Nothing but the Btc foundation giving itself legitimacy. I highly doubt he actually signed any documents or was contacted in any way to get his name on there. Why would he support a foundation for a decentralized currency, ESPECIALLY if he went underground back in 2008 (I believe?) and the foundation was formed in 2012.

Lol wow. Talk about wanting the return of the Soviet Union. Especially ironic with the Stalin flags, considering he indirectly killed millions of Ukrainians because of causing the Ukrainian famine of 1933.

Incompetence is often (or usually?) the best explanation for things. But in this case it just doesn't seem that plausible. How likely is it for a team of guys that created one of the first and most popular bitcoin exchanges, and were also early adopters of bitcoin themselves, to be incompetent enough to just "lose" 800,000 BTC and  then "find" a wallet with 200k?

Path of Exile is a free indie game and better than 99% of big studio games. I'd easily be willing to pay the normal 60ish $ price for it.

If you're going to spam post youtube videos everywhere can you at least provide descriptions or some context?

If a major business accepts Bitcoin (the likes of Amazon, bestbuy, etc) then that should create an environment where the other companies are pushed to accept it as well so they don't get left behind. Especially if this first business gets a noticeable boost in profits because of it. But the problem is, I think, that the corporate world is like one giant impenetrable monolith in alliance with banks and the people in control of this monolith are hostile to bitcoin for many reasons. Which is why we haven't seen a truly major brand accept it yet.

How is OP a scammer?...he has paid out to everyone.

With all this talk of guilds/groups...ARE there actually any groups of people playing? I'd imagine the Chinese have something like that, but anyone else?

That's exactly my point seed. That's why bots are killing the coin.

https://poloniex.com/exchange/BTC_HUC

Huc tanking super fast on poloniex.

You're missing the point. If only bots are playing, the coin has no value. And right now, every day it's getting more difficult for "human" players to mine coins. In my case for example, I haven't actually made any coins for about a week because I keep losing hunters so I'm barely keeping even.

The more bots there are, the less value the coin has. So it will continue falling and I highly doubt there will be "development" of the bots. The bots are bringing the coin's value down into the ground. Think about it, if people can just turn on bots and run them, why would "real" people play? And if nobody is playing the game anymore, the coin loses all value.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/captain_america_the_winter_soldier_2014/

90% tomatometer right now and 4 positive top critic reviews. Looks like we may actually get a good Marvel movie two years after Avengers.

Heh. That's a good analogy, but I think the situation is different because the relationship between people and money is different than people and religion. Money is something everyone relies on to survive, religion is not as important. So it will be more difficult for "Bitcoinism" to overtake "Fiatism" like atheism is doing right now to religion.

I'm inclined to agree with the anti-bot angle. And I do think it is being reflected in the rapidly-falling coin price. When people spend less time playing the game to mine because bots are doing it for them, it's only logical that the value of the coin will drop. If you work less hours, you get paid less money, as an analogy.

Having said that though I still think HUC is an "underground" coin right now and it still has the potential to be discovered by a lot more people. Right now it's just crypto-enthusiasts that know about it.

edit:

Also to address snail and his insistence for people to form mining "guilds" - the idea is good but I don't think anyone is actually willing to do it. Why? Because it's too much hassle. We're playing this as a game after all, and creating an organization where you would have to communicate with people (perhaps even over voice chat) is just too much work.

Thanks for the explanation D&T. Now that I think of it, I remember when I was using my armory wallet it would immediately add on the transaction fee to the amount sent.

The competitors don't have the infrastructure though. And that is what it really comes down to. That is why for Bitcoin to be "abandoned" by everyone there would have to be a catastrophic failure of some kind. The community and numerous businesses / organizations have invested too much into Bitcoin infrastructure to just throw it all away. A lesser coin would've died a hundred times over.

I sent it from my vaultofsatoshi exchange wallet. The amount that it says was sent in there is exactly the amount that was requested, but I did click on the transaction and there was a small fee deducted. First transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/a731d06438488ffa261874f2b894a2af0750f68b7a4cf0692fb11364b8b9c21b.


Here's my second attempt: https://blockchain.info/tx/43170840219c1639b816a67e21cf0277fa17b1742c5775eeb5ab1f7025f3a9b4


One thing I don't understand is why in both of these there is a second smaller amount being sent along with my BTC. You can see the "Estimated BTC transacted" is close to the amount that I paid, but the "total input" is much larger and includes somebody else's transaction?

You're being far too generous. The 3rd one was a steaming pile of horseshit and I have no idea why the critics were so kind to it. Oh wait maybe I do...they were giving positive reviews for $$.

Hmm excellent point. I've actually completely forgotten that this is probably the biggest booster for Bitcoin: not good developments in the Bitcoin world, but bad developments in the fiat world.