Sooner or later, yes, unfortunately. But I'm still good - I haven't sold grandma yet.
|
|
|
I hope (and believe) we will see the last dip today, before going up again for an extended period. The bottom, as they say. I set my orders accordingly.
Same here. My last hopelessy-low-will-never-get-filled buy order got almost half filled. Undecided if I should place another just 50$ lower. Hmmm... maybe not until this one gets cleared. On a related note, please keep posting, everyone! The more we post (especially memes with TITS!), the better we'll be off when we're back to WOPC parity later this year.
|
|
|
I think a lot of these people bitching about scaling have never run a full node.
Surely, you mean a "full-validating, non-mining node"? Asks our wordsmith colleague jbreher.
|
|
|
Well, most is, but some is a little off. As an example, I agree adoption is the main point, but I haven't heard about bugs biting and making developers lose testnet funds recently. Also, the route-finding problem is exaggerated. It is impossible to guarantee an optimal (shortest) route is found, but quite feasible to find just any route. If channels live long enough, a store-and-forward policy could take care of that. Also, opening and closing channels can become much cheaper with some new proposed pooling/batching protocols. You just open many channels at once and share the fees. Things will only get better with Schnorr signatures. <tinfoil>Do you know/can you find out the guy's track record? It sounds a bit like undercover shilling.</tinfoil>
|
|
|
As noted by another poster, our guy Masterluc got his account on TradingView disabled. (yesterday at 12:37 pm) TradingView busted me whether it's the account, or the ideas. I do not know what I broke there. Well, fck them.
Where is that quote from Masterluc taken from? cause his account on bitcointalk was hacked the other day If's from VKontakte, his main outlet recently. https://vk.com/bitcoin_vanga
|
|
|
As noted by another poster, our guy Masterluc got his account on TradingView disabled. (yesterday at 12:37 pm) TradingView busted me whether it's the account, or the ideas. I do not know what I broke there. Well, fck them.
|
|
|
My previous low-too-low limit buy got filled, but in the meantime I slipped one more in. I won't be satisfied the rise has begun until I have at least one low buy order left unfilled! hahahahahahaha... I have seen several of your posts on this topic, and it seems that you just keep adding another one as soon as the lowest as fuck one gets filled, and then you have a new lowest as fuck buy order... self-fulfilling prophecy that is going to be true no matter what, right?.. It's a bilt like your 'buy on the way down' gospel, seasoned with a bit of gambler's spice (look for the bottom just for sports). unless we go to zero, then you will have to set them in the negative territory (just for the record, I don't think we are going to zero, and especially not to the negative price territory.. Is that too bullish of me?).
Negative territory... you get paid to get bitcoin. Definitely not too bullish. Not happening anyway, I tend to agree
|
|
|
It doesn't really imply all Nobel prizes for Economics are bunk. Not all prizes have been awarded to politically skewed theories of strict neo-Keynesian observance. As a good example, I'm thinking of K. Arrow's impossibility theorem (1972 prize).
|
|
|
It's all about normalized merit TERA.
I just mentally subtract a person's starting point.
I do the same, it's quite obvious isn't it?
|
|
|
My previous low-too-low limit buy got filled, but in the meantime I slipped one more in. I won't be satisfied the rise has begun until I have at least one low buy order left unfilled!
|
|
|
Tera isn't actually a one-way permabear IMHO. More like a cynical contrarian skeptic.
In other circles, they would just say "troll". I'm above that. (Badly missing an angel smiley.) Say "cynical contrarian skeptic" 3 times fast.
sinikalkontrarianskeptiksinikalkontrarianskeptiksinikalkontrarianskeptik I got my tongue twisted and tied. So what?
|
|
|
Masterluc thinks it's over. Well, so the present drop ends somewhere in the red circle. So, the price hit somewhere close to 61.7% Fibonacci of the entire growth from 150 to 19800. You know what it means? That the Third (wave?) is completed and we became its witnesses =) For this, congratulations to you. What's next? Next is the Fourth (going on now). And then the Fifth somewhere in the area of 100k. The current drop will bounce back very well into the area of 13,000-15,000 in the short term, where those who bought up on my advice will be able to sell off, but have already managed to curse everything and wet the diapers. Bleed there, because it is not for you. The critical level at 7700 does not really matter anymore, because I see that the wave is over. Well, here's my idea for trading watching https://ru.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/hg0S8xjw-historical-3-looks-to-be-completed/
|
|
|
I guess the cynical contrarian stance makes her a better trader than most around here.
It's likely. In one of her later posts, she wrote something to the effect that a good trader should be highly unpopular. Now the logical implication doesn't work in reverse of course, but she is somewhat unpopular here, isn't she?
|
|
|
Bitcoin is unique in that most of the traders are tied into being in one of two positions - either btc or usd. There arent a bunch of other stocks and asset classes for them to trade. They're not leaving the market. They're staying on the bitcoin exchanges with an eagle eye on the chart and soon as there is a hint of a reversal they have to all pile back in at once because if theyre on the wrong side of the market then theyre losing and wasting their time on high risk exchanges.
Something which, with some goodwill, could be interpreted as bullish from Tera? REVERSAL CONFIRMED! Tera isn't actually a one-way permabear IMHO. More like a cynical contrarian skeptic.
|
|
|
as soon as a transaction rate exceeds that of a regular bank, why using bitcoin?
Because you can send them to any address you like. Try doing that with banks, Visa etc.
|
|
|
Last from ML (Google translate) 1. Volumes fall, the subwave overlaps 2. A counter-trend continuation pattern is formed (flag) 3. Flashcross 50% for a month there are only bear traps. The present bloating is slow and painful 4. Weekly ma20 is not broken (by closing) for the time being 5. Did not climb into the zone of the previous wave ~ 7700
The situation and the truth is strange, but I'm still convinced that this is not a long blowoff.
|
|
|
Judging by the quotes I see, our old friend r0ach is spending most of his day composing his usual Nazi rants. No surprise.
What's more novel, though, is this crowd of bears that were long gone and come back without fail in times of descending prices. I wonder where they were during the latest series of ATHs. Of course this is an open discussion - possibly the most open on Bitcointalk, so everyone is welcome as long as they can contribute to the exchange of ideas.
I have one prayer, though. Don't clog the toilet again, please. It would be appreciated if you could manage your number twos and come here on empty bowels. It's getting smelly really fast.
|
|
|
This might be the last shake. Down to ~8.5k probably.
If the hodlers stay strong, I doubt there will be a shake into the 8k$ range. Makes sense. I could agree, but volumes are so small that high-mid 8000's seem feasible.
|
|
|
This might be the last shake. Down to ~8.5k probably.
|
|
|
I love the action here when everything goes red, this place feels so alive during such times.
carolina times are much more fun. I miss the tittiness very much!
|
|
|
|