Accept your apologies via pm.
Hope this won't be used for further phishing attacks. Please be attentive guys!
|
|
|
Oh, so to put down the whole network one should simply ddos only main nodes? No, How can You imagine this Any Linux client can be main peers, for the operation of network 100% us enough 1 main peer, and they can be 10,1000,10000 ..... main peers we also wrote 10 000 connection, actually on technology node.js withstands over 100 000 connection Oh, again strange answers. You say "Any Linux client can be main peers" - it means Any Linux client can be or cannot be main peers - so it means nothing. You say "for the operation of network 100% is enough 1 main peer, and they can be 10,1000,10000 ..... main peers" - so it means to shut down the whole network one should simply ddos only 1 main peer, 10,1000,10000 ..... main peers - so answer to my question is "Yes", not "No" BTW, can NODE network consist of 10000 main peers and 1 non main peer? Or non main peers must always be 10x, 100x of main peers? Well, you are always "able" to DDOS every peer of a network to shut it down. What RealSilk means is, that the number of main nodes is neither limited nor static. Everyone of us can operate such a node. But yes, if only 10 people run such a node it would be easy to DDOS them. But in a pulsing network where nodes come and go in a high number, it's nearly impossible to DDOS all nodes at once. 1 main node would be enough to run a network with 10,000 clients.
|
|
|
Congratulations Jared and Digibyte Team! Well done!
|
|
|
Remember a few months ago when the algo change happened? The block reward was about 7647. Now it's about 6917. That's about a 10% drop in block reward over three months. Now there's a proposed change to make the block reward 2435 and then only drop 11-12% over the course of a whole year!! That's a huge slowdown to the reduction of the block reward and may result in a slight increase in value in the short term, not the long term.
If left alone, the block reward would hit 2435 in two years. And would continue to decrease faster than the new proposed change. This means that with the new change, in two years DGB will be adding coins to circulation FASTER than if they left the block reward as it is now.
Excellent analysis. I'm also inclined to agree with you on both the motives for catering to short term anxieties, and the long term negative consequences of doing so. I hadn't realized this would happen. Once again, thanks for this extremely important comparative analysis. Great work! I don't agree to this analysis. The numbers might be true (I didn't valid them). However, if we are for the longterm we must assume there will be a much better adoption of DGB with a lot more users as we have currently. If we don't assume this there's no sense in investing more time and money in this project So we assume more adoption in 2 years. That also means that the daily coin production will be much smaller relative to the daily trading volume. Therefore, the new production rules will help now but don't hurt later.
|
|
|
Well, I use this opportunity to get some more DGB. Even I'm moaning from time to time I'm still convinced this is going somewhere
|
|
|
A sad day: 10 Satoshi new all time low But I appreciate the interview - it raises hope for a brighter future for DGB.
|
|
|
Ok so the first and most important thing in marketing is defining a goal and therefore a strategy. The target group is easy, first all cryptousers and after that the rest of the world, including businesses.
For the strategy, it is important for every product to find an USP (Unique selling proposition) For NODE I think it only can be Instant Transactions. And we should declare it every time, that instant trnasaction are THE KILLER FEATURE in cryptoland.
So I would start to make sure that every marketeer outthere knows our USP. So every post, every tweet, every slogan, every video, every signature, you know what I want to say, we have to hammer it inside everyones head that NODE equals the first instant transactions blockchain in the world.
So now comes the dangerous part. I think we have a lack in explaining ot the tech freaks how this is possible and save. So we need the devs to give us a writing about POA and the netowrk design that nails every doubt about NODEīs safety and scalability.
I think thatīs absolutely necessary, cause the guys out there are smart, and they will find every lack in our explanation.
After thatīs itīs just spreading the word and everybody will talk about it.
So NODE --> Instant Transactions --> Killer Feature --> Proof of safety and scalability.
+1 But this post may be better placed at the promo thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=860761.0;topicseen
|
|
|
Well, if NODE realy uses N*N topology we realy have a serious problem. If there are just 1000 nodes online many users will have problems as it's not uncommon that cheap consumer routers can't handle that much connections (or even more).
