|
Shit, I have never compiled in osx or a PoS.
I guess you read the build-osx.md and followed instructions, building the correct deps.
The obj files can be funny with memory, but it is an error 4 you get for that, at least in Linux).
Only other thing is there can be issues with the hardware you're using. In the makefile it might say hardware requirements are higher than you have.
Using make -f makefile.osx USE_UPNP=- could be an issue.
I have had daemon's refuse to compile, only to compile with:
make -f makefile.unix
Lastly, sometimes getting rid of the root dir and starting over can solve issues.
And check you are using the correct QT. If it is 4.8, compiling in 5 is a recipe for disaster.
You would have to specify to build in 4.8, and download the correct deps.
Good luck!
|
|
|
|
A few gems about the special features that I have heard so much about.
What's your baseline for comparison? Oh that's right - all the other cryptocurrencies that can inherit all the work and broad testing that's gone into Bitcoin over the past 5.5 years. Makes perfect sense, carry on then. My baseline is that people want things to work when they buy them. When you take a product to market, you ensure it can do basic things. If you don't you are asking your customers to trust that you will solve the challenges faced. You seem to think that XMR can be the biggest pile of shit but is excused all its technical deficiencies because it's a different type of crypto to the glut we already have. That is a bullshit way of thinking, and demonstrates very low expectation, naivety or yet another attempt at deflection. |
|
|
|
|
I guess it is something to do with the makefile.osx.
Have you opened it and checked there is a rule?
OBJS= \
obj/fugue.o \
|
|
|
|
|
these offers are eveywhere, and you still have to pay 5 dollars to get started.
|
|
|
|
|
are you compiling from dir src?
* edit, if so check there is an obj folder, if not:
"mkdir obj"
|
|
|
|
|
A few gems about the special features that I have heard so much about.
"CryptoNote is the technology that allows creation of highly private egalitarian cryptocurrencies. (No sense or nonsense)
"Decimal point has been moved from BCN (18.446 million max supply instead of 184.46 billion). This is purely a UI change – technically there will be 264−1 atomic units (roughly 1019).
"My blockchain doesn’t work^
The first time you mine monero on a machine, you may want to speedup the syncing process by copying the blockchain from a previous machine. The blockchain.bin file is incompatible between Windows and Linux. It is a known problem with the boost library this is using to save the files."
"We are happy to announce a new version script. It now supports blockchain download, but only 64bit though, because we don’t have a clean 32bit provided by a user yet."
"Downloads: Win-64 (Vista and more) • Win-32 (XP) • OS X • Linux"
"Mac
Requires OS X Mavericks (10.9). Please note: this is not Wolf's miner, but LucasJones' which is less powerful."
"Important: this won't work on Windows out of the box! You must install MinGW, which is a tedious task."
"If you let you wallet opened all the time, you may think that you are not receiving any monero. This is because refresh is not automatic. You must either close the wallet and reopen it of, much more elegant, use the refresh command."
monero.cc
|
|
|
|
|
CoinEx with a daemon, surely not?
|
|
|
|
|
It's not bad looking actually. I can do a simple CallmeJake which is great, but expensive if you pay hosting, etc. Plus, just compiling a daemon on a server these days seems very costly. AWS is useless unless you take a paid plan, and even Digital Ocean is playing up and running out of virtual memory on the lower deal offers.
Out of interest, what are you charging monthly?
I'm not in the market at the moment, but others are.
|
|
|
|
all I need help with is compiling it, got mingw and msys on C: on windows. If anyone has the patience to help I thank you very much!
offer a bounty of a couple of BTC, someone will probably talk you through it. (pay after service) fixed. I don't have much Bitcoin either, i'll try cryptocointalk. Maybe if you explain the plan, the algo, the coin count, etc? If you're going straight to Windows without Linux, you'll have an uphill battle. If you have everything in place, including a server, daemon, source code with unique genesis (and the rest), there should be no problem finding someone to help. If you are still working out how a coin is constructed, then you will have issues. |
|
|
|
Wait wasn't it Chinese people that helped propel Bitcoin to its glory days of $1,000+ a coin? I think that the $1300 high was down to a Mr Karpeles, an American, living in Japan. |
|
|
|
|
None of you have anything to say, you attack the poster or divert attention from points of view to ensure threads become petty.
You can't defend Monero at all.
|
|
|
|
well if miners are dumping to break even, then they clearly don't see a future for this coin.
Thanks for the perfect description of the Litecoin ASIC mining scene. Honestly, your replies are silly, especially given i don't have an interest in LTC beyond speculating on it at this low price. |
|
|
|
|
why mine to break even?
