I voted as maybe. It seems too early for bulls to run fast. But I can say that it is strong to break the 31 thousand dollar resistance, so I am approaching maybe. But there is a really motivating environment to protect your bitcoins right now. If it can close above 30-31K Usd in June, it will have solidified the price base and will be a strong support at these levels. I also worry about a new FUD coming out on the market at any moment, so I can't be too positive and hype.

No. If only to meet the needs of life they are difficult. How is it possible that people can run investments in bitcoin.

Well...

Those who can't form separate squads (such as Ireland and Sri Lanka) doesn't deserve to play test cricket.

That makes it debatable because the answers are subjective. One person can state on why renting a real estate is better and the other person can give his opinion as well on why buying a real estate is the best. Real estate in a city is expensive but once you buy it, you can still be able to recover your capital for a short period of time if you open up different businesses there.

You can also resell your real estate later on, for a much higher value. To have a real estate in the province area do also have its own advantage because it is more relaxing there and you can use some of your land to make a farm. It can as well provide you an extra income.

The cost of living shouldn't kill the living please. The living should find a way to rise above the cost of living. The living should grow their own vegetables and rear theor own animals if need be. The living should find a smart way to reduce their cost. With reality now, the living shouldn't be competing for the latest car, clothes, electronic gadget. The living shouldn't take out a loan at this time. Bitcoin freedom for the living.

It doesn't matter that this is just a formality or not of the peace shown by the US and China. But the words Peace and mutual respect are enough to reduce the heat in the conflict between the two countries over Taiwan. Because I prefer to see these two countries compete in global politics and compete in economic power. and I don't like to see conflict in war or other issues that could bring these two countries closer to clashes. at least the steps taken by the US I think are quite wise. even if it should make the US a bit weaker on China. I hope everything will be over quickly and I don't like all things war and conflict between countries. because I don't like the impact it has on the global economy, such as peaking inflation and so on.

As a matter of fact, I am not a big fan of test cricket. But still, I would argue that players who are not interested in test cricket should not be a part of the test squad. While watching the WTC final, this was the impression that I got from the Indian players. It seemed as if they are paying just for the sake of it. The aggression and commitment that these same players were showing while participating in the IPL a few weeks ago was suddenly missing when they were playing against Australia at the Oval. In fact they looked quite happy when the match was over.

Yeah, now things are going to be divided for the two formats like we will have white-ball and red-ball here things are tricky for the boards because they need to have few players set for the red-ball which give their best even across conditions and also have good first class practice which give them good amount of money and white-ball players just need to be settled in this format which will create good body language and success.
 
We're already having too many issues in different boards and white-ball is now also main source of income for the players and boards, so they need to reduce teams in red-ball and have two teams in all boards which will surely burden still a good way to stay in competition and increase quality level in WTC for the future. Having just 6 to 8 teams in red-ball format and going with 16 to 20 teams into white-ball will give better results and involvement from players as well.

After impressive batting display by all top order batting line-up, Hasaranga bowled career best bowling spell and give his team thumbing first win of this event which is surely expected because of their experience and quality even mostly are youngsters but doing good job for the future.

All batsmen from top order have their best in this match, and we have four fifties and blitzing inning from Charith Asalanka who smashed 48 on 23 balls which helps Sri Lanka for having target of 355 which was never been easy to chase for the team like the UAE but Hasaranga give them no space and have 6 for 24 which is his career best in ODI and big win for his team of 175 runs.

Sri Lanka will take advantage of UAE's weak bowling but it is only natural that Sri Lanka was a popular team at one time maybe because of the points table or net run rate they have to play the World Cup qualifiers. However, Sri Lanka did a fantastic performance against UAE in today's match and set a target of 356 runs. The target of 356 is impossible for UAE at the moment as they have lost 4 wickets for 100 runs.
Sri Lanka and West Indies have been top in terms of popularity in the past but they have to play qualifiers to qualify.

Yes, it is possible and there are discussions going on in many parts of the world about it to create a multi-currency system that is not solely dependent on pre-dominated US dollar-based system, and digital currencies such as Bitcoin is also an option. The major economic powers such as China and Russia are already using their national currencies to trade goods and services. However, completely moving away from US dollar poses significant challenges due to complexities involved and need for agreements among nations to establish and accept a new system.

