What an earth are you talking about?

Why is that equality "alarming"?

Come on, now you are just making up stuff. 60 to 70% chances of winning the bet doesn't tell us anything. Are those 0.05% multipliers? Or are you claiming that they have 60% - 70% change to make profit at the end of the day? Because that's just nonsense. It would put gambling industry out of business, as no one would bet themselves and would just delegate their bets to people who would bring the profits.
Obviously there can be good women gamblers no matter the gender, but give me some studies of statistics and don't just make them up as you write.

Gongratulations on your choice for getting in.

On investment-wise i know how you feel. I bought a top as well when i started, even though i started several years earlier (2014). And you are not late, even though people will tell you that. I thought i was late in 2014. I had to learn about DCA as well, and trick about doing dca is to do it when everyone around you say it's over. Then you are buying the fear of others. And sounds like you have picked some good tips on the way. Always listen to people who have done this longer.

But it's not only DCA that i had to learn. I was new to investing and had to learn about valuation. Meaning i had to understand why bitcoin has value and how much value could it have. I didn't understand the marketcap or charts, not to talk about technical analysis of any kind. So it was a crash course to trading 101. Sometimes it felt like i knew more than others, even though i was new at everything. That can happen especially in the bull run. We get cocky as we feel invincible and trader gurus. We forget that bullrun doesn'r make as good investors, how we keep the money we gain in the bear run, is the real test.

And remember to use your winnings. Because it's all casino money before you cash it out. And you don't need to wait for the top. It's only few people who manage to sell that anyway. Just be glad that you made profit.

Why specificly young people and in where? Do you have any articles about this?

Again where in the world? What sites? And who are these many people who have individually million dollar to throw away for a scam? I would really want to see some stats about that.

Are you talking about some specific casinos, or phishing sites or what?

Choosing a reputable site is pretty easy. First of all, if something looks too good to be true, like a lucrative bonus that would make you rich, it's most likely a scam. Just common sense tells you that. If you have doubt about any site, look for an unmoderated announcement in bitcointalk. Longer the casino has existed and if it's a scam, more likely there will be a majority of people giving red trust for it. So look for older casinos that has most people saying good things about them. If it doesn't have unmoderated announcement in here, just don't play there.

1. I didn't think they would have invested to btc or eth with company money, but i guess they thought that they would never be considered as securities. I didn't doubt that they wouldn't invest with their personal money.

2. It's probably peanuts against their total holdings, and since regulations / taxing on it are unclear and rapidly changing, o am guessing many of these companies just rather leave it alone and to mature.

3. It doesn't really matter who hodls it, but take reddit for example: i have been closely following their growth and interest on the subject. It's not because they hodl it that would be beneficial to markets, it's the fact that they are also first one of actually adopting the nft tech and making it very visible with their avatars. And that has created some wealthy artists, so it's creating buzz among the artists as well, which used to hate the plagiarism of it. I am really astonished why crypto people seemed to see this nft thing as a fad. As it doesn't matter what their price even is, or if they have a future. Just the fact that reddit keep using them is bringing a lot of awareness for crypto.

I would be more interested on what my share is, but if i had to guess the token price, i would put initial launching price as very much undervalued:

If i am trying to calculate it based on rollbit marketcap which is $478M, and with my pseudo math, marketcap of rlb: $478M divided with shfl initial circulating token supply: 71,126,984.56 = $6.7

But considering the fact that similarweb stats show me, that rollbit had 5.829M visitors in last 3 months, while shuffle had 1.314M tells me that Shuffle still has way smaller community (-77.5%) and i recon some of these miners never attended to be part of community.

So that would definitely cut from comparison marketcap and the fact it's traded on prepertual markets for as low as $1.6 throws me off a little bit. But i would predict it's trading somewhere $2.5 at the start, even though many uncertain things could affect it, like issuance rate and new token fomo.

These are of course rookie numbers next to established big casinos, and traffic might grow radically with the marketcap later on. And if delfationary tokenomics are effective enough, token price would grow despite where marketcap is going.

You can think of economics similar to tokenomics, as that itself isn't going to fix the gap between the rich and poor.

I am oversimplifying this, but most economic systems are working well when people keep swapping money for services, as most economic systems are build on people swapping money with goods. But when enough people just keep hoarding money/wealth, it slowly decreases the money velocity, And higher the money velocity is, better the economy is doing. And aside from rich doing their weird eccentric purchaces, they hoard way more than they spend, as their purchaces are most of the time are just gaining more wealth for them.

This is one of the reasons why you need to print more money to stimulate the economy, because poor or even middle class, can't buy enough to keep up the money velocity. And this is also why fiat money loses value over time. It never was supposed to be long time store of value, just very liquid and very stable in short time.

