Leute, wir sind Zeugen historischer Entwicklungen und Gleisstellungen "Eliten" mit aktuellem Finanzsystem und ihrem Gefrickel (siehe auch Yellen, Draghi, Deutscher Bank und Griechenland) vs. Software-Demokratie und OpenSource mit ihrem Codegefrickel (Bitcoin und Blockgroessendiskussion) Bin echt gespannt wer da gestaerkt hervorgehen wird ... LOL Finanzsysteme steuern sich größtenteils von alleine. Alle eingreifenden Mittel wie die der ZB haben nur symbolische Wirkung. Software-Demokratie hat es noch nie gegeben ... OpenSource ist auch nur eine Form des Teilens von Wissen von dem andere profitieren können wenn sie wollen und zwar um einiges mehr als der Author vom Orginalcode.
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification guys. I had no idea there were superblocks. So happy I'm solo mining now.
Hey Rascal, you mentioned that you were working on a proxy for other coins. Hows that going?
Well it's more or less complete I guess but I sort of hit a road block with getting some of the algos to build correctly so I wanted to try to iron that out first but I might just release it anyway and work out the rest later, plus I'm still debating on if I'm going to leave the dev fee or just take it out. Leave the dev fee and the ability to change it from 0 to whatever we want. I left it on for riecoin and will leave it on when I mine scrypt coins. Nothing wrong with getting paid for your work. Totally agree ... most of my miners had the dev fee on while mining RIE on pools. More importantly release the source code! one4many
|
|
|
Another good hope is a group gets together, works out a large chip order and gets a board designed around 'em that can be manufactured as soon as chips arrive.
Not gonna happen. Imagine a large group of greedy people funding such a venture. Something goes wrong, and just delays everything by a month or two (easily done with board manufacturers or just suppliers of electronics (parts, power supplies, etc ... you name it). Hell on earth is gone break loose for the guys who are in charge of the work. It will fail miserably and people will loose a significant part of their investment. The only winners are the suppliers (bitfury, manufacturers and part suppliers) .. The biggest losers the guys who did the work for free for the rest of the "investors" ... A story seen very often here in bitcointalk ... Unless you have everything ready to go already ... boards lying on your table, only missing the bitfury chips ... and even then, if bitfury does not deliver as promised it goes ugly really fast ... Think of the bitmine.ch guys ... they were in that position in 2013.
|
|
|
Now someone please explain to me why at least 10 blocks solved by RiePool were magically assigned to XpoolX in a few seconds!
I just want to know why someone is playing games here!
No games here. Your pools share roughly 50 % of the network. Due to propagation speed of the 1st block found (in the chain of ten) xpoolx's result got accepted by the majority of the network a little faster than the block your pool has found. So the thing is, because xpool's block got accepted and yours not (but the network needed some time to find that out and feed that information back to you) xpoolx already worked on the next block, where as you started on the next block while not knowing for a few seconds that the work done by the miners in your pool is based on your (soon the) orphaned block. So hashpower 'was wasted' on a wrong basis (false block), which gave xpool a slight time advantage to find the next block, where as you had to restart work on the basis of the block which was accepted by the network. This happened (unfortunately) 10 times in a row. And my guess it will always happen when booth of your pools have roughly the same hashpower (between 48 and 52 %) of the while RIC network. That is way a 3rd pool would be quite 'nice' for RIC. Slightly related topic, a form of attack on the blockchain network (and the involved miners) if somebody has more than 50 % hashpower is the following idea. If you have let's say 90 % of the networks hashpower your probability finding a block before anyone else does, is very high (around 90 %). So if you take that hashpower away the rest of the network takes quite a bit longer to find the next block. Imagine the following: You can calculate roughly how long it would take for the rest of the network to find the next block. Let's say 15 minutes in RIC p2p network (just for arguments sake). So you as the evil attacker calculate the block (within 2 minutes), but don't announce it to the network. Instead you keep mining for 10 more minutes, finding 5 more blocks. So just before the others (the 10 % networks share) finds the result and announces it, you announce the all the blocks within a very short time frame (in our example within 5 minutes). You effectively DOS'ed the 10 % of the network and you can start your game from the beginning. Eventually you while loose from time to time in your game, but most of the time you create close to 100 % of all blocks because of your network superiority. The crazy thing is, that you actually don't need 90 % of the networks hash power to carry out the attack, you need just more than 50 %. In the 90 % example, the 10 % guys will give up mining. one4many P.S.: Please stop the cry-baby act and THINK before you write accusations like this.
|
|
|
All low temp heat recovery systems provide such pitiful efficiencies that its just pointless. If they weren't, they'd be strapped to every server in the world. No quite ... there a companies making a living out of it: https://www.cloudandheat.com/en/index.html
|
|
|
it's 14/16nm for sure but the question is who.
