Any development of an AMD miner? I cannot understand why Claymore has not jumped all over ZHash algo with a miner. Great opportunity for him and his dev fee  which most of us would be ok with..... Those mining software developers are so dirty rich by now that they will never have to work. We all look at these "early adopters" who hoarded coins in 2014 when everything crashed and suddenly became rich in late 2017. But I'm pretty sure these software developers are way, way richer. |
|
|
|
Good stuff but who comes up with these names? KioskZ?  People underestimate how important a name is. |
|
|
|
|
Is EXMO faking volume on CMC? They have considerably more volume than TradeSatoshi according to CMC, but look at sell/trader orders:
EXMO:
BTCZ buy order: 1 BTC
BTCZ sell order: 7.560.018 BTCZ
TradeSatoshi:
BTCZ buy order: 9 BTC
BTCZ sell order: 26.444.673 BTCZ
I see no reason to use EXMO because they barely have any orders up compared to TradeSatoshi.
|
|
|
|
Withdrawal fee at EXMO is 0.005 BTC ca 1500 BTC @ 32 Satoshi WTF. Although, this punishes only those who very often mine and dump. |
|
|
|
That fork was an act of greed disguised as the opposite. Centralization paved the way.
Next generation will learn from the mistakes.
Elaborate. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry to burst the bubble but the price is up because someone is buying BTCZ with USD and paying big money.
Exrates BTCZ/USD $29,943 $0.002749
The rest is trading as normal:
Exrates BTCZ/BTC $16,107 $0.001474 20.95% Recently
Exrates BTCZ/ETH $15,278 $0.001511 19.87% Recently
Stocks.Exchange BTCZ/BTC $12,063 $0.001542 15.69% Recently
|
|
|
|
|
No issues at all with 1.4 wallet here.
I transferred large amounts before (100k) and lately around 30-50k, no problems at all. But I did not try from T to Z.
|
|
|
|
|
Man, the bubble truly burst. Fortunately one of my coins (Waves) did hold its value well, its ATH was $17, currently $3.7, so not that bad, but some coins went down 95% and we're not talking shit coins, we're talking promising coins with active, dedicated developers (Shift, COSS, SunContract).
The only option is to hold. I'll hold everything except Waves. It does hold its value well, but its value is hardly increasing even when big things happen. It's a competitor to Ethereum and Ethereum has a snowball effect. It just keeps getting bigger and bigger and no one cares about their competitors (look at NEO).
|
|
|
|
Interesting how quickly after fork profit came to almost identical levels as few days ago, even without ASIC's and AMD GPU's ASICs didn't always mine BitcoinZ. Also, with higher profitability, GPU mining farms like NiceHash switch to BitcoinZ. Considering there are no ASIC and no AMD than this still should be more profitable but it isnt:) Your claim is false. According to my calculations, my profitability is about twice as much as before the algo change. I have already mined (less than 18 hours since midnight - when I started calculating) a lot more coins than what I used to mine during the 24 hour period before the change. I get almost the same amount of coins as before the fork. I am happy with resoult because there will be less dumps after price increases. I just got 9250 coins over 24h period. My June average before the fork is 6000. So a bit over 50% increase. Well, your calculation explains it - we just have different perspectives of profitabillity TBH, up until this morning it was really above average, but in last 14 hours it settled on almost identical levels as before zhash fork. We'll see how it will came after AMD cards get on train ... Edit: Global hashrate is currently droping and profitability is on rise again ... Not sure what you're trying to say. I mine and hoard, not mine and dump. So if I earn more coins, it's better for me, the current price is irrelevant. |
|
|
|
Interesting how quickly after fork profit came to almost identical levels as few days ago, even without ASIC's and AMD GPU's ASICs didn't always mine BitcoinZ. Also, with higher profitability, GPU mining farms like NiceHash switch to BitcoinZ. Considering there are no ASIC and no AMD than this still should be more profitable but it isnt:) Your claim is false. According to my calculations, my profitability is about twice as much as before the algo change. I have already mined (less than 18 hours since midnight - when I started calculating) a lot more coins than what I used to mine during the 24 hour period before the change. I get almost the same amount of coins as before the fork. I am happy with resoult because there will be less dumps after price increases. I just got 9250 coins over 24h period. My June average before the fork is 6000. So a bit over 50% increase. |
|
|
|
|
Why do you insist on forking a shitcoin?
|
|
|
|
Does anyone knows what will Suncontract benifit from this "Intersolar Europe"? Any plans or just introduction of project.
