You can't enter a casino when under 18 so I don't see why there should be different rules for online casinos.
|
|
|
I guess my point has been proven.....
|
|
|
Use BTCpay if you don't want to pay any fees at all. They support multiple altcoins too.
|
|
|
He is garbage man with low self esteem.
I don't think Hhampuz has ever been a garbage man. There is nothing wrong with garbage men either. They world will turn into a huge pile of litter if nobody empties our bins once a week. Show a little respect or feel free to drive your own garbage to a local landfill instead!
|
|
|
Now that same group (i guess suchmoon) digged into his history and found a plagiarism from before 2015 for which he got banned.Of course they are now justifying with it the red tags they are giving and destroying that account.
Sounds like a false accusation to me. Before you know it you will be taken to court for libel charges.
|
|
|
Delete 7 I have a relaxing week off to enjoy myself and come back to more disgusting shady and devious moderation A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. We should not be trying to leverage this just to get our own red removed.
We need to think of the best interests of the entire board. There can be no valid reason to remove red from persons that have such a trail of observable financially motivated dangerous and scamming behaviors on this board.
Explanation required or again I call these mods out for being super shady here. Trying to weaponize this "deleted posts" metric to get excellent, honest and and truthful members banned. Also hiding truths their pals want to remain hidden. 1. how was it off topic? 2. how was it irrelevant ? which mod deleted it ? from my own thread? examining OGnastys motivation for the removal of legitimate scam tags from an observable liar and scammer like lauda What kind of board is this where you get a scam tag for presenting observable instances of lying and scamming by those voting themselves into DT and excluding any other persons that dare to call them out for the untrustworthy scum they have demonstrated themselves to be. This is becoming one of the most horrendous environments of any forum out there.Nobody is forcing you to stay. Also, you should include a link to each topic when complaining about a deleted post (for reference). Wait until this post is about to drop off page 1 before bumping it in future. Everyone honest person is forcing me to stay. You mean nobody from your fortune jack sig spamming dirt bag club wants me to stay. The email contained no link. This seems like an issue with the forum software. It should give the mods name, the mods reason for deleting and the link. Take it up with theymos. Nobody should be forcing you to stay or to leave. It is just a forum buddy, a place where people can discuss things. You should take it a bit more lightly. If you don't like it here, leave. If you like it here, stay.
|
|
|
Delete 7 I have a relaxing week off to enjoy myself and come back to more disgusting shady and devious moderation A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. We should not be trying to leverage this just to get our own red removed.
We need to think of the best interests of the entire board. There can be no valid reason to remove red from persons that have such a trail of observable financially motivated dangerous and scamming behaviors on this board.
Explanation required or again I call these mods out for being super shady here. Trying to weaponize this "deleted posts" metric to get excellent, honest and and truthful members banned. Also hiding truths their pals want to remain hidden. 1. how was it off topic? 2. how was it irrelevant ? which mod deleted it ? from my own thread? examining OGnastys motivation for the removal of legitimate scam tags from an observable liar and scammer like lauda What kind of board is this where you get a scam tag for presenting observable instances of lying and scamming by those voting themselves into DT and excluding any other persons that dare to call them out for the untrustworthy scum they have demonstrated themselves to be. This is becoming one of the most horrendous environments of any forum out there.Nobody is forcing you to stay. Also, you should include a link to each topic when complaining about a deleted post (for reference).
|
|
|
The new cases look great. Are they for sale yet?
|
|
|
Thule is using the CSW tactic: Threaten people with a lawsuit, hope they get intimidated and back down. Unfortunately for Thule everyone sees he is full of shit and are laughing in his face.
|
|
|
Hhampuz appears to be making decisions on behalf of those he is working for (eg his advertisers/clients) that benefit him personally, that are detrimental to his clients/customers.
If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I would suggest that you not.
Untrustworthy
I am awaiting negative trust if you do believe this to be true. Also you should probably write this in my service thread for my campaign management, would make the most sense. Ignore him, he's just struggling to remain relevant. It's not like anyone values his biased opinions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
|
|
|
I think theymos should go back to cultivating a good (default) trust list.
I don’t think the current experiment is a success.
~I'm not going to do anything hasty or out of emotion with respect to my trust list until I can figure out what the hell is going on. ~ I really don't like the state bitcointalk is in right now.
What a surprise these people who are talking the most about forgiveness trying to end that topic and gaslightning are the ones who kicked other DT members out.
Hhampuz had me included as of this morning, now suddenly I am excluded in spite of the fact I never said a word about Hhampuz during this whole blowout, which leads me to believe he is doing so because he has pressure being put on him from the "club of special people" he is so desperately trying to be a part of. I would have loved to hear his objections, but when I went to PM him about it, I found he had blocked me too like a coward in spite of our previous open line of amicable communication. I guess I will just have to take my discussion of it to the public then since he is to afraid to have a private conversation with people he found trustworthy as of a day ago.
