I don't get why they think that wallet would belong to Donald. Because of Trump Cards activity?

This is from the site that sold the cards:



Those guys (obviously guys) just issued the cards with stolen and modified images, and got go-ahead from trump, with some kind of monetary deal. And i am sincerely wondering when trump is suing them because of a bad deal he made again.

And sure, every wallet that is suspected by being donald's wallet will be probably flooded with incoming memetokens to "trump" for hodl, as creators of them want name for themselves and people are watching what that wallet is holding. You know, like they flooded Vitalik's wallets

Lol , keep on coping. You mean Cohen, one of those best people dump was talking about? Who served his sentence, because he did what dump asked him to do? Because he cooperated unlike dump? Because he taped him? You are really following different feeds.

And of course some people will support the Trump, as some people support only ideas, that are strongly against scientific method or consensus, like you for example.

I've been wondering why reality is such a hard pill to swallow for you, that every unlikely alternative is better? Would reality make you seem too insignificant or something? Would it help of you to think of it as setting you free and have fulfilling life instead? You just have to accept it, you know, like you accepted what ever religion you have? This way you would have actual overwhelming evidence to support your views.

Here's a simple image to remind you:


I am not trying to hijack this thread to speak about reality, but i think i need to remind you the concept of it, because what's happening now is part of it, and you need to accept that.

I automatically misread that luck as a cuck as in: "Best of cuck: President Trump".
Must be because i am used to it coming from "i dO mY OwN rEseArCH, without any actual science involved" -type of crowd, that are using it as a slur a lot.

I see them as useless as most of the other tokens and coins. But narrative why people buy them differs from coins that trying to solve something. Because meme's aren't really trying to be anything else then they are, they are not offering solutions, but sort of change to rebel against normal markets, like old bitcoiners, when suits were laughing at it. Even though bitcoin has real fundamentals, i see the rebelliious part similar.

Meme tokens customer base seems to be people who are rebels, or just bored of old market narratives and more interested about "casino markets". Because while most of them die and new ones come and die after that, the ones that keep on surviving are like this weird essence of everything that's wrong with markets. They are absurd examples of something that shouldn't work and keep on working. They are mocking the tokens and coins that were marketed as "real" utility tokens. Real utility world changing "decentralized" tokens that didn't have point in the first place. Never will have a purpose, and are slowly dying. So why wouldn't i invest in some lowcap or use mature meme tokens as a currency, just for the meme value and laughs.

Yeah, i wasn't talking about crypto being money. That doesn't even make any sense. I don't think you really read what i said.

Sure, you can create a meme token that has only speculative value, it's permissionless after all, and if you market it correctly or airdrop it you might not have any problems with it. .

But it's hardly "your own business" anymore. Especially if crypto you sold is tied to real world company incentives. Why would you think that any CEX would list that if your project clearly break AML laws and aren't even passing the Howey Test?

These kind of projects you are describing worked with low level in 2015-2016 in NXT ecosystem for example, but only because money inflow was low and no one was paying attention enough to force any regulations. Have you paid any attention why teams and exchanges get sued from left and right these days? Or are you purposely ignoring that?

Sentencing is in July 11. So this case will be resolved even before s before republicans picking Trump as 2024 presidental nominee. But dumb is facing three other criminal cases as well that could take time to get resolved. If this would be any other person then ex president, he would be in holding cell already and after that rest of his life in prison. But for ex president, i would guess it's going to be just home detention with an ankle bracelet. But could be rest of his life. I am also interested to see if this sentencing includes any financial penalties.

There has been several projects that have tried RWA's, but nothing has been really successful so far because of regulatory limits with trading securities. And you do understand that we literally already have such investing opportunities, by investing companies with stocks? They aren't just decentralized, and making them decentralized often falls to ever changing regulatory demands, and lack of the platform that operates in a way FATF would be happy about it.

You can't just create a erc-20 or other token and say they are company shares or rwa's... Well you can but you couldn't even trade them via any legit cex. And sharing company profits to pseudonymous accounts would break AML laws and get you to jail eventually, if amounts were big enough.

