|
I have known TF since I started using CoinChat (one of his websites). TF came across as a very friendly and helpful guy. I defended him at first because I didn't believe him to be a scammer. Especially since people were wildly speculating without any factual evidence (yet). Call it a complete misjudgement of character ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
|
|
|
|
DefaultTrust membership should mean your Trust ratings are accurate, that's it. Someone can be a trustworthy person but their judgement may still be subpar. Or they might not trade much with other forum members but they may be good at spotting scammers.
Vod’s trust ratings on me are 100% provable lies, yet he sits in DT1 even after theymos told him he would be removed for posting such lying trust ratings about me. How is this justified? Why is this allowed? That's a question only Theymos can answer. |
|
|
|
The author of the article on Twitter: "Australian entrepreneur Craig Wright claims he did. But there are inconsistencies in his account." ( source) Craig fucked up the metadata......again. |
|
|
|
|
I'd love to hear Craig's opinion on the latest court ruling (denying the dismissal of the Wright vs Kleiman case).
|
|
|
|
Wankety wank
Wow, you're actually using the "if it's ok for him to do it, then it's ok for me to as well" defence... @TheNewAnon135246 be sure to lemmie know when you have finished editing your rant post. My reply will still be the same: truth hurts. Yes, it hurts terribly. |
|
|
|
I didn't realise the 3 day activity requirement, that kills my point in another post - I'd better editit.
I still think it would be handy to have a trading trust ranking, rather than a forum policeman ranking.
There was never supposed to be a forum policeman ranking... Especially when people like Vod who are straight up liars are included in DT1. I hope this forum can find it's way back to being more than a trollbox at some point. It won't happen without strong leadership from honest people. What's the point of bringing up your opinion about Vod in every topic related to DT1? Your own topic is a perfect place to ventilate your frustration towards him. Derailing other topics is kinda getting old at this point. Whats the point of supporting Vod's lies? theymos himself has distrust this idiot,isnt that enough ?you wanna join the distrusted list of the forum owner? you're not helping fag let them fight if they want ! its none of your business freak. This topic is a discussion about people in DT1 with zero or neutral trust. This topic isn't about Vod or Vod's behaviour. They can fight all they want but there is no need to derail multiple topics with their childish arguements. Derailing topics, while there is an open topic about the subject, is actually considered as off-topic posting.
2. No off-topic posts.
I have no idea how my post makes you think that I am supporting 'Vod's lies'. Understanding basic English is obviously hard for you so it might be too difficult for you to follow. |
|
|
|
I didn't realise the 3 day activity requirement, that kills my point in another post - I'd better editit.
I still think it would be handy to have a trading trust ranking, rather than a forum policeman ranking.
There was never supposed to be a forum policeman ranking... Especially when people like Vod who are straight up liars are included in DT1. I hope this forum can find it's way back to being more than a trollbox at some point. It won't happen without strong leadership from honest people. What's the point of bringing up your opinion about Vod in every topic related to DT1? Your own topic is a perfect place to ventilate your frustration towards him. Derailing other topics is kinda getting old at this point. |
|
|
|
~ after the post was deleted. Are you sure you didn't just read the original quoted? That's what I did  I am confident I read it in the original thread. I wanted to read its context since the post was made a year ago. |
|
|
|
|
What seperates Mooney from apps like Blockfolio and Delta?
