Well, it's nice to know i am not totally heading on wrong direction with my strategy. There are several suggestions that i live by like not losing more then i could afford. I just thought that there might be clever ways to use

Like "handicap", "set" and "total" markets etc.. Because it''s hard to me to grasp how can i utilize those efficiently.

I thought it might not be, even though it's currently working for me. Eventually i will lose.

This i didn't quite understand. Do you mean that if i play often, i will take unnecessary risks? As i know that i am not supposed to reach and try to risk more just because i want to gamble more.

I gamble on everything i know basic rules about, like how log each round, set or game takes? How much points there are even possible to make and in what time. And in overall how fast can games change and for what reason. But i do lack some basic knowledge about some sports. Like cricket for example. And i am not touching that until i read the rule book no matter what the odds are. Odds to me are pointless unless i know how i am risking my money. Just like i am not gambling with all the betting types that i don't know anything about.

Either you misunderstood or i am missing some key information here. To my knowledge they aren't distributing any profits for tokens holders, but they are using profits to buy those tokens from the market and burn. Which is actually way better and way more legal method.

And yeah, i do get the liquidity pool part. I just don't agree that raising money that way would be a good idea. Token sales clash with regulators all the time, because they are often marketed illegally.

I am not sure where in the world this happened but it certainly wouldn't fly in here. Those gambling places would basically be holding an illegal register, even if the register contains one person.
Not even bars can have pictures of banned people, they will just have to remember them. Also it's far from effective, and might have worked 100 years ago when regulations were looser and moer people used to know each other in the same village or city.

Like you said, all you need to do is change the scenery and play in somewhere else. Or just play online. If the person wasn't grounded and offline, there's only so many ways to restrict them. Better way would be convincing them not to gamble, and find them something else to do. Something else to fill their time with.

I've been recently trying live betting, with a strategy of betting for winners after a quick evaluation of how is the game going, and how much of it is left to play. I am accepting even smallest multipliers like 1.05+ if i am quite certain i would win. I've done many of them for few days now and so far i've been happy for my system, and i already have 3x my initial starting bet.

But i can't help wonder if i am making some noob errors that come back to bite me later. As i know that there are no 100% safe winning, i think i will start losing at some point, and with small multipilers, all it takes is few losses to get back to where i started from. I am quite noob at this so i am probably doing every newbie mistake.

So i wanted to ask from experienced gamblers here, who make live bets; how do you choose your bets and what kind of bets are you preferring (other then betting for winners).

Also are there some good tips on how to make most of from those? Because to someone less informed like myself, most of the other kind of bets seem like shots in the dark. I am assuming that there are more profitable strategies. Like what kind of other bets are worth looking into?

It's about educating yourself on raising children, and not being a main character of your life anymore. You sometimes need to put your life on hold as it was and focus on what's important.
When you get your first child, your priorities and some of your values will shift. You should put more focus on practicality and psychological well being rather than delegating your work to some spirit, or what ever you believe in.

You can pray if you want or not to pray if it suits you, but that doesn't really affect the outcome, especially if you are trusting solely in praying. It might relax you as a form of meditation, but don't count that as a parenting. You need to do parenting yourself and not trust invisible dad from the sky to watch your kids. There's an actual physical parents that child needs to be present and noticing them in order for them to grow up as emphatic, and balanced, good human beings.

You don't need to worry about that. BD-level of crazy is whole another scale and government will take custody of those children in no-time.

What ever is cheapest and fastest to move. I rather not gamble with stablecoins as i just need more crypto. And when crypto is moving up i feel like i am losing if i am not making more then the altcoin gains against usdt.

I might use usdt if prices are moving down i can send it via fast L2 like arbitrum, polygon or bsc. But i rather not because that doesn't really differ in anyway from playing in normie fiat money casinos. And i feel we lose something important ideologically, if we move away from real cryptos to stablecoins and fiat money.

Then again, in the bullrun, people who get the airdrop wouldn't have been invested per se, but there would be definitely people investing. Meaning, like you said, they would be most likely buying overpriced tokens. And i myself wouldn't mind as they would be buying from us.

I don't have an opinion about the public sale, that's apparently happening with SHFL as well, because i don't have enough data on that, but i feel that's a little iffy, and i don't get why they would need to do this. If they indeed are selling them against crypto.

And it's not like everyone would be dumping at once. These 3 reasons are enough for many people to hodl or even buy more. Especially buyback and burn with fixed supply sounds juicy.
 

I am not sure what the conflict of interest would be. It's not like they can affect the outcome of the match. Maybe with large enough bets they could affect to multipliers, but that would be affecting against them. But if there would be a way it would be unethical or conflict of interest, that i don't see, it would be against regulations and these casinos are constantly audited, so it really wouldn't make sense.

And when you take a look how much money they are making i a year, then you quickly notice that making even insane large bets (that would instantly be flagged by auditors) wouldn't even affect the income in any meaningful way. So i am guessing they don't need to gamble.

