Can you give us at least two weeks notice on the hard fork?
What do you mean hard fork? I have been through google.translate read your posts, sometimes a bit not clear! Intended hard fork means the developer changes the way the coins will be generated. It usually involves the update of the wallet(QT) files. We have to install the new file before the time point when the new algorithm becomes effective. That is called hard fork. Before the hard fork time point, both old and new wallet files will work in the same way. After that, the two wallet files will work differently, there will be two forks of the coin. |
|
|
|
the 10% interest has been extended. my wallet keeps getting bigger. How cool is that? This cool:  That just means there will be more SUM and price will adjust downwards. |
|
|
|
We will either be implementing DGW3 or Digishield over the next week as well as QR support which will mean a hardfork.
Can you give us at least two weeks notice on the hard fork? |
|
|
|
Anyone have any tips on how I can lower my DOA rate on the p2pool? It's at about 15-20% consistently. I lowered my intensity from 19 to 15 and my hash rates drops significantly (like 20%) but my DOA % only drops slightly (down to about 12-18% from 15-20).
I am running 4 of the R9 290X cards with 8GB of RAM per rig. Consistent DOA over all rigs. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Have you tried different p2pool servers? How about adjusting your share difficulty? That helped me get more consistent numbers. Also, what are your 290X settings? With mine I've found best hash rate with TC 27800, I 19, RAM 1500, GPU 930 (Elpida) or 1000 (Hynix). It's very sensitive to GPU speed. A bit too high and rate really drops. DarthMuffin, I have tried a few different p2pool servers all with similar results. It seems I am almost always one of, it not the, highest DOA of the group. Here are the meaningful settings from one of my rigs: "intensity" : "19", "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "2", "gpu-engine" : "850,1000,1000,900", "gpu-fan" : "40-100", "gpu-memclock" : "1500,1500,1500,1500", I think it is your internet connection speed/latency the cause of your problem if you change the intensity to 15 and have the same problem. You need to reduce the network load or enable QoS (quality of service, please google) in your router. For P2Pool, the stale rate of 10-15% is reasonable. The efficiency (your rate of stable/other people's stable rate) counts. |
|
|
|
Nice to see X11 thread here! Can someone point me where I can find good X11 conf to my rig: Gigabyte R9 280x rev 2.0 (GV-R928XOC-3GD-GA) Gigabyte HD 7950 rev 2.0 (GV-R795WF3-3GD) 280x should run on 2 threads with no problems, but what about 7950? Do I need to make it run on 1 thread or can it handle 2 threads too? Thanks  For 7950, I run: TC = 24000, gpu-threads = 1, intensity = 18. For 280X, I run: TC = 8192, gpu-threads = 2, intensity = 13. |
|
|
|
i still dont understand how the multipools a working if its pow period ended ?
You mine other coins with your miner in the multipool. The multipool sells other coins and buys SUM and pay it to you. |
|
|
|
The dev disappeared for days . I worry about this, maybe he has lost the passion to the coin.
I am also worried. I hope the premine is safe. However, there is no volume in the exchanges, so there is no dump from the premine. |
|
|
|
|
What is the folder name and .conf file name in the roaming folder?
|
|
|
|
Logi is in a very strong position considering its age, I wonder if I am one of many who are mining and holding?  price increase on poloniex is nice and steady, with a respectable 24 hour volume, which I think is exactly what any young coin needs. I had a thought regarding funding, another X11 coin (summercoin I think) is coded to send a percentage of all coins to a development fund. I know this smells a lot like a premine, but it is one which assures the miners that there is no unfairness regarding a disproportionate initial distribution which would eventually lead to a large dump, actually it's probably the opposite, it acts as an ongoing incentive for the developer to ensure that the coin is a success, as they will be getting a steady payment from every mined block which funds further innovations in the coin. I'm aware that the developer of Logi is far from the likes of other devs which dump their premine and abandon the coin, which is why I'm suggesting a variation of the premine to help with the funding, as I believe it to be in the best interests of the coin itself. Perhaps it could go up for vote and let the community decide? I think 0.1 LGC every block to the development and promotion is reasonable. It is a large percentage at the later stage. |
|
|
|
Post the p2pool source code link on the first post with the pool list. It's better to have p2pool to spread the hash power. I download the source code and set up the node. The P2P software can connect to my Muniti wallet, and connect to the P2Pool network. It reads the current block. But it cannot download shares, it still shows success. Any help is appreciated. I would like to spread the hash. |
|
|
|
Ever since I switched to X11 and I'm using the modified SGminer, I'm having a lot of problems connecting to pools. SGminer start and then reports "Waiting for work to be available from pools". Then it closes and CGwatcher restarts it. This goes on until eventually it will connect to a pool. I think this is a bug that has been ported into SGminer from from CGminer reported here:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?to...355#msg3464355 and acknowledged as a bug here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?to...923#msg3473923Does anybody else have this same problem? I'm using the windows binaries compiled by badman74 and have tried both the first (DRK only) and the last version (lots of coins) but I keep having the same problem. 0.1 BTC bounty for the person that can solve this for me. I have the same problem occasionally. I solo mine. The miner can work on long time, then it will report "waiting for work from pools". After about 30 min, it will find work and mine again. This happen several time a day. I do not have this problem when mining in a pool. |
|
|
|
why x11 is good than other ?