You could argue that this is why bitcoin was doing well as money velocity dropped significally during covid lockdowns, and as bitcoin is basically symbol of hodl (or hoarding).

Big companies acquire little companies all the time, and just like most companies in genelrall i don't think majority of them are going anywhere. I recon big companies buy them mostly because their own organic growth isn't fast enough and they want to stay relevant and keep speculators interested. At the time of digicash, it was the cutting edge tech and they were really on to something.

Bitcoin succeeded because it was born on the right time and under right circumstances. Right people aquired it just a right amount and right people bought it when it was relatively cheap. If digicash had been succeeded microsoft realized that it would bring a lot of more investors, bringing their own stock value up. So they took a risk, just like with most of their acquisitions.

Writing alternative history for something like that is hard, but i recon that Mircosoft was seen as the "suits", and reason bitcoin succeeded was because it was anti-suits. It was rebellious and anarchist. It seemed to be all the things cyberpunk franchise promised future to be. It was something people really wanted, so it was attractive. Another money from "suits". would never had that kind of effect. Also it would be highly centralized and probably died because it would be forced to something else by regulators.

I am blown away how people think that that guy is even telling the truth. Why do you think it was the woman who showed her true colors? There's a reason they split up, the reason that the man wouldn't  share here for obvious reasons, if it was because of him. She got her kid to protect as well, so she is sensitive for spotting red flags as she should in that situation. And what kind of man goes to talk to press and tries to defame her instantly?

"It just came out of the blue" is something i hear pretty much from every broken relationship where communication didn't work, and usually it is because other one wasn't listening.

And since you brought up that you would have been running away, she literally ran away already, so something tells me it wasn't the man who was trying to dodge the bullet here.

Formula for that is not public information yet, so are those rhetoric questions? And even if we did have it would probably be hard to calculate if they have balanced it out some weird ways.

All we know is what noah answered to in this thread and its all still pretty vague. There are several questions answered on that thead, so it's pointless to pick just one, but if i had to i would go for this take:



And since i am getting a hostile vibes from your post, i have to ask what you are even angry about? The fact we are uninformed about this? Seems like a waste of your time. Like noah said: "it's not that drastic".

People use them for good time, and later because they got addicted and for normal time. Some people are also so called self-medicating, as some drugs work better with some brains then others. Artists can take LSD to speed up their exploration of mind and figure out new ways to create. People with ADHD take amphetamine to relax and get their wires work like they work with normal people. Normal people would have an opposite effect of that.

Put let me put in words that our police use years ago with their drug awareness propaganda:
Our police listed every drug out there on their education paper, and side effects with them, with cannabis came paranoia, with lsd schizophrenia, with amphetamine it was heart attack and psychosis. And with heroin, it only read, extreme euphoria and possibly overdose.

If you one day decided to try drugs, which one would you pick with those symptoms? I find it weird that they have been over exaggerating the problems of mild drugs so long, that hard drugs looked good in comparison.

I don't see them anything like religions, those are not trying to work out on how to make working economy, but how to deal with death. I personally believe in Keynesian economics, even though it seems to be everything cryptocurrecy scene hates, but none of the economic systems are perfect and they may have to develop themselves to survive. If i had to guess, Satoshi followed Austrian economics. Least that it was how this started imho; cyberpunk money for libertarians.

There's really no perfect economy system. But since you asked alternative for keynesian system, i have been reading about monetarism, and while it has problems as well, it deals with some of the problems that comes with keynesian economics.



There are others as well but let's start from here.

Who are you trying to convince here? If you really think money triumphs education, just because money is the only thing you want then go for it. But don't except everyone else valuating money over everything. Money helps me with lots of things but it doesn't give any substance for my life. It's just financial safety and things i can buy.

I value good, educated conversation and learning with friends or spending time with my kids more then $10000 in hand replacing that. I value the fact, that i bothered to study and learned about cultures, music, psychology, maths, philosophy and politics. I value that there's so much to learn, and i can use my time for that instead of chasing just money. If i wanted just to be rich, i would have been studying to have a career in finances.

Education can make your life rich in ways can't even know beforehand, as you aren't educated in that section. People who know things and can explain things are interesting to talk to. Everyone i know who is purely interested to get rich haven't been interesting so far. In fact they tend to value tacky things. More you know, more you see and deeper you see, it helps you think deeper and understand cause and effect. You can't buy that just with money, you actually have to learn things to have it.

All i am saying is that money earmarked for airdrop (28%) isn't a same section of pie as early contributors (8.8%). So by giving more weight on the bets for early players from the airdrop section (as Noah said), they are keeping their commitment of rewarding early players. They don't have to give anything from early adopters pie, which they never said they would.

