Once you get 1 good coin the clones follow with their self-bought ICOs...
|
|
|
at least its a senior member, where is the dev anyway
It's all about "Hero" members now Senior members was a thing back in 2014.
|
|
|
Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping
So where are the records of what every single Satoshi was spent on?
|
|
|
This coin is too centralized for me. I don't see it becoming a success because of the centralized mining structure.
This is because you are biased from the results of all the near pointless altcoins. In the real world, with actual projects that need ongoing maintenance and improvement, giving developers a longterm stake is actually more aligned incentive wise. The developers get paid in proportion to the value they bring to the project. Once the people who run the project have salaries not paid in stake, that is when you have nothing but altruism to rely on or a need to maintain one's credibility. However all these weirdo POW miner types have this weird sense of entitlement. Their logic is this - Since the first blockchain relies on POW every other blockchain should rely on POW ... just because. How annoying. I don't think you understand what factom is. It's mining (PoW or PoS doesn't matter)... but only 8 centralized miners are allowed to mine. These centralized miners will obtain 50% of all factoids created. This centralization will allow Factom to modify blockchains and create forks easily. This is why I don't understand what this project is. If I wanted my data backed up 8 times redundant I could hash my data myself and host it on Google who would probably offer better redundancy to my data. Nothing on Factom can be trusted because it's centralized. For the next project, I would rather the public raise funds for salaries as the project goes a long. No need to hand out golden parachutes to obtain developers. Raise funds every year and create more XCP tokens to give investors. This will probably go down as the dumbest crypto idea that the public got tricked into buying yet. Amazingly, the public will only be receiving 25% of all Factoids.
|
|
|
This coin is great. I will buy some more. The order books are filling up.
|
|
|
You better give all of the majority of premined coins to polish sex industry workers or this is a scam.
|
|
|
Can someone post a screen capture video showing the BOTs features in live action?
Bob will do that for you he make that for circ, just the same! Come on, someone make it! I hear like 360 people bought this BOT in the first 1 second of the sale. I'm sure one of you could make a screen capture demonstrating the BOT.
|
|
|
As for the reserve, 90% will be locked and released slowly over time no matter what, and this will be controlled by the Expanse Organization as a whole, not just the team. The time frame for this could be one year, five years, or whatever the community thinks is best. I personally think one year isn't long enough as it is likely funds will be spent as available on bounties and this could create an issue a year down the line, even if it is a year away. Although it is possible POS or something else might be implemented later, or perhaps voluntary mining percentage going to the community fund later. This would be up to the Expanse Organization as a whole. I personally prefer keeping it proof of work as many might not find out about this until years later, and I would like them to be able to mine it even then, but that is just my own view.
We are certainly open to suggestions on what time frame the community funds should be dispersed over, and it is critical that the community has control of them as laid out in the Organization plans. That is the point of smart contracts and having everything transparent.
Just remove it. Let core team take premine they want and that's all. You can't guarantee that reserve will be community reserve so it will be considered as more or less hidden premine. Actually you can. contract token { mapping (address => uint) public coinBalanceOf; function token() { } function sendCoin(address receiver, uint amount) returns(bool sufficient) { } }
contract Democracy {
uint public minimumQuorum; uint public debatingPeriod; token public voterShare; address public founder; Proposal[] public proposals; uint public numProposals;
event ProposalAdded(uint proposalID, address recipient, uint amount, bytes32 data, string description); event Voted(uint proposalID, int position, address voter); event ProposalTallied(uint proposalID, int result, uint quorum, bool active);
struct Proposal { address recipient; uint amount; bytes32 data; string description; uint creationDate; bool active; Vote[] votes; mapping (address => bool) voted; }
struct Vote { int position; address voter; }
function Democracy(token _voterShareAddress, uint _minimumQuorum, uint _debatingPeriod) { founder = msg.sender; voterShare = token(_voterShareAddress); minimumQuorum = _minimumQuorum || 10; debatingPeriod = _debatingPeriod * 1 minutes || 30 days; }