You do realize that liquidity would be scarce if you try to get rid of them quickly. And you would sometimes need to list them for ages to get premium price. Consumer base for those is smaller then other things and if you wanted cash quickly you would most likely need to sell them with huge loss, as people wouldn't necessarily be interested of them at that time without huge discount. And rich people aren't some sort of monolith with their taste. They collect different kinds of luxuries, and your popular luxury now might be niche market in the future.

So why wouldn't you just buy stocks or commodities instead, from an exchange with huge liquidity. Why is it important to own something physical luxury? Just the cost for maintaining and protecting them would set you back so much, that it doesn't seem you thought this though at all.

20x odd. I was starting on betting and it was a boxing match on a casino i haven't used for a long time anymore. It was a match that looked like it could be boring to watch live. And if i had bet on either of the fighters odds would have been really low, so i decided to make things more interesting. I have to say i was really surprised i won. I think it was only $5 bet though. I can't remeber who the fighters were, only that they were men. It was a long time ago.

But it was pure luck, and combination bets have served me better.

I am assuming you have more screenshots from these bad messages and insults to back your story. At least that i would have done.. screenshotted everything.

I have to say that sounds strange, but keeping in mind the impersonating incident i'll take anything what might be a fud attack with a huge grain of salt now. And maybe start over your story, because when you say things like "they even have some reasons for not liking me", it sounds like you are leaving something important out, not enough to dox you of course but it would help to have a full story and not just fragments that we need to put together.

Your kyc might have leaked from other places as well, and if you are using same nick, it's not that hard to dox you and use it to freak you out. However i would like to know how shuffle responds, before jumping to conclusions, as we have only your word and two censored pics with it.

Last time i tried to get in almost late, it was full 3k for the first time i've seen, but i've only played 3 times, and once got to somewhere around 150th with a dollar prize . Tactics to get there aren't really suddle. People are putting all in with crappy hands because they aren't losing anything by trying. So in the end there seems to be few lucky ones. Tactics don't really matter much, at least on that level.

Also i tried with mobile last time and i think they fixed the folded cards trasparency issue that i and other people complained about, or it just shows up differently with mobile.

Ok, i'll correct then.

1. Bitcoin code is open source and have been copied several times and duplicates and variations have been made, sometimes by only changing the name, and i have lost count on the number of forks that derived from it.
2. Your circular argument doesn't really make sense. You are just basically describing popularity.
3. Buying bitcoin forks or altcoins doesn't affect bitcoin network security in any way.
4. Yeah, everyone wants bitcoin network to be secure, bit like i already said. Buying "competition" doesn't affect it.
5. I don't grasp what you are trying to say with point c. Network being less secure wouldn't rise the price, in fact it would have an opposite effect. People are buying it because it's secure. Which is one of the reasons there will be plenty of miners to keep it secure. And as long as that stays decentralized enough, it will stay secure.

If you didn't buy them cheap, you won't buy them when they are "expensive" either. Because the expensive price you are referring today can be cheap next week when you realize it's not going down and that was near bottom compared to where is it that day. You will only lose it you are going to chase the bottom, because you won't ever invest into it while waiting for next bottom.

Reason i know that is i've seen this so many times, people think they are expensive now, and later there will be people who say that if they only knew about such coin they would surely bought them at that level, but they wouldn't. Because cheap and expensive are relative terms and mean nothing without context.

That's psychology of hindsight, you would have thought bitcoin was expensive in 2014 as well because it hadn't drop to the level it started from.

Sure, but if i don't change my gambling habits because of profits but because of maximizing airdrop, i think it makes sense. And my post was an airdrop specific. And if volume is what counts, i am not sure why i should stay with my original volume which would be a lot lower and would guarantee i would get smaller airdrop. If you have enough money, i guess you could trust on high rtp eventually giving your money back, but if you are going with small budget, you can pretty much guarantee that you will create surprisingly large volume with just $20

That kind of advertising is illegal in my country. I am assuming it's illegal in most first world countries in a same way you can't advertise a token sale like that without SEC ruling it as a security.
But i really sometimes wonder why people think casinos would be profitable organizations if most people win more money then they would lose?

