really cheap. when btc (gold) rises, ltc (silver) will follow. money flows.
first, there is no such thing as gold and silver in crypto's, you should check why ppl are investing in physical gold/silver in the first place. second, you should check the recent charts for btc/ltc and you will see that ltc in fact does not follow btc. while btc is rising, ltc is going down and down and down, and the difficulty still rises (because, ASIC ) [ It's a metaphor
|
|
|
It's cheap, but maybe only in terms of against BTC. either could crash back to levels before the insanity of a few months ago.
|
|
|
none ... there are no coins, after the Ripple fiasco, that look promising i real, long-term economic terms. Bitcoin and litecoin are the only that might have a chance.
|
|
|
You add coins all the time, so taking them away makes sense. But let's be honest, and you are when you contradict sentence-1 in sentence-2. This is about free market, not contributing to humanity or science.
|
|
|
I bought this domain, thinking it was a good idea, but honestly have nothing to put on the site Anyone want it?
I'll set a reserve of 1 LTC on it. Give it a week.
litecoin.gl
Just think, you'll be able to capture the market for litecoin sales in Greenland. :-)
|
|
|
yes ltc is the key to the rest of the alts staying afloat. ltc survived previous waves of alts which are dead or so close it isnt funny. it continued survival shows cryptos outside of btc can survive. if it was to die (which isnt going to happen) who'd invest in any alt? that's what the fools plugging their own shitcoin don't seem to get, they think they have to fud others to push their own crap (for which they'll dump anyways if they make enough fiat). none of the latest flavors of the month will survive outside of this forum....ltc would There has never been previous alts that Litecoin has faced like there are now it 2014. It's not comparable at all. Since bitcoin peaked out around $1200 the game as changed and the market is now ultra competitive with new tech and code coming out all the time. That was never the case in the last three years where Litecoin sat virtually unopposed. competitive ? so saturating the scene with useless garbage scam coin clones is competitive ? hmm really go figure who knew ? You (and other Litecoiners) are misinformed if you think all the new coins are garbage scam coins. Some are truly innovative and that is why Litecoin is in the tank. Yeah, I find the complete disrespect and lack of regard for other technologies odd. I wonder if we ever see a time when Bitcoin itself is under threat from legitimate competition that we'll see Bitcoiners acting the same way. What a ridiculous post, and I'm just stumped to be able to reply in terms that you would understand. But focusing on the argument you make, I'd like to ask you a question: When did you last beat your wife?
|
|
|
What is it with the "LTC dead" thing? There seems to be a small semi-literate group spamming the forum. Yet, if we look at the facts, we see the mining difficulty getting higher. We also see that the price against BTC is low, but we can see that this is typical, with BTC/LTC exchange rates. They vary, and over the last 12-months have been between 0.009 and 0.05. There appears to be an average of about 0.025 (a guess).
Really nothing has changed, and bringing the "innovation" card into things is absurd. For a start, BTC is useless in terms of making quick transactions, so it is hardly fit to be anything but the commodity it is. LTC is quicker, but Earthcoin is even quicker and I think VOLT faster still.
Crypto people have proved to be conservative, and until Google or Paypal market a contender, LTC is staying put as the second coin in a sea of shite.
|
|
|
let's get back to the discussion So I think LTC is gonna stick around for a while until a huge company like google or apple decides to being in their own cryptocurrency. LTC is great since it has a lot of volume, but that only lasts so long imo Well spotted, the crypto to take off will be marketed to the people by a corporate giant. Until then, and given that LTC and BTC are entrenched in crypto-culture, with absurdly high difficulty levels, which increase every 2000 or so blocks, there is no reason to assume LTC is finished. It is following the same pattern as ever, currently down on its luck, soon to be pumped when the Whales have picked enough up. One thing is certain, BTC cannot survive beyond the fringe unless the BTC Foundation (or similar) is able to manoeuvre its greedy hands around it, wrap it up, speed it up, claim it is theirs, win intellectual property rights, and sell it to the highest bidder who will immediately regulate all use of it.
|
|
|
DVC, Litecoin, both resonate well with me.
DVC is really ailing at the moment, and I wonder if the rise of cloud mining is responsible.Those extra DVC that people get just getting dumped.
The worst from the list given is Doge, just because it is a silly coin, and was not funny ... ever.
After that, WDC "community" became like a cult, which was creepy .... but what about the rumours of WDC being sold off on the cheap from the ex official facebook? (later claim was that it was hacked).
Last, FTC has the worst name possible, so I can't take it seriously.
Devcoin has many problems. 1. Tons of trolls came after someone that used Devcoin and ended up basically working there and they are horrible people. 2. People get the coins FREE, then they all hold on for dear life. Coins MUST have fluid motion, or it will die. The people that have been writing for coins for 2+ years need to just give a good chunk of them up so that the coin can breathe. 3. The people there only seem to like getting things done when it is in spite of someone. Other than those things, it's a great project. I don't see why they should give their coins up because you think it might serve a greater good. I'm sure there is fluidity, it is mined everyday along with BTC.
|
|
|
DVC, Litecoin, both resonate well with me.
DVC is really ailing at the moment, and I wonder if the rise of cloud mining is responsible.Those extra DVC that people get just getting dumped.
The worst from the list given is Doge, just because it is a silly coin, and was not funny ... ever.