I am certain that there's a group of people that this could help with small amount of money, but i don't think it's the majority of people. In worst case scenario it will have an opposite effect.
When we are talking about enough money, we can't grasp the value just by looking at it. And then there's the fact that you would probably feel like you had more money when you constantly saw it as a cash form. Psychologically it would just make you probably value it less, as that would be constantly in your sights.

Nfts have already been used for representing liquidity pools in uniswap. You are talking about that tech linked to some images. They can be linked to anything. Also, i am quite concerned that people are using same arguments about nfts as nocoiners are using about countless tokens and cryptos. That they are a scam and have no real value, except when people decide to give them value. Just like with most cryptos out there. Only difference being that they represent unique assets and are illiquid. But most cryptos out there are illiquid and dead.

I don't know, money from huge heists is hard to launder, and $3M risk free money must sound appealing. But i don't understand why anyone would believe it's not a trap.
That contract wouldn't be binded by law, and paper contract like that would be laughed out from any court if the criminal decides to take it.

Why would they give hacker anything after that? They would take the money and try to hand the hacker to police.

Every rich person know still looks at the price tag. That's part of the reason they got rich. Price doesn't prevent them buying the thing, but they will definitely try to get it cheaper from somewhere else.
Also, they don't just buy any products but products that last. Richest one i know doesn't even do fine dining himself. He buys that to his partner though.

But i admit that in the grocery store, it's huge advantage that you don't need to count your money and compromise as you can't afford everything you need.

Once again missed out because i don't use twitter. I might give up and made a temp new account just for this kind of stuff.

But anyway, i was wondering when their snapshot date would be and i noticed this:



So, first airdrop is 12 month from inception. It took some digging, but i found their first tweet via Nitter
 


Does this mean the snapshot would be would be 1st of April, as that's their official inception day? That would like up with their "early 2024" promise.

You might want to zoom out. Here's a chart of most popular game token IMX. It's an layer 2 ecosystem build for Gods unchained because at the time it didn't make any sense doing small transactions in ETH, as fees costed more then most nfts. This tech was surpassed by many others, so imx was quickly outdated tech.

IMX



Here's their in-game reward token GODS



Here's axie infinity, one of the most famous gamefi tokens



Do they still look like they are recovering from here?

Far from billionaire, but rich. Although reason people work in the first place, is that they need your salary to pay your bills, buy food and all the necessities, so majority of it isn't invested.
And i remember that fomo time pretty well. After 2014 when it started dropping, almost everyone in this planet would have exited. Bitcoin was new and everyone was laughing at you when you bought ath of that time. I can't remember any media reporting that it would go back up, so it would have taken mixture of crazy and true believer to hold it. Especially when no one could have predicted how high it would go.

Is there a reason why you haven't posted this to scam accusations yet? I am pretty sure that betfury doesn't even read their announcement thread.

They already have flag for their affiliate fraud, so i don't see a scenario where you would get your money (mainly because i don't trust them either), but at you can
get more red trust. And since trust is something casinos live with, they will probably regret their decision not to pay.

Ok, i confirmed that's a correct url from seabet.io livechat so i apologize.

But seriously this doesn't make any sense to me . Why would you do this? Don't you think that typosquatting is the first thing people would associate miswritten urls with?

I am just confused on what's the advantage of doing this? Wouldn't affiliate links would be enough? Why do you need whole different urls for it?
Maybe you can explain so as a noob i won't be this suspicious in the future.

So isn't anyone going to talk about the fact that topic says seabet.io, and that there's a real site in https://www.seabet.io but OP so linking to url seabet9.io

I am just wondering why anyone in here wouldn't thing that this wouldn't be a phishing scam? Because to me it just seems obvious and there's no way i would link trough that site. Or am i missing something obvious here?

If  desperately needed all my pennies for my family. I mean, not being able to afford food or necessities for a safe life.

Family comes first in my priorities and i am including myself and my needs on that. At the moment i have some to spare, but that's tightly budjeted as well.
And i wouldn't stop for the rest of my life, but just until the situation, (what ever that might be) is over and we are on the safe waters.

I don't get scolded by my wife as i am not married anymore and my parents are too old to care what i do. I am an adult after all.

Secondly, if i would go over my budget i would stop. Not for the rest of the life but enough time for serious self reflecting.

I don't think anything has changed, there are just more humans and more things to buy. Just because we think it's waste of money, it might be worth it to someone else. And it's not like that money would be out of circulation. It just moves to other people. Who cares what item has been changed for the money?

I don't understand most of the things people buy, but at least that's something real that person bought. In comparison someone paid $23.7 million for CryptoPunk #5822 NFT.

To smell good is a good as reason as any for me.

No me financial freedom, is basically same thing i value money in the first place. It's a freedom to live your life without being constantly afraid that you or your kids might starve.
Riches won't automatically make you happy, but they create one hell of a safety net. If you have ever been poor, you know what i am talking about.

It's also a freedom to pursue your interests without wondering if you are making money.