In fact that applies to every game in every casino. The fact some people really think that there would be a tactic that they just haven't found, or that they are just gambling wrong and losing because of that puzzles me. Do these people totally ignore the concept of luck? Or do they consider other winners lucky and they themselves, not only unlucky but gambling wrong? It shouldn't be a news that casinos are build so that they are mathematically guaranteed ultimately to make profit.

There are several reasons why people would VPN, and in most cases that's technically allowed and not illegal. But when casinos that say they allow VPN, they don't mean they allow VPN to escape regulations and mislead casino about the bout one's country of residence.

And because people are misusing VPN to hide country they are living on to be able to play, many casinos just rather blanket ban all VPNs.

Saying VPN's are allowed is similar to saying, "driving licence cards are allowed as proof of identity", And people would see that as an opportunity to use other people's driver licence as their own, because they were "allowed" as proof of identity.

Insulting people for not blindly trusting newbie anon is only red flag anyone would need. I've seen only scammers using this type of tactic, and funny enough, oddly defensive insulting before anyone has even said anything is either a sign of not a very bright scammer, or a sign of insecurity. In both cases, i will just roll my eyes for replies like this

You see this kind of negging tactics in dating sites done by sociopathic incels, so i guess it would work for someone who desperately needs respect from anon in the internet.

And stop spamming this thread several times per day. You can fit several answers to one message. Pumping this thread by yourself many times per day, like you did in May 23-24. That's against forum rules.

What makes sense in this scenario is having a budget and exit plan. But 100% in profits are just an arbitrary number and wouldn't fit on everyone, it makes as much sense as make as much sense as leaving when losing $100, which will be happening more often then winning that $200 i am guessing. So if there's a change to make more than that $100, why wouldn't you?

For example, let's say you are winning $120 in one bet, are you going to leave because you won over $100 and or take out that $100 because you need to secure that and see how far that extra $20 takes you? Because in my book it would make more sense to pick the latter one. '

Thing with gambling is that sometimes there are possibility for huge wins, and at least i wouldn't leave those ignored, because i want to settle for less. If i had that 100 secured, i would definitely go for a moonshot with that $20.

If you can't access that from a region you are from, you really shouldn't try to get around that. Getting caught for trying to hide where you are living in usually will lead to frozen account as there's a reason for that restriction in the first place, and gambling service providers are legally obligated to kick you if they find out. And they don't even need to pay your money back as you were cheating in the first place.

But about your question, i could imagine that some third party game providers (like live games and slots) could block ip's themselves, and known vpn ips might be flagged and blocked by such service providers. It's just a theory, but i can't see why they wouldn't. I am not sure if they need to or if they can trust casinos doing that.

Can you elaborate few points? Maybe you lost me here. I start by saying that i am not advocating Kaspa in any way, i know too little of them to do so.

But you are saying it doesn't have an utility? To me it sounds like another L1 solution that tries to solve age old problems and be improvement of the likes of bitcoin. Coins work as an incentive to keep the chain secure, so i am not sure what other utility they would need to have. And when a PoW coin has $3.2 billion marketcap, obviously ASIC makers want to cash out on that.

I don't see anything wrong with trying to make something better or different than bitcoin. It's not an attack to bitcoin, but just normal development. Bitmain would obviously be interested to push this because it's Proof of Work. And i am not sure why it would be strange that they tried to use PoW coin with a 3.2 Billion marketcap on their advantage.


This used to be a common thing with "community" driven projects, and it's natural that project attracts professionals who want to participate. And what would be more motivated worker then a person who have fallen love with the coin, who is also total believer and fanatic.

Maybe i am missing out something obvious you tried to point out here, but people with certain type of rigs are usually lobbying projects that benefit them. I am guessing that lot of FUD against Eth2.0 PoS was organized by people who used to mine eth.

I don't follow you. But wouldn't that depend how you play regularly? I am regularly playing with slots and there are very low changes that i would make same amount of volume using $5 on playing with slots versus playing $5 on dice with 1.0102 multiplier. My money would run out faster with slots if i didn't get large wins. When with dice i would lose a bet 2 times out of 100 (in theory), so even if i wouldn't win with dice, changes are that i would lose slower.

And bear in mind this is just for mining the tokens, and grinding up levels. Not a long term solution, and basically not a lot to do with gambling. I'll get back to playing slots and betting with sports later.