function newProposal(address _recipient, uint _amount, bytes32 _data, string _description) returns (uint proposalID) { if (voterShare.coinBalanceOf(msg.sender)>0) { proposalID = proposals.length++; Proposal p = proposals[proposalID]; p.recipient = _recipient; p.amount = _amount; p.data = _data; p.description = _description; p.creationDate = now; p.active = true; ProposalAdded(proposalID, _recipient, _amount, _data, _description); numProposals = proposalID+1; } }
function vote(uint _proposalID, int _position) returns (uint voteID){ if (voterShare.coinBalanceOf(msg.sender)>0 && (_position >= -1 || _position <= 1 )) { Proposal p = proposals[_proposalID]; if (p.voted[msg.sender] == true) return; voteID = p.votes.length++; p.votes[voteID] = Vote({position: _position, voter: msg.sender}); p.voted[msg.sender] = true; Voted(_proposalID, _position, msg.sender); } }
function executeProposal(uint _proposalID) returns (int result) { Proposal p = proposals[_proposalID]; /* Check if debating period is over */ if (now > (p.creationDate + debatingPeriod) && p.active){ uint quorum = 0; /* tally the votes */ for (uint i = 0; i < p.votes.length; ++i) { Vote v = p.votes[i]; uint voteWeight = voterShare.coinBalanceOf(v.voter); quorum += voteWeight; result += int(voteWeight) * v.position; } /* execute result */ if (quorum > minimumQuorum && result > 0 ) { p.recipient.call.value(p.amount)(p.data); p.active = false; } else if (quorum > minimumQuorum && result < 0) { p.active = false; } ProposalTallied(_proposalID, result, quorum, p.active); } } }
This is just the basic example provided by Ethereum.. and not to cast stones or anything but... even the Ethereum reserve contract doesnt use a DAO like we are. Some people just don't understand how much better Ethereum is than BitCoin.
|
|
|
Can someone post a screen capture video showing the BOTs features in live action?
|
|
|
I love Ethereum clones. I hope more people realize they are the future.
|
|
|
This should be a positive review!
|
|
|
I wonder if there will be another pump. Someone bought this up on bittrex.
|
|
|
lost the dip today...I'll leave my order. Hope to see it filled soon
Can I get mine filled first? These are really some cheap prices.
|
|
|
Looks good. Let's get a big community right from the beginning and make this stronger than Ethereum.
|
|
|
Let's compare:
Expanse, 11,000,000 premine with 1,100,000 million available immediately. Block target 1 minute and 8 EXP block reward. 4,207,680 EXP mined per year. Time to match premine = 2 years, 7 1/2 months
Ethereum, 72,000,000 premine to prerelease investors, devs, contributors, and their foundation. Block target 15 seconds and 5 Ether block reward. 10,519,200 Ether mined (and staked in future) per year. Time to match premine = 6 years 10 months
Shift, 250,000 premine. Block target 12 seconds (in theory, its first post says average blocktime is higher) and 3 SHF block reward. 7,889,400 (theoretical) mined (or staked in future) per year. Time to match premine = 12 days.
you right at the same time "shift didn`t turn out to be a good project because of greedy dev, but this looks great" and 12 days and more than 2 year. someone do not like math This project has 3 real people putting their identities behind this one. I think it will work out well. SHF is most likely going to do really well also. I wouldnt want to miss either of them. If I had to pick... I would guess this one will do better.
|
|
|
Ding ding Suprnova is offline time to solo mine Back online.. But IMHO, Solo is really better for Shift I'm solo mining with SHF. I get like 30 coins a day now with each GPU card. That would make the price of these coins 0.00073333 BTC each. This coin is under valued. I better buy some more.
|
|
|
Very disappointing that the devs won't share the bounty with developers. They should post bounties and whoever claims them claims them. They can claim the bounties themselves if they can.
No. No not worth it, correct. Escpecially when we have a sql backend next release (new feature). If we want to build a lasting currency and a platform we have to prio and not throw shf around like some lady on a shopping spree. Kind regards Ok, I will trust you. It sounds like too much work but I will wait and see what you can do over the next month.
|
|
|
Will the test launch mine real coins on the 10th? I want in from block 1.
|
|
|
The Main Launch will take place 9/14/2015 12:00am UTC.
I'm in. SHF didn't turn out too well. The SHF devs are anonymous and are being greedy with bounties. This looks way better.
|
|
|
@dopecoindude @all-of-Dope-Community
Want: cryptopia listing Need: dedicated team to cast votes on Mondays & Tuesdays
if you get a good jump out of the gate you can win the weekly vote
I'm in if I remember.
|
|
|
|