I have several times repeated, we use technology node.js. Node.js allows the use of both 100 000 connection. I'm not talking about the scalability peers, then we will go further. Node.js network application Keep up the good work. If you build it, they will come. The dumpers will look back and see their error and we will all laugh about this. Node is either going to change the world or it won't, all the troubles in between are just steeping stones on the path. A network is not just a theoretical number of connections. Also means some physcaly infrastructure: routers, switches, etc For those big numbers sure should be some state-of-the-art products. You have the latest network technology in bedroom ? How many simultaneous connections can eg your router or switch to have with torrents? You got the point! It's not of interest how much connections Node.js can handle in theory. The bottleneck is the hardware the people are using. Don't understand me wrong, RealSilk, I don't want to FUD on Node as I think it's a great idea and all plus I'm personally invested. But we need to point out potential problems before they actually become a real problem.
|
|
|
newbie Question, sorry I need to send Node for forging, or can I just leave them in my wallet ? You need at least 500.000 NODE in your wallet for forging. Just leaving the wallet opened is enough. Very nice ,thank you errrm ... How do I do that on a VPS? Probably there is something really obvious I am overlooking? I can log in with a browser from remote, activate my nodes there, and when I close the browser window w/o logout, it stays active and forges ahead? cd node/lib edit clientConfig.js accName: 'your passphrase' Probably this should be done within a 'screen' session
|
|
|
Well, if NODE realy uses N*N topology we realy have a serious problem. If there are just 1000 nodes online many users will have problems as it's not uncommon that cheap consumer routers can't handle that much connections (or even more).
|
|
|
Node up now. If I just leave the wallet NODE online, I'll find some block? Because when someone finds one, it resets the Poa score, and mine continues or also resets? Resets. But remember u need to have atleast 500k NODE in your wallet. Cheers So I'll never find a block only leave the wallet open all the time? The points you earn are going to increase the probability of finding a block or determine who they find one, for example: who have more necessarily find the block? thx! I don't think your score gets reset. You get 1 point for each second/minute/hour (I don't remember) having the wallet opened and 1point for each Node you sent. If someone finds a block his points are reset to 0 while you still have your points for the open wallet. If I'm not mistaken
|
|
|
Is it possible to make the website (localhost:19775 or yourdomain.com:19775) secured by ssl? I tried that but https://yourdomain.com:19775 does not work on my server that has a ssl certificate. If you want secured access to the web interface at your server, you can tunnel your requests via ssh. Try this: ssh -L20775:localhost:19775 user@example.comThen you can reach the interface at localhost:20775 and all traffic is secured by ssh.
|
|
|
I'm willing to make a german translation and also to take care of the multilingual configuration of Drupal (I'm a Drupal professional). But before I invest time in this project I want to see it's worth it by getting more information about the "good things around the corner for DGB" and their status. This is the 3rd time I'm asking and still have no answer...
|
|
|
Any news about the good things "around the corner"?
|
|
|
You are a member of the shareholder list, but not a real member of the comunity. You had months no interest on NODE / NXTL and crying now. As an active member of the comunity you would have your Nodes a long time, like the others.
It doesn't matter if he's an active member or not. When we paid for our stake there was neither a rule like "be active member" or "check the thread at least once a week" or anything else like that. Just give this guy HIS stake and all is good.
|
|
|
Haggis, It is relevant because if the price is declining, it suggests that the buying power to acquire more DGB is advantageous. If the short term trend is rising, it will cause the opposite. I think at times we all get caught in the short term for such large events that we fail to realize most of the specific items can take months or even upwards to a year to really materialize. It's good to keep everyone accountable, but expectations need to be managed. If DGB was ever thought of as day trading crypto, you are in the wrong area. YC For you folks looking at trends, do you think BTC is going down or up short term?
YC
How is that related to DGB? I kind of dislike the spirit here of posting things just for the sake of posting. I'm more interested at what is actually happening behind the scenes...the "great things around the corner" we heared so much (or nothing?) about? Is there anything else beside promotion the community can do for DGB? Sorry, I don't get your point. But it sounds like it fits more to this subforum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=8.0As you mentioned correctly, DGB is not for the short term. Therefore I see no point about talking about any kind of "buying power". As there is very small to none buying power for DGB, we should talk about the fundamentals to move forward.
|
|
|
For you folks looking at trends, do you think BTC is going down or up short term?
YC
How is that related to DGB? I kind of dislike the spirit here of posting things just for the sake of posting. I'm more interested at what is actually happening behind the scenes...the "great things around the corner" we heared so much (or nothing?) about? Is there anything else beside promotion the community can do for DGB?
|
|
|
Another calculation question. How do you determine the current average SAT price of your investment?
For example:
First investment: $1,000 and obtain 10M DGB Second investment: $700 and obtain 8M DGB
What is your SAT price of the $1,700 investment at 18M DGB?
Thanks, YC
(1700/[BTC_USD])/18M 26 SAT at $369 per BTC
|
|
|
great to see the progress holding and lurking around the thread here Yes, I also actually don't care about the price as I'm very confident this one will rock earlier or later.
|
|
|
|