Different post so as to not make a huge and confusing chain of replies. I recently had to reinstall the DGB client and can't seem to be able to download the block chain. Any suggestions on how to fix this?
Are you stuck somewhere or doesn't it even start? |
|
|
|
No, it's an own development
Do you mean this feature is not just ported from NXT? If so...coool  We should promote it more. At best with some case studies. It's not a feature, it's a service. But you may promote it anyway  Is there any list of already existing gateways? I assume there is a bitcoin gateway operated by you, isn't it? |
|
|
|
No, it's an own development
Do you mean this feature is not just ported from NXT? If so...coool We should promote it more. At best with some case studies. |
|
|
|
@marada The error seems to be here: src/main.cpp:1783:67: error: ‘COINBASE_MATURITY2’ was not declared in this scope
nSpendHeight - coins.nHeight, nSpendHeight, coins.nHeight, COINBASE_MATURITY2)); Please try to replace all occurences of "COINBASE_MATURITY2" with "COINBASE_MATURITY_2" in src/main.cpp. Looks like Jared already upped some new code which is not yet ready (u can see i.e. groestl.c). I would suggest to download the latest release here instead: https://github.com/digibyte/DigiByteProject/releases |
|
|
|
qmake-qt4 gives results like everywhere else. $ qmake-qt4 USE_UPNP=-
Project MESSAGE: Building without UPNP support
Removed plural forms as the target language has less forms.
If this sounds wrong, possibly the target language is not set or recognized.
Removed plural forms as the target language has less forms.
If this sounds wrong, possibly the target language is not set or recognized.
Removed plural forms as the target language has less forms.
If this sounds wrong, possibly the target language is not set or recognized.
Removed plural forms as the target language has less forms.
If this sounds wrong, possibly the target language is not set or recognized.
Maybe here are some more details. Something with JSON? In file included from src/bitcoinrpc.h:17:0,
from src/init.cpp:12:
src/json/json_spirit_writer_template.h: In function ‘String_type json_spirit::non_printable_to_string(unsigned int)’:
src/json/json_spirit_writer_template.h:31:50: warning: typedef ‘Char_type’ locally defined but not used [-Wunused-local-typedefs]
typedef typename String_type::value_type Char_type;
^
make: *** [build/main.o] Error 1
Can you post the whole output? The part saying something about the error is still missing  |
|
|
|
I am trying to compile the new wallet and most likely a dependency is missing. g++ -c -m64 -pipe -fstack-protector-all -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=native -O2 -D_REENTRANT -fdiagnostics-show-option -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstack-protector -DQT_WEBKIT -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DUSE_IPV6=1 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -DLINUX -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++-64 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/include/qt4/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt4 -Isrc -Isrc/json -Isrc/qt -Isrc/leveldb/include -Isrc/leveldb/helpers -Ibuild -Ibuild -o build/addrman.o src/addrman.cpp
make: *** [build/main.o] Error 1
Digibytes have some unusual dependencies as many other wallets compile fine. Right, unusual coin . Anyway what could it be? Could maybe someone also post a list dependencies? In the doc folder I see only standard bitcoin-qt dependencies and these are met. Please do a "./qmake-qt4" and post your output. The above is just saying there is an error anywhere |
|
|
|
First what we need is a working wallet. Never happened to me before, but today, the wallet shows +- 20k more coins that i have. Fighting it half day now to recover my coins, unsuccessful for now. Explorer shows bullshit, wallet too, i cant send any amount from the wallet anywhere.. There is some serious bug...  Trying random backups now and i hope i didnt lost the coins. So, got them back finally.. The problem occurs when stake goes wrong and get stucked in transactions with 0 confirmations. Wallet restarting at this time repairs the problem, the transaction disappears after restart. But if you have another good stake right after this one stucked, it will not repair itself even with hundreds of restarts and it starts making nonsense transactions with 0 confirmations and it starts displaying bullshit in total balance. And finally it doesnt allow me to sent any amount even a little of 100 coins, it ends up with error of already spent coins, the coins are stucked in transactions with 0 confirms and youre fucked, because they got out of balance too. https://www.dropbox.com/s/zjubbfk87gx9zkb/wallet_bad.jpgSolution is pretty simple, but you must have a backup of your wallet.dat before this stucked transactions. Replace the wallet.dat with your backed up one and voila, balance is ok, stucked transactions are away and you can send coins again.. https://www.dropbox.com/s/74gvnfucin5n44u/wallet_ok.jpgEDIT: forgot to say that redownloading the blockchain even -rescan didnt work Sounds like it's just a bug in the qt-wallet and not in the blockchain itself. This should make it much easier to fix. |
|
|
|
maybe we can arrange a listing on dgex?  would be nice promotion for nxt-users furthermore dgex just lists coins that are similar to nxt or am I completely wrong? just ideas .. imho dgex is a waste of space. super expensive withdrawal fees. no withdrawals on weekends and its all manual deposit and payouts. plus its still down since it was hacked I see, it's no option maybe poloniex would be a better choice? there we could get a litsting easily I think Don't forget Bittrex. They add new coins quite fast if there is enough community demand. |
|
|
|
LOL maybe he's using old wallet? Who are you talking about? I use the latest wallet with an old wallet.dat |
|
|
|
Just want to throw in that not everyone has problems with the wallet I withdrawed my CINNI 1 week ago to my ~2month old address, staked for a couple of days and then deposited it again at poloniex. Everything went smooth within minutes, no lost coins. I sent a small test transaction beforehand though, just to be sure That's always a good advice for cryptocurrencies imho. |
|
|
|
|
I personally also dislike X11 because my GPUs produced a very high tone (heared it because of watercooling) which makes me feel they are near of explosion. Second is, I saw people on DRK pools with a hashrate equivalent of nearly 2000 R9 290 GPUs. That's a sign for me that either some persons have more efficient mining software or FPGAs or both.