The most important benefit is a direct conversation with European Commission Representatives and establishing new partnerships with biggest energy players on the world. Just check out who will be present on the event: LINK TO EXHIBITORS LISTThat list is way too long to go through Go out there and change the world! |
|
|
|
Interesting how quickly after fork profit came to almost identical levels as few days ago, even without ASIC's and AMD GPU's ASICs didn't always mine BitcoinZ. Also, with higher profitability, GPU mining farms like NiceHash switch to BitcoinZ. Considering there are no ASIC and no AMD than this still should be more profitable but it isnt:) Your claim is false. According to my calculations, my profitability is about twice as much as before the algo change. I have already mined (less than 18 hours since midnight - when I started calculating) a lot more coins than what I used to mine during the 24 hour period before the change. |
|
|
|
Interesting how quickly after fork profit came to almost identical levels as few days ago, even without ASIC's and AMD GPU's ASICs didn't always mine BitcoinZ. Also, with higher profitability, GPU mining farms like NiceHash switch to BitcoinZ. |
|
|
|
Got my 3 rigs running (not sure how stable)
Rig 1:
1xGTX 1080Ti
+100 core
+700 mem
Power: 100%
60 SOLs
Rig 2:
6xGTX 1060 3GB
+190 core
+500 mem
Power: 79%
122 SOLs (~20.3 each card)
Rig 3:
7xGTX 1060 3GB
+200 core
+500 mem
Power: 74%
138 SOLs (~19,7 each card)
You have good performance on 1060 3go, memory goes up high, what kind of memories do they have? You can find out with GPU Z  Actually, it's the crappy ones with Hynix memory. 10 of them are Asus Phoenix mini 1060 3gb and 3 are Gigabyte Windforce mini 1060 3gb. I don't know why people talk about memory on Equihash algo. It's not ETHhash and is not as memory dependant. Equihash is more dependant on GPU frequency. Going from +700 mem to -502 mem on my 1080Ti, I lose about 5-6 SOLs (60 > 55). Anyway, when I mine with my 1080Ti, I can't watch 1080p movie, it's lagging. This didn't happen with ccminer :/ |
|
|
|
|
Got my 3 rigs running (not sure how stable)
Rig 1:
1xGTX 1080Ti
+100 core
+700 mem
Power: 100%
60 SOLs
Rig 2:
6xGTX 1060 3GB
+190 core
+500 mem
Power: 79%
122 SOLs (~20.3 each card)
Rig 3:
7xGTX 1060 3GB
+200 core
+500 mem
Power: 74%
138 SOLs (~19,7 each card)
|
|
|
|
My 1080Ti is mining with 54 SOL but I keep getting rejected shares from suprnova. Why is that? The bat file is like this: miner --algo 144_5 --pers ZERO_PoW --server btcz.suprnova.cc --port 6586 --user XXXXXXXXXX
pause I tried with both 144_5 and 192_7, both give 100% rejected shares. Edit: Figured out it. You need to write "BitcoinZ" instead of "ZERO_PoW". That or the new 0.2 version solved the problem. 1080Ti is not at 61 SOL. Do you happen to know the best MSI Burner settings for 1070? Im getting about 10% ejected shares and my SOLs are only 28.5 for 1070. Thanks! I don't have a 1070, sorry. But you might want to try lower your oc and see if it helps with rejected shares. Also, try new nvidia drivers. I'm in the process of making this work with my other rigs. The first rig with 1080Ti is working fine at about 59-61 SOL. The second rig which has 7x1060 3GB is hashing about 130-135, which does not make me happy since with old miner, my 1080Ti was hashing about 780 SOL while 7x1060 rig hashed 2000 SOL, that is 250% of 1080Ti hash rate. With the new miner, it's about 210% |
|
|
|
My 1080Ti is mining with 54 SOL but I keep getting rejected shares from suprnova. Why is that? The bat file is like this: miner --algo 144_5 --pers ZERO_PoW --server btcz.suprnova.cc --port 6586 --user XXXXXXXXXX
pause I tried with both 144_5 and 192_7, both give 100% rejected shares. Edit: Figured out it. You need to write "BitcoinZ" instead of "ZERO_PoW". That or the new 0.2 version solved the problem. 1080Ti is not at 61 SOL. |
|
|
|
1060 3GB doesnt work  Try editing with 144_5. Open run.bat and change 192_7 to 144_5. |
|
|
|
|
I'm going to sleep.
You guys fucked up pointing us to EWBF with his 2% fee that goes NOWHERE but in his own pockets.
Also, trying his miner shows my 1080Ti mining 30SOL, which is equal to 1070, lol. I don't even want to know how much my 13x1060 3gb will perform.
What a freaking mess. I will mine something else until this shit is sorted out.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
