I think the only way Snowden can go home is if he gets a presidential pardon at some point.
And, as others have already pointed out in this thread, why should he ever believe them? I wouldn't. |
|
|
|
What if we already have a whole bunch of chips ordered and paid for by these umbrella operations we are working with at a higher than fair market price. wont that be good for us?
Let me see if I understand, you mean that if the buyer pre-paid those chips and then difficulty rose more than expected, well he has already paid so that's good for AM, right? |
|
|
|
@electrium & lambchopfuck: plz get lost. you know nothing. AM is risky, but as far as i see & understand everything is on track. and the best is yet to come.
The "aggressive dividends" are definitely not "on track". |
|
|
|
Seems like China bans bitcoin everyday: they wake up, ban bitcoin, eat rice, go to Foxconn, eat rice again, go back to sleep and repeat.
China=/=eating rice u tard... |
|
|
|
for many of us, those that have interest in new money and avoiding the coming relentless restraints place by the US govt inc, it's more beneficial to go to St. Kitts, Puerto Rico or some such place
Uh? Isn't Puerto Rico an US territory? Did I miss something? |
|
|
|
our main goal is to make 1 OPC cost equal to 1 barrel of oil
This is beyond stupid. There is one and only way to do that, and it is to have real barrels of oil you can get redeeming those coins. If it's not the case (and it isn't), then this is one of the most egregiously retarded sentences I've ever read in this forum. And believe me, I've read many. |
|
|
|
In addition to this, the reality of the entire board of directors not being aware of this and then also not acting out on it is extremely unlikely. A complete change in ownership may be possible to pull off from the perspective of a BitcoinTalk forum account, however to convince / trick / bribe the board of directors that this change happened and not verbalize this information sounds more like fantasy.
And how could they know? AFAIK ASICMINER is a virtual company, doesn't really exist officially. Bitfountain is the real company, and it is not publicly traded. Are you aware that the so-called "board of directors" do not really meet face-to-face? I'm not sure exactly how they communicate, but you are assuming there's a "real company" behind all that, while there isn't. Nothing is "verbalized". |
|
|
|
I know... what i meant is that i dont have the feeling that the italian police did anything yet. Well, for starters you could contact the linked GdF, since currencly AFAIK the only police force alerted of this has been the Polizia Postale. I guess two forces working on two sides on the same problem are more likely to find the problem than just one. That being said, unfortunately yes, if you are not lucky they might take a long time before accomplishing anything. |
|
|
|
but on a realistic POW, this is a slow industry in that sens that miners still have to be manufactured and plugged whilst chip batches have to be payed in advance. they took their time to come up with those chips specs sure, but after that there is still a lot of work to go on with. no?
No. "I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further." |
|
|
|
Grazie dei suggerimenti!
/paci
Di nulla, sapevo che sarebbero stati ben recepiti! : ) |
|
|
|
so divs should start over by july/august when they finally sold all 3 batches, stack up on selfmining operation and franchisees kicking in too?!
Nope. They should have started a few days ago. Delays means lies means never. |
|
|
|
Also I want to say friedcat could have run with everything after GLBSE went down. He came back and paid out tens of thousands of BTC he could have kept. I highly doubt he is going to start scamming now.
There is no friedcat. "friedcat" is just an account with no RL name attached, Bitfountain could have easily changed account's owner down the line. As long as he was giving regular updates yes, he was rightly labeled as reliable and trustable. Then everything changed. Like past dividends do not imply future dividends, past reputation do not imply you are still honest. Especially if we don't even know who "he" is. |
|
|
|
No, the price fell because we got yet another lie, and more lies you add up, more the people will stop trusting you.
Any clear-minded investor should have sold the moment friedcat stopped posting regular updates: that was the first sign something was changing for the worse.
Sounds quite reasonable but then you have the entire board to convince of going down an unethical path and they have an interest in the stock as well. Nope, the board has exactly 0 say in what the company does. |
|
|
|
|
the word you are searching for is "lie".
|
|
|
|
Anyone claiming pools are good for NXT is either trying to scam you, or is completely clueless.
Do you still want to hear my answer? I seems you already have your one. I do already have one. You are free to provide a different one or not, this is a public forum. |
|
|
|
|
Ho notato una gestione a mio parere errata dell'abilitazione dell'authenticator.
Normalmente la procedura corretta è la seguente:
- sul sito abiliti l'authenticator (nota: a questo punto non è ancora attivo)
- scansioni il barcode
- il sito ti chiede di inserire un codice, per verifica
- inserisci il codice generato dall'authenticator
- solo a questo punto l'authenticator è attivo
Il tutto gestito nella pagina "sicurezza".
Questa procedura ti impedisce di bloccarti l'accesso all'account in caso qualcosa vada storto.
Ciò che succede su the rock al momento è:
- nella pagina "opzioni", puoi abilitare o disabilitare l'authenticator, a prescindere da tutto
- nella pagina "sicurezza", c'è il qrcode che puoi scansionare
fine.
In pratica puoi abilitare l'authenticator senza verificare che questo funzioni, sparso in due pagine diverse.
Andrebbe spostato tutto nella pagina sicurezza, e abilitato solo previo inserimento di un codice corretto.
Inoltre non bisognerebbe permettere di disabilitarlo senza inserire un codice di conferma, cosa che temo al momento accada. Certo, per loggarti ti serve, ma una volta loggato sei privo di protezione finché non ti slogghi, il che è sbagliato.
Infine, per una ragione simile, sarebbe bene chiedere di inserire un codice per ogni operazione eseguita, non ho idea se sia così al momento o se sia veramente usato solo per il login.
|
|
|
|
Can't see anything substantive in what TAT said. Doesn't mean he is wrong. Just nothing substantive.
He said there's no reason to believe the owners will care about the shareholders. This is strongly backed by what actually has happened so far. So basically price fell 75% overnight because friedcat is not giving the EXISTING money NOW but a little bit LATER because he can use it to MAKE MORE in a SHORT PERIOD.
No, the price fell because we got yet another lie, and more lies you add up, more the people will stop trusting you. Any clear-minded investor should have sold the moment friedcat stopped posting regular updates: that was the first sign something was changing for the worse. |
|
|
|
Pools defeat the very purpose and will end up centralising it badly. Keep your coins with yourselves.
They will serve another purpose. Such as? There's no point in mining a proof-of-ownership coin such as this one, pools offer no advantage at all, while it bears the same high risk it has for other coins. Anyone claiming pools are good for NXT is either trying to scam you, or is completely clueless. |
|
|
|
My goal has always been to get 2100 BTC so I could have .01% of all bitcoins that will ever be.
Not seeing that happening any time soon I started shooting for .01% of current bitcoins (just over 1200).
I'm not close to that either.
Almost always the best chance to reach X bitcoins in your life, is to immediately buy them at whatever means available.  Well, given the wild swings, I beg to disagree. What if he bought them at 1000$? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
