I have a windows version, one4many,.. as I posted above, are we on the same chain?
And if so, which files do these guys need
Great ... it looks like we (you and me) are on the same chain ... current block in my client is: 8216 [EDIT: 8217 now] So they need all .dat files from your Philosopherstone data directory ... WITHOUT wallet.dat and peers.dat All the best! one4many |
|
|
|
yeah, thats to much trouble. i want my money back Moray
Hmmm .... It is actually none of my business and I couldn't care less about your LTC's ... BUT ... If he sent you the coins using the correct chain, it is your responsibility to maintain an up-to-date client and not his. He did nothing wrong. On the other hand, if he is/was on the wrong chain ... then he should send the LTC's back to you. Just my 0.000005 (worthless) PHS's  |
|
|
|
I got the runaway exception too. The db.log said something about it happening copying between environments. Was the blockchain made in Linux, and fails in Windows?
Yes it was made on Linux ... sorry I forgot to mention this. |
|
|
|
i did what you said and i get a runaway exception error when i run philosopherstone with the new blockchian
Hmmm ... can you post your exception! Thx! Alternatively you can - delete your philosopherstone data directory (AFTER backing up wallet.dat) - start the 1.2.0.0 client ... it will immediately stop again with the usual message ... - create a new philosopherstone.conf file (don't for get the nodes!) - delete the dat files (except the empty wallet.dat file) and the files in the database directory (NOT the directory itself) - copy in the files from the zip file - start philosopherstoned again ... let it catch up with the chain - stop philosopherstoned - delete the empty wallet.dat - copy in your wallet.dat - start philosopherstoned YOU SHOULD BE FINE! one4many |
|
|
|
Hi guys, here for everyone who is stuck in the wrong fork. This ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/koc5o9akrfva9ug/PhiloBlockchain-8190.zip) is a backup of my blockchain which was at the time at a block around 8190. Here some proof that I'm on "the right" fork: hero ~ # ./philosopherstone/src/philosopherstoned getinfo
{
"version" : "v1.2.0.0",
"protocolversion" : 60006,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : x.x,
"newmint" : x.xx,
"stake" : x.xx,
"blocks" : 8196,
"moneysupply" : 797097.47749300,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "x.x.x.x",
"difficulty" : 1.41826091,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1375034668,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.01000000,
"errors" : ""
}
additionally a few of my peers which are also on the right fork and not stuck on "the old" 6xxx chain. addnode=24.6.21.198
addnode=46.150.89.173
addnode=64.120.17.149
addnode=70.29.193.48
addnode=125.79.142.201 Some instructions on how to use this backup! - Backup your wallet.dat file and move it out of the Philosopherstone data directory - Verify that you are actually running version 1.2.0.0 using the philosopherstoned getinfo command - Unzip and copy blk*.dat files into your Philosopherstone data directory - Remove any database/log* files and the peers.dat file from your Philosopherstone data directory - Run Philosopherstoned with the addnode entries from above in your conf file - Watch the debug log (tail -f debug.log for example) until the sync has caught up with the current block - Stop Philosopherstoned - copy your wallet into the Philosopherstone data directory - issue Philosopherstone command -rescan to get everything recognized ... YOU SHOULD BE FINE NOW What this does: - Resets the Philosopherstone block database and block database index to the state it was in at the time the snapshot was taken. - With the -rescan command all your transactions should get recognized unless they have been made on the fork ... those will be discarded (they vanish without a trace) Hope this helps! oen4many [EDIT] If this worked for you consider donating a few PHS's to 9gbnW2vwTtUSNtoxhJbAEeW6DjfNQhbApC ... THX! [EDIT2] NOTE This blockchain backup has been made on Linux. It might not work under a windows client (something I don't own .. Thank god  ) |
|
|
|
watching this closely .... maybe I can learn something ... About what? Free bump ... keeping my thumbs pressed! |
|
|
|
watching this closely .... maybe I can learn something ...
|
|
|
|
Lets spice it up. First order to be paid will be @130 - a 10btc discount.
Keep all 5 and mine ... be happy ... Start your auction at 100 each and then you might get lucky. |
|
|
|
No tricks. 500 8-core opteron servers running mikhaels hp8.
I simply took the best scripts from this thread and used some recommendations from members.
Cloud you please share your primecoin.conf settings ... somehow is my 8-core Opteron processor hugely under-performing compared to my XEON quard core. :-/ Thx! one4many Just overclock it. Use mikhael's Linux build so the system uses the most adequate library for your processor. Hmmm .... I get PrimesPerSEc: 5864 ... Chainspermin: 4 Default settings .. no changes to conf file. one4many |
|
|
|
No tricks. 500 8-core opteron servers running mikhaels hp8.
I simply took the best scripts from this thread and used some recommendations from members.
