Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 01:03:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 »
621  Economy / Reputation / Re: KingofSports : Account will be under new ownership soon. Request. on: January 15, 2015, 06:42:04 AM
yay, I am the new owner.

Can someone give me a briefing about what is the problem with KoS?


@Vod I can't PM you.
For some reason I doubt that anyone is going to believe you. Especially without revealing your "main" account. If you are going to use your identity as the newbie account in the first post then it is going to look like the ownership transfer did not actually take place.


-snip-

I am not at fault, because I was not aware of this loan. The real KoS, did not mention it or anything. While I checked the trust, most of them was "this account is sold" and stuff, whcih is not against the rules. It is his responsibilty to mention it, not mine.
If this is the case then you should go after the previous owner, however it is not the case because you probably did not actually buy the account. I counted three references from people on default trust saying that you defaulted on a loan so even if the account was sold then it is your own fault for ignoring this. There are more references to the defaulted loan then there are to the account being sold.  
KoS did not make a profit from this. Even the time required to become a hero member is worth 10 times more than this.[/b]
He profited handsomely from the 2 BTC loan he defaulted on
Now now Opposum, lets get your facts straight buddy. I didn't default on any loan. Going by the gossip of the forums doesn't do you any good either, you should probably stay out of business that occurred before you even joined the forums. The discussed BTC happened in august or september of 2013, I see you were welcomed to bitcoins a couple months later.

ANYWAYS, lets discuss what really did happen opposum, just so you know for future reference so you get it right (AND I DONT EVEN OWN THAT ACCOUNT ANYMORE LOL). But hey, I want people to know the truth.

I took a 2 BTC loan and said it would be repaid in 6 hours, in exchange for 2.01 BTC. I rec'd and sent back that payment. However, a second 2 BTC payment was sent to my address. It was a merchant-pay address with coinbase that all of the funds were sent to. The market was volatile and I had payment coming in 6 hours at the time so I agreed to the 2.00 loan. However, I was sent 4 BTC, 2 BTC I did not agree to owe. However, that doesn't make me not accountable for that BTC but once it was converted to USD since it was an auto-converting coinbase address, I owed the sender the final product I got for his mistake, the $250. However, I was not aware of this for a couple weeks as I went to the hospital that night for a seizure and later a panic attack. The first ever in my life. I stayed off computers and other things that could cause it to see what might have triggered it. When I returned to the forums I found my account red trusted and accusations against me. I told bitz that he could have the $250 USD I rec'd for it but I couldn't give him 2 BTC cause I never had it, and I wasn't about to fork out $800 to buy the 2 BTC he had sent by mistake since I never agreed to it and I never rec'd 2 BTC I rec'd $250.

So again I'm not a scammer, it was before your time so I'd appreciate if you butt out of something you don't know anything about. But what do I care, I just hate when people talk shit and don't even know what happened.

Oh and yeah OP seriously you should reveal your real username. This account is just gonna go under more scrutiny I think otherwise.

Just saying, you could have easily bought 2 btc for around $350 today, gotten your negative trust removed, sold your account for $100 than what you sold it for with the negative trust, and have repaid your debt on the terms you said you would.
622  Economy / Reputation / Re: KingofSports : Account will be under new ownership soon. Request. on: January 15, 2015, 05:57:01 AM
Quote
   To this day, I offer you $275 in BTC. When you sent me 2 BTC BY MISTAKE, BTC was at $125 a piece. After going away for a couple weeks due to personal issues I came back and BTC had skyrocketed 6x. There is no reason why your mistake should be rewarded 6x. I am not a defaulter, nor a scammer. To this day I offer you the USD amount + 10% interest on the 2 BTC you sent to me by mistake as a nice gesture of goodwill however it was never owed nor agreed upon. $275 option to collect in BTC at the current exchange rate is available anytime just PM me if you want it.

A bit unrelated, but according to the feedback KoS left BigBitz, he could have pretty much repaid his debt last night when BTC hit $150, it's a shame he didn't make things right before he left.
623  Economy / Digital goods / Re: 40 x Chroma Case Keys on: January 14, 2015, 08:30:46 PM
What are the changes of me getting scammed by this. I mean I transfer the coins to escrow he sends me the keys escrow releases funds to him and at this point can he take the keys back?

I have bought keys via escrow with this user with no issues, you should be fine.
624  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: WorldWideBTC scammer on: January 14, 2015, 07:23:47 AM
And dude spent over a year cultivating that account... to steal $500 ROFL

Eh, there's a good chance this is a bought account. His post history cuts off last April and he suddenly reappears near the beginning of December. Then he begins making transactions a month later, right when the "This user's password has been reset recently" warning is no longer on his profile or in the mod log. Just a guess, but it lines up perfectly for this to be the case.

I mentioned something about that a couple of days ago... No idea why negative feedback was removed.

It appears that WWBTC traded with RockMiner before the JohnnyQuid thread was made, so it wouldn't have made that much of a difference in this case. That being said, the main problem is that it is pretty easy to get negative feedback removed if you haven't actually scammed anyone yet, it isn't a hard argument to make and most members in default trust don't want to put up with the hassle of defending their ratings (you've seen what Vod puts up with). Seeing as you were just added to default trust, your trust rating should be enough to warn users as long as you are willing to back it up with enough evidence.
625  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: WorldWideBTC scammer on: January 14, 2015, 06:54:52 AM
And dude spent over a year cultivating that account... to steal $500 ROFL

Eh, there's a good chance this is a bought account. His post history cuts off last April and he suddenly reappears near the beginning of December. Then he begins making transactions a month later, right when the "This user's password has been reset recently" warning is no longer on his profile or in the mod log. Just a guess, but it lines up perfectly for this to be the case.
626  Other / Meta / Re: Akka - Default trust account no longer hacked! on: January 14, 2015, 06:45:14 AM
I banned him and removed him from my trust list.

