Since this is an off-topic thread, inside an off-topic forum, does that really mean that the posts have to be on-topic, and that off-topic posts are really the on-topic ones?

Didn't you pay 0.012 last time around?

Still available

Proof is being gathered and a lawsuite will be filled against this thief.

Done. Also, could you verify if I had anything in CoinLenders? I don't think I did, but better safe then sorry

If that is true then great (although I doubt it judging from the many frustrated comments both on the forum itself and social media).

Most people don't have the time to sit on a forum waiting for something to fall into their lap.

P.S.

I've sold 2. Never too late. Clearly you have no clue.

What is obvious is that you have a strong preconceived opinion, and have no interest of changing your views irrespective to what I say. Your postings revolve around demonstrating that you consider yourself wiser than other people because you stopped using CoinLenders earlier. I think you should find more interesting and less boastful uses of your time.

I won't be responding to you in the future because of your firm opinions and attitude, not because I have no arguments against your views.

Apparently most adults never emotionally mature beyond the grade school level, or at least enough of them don't that the feds can count on somebody complaining about the people exchanging BTC for USD in a Starbucks to give them an excuse to take action.

http://contrariancompliance.com/2014/09/19/us-money-transmission-laws-are-worthless-and-unconstitutional/

there will only be 300-400BTC left; maybe to be distributed in 6months in a big game with 300 prizes of 1BTC, spread the fun!

It did. I truly believe that so I'm pretty disgusted with the response he got.

I still have a little over 1000 BTC unclaimed in JD accounts, although I noticed last night that the last remaining large investor was attempting to withdraw his ~600 BTC balance.

The hot wallet was empty, so he couldn't. I refilled it this morning, but he's not been back.

Mystery investor: if you're out there, there are ~300 coins in the hot wallet waiting for you. If you withdraw them, I'll put another 300 in so you can take those too.

Meh.  The Feds only care about the big guys.  Those they'll notice and regulate.  They won't bother with the guys exchanging BTC for USD in a Starbucks.

I don't remember when an announcement was ever made or a prompt for me to accept new terms...  I assume the change happened when it was converted into the "demo" mode correct?  I don't remember new terms popping up that I had to sign and agree to, of course I could be just forgetting, but I don't remember posts on here or on his website saying the investments were no longer backed.

It existed when I put in my coins, that's the reason that I did!

Agreed to receive two payments totalling 0.012 btc.

One prior to sending invite, one after.

Awaiting second payment.

Invite sent.


Edit:
Received two payments.

Thank you for your business.

SOLD. Pm your details.

Fresh invite on offer.

Make your bids.

but doesn't being able to leave trust for anybody at any time obliterate the definition of "trust"?

For the longest time I was under the impression you could only collect negative trust if you were in a trade and didn't deliver. Ironically, "negative trust" left by a default user over their disagreement with my personal opinions supersedes positive trust left by a non-default user which involved a trade.

This is clear abuse of the trust system and exactly why default trust is BAD. Very Bad. As the title infers.

I never asked him to trust me. I never asked anyone to trust me. If you could legitimately be awarded negative trust for personal opinions we should all be at -1000 by now.

Anybody wanna step up and interject here? It would be appreciated. MsCollec seems to think he/she should just be able to leave people negative trust for any ol' reason. It sort of defeats the purpose of the system, wouldn't you agree?