I don't think so ... I is just a massive sale of the Antminers going online now. BTW what happened to Spoondoolies beast .. SP50 (or whatever the name was).
|
|
|
Hey guys only 7 votes so far ... take the time and vote please ... The goal would be 30 or 40. one4many
|
|
|
Hi,
ich suche grad einen Altcoin den man noch mit der CPU (Intel, 16core) irgendwie minen kann. (bin im minen so nicht mehr drin, da ich eigentlich nur PoS-Coins noch habe) Da ich aber momentan einen meiner Server übrig habe und der für 3Monate bezahlt ist, wäre das praktisch, so läuft das Ding nicht total sinnlos. Energiekosten sind also egal, Fokus wäre von mir so täglich 10.000sat an Wert (wenn es geht). Hat jemand Vorschläge? Der Coin sollte natürlich noch irgendwo tauschbar sein.
Vielen Dank schon mal für die Hilfe.
Probier mal RIC https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446703.0 mit 16 cores sollte schon was rum kommen.
|
|
|
Bin generell auch gegen solche Grenzen .. aber mal ernsthaft, wie oft habt Ihr in eurem Leben jetzt etwas Bar bezahlt das mehr als 5000 EUR gekostet hat. Ich kann das an einer Hand abzählen.
Das spielt keine Rolle. Zuerst kommt die 5000.- EUR Grenze, dann wird sie gesenkt auf 1000.- und irgendwann auf 200.- Sobald eine solche Grenze im Gesetz verankert ist, ist nicht mehr zu verhindern, dass das Bargeld über kurz oder lang abgeschafft wird. Wehret den Anfängen LOL ... am besten Gold / Silber / Platin etc. auch gleich verbieten ... damit könnte man ja auch 'bar' zahlen ... Diese Politikeraffen reissen auch erst das Maul auf bevor sie nachdenken ... traurig traurig Anyhow .. keep calm and trade bitcoin
|
|
|
Schon gezeichnet und einen Tweet los gelassen ...
|
|
|
Bin generell auch gegen solche Grenzen .. aber mal ernsthaft, wie oft habt Ihr in eurem Leben jetzt etwas Bar bezahlt das mehr als 5000 EUR gekostet hat. Ich kann das an einer Hand abzählen.
Na siehst Du. Und jeder einzelne Fall wird in Zukunft illegal sein, falls ihr das aktzeptiert. Ich für meinen Teil werde auch in Zukunft beliebige Summen in Bar aktzeptieren und bezahlen. Sollte das illegal sein - naja ihr wisst ja: legal, illegal, sch...egal. Naja ... ich denk mal hier geht es um die Wirtschaft und nicht um den Privatmann ... oder irre ich mich da? Dann wär ja der Besitz von 5 k EUR in Bar schon illegal.
|
|
|
Na ist es denn schon soeweit, das der Menschheit nun auch die letzte Freiheit genommen wird, dachte es geschieht erst später War klar das als Ursache die Terror finanzierung gennant wird und bestimmt schon Jahre zuvor so geplannt war, wie könnte es auch anders kommen Im Buch "Die Schock-Strategie" ist echt gut erklärt wie z.B. "Terror" erfunden wurde und genutzt wird um den Willen von einigen wenigen Menschen subtil durchzusetzen. Kann ich echt empfehlen, weise aber darauf hin, dass ein paar Passagen recht trocken sind. Klar kommt es von einigen wenigen Menschen, die neue Weltordnung lässt grüssen und dabei haben die es auch nicht so schwer, alle schlucken mal wieder und kaum einer wehrt sich Bin generell auch gegen solche Grenzen .. aber mal ernsthaft, wie oft habt Ihr in eurem Leben jetzt etwas Bar bezahlt das mehr als 5000 EUR gekostet hat. Ich kann das an einer Hand abzählen.
