didn't use any method, you didn't study anything, you just, for some reason, assume that those guys you mention are right and all the others aren't but how do you really know? What credentials do you have to make that assessment? You are not answering the question because you know you can't, the only answer is, you didn't, you didn't study anything, you didn't use any method, you simple chose some random scientists that lived decades ago who thought they ''falsified'' relativity. You are a hoax. |
|
|
|
^^^ The only one fighting established and meticulously documented science is you and your appeals to some imaginary authority or engineered consensus. Dufour was Sagnac's successor at the university of Paris, he was not some random crackpot off the street.
Ok so, you have a few guys, you claim they did something. How did you determine that what they did is true? You clearly don't believe Einstein, Newton and all the other hundreds of scientists who created, hypothesis, theories, etc for gravity, the universe, etc. What methodology did you use to determine those few that you are always quoting are the ones who are right? |
|
|
|
^^^ These French scientists (Dufour & Prunier), their credentials, published works and achievements speak for themselves. The one dude invented the oscilloscope for crying out loud. As their experiments established a static aether and proved "problematic for relativity" they receive nothing but slander and ignorance form powerful and secretive groups like the Jesuits and the Jews of whom Eisenstein was both. They refuse to stop pushing the Copernican model on anybody who isn't part of their club; it's a conspiracy and yes, the Freemasons are in bed with the Jesuits and the Jews on this; they're all massive hypocrites.
Riiiight and Einstein/Newton etcetera, their credentials and published works don't speak for themselves because... ehem. As their experiments established what gravity is, they receive nothing but slander from ignorant flattards who want to discredit their work. You still haven't even answered the question, how do you know they did what they claimed they did? Are you a scientist? Are you certified in any type of science? How do you know what you are reading about them is true? Why would you pick them instead of the other thousands of scientists who support gravity, globe earth, etc? |
|
|
|
|
I don't think homosexuality is a mental disorder since it involves a preference. I would say being a transexual is a mental disorder because it's not a preference and genders are already explained scientifically. Homosexuality on the other hand is a preference just like an heterosexual likes only certain type of women, not all, I don't know anyone who likes all women, I'm personally not very picky and I would still only like 40-50% of women at best, does that mean I have a mental disorder?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know about whales but all the technical indicators are pointing towards a nice recovery. Weekly trend changing is huge, it hasn't happened since 2017. The daily trend looking stronger than ever and good volume behind it, the sentiment also seems to be changing and look at the recent ICO's held by Binance or Bittrex, sold out in minutes if not seconds.
|
|
|
|
^^^ You should kill yourself instead of being a massive cuck.
They took rotating frames of reference into account and falsified relativity with their replication of the Sagnac experiment, if you want details then read their fucking work.
How do you know? Why do you keep saying ''they took'' were you there? Did you try it by yourself? Are you even a scientist? Read their work you say, why should I? I've read other work saying their work is garbage. |
|
|
|
I'm not letting it go badecker. You have to admit you were proven wrong, otherwise it's pointless to debate with you if you never admit defeat. You said that scientists have no proof because ''OTHERWISE THEY WOULD HAVE'' blasted the proof all over the headlines. I showed you the headlines, therefore you were wrong, admit it, stop being a delusional prick.