In long-term trades, patience is the most important thing, and I don't think it's always just a matter of whether or not you can keep the money for the long term. Sometimes the market drops so much that you can lose faith in the success of the transaction, and in this case, sell at a loss. Manipulators achieve this, if they provoke a panic during a fall, then panic selling will lower the price even lower and at that time they will buy.

She will definitely gonna appreciate it as a gift, if only the next day Bitcoin price grows But if she will see a price reduction during a good period of time, she might really get disappointed. OP, also think how you will look in father-in-law and mother-in-law eyes, and other guests. If you gonna give your present on public, are you sure everyone gonna understand your gift? If you do it privately, she will tell her parents about that gift anyway. If they are not tech guys, and she is not a tactical person, you will end with a guy who gave a virtual gift... I would better think of a more romantic gift, but later just give half of private key to her.

As we already really understand the situation:
1. First and foremost, the SEC has no claims against bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general.
2. The SEC reasonably considers some alternative cryptocurrencies as stock-type assets, and some exchange services as services from a banking service - the claim is only to regulate this moment, otherwise it turns out - banks should be regulated and taxed, and crypto exchanges that do the same - No. Untouchable for the laws - no!
3. Claims against Binance are based purely on the illegal actions of this company, and they violate the laws not only in the US, but also in other locations.

Most likely the result will be:
- Binas will lose its positions, and most likely there will be the next iteration, because. Binance will now sign the “settlement agreement” again to avoid really big problems. But after a while, it will again support illegal services. There will be either a new "scheme" or a new gasket company, which will simply be closed and a new one opened
- The crypto market will react with slight fluctuations, but there will be no global drawdown of cryptocurrencies.
The problem with Binance is not a mass problem of cryptocurrencies, it is a local problem of a company that conducts illegal activities.

Binance is currently the largest exchange in the crypto currency world and has a large market dominance, so I think Binance will have a good impact on the market if there is currently some crisis. But I also know that the cryptocurrency world has its ups and downs. But Binance's crisis doesn't mean the end of the cryptocurrency world.  I think that sometimes when these things happen, first there is a crisis and the market is down for a few days, but then the market will recover again, just like what happened after the crash of the FTX exchange.

The SEC is not our enemy nor it was against crypto adoption but they are against useless projects that scammers tried to get some space on known exchanges and use this as a medium to scam innocent people. Unfortunately, most of us misunderstood what they want to happen in the crypto space and that is to wipe out all shitcoins that flooded the market due to rising complaints against them.
They are helping the crypto space free from such fraudulent acts and scam projects - and I see their vital role in improving and building trust.

I do not think that ordinary citizens of any state need to approve and strive to ensure that paper money disappears from circulation. If we want to keep the remnants of our privacy and anonymity, we must remember that paper money is the least monitored by governments. Any non-cash money issued by states, governments can and will use to collect confidential information about their users as well as their financial activities.
At the same time, paper money is very easy to use, does not require the use of technical devices and is sometimes simply indispensable for small household transactions.

Whether we like it or not, centralized exchanges are safe-ish and convenient to use, which are the main reasons they'll continue to be in business. You can avoid using CEX by switching to DEX platforms such as Bisq, where your funds always remain in your wallet.

Looks like Australia will give England a decent lead since the tail is supporting Khawaja pretty well so far. Khawaja might actually score a double century as long as the tail continues giving him proper support.

Stokes is probably regretting declaring so early since they could have gotten 30+ runs more despite losing 8 wickets. Exciting opening encounter.

The poverty is caused by the failed to keep the money for your future on earning.When the government made many schemes for the people poverty reduction.The government executive should check the exact way of making reach to the people.When the people in the full poverty,the government should concentrate of giving basic needs as compared to giving free bees to poor people.

Sure, it feels like religion and gambling are polar opposites! Your insight about character shaping obsession is apt. But, doesn't belief mold our character as well? I think that religion doesn't automatically lead to obsession. Yet, religion, through its ethics, can manage behavior. Could lack of such guidance result in impulsive tendencies?
Consider religious folks who gamble. Perhaps they've misconstrued their teachings or their traits outweigh their beliefs. It's complicated, so we shouldn't rule out religion