I understand that you're fairly new to PD, but Lain was often a high roller on PD2 and did in fact wager a large amount. I don't think it is unreasonable to be upset by an error on PD's side that could have cost him a lot of money.

Just adding onto Lain's complaint about the list of incorrectly rounded bets, I don't really understand how it can be that every error occurred @ 2x multiplier, even though it is the most common amount. Surely it happened at other multipliers, at least once. I don't believe that is a complete list of users who were impacted by the error. I would like to remind whoever from PD investigates this claim that they should look for bets with a potential profit of .002, not just a wager of .002, since I'm almost positive you will find lower odds bets that wagered less than .002 but would have won more than .002 if they had been settled correctly. I feel this should be a higher priority for PD to investigate, since they are in the wrong here.

I would definitely take that 1.5 btc offer. You can easily buy keys @1.75/1.8 usd/key and lower, so this is pretty much a 320 key offer + you don't need to bother cashing out your keys, which is a hassle. Keys are valued at 2.5 each in terms of steam price, but valued at max $2 in terms of PayPal/USD/Bitcoin, and you're realistically not going to sell them higher than 1.9 unless you're lucky. I looked around and most people have a buyout of 270-300 keys for fn butterfly slaughter phoenix pattern, some of those as old as a month ago when butterfly knives were more expensive. I would take this offer if they're using escrow.

You still have an excellent trading reputation, and your trust ratings will be weighted with this in mind when people see them. Being removed from default trust will not change this for most intelligent people. The problem is that default trust comes with added weight, and it is clear that any trust you give will be more damaging than normal. Since a TWC tag arguably ruins one's account, most people would say that people on default trust have an extra obligation to act responsibly with their trust ratings. It is clear that a majority of the community felt your trust rating on Armis was unwarranted, because of the damage default trust has. Your refusal to delete the rating in response to this is what caused your removal from default trust. You're entitled to leave whatever trust you would like to as an individual, but not with the added weight of other respected members of the community, which is what default trust does. The trust system is a right, but default trust is a privilege, which you lost when you acted how you did.

You also point out that many other members in default trust give out trust ratings for similar reasons (I believe you mentioned Vod as an example). What distinguishes them from you is that if a valid complaint were to be made against one of their trust ratings and there was a consensus that they were wrong to give such a rating, they would probably remove it, while you refused to do so.

I think it is a foolish decision for PRCDice to remove its forum presence, since the forums are one of the best sources of traffic.

Butterfly slaughter FN is between 230 and 270 keys depending on the pattern, a lot more than $400 steam.

It is worth more than the $400 steam market cap. Steamanalyst will not report off market sales, which is where this knife sells.

I don't think it is proper to assign a 68 btc value to your negative trust. Yes, you did do business with this amount, but it gives the impression that he somehow scammed you for this amount, when in fact you were paid out. All he has withheld from you is the bug bounty, which would be a value considerably less than 68 btc. In my opinion, it would be best to split your trust into 2 ratings. First, a neutral rating of 68 btc risked, where you acknowledge that he has paid you out, but point out that it was much delayed and that he has in not very professional (essentially the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs of your current rating). Along with this, you leave a negative rating only addressing the bug bounty, with whatever btc value you feel you ought to attach to it. Seems like a perfect use of the new neutral trust feature to me.

Sent you a PM regarding prices.

Trust is not visible in sections where users are unlikely to be making financial transactions, such as Meta, Off-topic, and Bitcoin Discussion. It makes sense that it only shows in sections like Lending, Auctions, etc. where trust rating is actually relevant to discussions.

Well, as long as this account is linked to that email, there is no way your account could securely be held as collateral. You could recover it whenever you wanted to from this email, which I'm sure you would agree would make it worthless collateral.

Even if you have 120% stable altcoin collateral that you're willing to send to a third party trusted escrow? 

Wouldn't you be a bit more cautious trading with an account that had this warning message? It lets you know that the account was possibly hacked or sold, allowing you to be wary of any previous trust/reputation it might have. That seems to be the use of the warning message to me.

Please take a moment to realize how absurd your accusation is. Let's not even discuss the claim, which is beyond dubious at best, and focus on the fact that you have almost no evidence to support it. Has it occurred to you that there are other ways someone might be able to have obtained your password? It isn't even clear from your post whether they successfully accessed your account or merely attempted to do so.

It's also worth pointing out that this is referring to the number of subscriber's to the Bitcoin subreddit, which might make this post confusing to some, since you don't actually mention that this is referring to reddit in your post.

Haha, I had forgotten about that. I had felt kinda bad for ricky until this point, then I found the whole thing hilarious.

BB tried to warn you the site was rigged 

Oh we're pretending that every other dice site that lost investor coins was "hacked". Got it.

Just wondering, what does this actually prove? Funds do not need to leave the cold wallet for a theft to take place. Those coins could stay in that wallet for years after you've lost the ability to withdraw them, since it is up to owner to allow you to do so.

"Lunae Libertas" would be a correct translation. "Lunae" is the genitive of "Luna" (moon), which makes the translation literally come out to "Liberty of the moon". Personally, I would switch the word order to "Libertas Lunae", since the order can be either way and I think it sounds better this way.

Source: took Latin for 3 years