Another fact I want to add is that these new 3-4 or a bit more persons are even damaging users who have been here for much longer than them and have a history of trading goods worth thousand of dollars and yet they don't decide anything but these new users do, how fucked up is that ?
The experiment is indeed a failure and intervention will only increase in the following months. If theymos has to intervene for every little disagreement, the experiment is a failure.
Theymos should go back and pick his real friends as DT, people he interacts with regularly. It will reset the forum norms in line with their collective values and behavior.That sounds like a government to me, which is exactly what Theymos wants to avoid.
|
|
|
Hhampuz appears to be making decisions on behalf of those he is working for (eg his advertisers/clients) that benefit him personally, that are detrimental to his clients/customers.
If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I would suggest that you not.
Untrustworthy
I am awaiting negative trust if you do believe this to be true. Also you should probably write this in my service thread for my campaign management, would make the most sense. Ignore him, he's just struggling to remain relevant. It's not like anyone values his biased opinions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
|
|
|
Seeing some interesting things in your list, thanks for sharing!
|
|
|
What's up with all these butthurt alts?
|
|
|
I do not want to blame anyone prematurely, but all it looks very bad:
You don't need either, proof can talk Solid connection found as of now. 1. Bounty abuse 2. Trust feedback abuse if they are alt (No doubt though) Coolcryptovator and TalkStar, Can both of you you please clarify this proof? Edit- Wrong quote because of heartbeat?
Its really surprising to have an question like this dude. To fulfill your demand i will have to purchase a time machine and opening a new account in past for giving you a strong proof. I think it would be better if you ask me clearly that please stop revealing bad guys activities. Isn't it looks suspicious to you that a new user who have just opened a new account and claiming coolcryptovator abusing and having an alt account? Tell me if i am wrong from my end.
The only connection I see so far is that they are both sending BTC to the same address. Maybe one of them could clarify what address it is.
|
|
|
The vending business is huge especially in many developed countries and it is catching up in several third-world countries as well. Vending provides convenience to the customers or consumers and a great business opportunity with less overhead expenses to the vending machine owners. I am sure that this is one industry that can easily adopt with cryptocurrency and can help push for more mainstream adoption. iVendPay can lead the way for this industry integrating cryptocurrency into the picture. I am thinking: Is it possible that instead of offering products the vending machine can also offer cryptocurrencies for sale?
You can already buy crypto vouchers in stores and there are already loads of crypto ATMs available.
|
|
|
~snip~ I've suggested previously to look for people who already have a very high reputation amongst the community and have a history of holding and returning large amounts of money in the past (people like Dooglus etc). People who are already multimillionaires and have businesses here with reputations to keep are unlikely to run off with money they've been entrusted with. Alternatively and to rule out any shenanigans, maybe it's better for thyemos to just hold the money himself in maybe a safe deposit box and get some sort of legal contract drawn up in case of his death (or whatever) that the money will then be sent to certain trustees or to certain trustees multisig walllets. ~snip~
This leaves a question for me. What will be in the fate of this forum if any such thing accidentally happen? Is there anyone else well trained to take over the responsibilities or the forum will be gone with him? Note: Long live theymos, stay in good health. I'm pretty sure the head moderators/oldest staff are well capable of taking over. Bitcointalk shouldn't (and isn't) be dependant on one person.
|
|
|
Newbie account talking about trust system and this is first topic. Posting style is CH,
I have no idea if the OP is CH or not but the ad hominem attacks are not helping anything. Creating hundreds of topics about the same subject isn't helping either. Will you be kind enough to give an effective idea then please? It's better this way instead staying silent like shit. Don't get me wrong, I'm not telling you to stay silent. Anyone is allowed to speak up. What I meant was that there are numerous open threads on the same topic. There is no point in creating more threads, besides littering the forum. The best approach (imo) would be contacting Theymos directly to address your concerns. Threads like this alway end up in childish bickering (coming from both sides) and the last thing Theymos wants is to step in like some kindergarten teacher.
|
|
|
QS, would you be willing to lock this topic? There are already plenty of open topics about Vod and his behaviour. Send Theymos a PM and tell him why you feel like Vod should be removed as a merit source. He's the only one who can remove him as a source so having another endless discussion isn't contributing to the Meta section in any way.
|
|
|
Newbie account talking about trust system and this is first topic. Posting style is CH,
I have no idea if the OP is CH or not but the ad hominem attacks are not helping anything. Creating hundreds of topics about the same subject isn't helping either.
|
|
|
|