About cucks. The word "cuck" has nothing to do with polyamorism. I think it denotes males who get excited when they see their woman engage in sex with other men. I've known two such guys who wanted me to get it on with their lady. One was embarrassingly insistent. This guy was hoping to step in and have a threesome actually. I had to turn him down in a cold, unfriendly manner. The other guy was shy bordering on ashamed, and sent his woman to discuss the matter. I turned that down too, but gently. I later talked alone to the lady (who was my ex), and I suggested the two of us could make a tape for him. We met in private, but the event wasn't taped in the end The use of "cuck" as an insult statistically indicates one or more of the following: sexual insecureness, racism, moderate right wing conservatism, fascism, ignorance, protracted adolescence.
|
|
|
I guess part of it, I refuse to be the sexual property of another, so it would be pretty messed up for me to demand it the other way.
I see things the same way. However, most of the women I had deals with don't care a bit about being free (as in "not sexual property"). They just care about getting the exclusive rights, and are ready to give up their sexual freedom for it - at least in the relationship negotiation phase. There might be truth in the evolutionary explications for this kind of behavior.
|
|
|
How are we not designed to work 24/7? That's what people were doing when they lived in the woods and that has changed only fairly recently as far as I'm aware.
Well, but we didn't live as long back then. (hope I didn't mess up with the quote attribution)
|
|
|
Been away a couple of days, the backlog of unread pages is overwhelming. What if we had been mooning already? I cringe.
|
|
|
It's also quite sad that financial literacy isn't being taught in schools, not even electively. And it could be easily taught in playful ways that anybody could pick up on too.
Agreed. But along with basic financial literacy coursework, the book "Rich Dad Poor Dad" should be required reading. Great book. I like your reads!
|
|
|
... And I don't even want to start thinking about reviving that squalid goofy business with our pants...
What squalid goofy business with your pants don't you want to revive? STOP IT! I'm trying to forget. It's still grinding my aching gears, as PG would say.
|
|
|
not as good as suchmoon. it's a learning process. sad edit: don't ride him, man. he's the only mayor we got. Thank you. I'll try to go easy on the Mayor. But but but... my pants... uhhh, fk, forget about that. Try to, at least. Merited for self-celebration anyway
|
|
|
Aha! I knew! FOUND IT (proud ) We need a wordy man meme....
You are such a fucking pain in the ass, PoolMinor.
Your whole point seems to be that you want to make a BTC price prediction; however, you cannot just come out and make your supposedly marvelous prediction like a normal person. Instead, you want to get some kind of credit and praise and begging and DRAMA regarding how amazing your are, and therefore, you are trying to suggest that you had been correct about some thing BTC related in the past that you saw in a past BTC price trned/prediction from a year and a half ago, and so therefore there is some kind of connection in your logic or the charts or some kind of smartness that you supposedly have about today that is connected with your previous supposed smartness?
(...)
|
|
|
We need a wordy man meme....
Epic...lol! You’re good my friend! Damn ,I couldn’t find that one on the google... Sounds a bit like old JJG
|
|
|
Sorry folks, I'm sure it won't happen again. With all due respect, Mayor, can you please stop fucking with us? This Rosewater business - kidnapped, no, he's just hiding, no, it's my (millionaire BMB's) alter ego... it's exhausting. And I don't even want to start thinking about reviving that squalid goofy business with our pants... EDIT - This is my post #666. Mean anything?
|
|
|
What the fuck is going on with the mempool ? Good lord.
We have fucking wormsign. For sure this time.
D: what the fuck is that ? Blockchain.info bug and then mempool size double ? Edit : Are we facing a mempool attack ? Look at all the 1-2 sat/byte transactions... https://dedi.jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24hRoger probably just got his wittle panties in a wad again over the whole "Bitcoin Core" shit.... so he sicced his attack dogs on the Bitcoin mempool again, lmao. This time it might be something more substantial. If it's Roger "dont call it bcash, I'm a millionaire" Ver, his timing is not that good.
|
|
|
Volume surging. Buckle up gents, I have reason to believe it will be a long, choo-choo weekend.
|
|
|
What the fuck is going on with the mempool ? Good lord.
We have fucking wormsign. For sure this time.
One of us (Jojo?) noted that mempool activity is a decent predictor of price activity. I can't find the post in this huge thread though.
|
|
|
It's over 9000! No vegeta around here? Must we have pretty pictures on every single page? Uh well, a few curves now and then wouldn't be totally out of place methinks.
|
|
|
ETFs easier to trade then cryptos. Lmao. For the normies, it might be actually. And for the whale stock traders that want to use 1000X leverage, lol. The issue in my opinion is all crypto ETFs should be crypto (as opposed to fiat) backed.
|
|
|
ETFs easier to trade then cryptos. Lmao. For the normies, it might be actually.
|
|
|
Why do we always need to wait for Zerohedge to start posting to know what the reason for the pump is. Are there no "insiders" on here ? No. It's because robo-trading on technicals. "Reason" is made up and completely irrelevant. Agree. It's just a little negative (minus) FUD, which as we know has less impact than positive (actual) FUD, which as we know has relative impact. It smells technical, definitely.
|
|
|
Who remembers having WO page:btc parity
Easy, my friend. We all do. In due time. Just keep posting
|
|
|
Business Insider, hm. I wonder if this is a $500 article or a $1000 article. In other terms, has it been paid 0.055 or 0.11 BTC?
|
|
|
Here we go? 11k in the weekend?
|
|
|
|