And platform users are far from angel investors or private investors, which is a whole different thing. Angel investors or private investors have contracts (at least when they are serious investors).

Funny thing is, while his fortune is tied to real estates, his real state assets might be loan collateral already.
And if he sells those, he needs to pay taxes for any capital gains from them, and either pay those loans he got by using collateral or fund them somehow again.

And he is probably forced to sell trump tower, which will go cheap as who the hell is going to buy that with cash with one month warning?

So good luck with his golden 'never surrender' sneakers and new nfts funding what he owes.

Just don't gamble intoxicated ever, no matter if it's drugs or alcohol. Nothing good comes from that. You don't play with guns, drive, give public statements, do surgery while drunk for a reason. Because both your motor skills and judgement are impaired.

Only semi-safe way to gamble even while drunk is not to take debit card or phone with you, and only use pocket money for doing that. There's are few things that are worse to that feeling when you wake up in hangover, can't remember anything and you have no money left. You might as well have been robbed as you didn't enjoy the experience.

I don't do drugs, but not that i think of it, i actually had one good experience while gambling drunk. I remember leaving to casino from the bar and woke up next morning with lots of more money in my pockets then i had when i went out. That was fun i admit, but i didn't have the experience from gambling. I might as well had robbed someone and just didn't know it. I had vague memory from that casino so i pieced together that i might have been lucky. But that was the only time i made money while drinking, most of the time it's just playing more then planned and woke up with hangover and regret.

I have only had 2 coins in my life that i can remember that crashed to zero when i was sleepting. Both happened when i started this cryptocurrency journey, and back then i didn't luckily have too much money on them. Even with biggest rug pulls i experienced, i either managed to cash out my initial investments when i sold them while it mooned, or managed to trade swings when it crashed.

So in theory while i lost lot of profits in in monetary value, and those were technically my biggest monetary losses, but i consider it as imaginary money, because i didn't sell in time. So when i make more money then i put in, but lose more in profits, does easy come, easy go even count?

Coins where i lost significant amount of my investments were Decent, Rise and Deep Brain. I am not surprised if you haven't heard from them. Decent even seemed like a real project, but it just faded away and no one needed it. Deep brain, which i DCA:d because at the time i had money for it, and thought it would go back up. Because at the time everything was bouncing back. It was an early AI project, during ico frenzy, and back then no one seemed to question if it was needed. Blockchain + ai was enough. That reminds me of current AI trend.
Third one was "Rise vision" That was a special kind of travesty. It was more money laundering operation than a coin.

I am having a hard time to understand your point. Most who people who holds ANY crypto including bitcoin are doing it most likely, because they are expecting growth. Even times of hiding money into crypto as an use case are fading away because of regulations. Smart contracts can turn out to be essential part of the web in he future but i believe it when i see it.

Unless you are buying and selling something with it, you are holding it because you hope it will go up. Or because you pay less fees then with bank transactions. And about those transactions, what an earth do you mean by "cant be used for p2p transactions". How do you think cryptocurrencies work? As most of them are build only for that.

This isn't a question of what we would do on that situation, because we don't know anything about them as a "couple", but just the surface. We don't know if Michael turned out to be a horrible man for example, as he most likely is painting himself in a good light.

First of all they were a dating, not married and not even engaged, but they dated for 3 months. That's barely enough time to even know if you are suitable for each other, not to mention to assume that you are going to get half of nearly everything what your date owns. People split up, that's not surprising. Especially if you take someone to celebrate, and he starts babbling how you two should buy house together. So i see a real possibility that michael turned out to be obsessive and maybe showed his true colors by demanding what they do next. They obviously weren't friends soon after the celebration, so why would anyone want to share anything in that case.

And it's not like he bought it, they were at the shop together, buying it with her money. She even scratched it.

Am i right to assume that you don't know what altcoin futures are yet? Because that question is too vague to have an answer.
You are not telling us if you know technical analysis to base your decision of shorting or longing it, nor you are saying how much leverage are you confortable to use. And if you don't know anything about risks in those, how is any of this a good idea? Playing with futures can make you money, for sure, but get even experienced traders get rekt if they aren't careful with it.

If you already know everything there's to know, then sorry if i sound condescending. If not, there is ton of reading material everywhere in net.

It's definitely a scam. Even though the whole idea itself seems pointless, i had to google and you can pretty much find that out first few reddit posts, when you google monero mixer, where people explain how it's a scam. But i am baffled why would they make such a scam? How would people even fall for this, as it's targeting paranoid people and paranoid people definitely are checking twice where they are putting their money. There isn't even any incentive for greed.

Thanks for not posting any links with that.