It's probably made of cardboard, just to fool the enemy.
And why would they try to fool the enemy with decoy air defense on a roof in Moscow..... This will probably come as surprise to you, but New York, Washington etc also have air defense systems around them |
|
|
|
I don't think all would be that stupid or brave enough, but it seems you might be right.
Right now, they fear their tsar more than their own death.
One thing is for sure, most if not all Rashists will have to be eliminated. Just like the Nazis in Germany during WWII.
Russia, Iran, and North Korea's combined production capacity is no match against the Western military powerhouse.
This war will last for as long as Peter the Gopnik is alive.
They fear west invasion, and history say they're right about that. Treatment of Russia by USA and their EU vassals since breakup of USSR confirms their fears too. Unfortunately, USA currently owns much more soft power (USD printing machine been the most powerful part) that Russia could oppose it only by military That is the world we live in |
|
|
|
Glad to know you are revisiting expectations. It will take a few iterations of "victories by retreating" until you find out that war is costly, but for everyone. The only winner on this war is the US.
"He who fights and runs away, lives to fight another day." This is especially true when it is strategically planned... Soledar. The US will win, but not the way most people think. The US will win by its people being released from the warmongers among their leaders... the warmongers who are creating the Ukraine war.  Initially, I thought Russia will stop its aggression when 200K of its soldiers will be dead, but now I think it will take 3-5M of dead Russians to stop this clusterfuck. This war will continue for another 5-10 years or until the "Star-eek" dies or is killed. Russians can't afford to lose this war, so they will probably all die before giving up |
|
|
|
Ukraine did not have, does not have and will not have a chance in confrontation with Russia. Any tactical success is simply an increase in the number of deadweight losses
So what's the difference between a "confrontation with Russia", where Ukraine never has a chance and a "tactical success" like, for example, defending their Capital city from Russia or recapturing hundreds of square miles of land that Russia had occupied for months. What do you think the worst case scenario for Russia is 1 year from now? Worst will probably be having to resort to nukes |
|
|
|
https://www.freilich-magazin.com/welt/kollabiert-die-ukraine-in-den-naechsten-wochen"In a recent analysis, the Estonian secret service also warns that the Ukrainians could run out of supplies and reserves in the near future. According to this, the Russian side could soon send 200,000 new soldiers to the front – but they had up to 30 million reservists at their disposal. At the same time, the Ukrainians ran out of soldiers. On the Ukrainian side, people over 60 are drafted anyway."
|
|
|
|
For those who are saying that Russian economy is doing fine: Their budget deficit in 2022 was 3.35 trillion rubles or $47.3 billion. Only year when it was worse was covid affected 2020. But everything is fine, nothing didn't happened and only Europe is freezing to cold this winter https://t.me/donbasscase/10205Russian general "Armageddon" Surovikin, who was supposed to turn the shitshow around but ended up giving up Kherson and wasting missiles on transformers, has been demoted from the position of the commander of the "special operation". The new commander is Valery Gerasimov (Chief of the General Staff), who seems to get a lot of hate in the Z-channels for alleged corruption and incompetence. I doubt this will improve anything for the Russian forces. Maybe Gerasimov will be the fall guy. Also, they promoted Aleksandr Lapin to cheff of Ground Forces. I just remind that Lapin got lot of hate in Russia after retreat from Lyman As I understand it, a cauldron was formed there for at least 400 fighters of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, who heroically continue to resist without much chance of success after losing control over the dominant height. Good job Wagner.