Look. In the Book of Ester in the Bible, it talks about "the law of the Medes and Persians." This law was a very strong law. It said that when the king made an edict to which he affixed the seal from his signet ring, that edict could not be changed. This law is talked about in the book of Daniel, as well. So, in Esther, when a Medes-and-Persians edict was made to kill all the Jews, how did they get around it? Not by changing the edict. They couldn't do that. It was against the law. They did it by making another edict that was stronger and longer lasting. The second edict outlasted the first. Why is this important to the whole universe? When God finally settled His physics laws in place, they couldn't be changed thereafter. Satan knew how this worked, so he tricked people into using the laws of physics in a wrong way so that they would die. Because of what God is and does, even He couldn't change something (laws of physics) that He had put His strength into making. So He did something to go around it all, just like in Esther. God sent Jesus to take the punishment for all people. This means that God will-make/is-making a New Universe, with new physics, to take His people to. Why? Because this universe is being destroyed through the trick that Satan pulled that is actually destroying this universe. This way God doesn't break the physics of this universe. But He gets the results that He wants... just like in Esther. God has shown me the way around what you are doing. He showed me this, and I already showed it to you. It lies in the fact that headlines don't prove anything except that they exist. I'm sure you are feeling a bit like Satan did when He found out that he had duped himself. That has nothing to do with what we were talking about, you were proven wrong and you can't admit it even if it's a simple thing like it was, it shows your inability to accept when you are wrong, which you clearly can't. This leads to you not accepting anything, ever, unless you think it's the right thing. |
|
|
|
If it was the stupidest then why all statistics show that educated people tend towards atheism rather than any other religion? Nothing suggests that smart people chose religion over science, nothing, in fact scientists are the group with biggest percentage of atheists.
People with high IQ grow very confident in their ability to control the world and in their intellectual superiority over “lesser minds”. That leads to a tendency to reject inherited traditions as unwanted restraints from primitive times shackles placed upon them by their intellectual inferiors. Like an intelligent teenager who rejects the rules of his school and parents because he wants to do his own thing and thinks he is smarter than his school teachers. Ultimately it’s not a choice between science and religion that is a false dichotomy. The choice is between theism and a materialism which if embraced leads to nihilism. Do they? Aren't stupid people the ones who think they are smart and smart people the ones who tend to underestimate their abilities? Your argument is that people with high IQ think they are better? Well, they are, usually. What's your point, though? |
|
|
|
I agree on that "incest porn", who the f+ck gets really excited about a video of a woman dressed like a 12 year old saying "oh daddy, mom is not here, we shouldn't be doing nasty things"... too twisted, it is not only incetuos, it is closing to pedophilia.
A lot of people do, it's really not that crazy. I'm sure you get off thinking of the idea of cumming on your girlfriend's face or perhaps in her mouth, perhaps you even like it when she swallows it, isn't that actually disgusting? Well yea it is and guess what, 80% of men like it. |
|
|
|
If Tether team was really making money out of thin air and pumping Bitcoin in 2017 and this gets proven at some point it will lead into a one big sell off. If this is what you mean by bringing down bitcoin it is possible.
Even if the above happens it won't destroy bitcoin so if by bring down you mean kill the coin it's impossible.
No because the sell off would be for Tether, not bitcoin, similarly to what happened last time, the value of tether went down but Bitcoin exploded upwards, people would be selling tether for bitcoins or any other coin pumping the price of those coins. |
|
|
|
Fernand Prunier is a French antirelativist engineer born in 1897 and died in 1971 who played a role in the history of the theory of relativity.
Summary
1 Books
2 Publications
3 References
4 External links
Books
Newton , Maupertuis and Einstein , reflections on relativity (1929)
On a displacement of fringes recorded on a platform in uniform rotation , with Alexandre Dufour (1940)
Some new observations and experiments and their consequences for theories of physics (1946)
On discrete numerical relations between the elements of the stars of the solar system and on their interpretation (1950)
On Fermat's theorem, did Fermat prove it? (1966)
Publications
On an experiment of Georges Sagnac which would be made with flows of electrons (January 1935)
On the observation of the Sagnac phenomenon with an untrained illuminating source (May 1937)
On the observation of the Sagnac phenomenon by an untrained observer (June 1937)
On the Sagnac effect (October 1937)
On the effect observed on a rotating Sagnac disc when part of the optical circuit is not trained (March 1939)
We Have Displacement of Fringes Recorded on a Platform in Uniform Rotation (September 1942)
References
Alex Moatti , Alterscience: postures, dogmas, ideologies , Odile Jacob, 2013, p.21.
Eric Gourgoulhon , Special Relativity in General Frames: From Particles to Astrophysics , Springer, 2010, p.469.