save power ?
It is as good as other algorithms as they are not brokenable for the time being using existing technology. X11 can be implemented with ASCII as well. The reason that there is no ASCII for X11 is that this market is too small to be profitable for ASCII manufacturers. Power saving just means the GPU is not optimised enough to make full use of the processors. |
|
|
|
Government-seized property is usually sold via auctions.
Selling on the exchanges is a kind of auction. |
|
|
|
If you might have noticed, we have been in talks with AACasino, and one of the topics which cropped up was a sort of "sponsorship" whereby companies would include our logos in their promotion. There's nothing solid on that aspect as of yet, but we're working towards that objective.
Good efforts. If you can convince the AACasino to accept Muniti, that would be fantastic. Maybe you can entice them with some premined coins? |
|
|
|
Manual Share Difficulty
Reccomended Share Difficulty
1 +0.00000116
Add this number to the end of your username (wallet address)
Example: WalletAddress+0.00116414 What does 1, 5, 1000 mean here? hashing speed If you have a rig with 15 MH you will calculate the Manual Share Difficulty like this just on p2pool nodes : 15000 khash * 0.00000116 = 0.0174 The settings will be like this ./sgminer -k darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://scorp.hopto.org:7903 -u WALLET+0.0174 -p x Thanks for the answer. If I have my own P2P node and my supposed difficulty of 0.0174, can I set my miner difficulty to be 0.005 to reduce the stale? As the network load is not a problem due to local P2P node? |
|
|
|
Manual Share Difficulty
Reccomended Share Difficulty
1 +0.00000116
5 +0.00000582
10 +0.00001164
50 +0.00005821
100 +0.00011641
250 +0.00029103
500 +0.00058207
750 +0.00087310
1000 +0.00116414
Add this number to the end of your username (wallet address)
Example: WalletAddress+0.00116414 What does 1, 5, 1000 mean here? |
|
|
|
Hi I hate to nitpick but should your username be Logicoin. admin ? apologies if your name is Adnim and I have jumped to the wrong conclusion here  also, I may go as far as brushing up on my Photoshop skills for a decent logo submission. Well spotted. |
|
|
|
Have you been mining Quebecoin at a pool charging fees? Are you mining at a pool that is down half the time, and sluggish even when up? Does the pool you mine at seem lacking in security, not even having the basic https offering on their website? Do you sometimes feel like the pool where you are mining does not really care about Quebecoin, and is just trying to make a quick buck and devaluating your own precious coins in the process? It might be time for a change! At the Quebecoin NicEMining pool, you ALWAYS mine at 0% fee. You always have a stable and responsive web site and server. Your security is always a priority. And the pool is run by people from Quebec, who care about Quebecoin and are working with you to make it a success! Join us now at https://qbc.nicemining.pw ! How do you make a living with 0% fee? |
|
|
|
total supply is 50,000,000
block reward is 1500 coin
and pow blocks are 10000
if these info is correct then total pow coin is 1500*10000=15,000,000
and 35,000,000 coin will be mine in pos period
is it right?
10,000 block could be mined in one day if the retargeting is 40 blocks. |
|
|
|
talking about fair launch with diff that shoots at 10 in 5 min , lmao
KGW at launch is lame, and still they keeps on using it
That is what I call fair launch. No instant minings. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