After that, the WDC "community" became like a cult, which was creepy .... but what about the rumours of WDC being sold off on the cheap from the ex official facebook? (later claim was that it was hacked).
Last, FTC has the worst name possible, so I can't take it seriously.
*Edit .. Peercoin, although I don't buy it, was a pretty good innovation.
Plus, XRP was clever, but the development team handled promotions very badly.
|
|
|
New to this, but I have a coin that was never released (the recipient decided he didn't want it).
Can I expect to synch the client if it is 9 months old?
I managed to compile a Linux version and a daemon (2 in fact), so I have connections (3 or 4). But the damned wallet (Windows and Linux) stays at "Catching up 0% done, last block was generated X days ago).
Am I wasting my time? I'm tying to avoid the whole genesis block thing, because this is a never released coin anyway.
Is there a "getaround", like tinkering with checkpoints or whatever?
|
|
|
Alts are all about bullshitting to a great degree, but the lies and misrepresentation where he takes figures plucked from one specific short time, and applies it as a general rule,makes no comparative analysis, then deletes perfectly sensible posts that try to balance his unique approach to the science of economics.
|
|
|
Just talks crap and spread fud on other coins to promote scamcoins he's holding, its that simple, less then zero cred and I wouldn't want that clown supporting any coin I hold He's hardly got anything anyway, so it is equally puzzling what his game is. He claims to be the holder 200 Darkcoin, as if that is somehow impressive. seems to be creating fud for nearly all altcoins even says darkcoin is a scam the main goal get people to fear buying other coins so he can then release his own developed coin, claiming it is the best check the newly created accounts there is one which is very similar to the person behind darkota Which account? I had him down as just some bored teenager. Anyway, I don't think he has any money in alts as such. The fact that he claimed BTC was not the best investment shows he can only be playing with a limited pot. He talks percentages, not dollar earnings and volume. initial failed project https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=489738.msg5396430#msg5396430is a developer, has a liking for sidechains and microtrust http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLoVikMXBeALove the way he tried to get people to send him BTC. Maybe he's that Altcoin Guy, the one that is a specialist, but cannot guarantee that your wallet will not quit! Oh ... the video .... hahaha
|
|
|
It's had it's day, I think.
I spotted that there was a slow dump at 110 (ish), so glad I sold what I had, at a profit.
I really wouldn't buy into it at the moment.
|
|
|
Just talks crap and spread fud on other coins to promote scamcoins he's holding, its that simple, less then zero cred and I wouldn't want that clown supporting any coin I hold He's hardly got anything anyway, so it is equally puzzling what his game is. He claims to be the holder 200 Darkcoin, as if that is somehow impressive. seems to be creating fud for nearly all altcoins even says darkcoin is a scam the main goal get people to fear buying other coins so he can then release his own developed coin, claiming it is the best check the newly created accounts there is one which is very similar to the person behind darkota Which account? I had him down as just some bored teenager. Anyway, I don't think he has any money in alts as such. The fact that he claimed BTC was not the best investment shows he can only be playing with a limited pot. He talks percentages, not dollar earnings and volume.
|
|
|
Just talks crap and spread fud on other coins to promote scamcoins he's holding, its that simple, less then zero cred and I wouldn't want that clown supporting any coin I hold He's hardly got anything anyway, so it is equally puzzling what his game is. He claims to be the holder 200 Darkcoin, as if that is somehow impressive.
|
|
|
why not just set up IRC? You hardcode a node, and you ask people to do whole lot of work.
Or add a few dollars to your price and give people a couple nodes for 6 months.
I don't fully understand. The node is provided to a customer by me , for free. Normally a coin has many nodes after launch and won't need mine. Nonetheless I'm offering it for a period of 1 month. If someone requests the node to run longer that could be arranged. By he way, I'll take a free package, and report back accordingly. If it's good, you will get excellent feedback, here and elsewhere.
Fact is, a lot of people have offered these deals, most have turned out to be fucking awful.
If you are different, then great.
Yes, many of those offering deals have been awful. Hopefully, I won't be one of those . I will hopefully get good feedback from the first two orders who accept 50% off ... these will also be added to my showcase. Your audacity in thinking you can "take" a free package is astonishing and borderline insulting. I may well have considered giving a free package if you approached me nicely and used words such as "please" or "may I " ... like most civilized people. You will not be "taking" anything. Hmm, it was meant in jest, why would I want a free package? You can't even guarantee that your wallets don't just quit. Even I can make altcoins that have wallets that quit.
|
|
|
Bitcoin is useless for investing in...from an investors perspective.
I wouldn't say bitcoin is useless for investing. With so many user around the world and large corporations showing interest, it is the safest crypto for investment. Altcoins offer explosive profits but successful alts are few and far between. You may get 10x gains from one alt while you write off investment for 10 others. It's the safest, but investors who actually want to make money don't opt for the safest. Safe investments are for those who want to make a moderate income monthly/yearly without having to worry about their investment crashing etc. That's why you do Research for any alt you invest in. You have a portfolio worth a few hundred dollars, which consists principally of darkcoin. You're not really making me think, "hey, this kid has a point".
|
|
|
210 darkcoin, did you buy that with your pocket money?
|
|
|
very weird little guy, maybe not a scammer, just seeking attention
|
|
|
|