External links
Authority records: National Library of France ( data )
-- https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernand_PrunierAlexandre Dufour is a French physicist who succeeded Georges Sagnac as lecturer in physics for the PCN certificate ( 1st year of medical studies) at the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Paris in September 1920. He obtained the title of professor without a chair on April 1 , 1927 , then was appointed full professor on October 1 , 1931 .
He was the inventor of the cathode oscillograph , whose process he described as early as 1914, before publishing the details of the apparatus in 1920.
A group of marginal scientists, defenders of theories for some of the pseudo-science, bore his name (the Physics Circle Alexandre Dufour). He met at the home of the Centralians from 1949 to 1983. Among its members was René-Louis Vallée, the inventor of Synergistic Physics .
Summary
1 Notes and references
2 See also
2.1 Bibliography
2.2 External links
Notes and references
↑ Reports of the sessions of the Academy of Sciences [archive] on Gallica
MA Dufour, " Cathodic Oscillograph " [archive] , on archives-ouvertes.fr
↑ Mentioned in particular by David Larousserie on lemonde.fr [archive]
Alexandre Moatti - SPS n ° 292, October 2010 [archive]
See also
Bibliography
Alexandre Moatti , Alterscience: Postures, dogmas, ideologies , Paris, Odile Jacob, coll. "Sciences", 2013 , 334 p. ( ISBN 978-2-7381-2887-4 ) , "Antirelativist Engineers: The Physics Circle Alexandre Dufour", p. 57-68.
External links
Research Resource: Professors of the Faculty of Sciences of Paris [archive]
-- https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandre_Dufour_(physicien)Where does it say anything about what you claimed about relativity? And where is the evidence they did so? |
|
|
|
How do you know the others are false religions? They also say the same about yours, there is no way to know which religion is the true religion.
We have gone through this in the past. The thing that anyone can plainly see is that your religion of non-religion is about the stupidest religion of all. If it was the stupidest then why all statistics show that educated people tend towards atheism rather than any other religion? Nothing suggests that smart people chose religion over science, nothing, in fact scientists are the group with biggest percentage of atheists. |
|
|
|
I don't know what that means, you asked for examples and I provided them, as usual you are ignoring the evidence because you are incapable of accepting it, you can't live without your imaginary god and that's fine but don't tell us you use science, you don't. First, I didn't ask for examples. You simply misunderstood; I was making a statement by appearing to ask for examples; Second, you continue to want to remain off-topic, and then state that you "don't know what that means;" Third, why do you think that I am not accepting your evidence, since it only serves to maintain the things that I have been saying?; Fourth, nobody can live without God. It is my hope that my imaginary god is way more like God than your imaginary god is.. at least until a time that our imaginary gods are very similar; Fifth, why would I want to use science? After all, science is so extremely limited that, even given the chance and freedom it has today, it would take thousands of years for science to catch up to the facts that religion has achieved through revelation from God. Wake up!, before it's too late for you. Atheism is one of the most stupid religions around. You said it has never been found, I showed you examples where it was found, again you wont accept your defeat, the delusion is too strong. ''Fourth, nobody can live without God.'' Plenty of people died in horrible conditions even though they were believers, I don't know what you mean by this. Your examples are simply examples of people becoming excited because they thought they had found it. Not because they had found it. Same with atheism. People think that they really have something in atheism. Then they find out that it is just another religion, because it doesn't fit nature and miracles and the fact that they live on faith... just like all the other false religions of the world. How do you know the others are false religions? They also say the same about yours, there is no way to know which religion is the true religion. |
|
|
|
^^^ Special Relativity has been falsified, deal with it.