|
|
|
|
"Re: Shit eaters Lauda and Pharmacist- Ban need to executed on these people" didn't show up in the mod log. He is lying. Mod logs can get filled pretty quickly. Especially with lots of deleted replies. I do know that about 1500 reports were sorted out between now and yesterday. I checked the log an hour after the post was deleted. Perhaps Loyce can pull up a full log but I'm pretty certain he deleted it for being called out and is now blaming someone else (as he does throughout his post history). |
|
|
|
Are you aware that you can click the date of a quote and it links you to the thread? Your post wasn't removed this morning so if a mod deleted it it should show up in the mod log. Delete reply: Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ in topic #5103988 by member #2061615 is the only one in the recent logs. The post was made in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4905217.msg44419708#msg44419708"Re: Shit eaters Lauda and Pharmacist- Ban need to executed on these people" didn't show up in the mod log. He is lying. |
|
|
|
It's a post from (exactly!) a year ago: I wish i could have known where this dickhead is living so that i could hire someone to put him down or atleast break his arms and legs ive got a couple of spare BTCs. What a waste of money. Even if these weren't empty threats, are you seriously going to use all that effort for someone who is mostly irrelevant in your life? It seems childish. I didn't scrape modlog yet back then, so I can't verify it myself. I saw the original post a few hours ago so it was deleted today. That means it should show up in the mod log, regardless of when the post was originally made right? can you shutup wannabe? it was on 2018,not today its 2019 already you're a year late.Who's the liar now? you saw the posts few hours ago? funny Haaaaa  Are you aware that you can click the date of a quote and it links you to the thread? Your post wasn't removed this morning so if a mod deleted it it should show up in the mod log. |
|
|
|
It's a post from (exactly!) a year ago: I wish i could have known where this dickhead is living so that i could hire someone to put him down or atleast break his arms and legs ive got a couple of spare BTCs. What a waste of money. Even if these weren't empty threats, are you seriously going to use all that effort for someone who is mostly irrelevant in your life? It seems childish. I didn't scrape modlog yet back then, so I can't verify it myself. I saw the original post a few hours ago so it was deleted today. That means it should show up in the mod log, regardless of when the post was originally made right? |
|
|
|
Hinting at hiring a hitman to injure somebody on this forum = negative feedback as far as I’m concerned Anything covered by forum rules should be handled by Mods: Forum rules 8. No threats to inflict bodily harm, death threats. I'd say hinting something ("I wish I'd know where he lives so I can do x") should be threated the same as a direct thread ("I'm going to do x"), and shouldn't get a free pass. The post got deleted though, I don't know if it was done by a Mod or by xolxol himself. It was the mod,prolly someone is pissed with him too,LoyceV i respect you as you contributed in this forum a lot unlike to those morons in DT which doesnt have any programming skills who only posts shits in meta and reputation so that they can look USEFULto the forum. "It was the mod". No it wasn't, don't lie. EDIT: https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php |
|
|
|
|
Prints have been sold, locking this thread.
|
|
|
|
couldn't agree more... Ik heb steeds het gevoel dat ik de charts moet in de gaten houden, zodat ik bij een spike of een dip kan reageren, maar in praktijk doe ik dat toch niet (ik ben een HODL'er) Je kan bij Blockfolio alerts instellen waarbij je specifieke prijs changes in % kan instellen (bijvoorbeeld 5% change binnen 15 minuten). |
|
|
|
Last Sunday Craig uploaded a document on SSRN, claiming that the document was written on October 30, 2007: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3438946Conveniently the document shows great resemblance to the Bitcoin whitepaper:   Craig wouldn't be Craig if it wasn't extremely simple to debunk the whole thing and point out that he has altered yet another document. Metadata shows that the document was created using Office 365, which wasn't released until 2011:   EDIT: I did a little more research and apparently large portions of his '2007 paper' are taken from his 2018 blog: https://medium.com/@craig_10243/payment-intermediaries-db46605e79f4 |
|
|
|
Lauda might passed away hopefully,rest unpeacefully hell yeah because you're a dog of lauda, a shit eating douchebag.
you're a racist son of a whore you deserved to be part of Lauda's gang,ass licking dog.
its all about abusive people like you and your colleagues
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black (or is that racist too?). Your post history has been nothing but abusive and insulting towards forum members, including hoping that one of them has died. This is obviously not your first account since even your first post is a rant about DT members. You have contributed absolutely nothing to this community besides causing polarization and wasting server disk space. It's enlightening to see users like Timelord2067 showing their true colors by rewarding such behaviour. So TMAN's ass deserves negative too? because he have been insulting users too? thats why he isnt trusted by theymos himself? jerk off lady ,you wont give him negative because hes part of the crew. You're doing a great job of making assumptions and generalizing standards/behaviour. Nowhere did I say that you deserve negative feedback nor have I left anyone else negative feedback merely for showing retarded behaviour. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