There are a number of coins that will make you a small profit, so I don't buy your story, especially given the hype surrounding Monero. it should not be mined and dumped if miners can mine it at slightly under trade price.
|
|
|
|
The volume is another tell-tale sign of it being suspect. It's trading around 100 BTCs a day, yet the price is more or less static. This is coupled with a number of posts on here and at Poloniex about Monero's ranking at Coinmarketcap.
How about the simpler explanation being most of the 100 is the amount mined per day (80 BTC) and given that the mining is close to break even most miners have to sell to pay their expenses? In fact I was looking on one of the big pools yesterday and the two biggest miners there had their coins going directly to poloniex. You can bet those are very likely being sold. What is different from many other coins is that the coins being sold by miners are being actively sought after by investors, keeping the price stable. You may disagree with those investors about the future prospects for Monero but ultimately no one is forcing them to do it. They believe it has a bright future, you don't. That's why there are markets. If you don't think the potential is there, I suggest you stay away. I promote the coin not at all. Anyone who buys it must come to their own conclusions. well if miners are dumping to break even, then they clearly don't see a future for this coin. |
|
|
|
I have no litecoin, I have 50 dogecoin or if anyone wants I can pay them in Envycoin when it's finished.
Try Cryptocointalk rather than here. |
|
|
|
|
It's done?
Best of luck with it ... I know that Windows is biatch to compile in.
Linux is just so simple.
Now you need to get the blockexplorer. :-)
justcallmejake works, but maybe with a day or two of frustration.
*Edit, oh I see the hilarious joke now.
So I guess the above was premature.
|
|
|
|
Dead thread, all points easily disproved above. Move along people.
Monero is the most well-organized pump job I've ever seen. Not only do they have an army of devs and paid fanboys spamming monero 24/7 but they also have the backing on an entire EXCHANGE to help coordinate and strengthen their pumps! (Poloniex, if there was any question). Monero represents the essence of greed and stupidity in the crypto community and although it is one of the more sophisticated scams / Ponzi schemes I have encountered here, it is still a scam / Ponzi nontheless. THINK ABOUT IT: Does ANYBODY care about Monero except for the flaming fanboys and Poloniex? NO!!! - NO real-world application - NO desire to integrate into day-to-day finances - NO long-term plan or evidence the dev team plans on being around even more than 1 year from now. Good post. I've yet to see anything like it, and although there are genuine people that have been manipulated, Monero appears to be a big scam, organised by a handful of people and backed by an exchange. The volume is another tell-tale sign of it being suspect. It's trading around 100 BTCs a day, yet the price is more or less static. This is coupled with a number of posts on here and at Poloniex about Monero's ranking at Coinmarketcap. Allegedly Feathercoin in the early days was buying and selling its own coins, I think this is another case. (allegedly) |
|
|
|
|
I think you need to offer at least a couple of bitcoin, but you might get lucky. A fellow scammer might have a few that he doesn't want anymore.
|
|
|
|
all I need help with is compiling it, got mingw and msys on C: on windows. If anyone has the patience to help I thank you very much!
offer a bounty of a couple of litecoins, someone will probably talk you through it. (pay after service) |
|
|
|
Anyone that buys into your way of thinking is likely to be quite stupid, so I wouldn't expect them to have lots of cash, or to to be able to work out how to use the MSDOS-like client.
I think the point they're making is that Bitcoin has 5.5 years of development, we have a couple of months. It "feels like Bitcoin in 2010" because it's the wild west, rough and raw and unknown and hard to use. I'd hope that in the next 3 or 4 or 5 years the Monero landscape will be vastly different;) I know what the point is, but it applies to every other altcoin. So singling out Monero makes no sense. I could single out twenty promising alts, and use the same line of argument. There is no solid reason to believe Monero will become another Bitcoin. Just because it's possible is not sufficient as an argument. It is possible that Beertokens will get a new dev, and take the coin to the moon. It is possible that there is no external world, and we are just brains in VATS (google it). There are infinite possibilities, and Monero does not appear to be placed in a position where we could say the possibility was a probability. probability is dependent on point of view.. calling the "next bitcoin" is basically enthusiastic and no serious investor will invest based on such statements. crypto note has great potential especially compared to generic clones, which most of alt coins are. Probability is not based on point of view. Some things are improbable, so we can't go down the road of calling the improbable probable. Probability is a term used when there is evidence from normally reliable sources to suggest X will occur. In fact, probability is all we really have. Tomorrow, the sun will probably rise. Don't lump fantasy together with probability. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