|
|
|
http://riepool.ovh Seems to be right at 50%, they do have a nice miner though, getting rates all over the place from 2485KH to 850KH (I think 850KH will be my average). What would be a working pool with less power? Tried the links on the page and this seems to be the only one online for me. The KH/s number does not mean anything really. The only valuable triplet to look at is RIC's per day at a certain difficultly. xpoolx should also work reliable, if not PM the user xpoolx (the owner of the pool). Alternatively, if you have enough CPU cores to spare, try solo mining. one4many
|
|
|
It seems the wallet is online again since i received word that someone was able to withdraw. I noticed the news page on the home pages mentions that kumala is aware of the email problem and that it's the fault of a third party software. He claimed he wants to replace it but the news is from august. Might even be august 2014 since cryptostocks does not show any years on any page. Guess accounting would be hard to prove if bitcoin projects wouldn't die so fast that you can be sure that some dates are from a certain year. Guess cryptostocks only was rising because no alternatives were there back in the time. Confirmed, I was able to withdraw some BTC. So the only questions which remains is can cryptostocks still be trusted or do we need another, better, safer, more reliable solution!??? We try to push our issuer to move to counterparty (xcp). It is a great, intuitive and very easy to handle way to handle shares. If i would have known about that before i would have suggested it before. You can bind shares to normal bitcoin addresses, can trade the shares and receive dividends. Pretty easy. So i can suggest checking it out. Here are some good tutorials. The videos are mostly gone but the picture tutorials are great: http://foldingcoin.net/resources/video-tutorials/counterparty-guides/Woow ... wall of text .. but looks very promising. Thank you for the tip. one4many
|
|
|
It seems the wallet is online again since i received word that someone was able to withdraw. I noticed the news page on the home pages mentions that kumala is aware of the email problem and that it's the fault of a third party software. He claimed he wants to replace it but the news is from august. Might even be august 2014 since cryptostocks does not show any years on any page. Guess accounting would be hard to prove if bitcoin projects wouldn't die so fast that you can be sure that some dates are from a certain year. Guess cryptostocks only was rising because no alternatives were there back in the time. Confirmed, I was able to withdraw some BTC. So the only questions which remains is can cryptostocks still be trusted or do we need another, better, safer, more reliable solution!???
|
|
|
Does anyone know what the price of these new chips would be?
Get a mining calculator on the same day the ship is ship-able. Calculate the return the chip generates (at 100 GHash/s) per month with the NEXT (estimated) difficulty. Multiply that number by 8 (this is when it should break even). And there you have it ... the price of one chip. Right now the cost would be: Next est. Difficulty: 1.52542370411e+11 with 100 GH/s per month: 0.01003473 BTC multiplied by 8: 0.08027784 BTC total cost per chip (in a functioning miner ... PSU, housing etc. included) which currently results in 30.45 USD Enjoy! But this calculation was good for 28nm chips, so, you need to divide this number by 16(nm) and multiply it by 28(nm). End result would be $53.28 LOL ... I guess more the other way around when it is based on 28 nm ... divide by 28 and multiply by 16 = 17.41 USD
|
|
|
Does anyone know what the price of these new chips would be?
Get a mining calculator on the same day the ship is ship-able. Calculate the return the chip generates (at 100 GHash/s) per month with the NEXT (estimated) difficulty. Multiply that number by 8 (this is when it should break even). And there you have it ... the price of one chip. Right now the cost would be: Next est. Difficulty: 1.52542370411e+11 with 100 GH/s per month: 0.01003473 BTC multiplied by 8: 0.08027784 BTC total cost per chip (in a functioning miner ... PSU, housing etc. included) which currently results in 30.45 USD Enjoy!
|
|
|
Is there a Riecon calculator you recommend? Esp for a 4770K
Unfortunately not. Best way forward is to choose a pool of your liking (preferably one that does not have a 50+ % network share) and start mining for a day. Difficulty makes a big difference tough. Anything below 1450 gives you quite a bit of RIC, everything above 1550+ signals a lot of CPU power on the net.
|
|
|
not sure what you guys are talking about, but PR simply states "full custom design"
It was mentioned in the CEO's blog that all transistors were laid out by hand. They probably meant the surrounding transistors, around the chip.
|
|
|
|