After long months of negative success and some glorious retreats, Russia finally achieved something... Do you still dream about taking Kyiv? That would put Russia at #15 spot on this list, hardly bad for country in war https://countryeconomy.com/deficit |
|
|
|
Russian general "Armageddon" Surovikin, who was supposed to turn the shitshow around but ended up giving up Kherson and wasting missiles on transformers, has been demoted from the position of the commander of the "special operation". The new commander is Valery Gerasimov (Chief of the General Staff), who seems to get a lot of hate in the Z-channels for alleged corruption and incompetence. I doubt this will improve anything for the Russian forces. Maybe Gerasimov will be the fall guy. NATO in Serbia did nothing but wasted missiles on transformers, bridges, buses, hospitals etc for weeks...and it worked in the end |
|
|
|
Probably because West wants their resources, so they sent Germany in WW1, then Lenin to make revolution, then supported bloodshed that ensued
in civil war, then sent Hitler, then sent Chicago boys and now sent Zelensky...hard to develop when big chunk of the world is working against that
all the time
Do you mean the USA in the west or a combination of some western countries? I don't get it, which country or part of countries sent Germany in WW1? So, as you say, the west sent Germany in WW1 to get Russia's resources but instead were helping them against the Germany, right? Do you find any logic here? I don't remember the west helping Germany against the Soviet Union, so idk what's in your mind. Its a bit more complicated, as its how the game is been played. People are writing books about the subject I recommend https://ia902904.us.archive.org/5/items/F.WilliamEngdahlCenturyOfWar/F.%20William%20Engdahl%20-%20Century%20of%20War.pdfand  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btF6nKHo2i0 |
|
|
|
Lol, NY Times, PR wing of US Army Meanwhile https://socialbites.ca/politics/146958.html"currently the leaders of EU countries are afraid of “caused discontent” by the United States or “blackmailed” by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky." - French EP MP Thierry Mariani |
|
|
|
in terms of GDP, Russia rose from 11th to 9th place in the world over the year
So the internets is telling me Russia is the largest country in the world (by a lot). And they have more resources than any other country (by a lot). So...why are they barely cracking the top 10 in countries by GDP?  Probably because West wants their resources, so they sent Germany in WW1, then Lenin to make revolution, then supported bloodshed that ensued in civil war, then sent Hitler, then sent Chicago boys and now sent Zelensky...hard to develop when big chunk of the world is working against that all the time |
|
|
|
 Ordinary day in Ukraine |
|
|
|
Ripple ATH has been 5$ Where? Are you ok, bro? He has to inflate it to boost his point  |
|
|
|
It will be a great success if Europe manages to avoid a big war next year. Everything that is happening in Ukraine now is, by and large, not a story about Ukraine, it is a struggle for the redistribution of spheres of influence in Europe. Russia is not satisfied with the current state of affairs, in which Europe is actually occupied by the United States and is under the protection of NATO. According to Russia, this is a threat to its security and generally destabilizes the situation in the region. I think following the results of the special operation in Ukraine, continental Europe will pass under the military protectorate of Russia. That is, Russia will be the guarantor of security in Europe and ensure stability in the region.
be, you are dreaming. Only with an increase of a 1% of GDP in military spending in the EU the military power of Europe would surpass the RF. And that is happening already - guess thanks to who. Not to mention the abundant evidence given by the RF not having most of the claimed capabilities, the number of vehicles, the technology, the manufacturing capacity... This war has evidenced that the RF army is unable to reach any objective even against a theoretically inferior enemy, with a weaker economy and a bad starting strategic situation. For example, and I take this with a "pinch of salt", a brit general recently declared: "I am going to inform Putin of something that his generals do not dare to say: You do not have enough artillery shells for fighting". An American sources says that there's a "critical shortage" of shells and even other war "staples". Instead of dreaming of the great Russia, you should be waking up to the harsh reality of a broken system. Before Iraq attacked them, Kuwait had (by invested dollars) one of strongest militaries in the world. However, they all flee once Iraq attacked. You can't buy courage and will to fight |
|
|
|
And, its very convenient, you can freely go and kill one yourself, as everyone will blame Putin...isn't that great opportunity or what? |
|
|
|
They're stupid, they keep billions in american banks, and those banks can hire hitmen to kill them,
keep money, knowing they're excused because morons will blame it on Putin
The bank doesn't get your money when you die, unless you designate the bank as your beneficiary, which would be quite weird. There is your grandma money, and there is dirty money that banks are laundering for people like that Russian. Your grandma money is safe, but that Russian guy and Tony Montana money are not Did any western bank returned Gadaffi family money, or Marcos or Mubarak money? Noriega maybe? |
|
|
|
^^^ Are these coincidences? So we see that it is not Russia who is the aggressor. I know, it seems weird, but maybe Putin ran out of polonium or novichok. They're stupid, they keep billions in american banks, and those banks can hire hitmen to kill them, keep money, knowing they're excused because morons will blame it on Putin |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
