Here is a new Andrew's Pitchfork with trend line projections drawn into first quarter 2018:  Remember chart is log scale. |
|
|
|
|
#1 @ 0.041 BTC
#2 @ 0.014 BTC
#3 @ 0.012 BTC
#9 @ 0.007 BTC
|
|
|
|
|
What happened to maximum 5 coins per bidder? SM23031997 is trying to grab all first ten coins. Not cool.
|
|
|
|
From the Trezor blog: In other words, your passphrase acts like a “25th seed word,” meaning your entire wallet — private and public keys, addresses — are generated from your 24 seed words and your passphrase — from all 25. Chainanalysis companies have been able to trace bitcoin transactions past mixers for over a year. Don't count on a mixer for privacy. If you need to recover your Trezor seed and passphrase to a different wallet see the guide on Trezor docs. This compromises your seed and passphase so you are better off just restoring to a spare Trezor. |
|
|
|
Pro tip: never ever clean a coin. You would hurt the value more by doing so. Should have been kept in an air-tite coin capsule from the start. What a shame to see a Casascius this badly worn. |
|
|
|
All you have to do is visit https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24h scroll down and easily see that over half the transactions in memory pool paid a miner fee of 0 - 5 satoshi/byte. Are those legitimate transactions or spam? Most likely latter. |
|
|
|
|
#1 @ 0.02 BTC
#3 @ 0.01 BTC
#5 @ 0.01 BTC
#10 @ 0.01 BTC
|
|
|
|
|
#1 @ 0.01 BTC
#3 @ 0.01 BTC
#5 @ 0.01 BTC
#10 @ 0.01 BTC
|
|
|
|
thanks both for your answers, but i don't understand why this choice.
I understand that the hwwallet can't use the same seed on my "old" electrum wallet, but why don't create a two different seed if i import two different wallet?
i think it's more safe (from malware attack) have your coin splitted in two wallet
You can have two Trezors. They can both use the same seed, which is the usual way people do it. This means you have a spare available right away if your primary Trezor is lost or stolen. All accounts on either Trezor are derived from the same seed. You can set up two Trezors with different seeds but that does not really provide you protection against malware. The common bitcoin malware right now like Crypto Shuffler replaces bitcoin addresses on the clipboard which is why Trezor warns you to double check addresses before sending. If you are using good anti-malware like Kaspersky you should not have a problem. |
|
|
|
|
Good fireproof safes are not cheap. Stick with the safety deposit box. The bank has security beyond what you could reasonably afford at home.
|
|
|
|
|
95% of day traders lose their bankroll and quit. If you think you are special trade on paper for a few months first.
|
|
|
|
I drew up this chart yesterday expecting a drop to $8741 before an advance to a new ATH:  Good to see price up from $9000 but I still have some concern we may go lower to complete an ABC Elliott Wave 4 correction. |
|
|
|
|
OP's transaction was confirmed on 2017-11-10 at 21:45:13.
|
|
|
|
I've an other question:
is it possibile to have to differenent wallet/seed with ledger or trezor
For example, i have 2 wallet on electrum. Can i import them separately on my hw wallet in a way that if i have to recover it on electrum i can restore 2 wallet instead of one?
Thanks in advance!
Short answer no. Your seeds for Electrum have already been displayed on a monitor so should be considered compromised. Each Trezor or Nano S has only one seed. You should just send your bitcoin from Electrum to your Trezor or Nano S. |
|
|
|
So I was just referred to Bitclub by someone I trade bitcoin with in meat space, says he was introduced to it through his father who is some kind of business person who knows the owners personally. I have no reason to doubt he believes what he told me, but even so, anyone know anything about it? Safe(ish) to invest in?
The way I see it, cloud mining is a flawed business model (for the subscribers, not for the sellers). If mining is indeed profitable, why should they sell a slice of their profit for a fair price? Either the price is unfair, or it is just a scam. Of course, they might be selling shares of the mining profit for fiat money immediately needed for maintenance, or for acquiring new gear and so on, but it's a very long shot. I'd imagine they should have their cash flow under check if they're so successful. And I've never heard of current mining gear being sold on credit. On the contrary, it is usually paid before delivery - often much too long before delivery. TL;DR I reckon you'd be better off investing your subscription fee directly in bitcoin. If you are going to invest in hosted mining the most profitable option from my experience is pool.viabtc.com. Now you may not want to buy from them because of their support for BCH. If that is not a problem for you they have the lowest daily fees I have found and they also have an internal market so you can sell your rented hashpower if you get bored. Stay away from Hashnest and pool.bitcoin.com because they charge higher fees which eat into your profit. They also charge more than viabtc per TH/s. Or you can just buy bitcoin and hold. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin price just reached the 11.09 Fibonacci extension from last ATH to swing low. This has never happened before in the history of bitcoin. A correction is already taking place, the question is: does price continue advancing to the next extension at $18286?  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