However, for any irrational reason, people still love X11 (infact, they could just throttle their scrypt to half the performance and would have the same effect...anyway). So I would integrate it into DGB for the ones who want to use it. It doesn't hurt people on other algos so - who cares? It's everybodys freedom to choose his favourite algo and might be it the worst.
I don't know enough about Groestl, didn't mine it myself. Just heared by Jared it is relative difficult to implement into the pool software(?). Would it be possible to include it as 6th algo instead of replacing another one?
|
|
|
|
Can't believe ppl are still posting here |
|
|
|
|
Didn't hear anything about the negotiations with the brick&mortar stores. Did you make any progress there or is this on standby until you fixed the flaws, Jared?
|
|
|
|
|
Even Cinnicoin would need the agreement of 51%.
|
|
|
|
answer is simple
cinni dev has to agree working with mindfox.... make him agree to work with mindfox
if cinni dev agrees; it is my part to convince mindfox and i am sure i can convince him
Why to ask permission? Source codes are open and all can use them! p.s. I have a small experience in programming, but don't know how to collect source codes Prompt please how to collect source codes from linux on windows the version? please stop talking nonsense so anyone who wants to change the code can change??? so i go and delete couple of codes or add some corrupt code; then coin will be corrupted?  .....is it that simple of course no; it is not possible to do any changes without mutual agreement with cinnicoin It is possible! The Source is free (type "git clone https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin.git" on your linux terminal to download it). You can change it as you like. Then you upload your changes to a new Github repository and provide also compiled versions of your code. After that you don't need the agreement of Cinnicoin but the agreement of at least 51% of the network (by using your code; in case you changed something on the blockchain/pos). If you just do cosmetic operations on the wallet, everyone can use another one and all are part of the same network with the same rules. |
|
|
|
Glad to see I'm not the last one with faith into Cinni. It has one of the greatest wallets I've seen so far and everything is working fine. There's also a vision and every update makes this vision more real. Of course, I'm not happy about the current price but as already said, it can be a huge chance to get more independent from Mintpal...and of course you can't make the dev responsible for the last dumps. Time will tell and if dev goes onto vacation for 2 weeks, I'm totaly fine with it There was a time when updates came in very short cycles and I guess this period cost a lot of power. Both, physical and psychic. Give him time. Once this coin gains more traction again, I'll be the first to stack up more Cinnis again. |
|
|
|
Haha yeah, doesn't fit to Cinnicoin but it realy kicks ass! |
|
|
|
2)If you made something memory intensive, you could check how much system memory exists then allocate a certain percentage of it. This way, botnets of really old machines wouldn't be as effective and the industry would have a hard time creating gpu / asics for the algorithm.
This is not possible. A malicious miner could modify the wallet sources to trick it. The blockchain is responsible for confirming blocks and has no possibility to check your system settings (luckily ). Hence you can only regulate a miners efficiency by the mathematic mechanics a hashing algo uses. To reach 100% fairness we first need to define "fairness". I think all efforts to achieve that will be for nothing  |
|
|
|
I started with Cryptsy, but wasn't sure on it's reliability after I heard of hack attempts on personal wallets. Maybe this is something to reconsider. Hence why a regulated exchange is the way to go! YC Not everyone is going to bittrex, I'm pretty much a cryptsy only trader. No need to go anywhere else for me.
Hack attempts on personal wallets? No idea what your talking about, Cryptsy (knock on wood) has yet to have any issues, with the exception of people blaming them for poor coins, when they need to increase confirmations due to 51% as in the case with RDD. Their not some fly by night 1 or 2 person operation either & provide a plethora of features no one else does. Reward points, USD markets, Weekly prize drawings, Maker/Taker trading for verified users... for me, the choice is simple. Not to leave out the huge hardware upgrades they did last month.. YMMV. I also heared multiple times about negative balances at cryptsy and a lot of following problems for the appropriate customers. Not sure whether this is true or just FUD. |
|
|
|
Mintpal is dying, they got robbed using simple SQL injection on a vericoin hot wallet where they kept 30% of it in existence. Noone can be sure they are solvent. so much less people keep there money longer than necessary.
That would be a real pity. Until now they were absolutely reliable. They even compensated me with 0.2BTC after a deposit never arrived. I like their user interface most and in comparison to poloniex/bittrex it performs much better on my notebook. In the case of VRC robbery they did everything to save their customers and themself. So I see no argument why someone should switch to bittrex except if someone wants to gamble with 0-day coins  For DGB Mintpal is still the exchange with the highest volume. But in case MP gets more and more unpopular we should take preventive action and try to get listed on other exchanges as well (namely Poloniex and Bittrex). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