Cloud you please share your primecoin.conf settings ... somehow is my 8-core Opteron processor hugely under-performing compared to my XEON quard core. :-/ Thx! one4many |
|
|
|
Diese Anschaffung zahlt sich im Normalfall immer aus, selbst 2014 (vorausgesetzt BFL entpuppt sich nicht als Ponzischema, was mMn derzeit das größte Risiko an der ganzen Sache ist).
Selbst bei einer Difficulty von 100Mio, bei einer monatlichen Steigerung von 30%, ungefähr 6000W, 0.3ct/kWh, kommst du im ersten Jahr auf mehr als 80.000$ Miningertrag.
Auch mit einer Difficulty von 200Mio ginge es sich noch aus positiv zu bilanzieren.
Das Beste wäre natürlich, sie würden es in Form von Singles ausliefern, die wären einzeln fast 75.000$ wert und du bräuchtest gar nicht mal zu minen um Gewinn zu machen.
Und wenn du schürfst, bei einer Fehlfunktion fällt dann zB nur eine Einheit aus und nicht ein ganzer Rig.
Ähm wo gibts die kWh für 0.3 Cent bitte???  |
|
|
|
Jetzt noch zu bestellen lohnt sich doch gar nicht mehr. Die kommen doch bestimmt erst im Frühjahr 2014 an
Wenn überhaupt ^^ Das ist ja die große Frage. An welcher Stelle ich mit meiner Bestellung noch stehen würde. Ne Lieferzeit wird Dir garantiert nicht verraten. Da aber nach PAYDATE (Bezahldatum) geliefert wird, bist Du damit zu 100 % der letzte der so ein Teil bekommt. Bestell-NR bei BFL ist völlig irrelevant. one4many |
|
|
|
@Yifu, dont hold back the chips , this have no sense. Think forward and send the chips.
+1 |
|
|
|
If primecoin proof of work is just probability of being prime, so how can you prove that a found blocked is really a prime number ?
I like your avatar |
|
|
|
[.... some stuff deleted ... irrelevant to my question ...]
..., but the facts at the moment are BFL is the only ASIC company shipping consumer devices in any reasonable quantity/hashrate. If the BE's drop to .6 BTC, they might see a return on their investment, but I doubt it even then.
Yepp ... you are shipping ... a huge backlog ... but shipping at last ... Anyhow .. BE's dropped to 0.45-0.55 BTC, I'm not sure if you are aware of it, see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263577.0 (actually shipping tomorrow ) and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263587.0So when is the next price drop at BFL going to happen? Thx |
|
|
|
Guys.....
The deal has been done, people have been paid. Get over it and move onto other investments.
"The deal is done, people have been paid." People (IE, ME) have also lost a LOT of money. Hard to get over it when I see people in here praising a scammer. Your money just has somebody else ... This also happens on FIAT stock exchanges. Nothing different here ... Bad luck ... so move on and stop crying. |
|
|
|
Something seems to be seriously wrong here: # spots/src/spotsd getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 1894,
"currentblocksize" : 1454,
"currentblocktx" : 1,
"difficulty" : 3.20559702,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 10316,
"networkhashps" : 77935380,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"testnet" : false
} And out of the logs: trying connection 194.141.43.4:4588 lastseen=82.5hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 174.107.165.198:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
trying connection 65.29.242.236:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
trying connection 174.50.248.26:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 173.228.105.207:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connect() failed after select(): No route to host
trying connection 184.162.218.92:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 193.40.150.210:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
trying connection 218.104.38.98:4588 lastseen=9.6hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
trying connection 89.29.69.214:4588 lastseen=5.4hrs
Flushed 294 addresses to peers.dat 2ms
connection timeout
trying connection 193.40.150.210:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
trying connection 68.41.11.231:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 50.149.211.203:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 84.187.121.13:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
trying connection 92.90.17.129:4588 lastseen=0.9hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
trying connection 69.140.55.237:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 69.85.86.195:4588 lastseen=354078.6hrs
trying connection 173.228.105.207:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
connect() failed after select(): No route to host
trying connection 174.50.248.26:4588 lastseen=1.9hrs
trying connection 69.85.86.195:4588 lastseen=354078.6hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
trying connection 68.103.6.158:4588 lastseen=354078.6hrs one4many |
|
|
|
one4many I guess no need to rush with chips... I will let you know if I end up needing them...
Sure no problem! I'll be on standby All the best! one4many |
|
|
|
I want to take a retail TP-Link 703n and use it in an Avalon Batch #2 (1.52 controller board).
I will try this with a USB extender cable and the 703N outside the enclosure, so I will use the PCB antenna.
The retail 703n receives power from the micro USB connector. I am assuming that I can connect the power adapter to this connector, and the USB extender cable back inside the Avalon.
Does anyone know whether this will create a problem? I have hear opinions both ways, but not from anyone that I think has read a schematic or done a test.
I guess you will run into memory problems, 64 MB RAM is needed as a minimum. If you need a replacement for your existing one I would say safe the trouble and talk to the bitmine.ch guys. They are willing to sell you (a modified, ready to go) one if you ask nicely All the best! one4many |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