Because... you say so? Where is the evidence for that? I googled what you said and I saw no results supporting your statements, even if there was 1 or 2 sites somewhere saying that, why should we trust them? Are you a scientist? How are you judging their results? In 1939 Dufour & Prunier performed a replication of the Sagnac Experiment that accounted for rotating frames of reference and it falsified special relativity. This is where the theoretical argument for gravity and black holes ends. There's no retreating to Newtonian gravity either, it's over. How do you know that actually happened? Where is the evidence? |
|
|
|
I don't know what that means, you asked for examples and I provided them, as usual you are ignoring the evidence because you are incapable of accepting it, you can't live without your imaginary god and that's fine but don't tell us you use science, you don't. First, I didn't ask for examples. You simply misunderstood; I was making a statement by appearing to ask for examples; Second, you continue to want to remain off-topic, and then state that you "don't know what that means;" Third, why do you think that I am not accepting your evidence, since it only serves to maintain the things that I have been saying?; Fourth, nobody can live without God. It is my hope that my imaginary god is way more like God than your imaginary god is.. at least until a time that our imaginary gods are very similar; Fifth, why would I want to use science? After all, science is so extremely limited that, even given the chance and freedom it has today, it would take thousands of years for science to catch up to the facts that religion has achieved through revelation from God. Wake up!, before it's too late for you. Atheism is one of the most stupid religions around. You said it has never been found, I showed you examples where it was found, again you wont accept your defeat, the delusion is too strong. ''Fourth, nobody can live without God.'' Plenty of people died in horrible conditions even though they were believers, I don't know what you mean by this. |
|
|
|
|
I'm not letting it go badecker. You have to admit you were proven wrong, otherwise it's pointless to debate with you if you never admit defeat. You said that scientists have no proof because ''OTHERWISE THEY WOULD HAVE'' blasted the proof all over the headlines. I showed you the headlines, therefore you were wrong, admit it, stop being a delusional prick.
|
|
|
|
 Watch notbatman losing his mind over the first picture of a black hole. ''An international scientific team on Wednesday announced a milestone in astrophysics – the first-ever photo of a black hole – using a global network of telescopes to gain insight into celestial objects with gravitational fields so strong no matter or light can escape. The team’s observations of the black hole at the center of Messier 87, a massive galaxy in the nearby Virgo galaxy cluster, lend strong support to the theory of general relativity put forward in 1915 by physicist Albert Einstein to explain the laws of gravity and their relation to other natural forces.'' https://globalnews.ca/news/5149768/black-hole-photo/No, we just laugh at this fake baloney image. I knew that astargath the top 3rd. globo guy would believe this is real. Government and monkey man science can't lie to you. Meanwhile already debunked with style, even more debunking videos will come along, don't worry: First Ever Black Hole Image EXPOSED (2019): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olmWRmXXAZoSome comments from people that have eyes to see: "Looks like sauron the lord of the rings"i see youuu lol""The photo looks like a cadesent old light bulb with a heavy filter on it""Looks like the 3 sixes used on CERN logo""The only black hole CNN can show that is real is Dom Lemon""This all looks like inverted satanic worship of Ketu the Black Sun. An observable node here on Earth. By using an image of Ketu, as Einstein's Black hole, they are both subverting the narrative & censoring the past. This "discovery" comes at an awfully convenient time for the GlobeEarthers"."I once sharted and left this exact image in my underwear"Bonus lesson for badecker: Atheist Frank Zindler admits that The Bible says flat earth: https://youtu.be/HuCA4rIX4cE?t=2171I give credit for that atheist guy, at least he is honest, but you badecker are dishonest (if in any case you believe what the Word of God really says). God called the dry land earth, and the gathering of the waters He called seas; and God saw that this was good (pleasing, useful) and He affirmed and sustained it. (AMP.version) Get lost with your Copernicus and nasa, repent. Yep, that's how science works, scientists use ''debunking'' youtube videos to make their new theories, thanks for your videos man, you are really helping them debunk all this fakery. Be careful tho, the men in black might come for you and kill you for saying this. |
|
|
|
^^^ Special Relativity has been falsified, deal with it.
Because... you say so? Where is the evidence for that? I googled what you said and I saw no results supporting your statements, even if there was 1 or 2 sites somewhere saying that, why should we trust them? Are you a scientist? How are you judging their results? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