The real Akka should email me.

Shouldn't Akka be re-added to your trust list now that he has regained access to his account? I would've assumed he has PMed you by now, but perhaps he hasn't noticed he was removed since his trust ratings still look the same on his end.

It's honestly not so important for me to be readded, beeing a trusted User it's kinda nice, but that's already it for me. But I still appear as Akka in his list. I that means I'm somehow untrusted in his list, Yes it would be nice if that could be fixed.

You should PM him, he only removed you because your account was hacked. Since you have regained access to your account and properly secured it, he should have no problems re-adding you, or at least removing you from his distrust list if that is all you care about.
627  Other / Meta / Re: Akka - Default trust account no longer hacked! on: January 14, 2015, 06:32:12 AM
I banned him and removed him from my trust list.

The real Akka should email me.

Shouldn't Akka be re-added to your trust list now that he has regained access to his account? I would've assumed he has PMed you by now, but perhaps he hasn't noticed he was removed since his trust ratings still look the same on his end.
628  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Cloud Tokens Ponzi on: January 14, 2015, 06:22:17 AM
This should be in the altcoin section, not in gambling.

This sounds interesting.

Basically, it works like a traditional ponzi but you get credited Cloud Tokens per BTC invested. It should be possible to keep reinvesting and earn more Cloud Tokens if that's the case. 


Basically, this is your first post ever in the gambling section when 99% of them are in the altcoin section. You're probably an alt of the OP.
629  Other / Meta / Re: Reports on: January 14, 2015, 05:57:07 AM
(Quoted from that thread shorena posted)

MembergroupAverage accuracy
(all)60%
Newbie51%
Jr. Member52%
Member54%
Full Member59%
Sr. Member63%
Hero Member73%
Staff88%

Is this true? This means that there are a lot of useless reports if accuracy is this low across the board. And how would shorena know these statistics?

Mine is currently 100% with 24 reports  Tongue. I don't see that many things to tattle on, unless it's worth it.

I'm not sure why it is attributed to shorena, the original post is from theymos:

Here are some updated stats:

MembergroupAverage accuracy
(all)60%
Newbie51%
Jr. Member52%
Member54%
Full Member59%
Sr. Member63%
Hero Member73%
Staff88%

In all, there have been 27,689 good reports, 8129 bad reports, and 1067 unhandled reports.

I think that this is all pretty good! Any accuracy percentage above ~25% is probably fine.

Since we're on the topic, I'm currently at 81 with 99% accuracy. I'm guessing the average accuracy is so low because people report scams, which aren't actually against the rules.
630  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Marco the Über Miner on: January 14, 2015, 12:50:06 AM
Marco was pushing pretty hard for me to add him to my Trust list, and this all makes perfect sense now. Mind you, having multiple accounts is not against forum rules.

Personally, I would never add anyone to my trust list who explicitly asked. I can't really see a valid reason for such a request.
631  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Recently I feel awful increased HYIP site on: January 12, 2015, 11:22:17 PM
No, they are all scams. It is a shame that so many seem to be appearing recently.
632  Other / Meta / Re: Vod - taking a hiatus from the forum for a couple months to study on: January 12, 2015, 09:58:23 AM
Hopefully you won't return to find the forums like this:

Jokes aside, good luck with your studies Vod, it sounds like you're making the right decison. The forum will be missing a valuable asset during your absence.
633  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: scam by cryptonius.com don't use that on: January 12, 2015, 07:16:34 AM
I would post a thread in scam accusations if you have evidence. As a general rule, all HYIPs turn out to be scams, do not invest in them.
634  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: Re: popular bitcoin techniques on: January 12, 2015, 07:15:27 AM
To those interested investing, I urge you to read this before you do so.
635  Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTB] CS:GO Key Supplier ; $1000-$5000 weekly. on: January 12, 2015, 03:45:57 AM
[To say that keys under $1.50 are carded is speculation, and I would rather assume that the person figured out how to duplicate the keys, or various other legal mechanics to accumulate bulk keys.

If someone is interested in a very organized, and profitable business opportunity, send a PM.

Either way,  have a great night everyone and thanks for your replies.



This is not a "legal mechanic", I can assure you that any trades you make with keys of this nature will be reversed. You will either be screwing yourself or those you resell to over. Anyway, good luck.
636  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Selling a few hero, legendary, a VIP, and a donator on: January 12, 2015, 01:29:37 AM
I highly doubt Tomatocage will agree to escrow this transaction. You have admitted that the accounts are hacked, and I doubt any reputable escrow will want to get involved in this, since selling hacked accounts is against the rules.
637  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stay away from bitcoin-stocks.com ! on: January 11, 2015, 12:15:52 AM
People forget that Pirate was offering only 7% per week and now everyone can see that it was clearly a scam. This is offering almost double that and people are still investing, makes no sense.
638  Other / Meta / Re: What is "mprep" doing as a moderator? on: January 11, 2015, 12:07:59 AM
There is no rule against ponzis. Even if they are obvious scams, they will not be removed.
639  Economy / Lending / Re: Loan request: 0.28 BTC, 20% interest on: January 11, 2015, 12:02:41 AM
You're also taking out a loan on your second account at the same time, which makes this even more risky for any lender.
640  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Just-Dice.com] UID 56 on: January 09, 2015, 11:00:07 PM
ill bid .1 clams

This is well below the starting bid listed in the OP.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!