HOLD ON! I deposited a large amount of btc to my account williamj2543, while waiting for the deposit to confirm I tabbed out of the chrome window and browed the internet for maybe 20 minutes or so. I go back to the tab, and find my bitcoins GONE! I looked at my recent bets and found that all was betted, without my consent or any click of a button. I have heard of lots of problems user having with autobets and the general website, and I will not stand to be a victim of this. Primedice, please look and check all of your code, and kindly refund my money. You should really make sure everything is working 100%, as this is a gambling website, and one wrong button could lead to all funds lost.
Please look into this issue, I have been an active member of primedice for a long time, I was part of signature campaign, and I really enjoy this website, but I cannot continue to recommend it until this issue is resolved.
Oh no.. Maybe you accidentally clicked the roll dice button. That is not possible. I only tabbed back in AFTER the balance was depleted, I clicked on the tab and saw my balance was 0, so I scrolled down and saw it was all betted. I have used autobet before (not in the same day as today) and could there possibly be something cached from before? If what you are saying is true, smells like session hi-jacking to me... No, a hijacker would have withdrawn the coins, not bet them. |
|
|
|
New accounts were restricted to only posting in the Beginners & Help section until they made five posts and browsed the forum for x amount of time (think it was originally 4 hours but may have been lowered to just 1 before it was removed completely).
In my opinion the 4 hour limit was a good deterrent, would be great if it was added back. |
|
|
|
|
.1 BTC hasn't been that price since August, how can you be sure your "method" still works? Proof of payment also doesn't prove profitability, since you could have deposited 1 BTC and lost .9 to get the same thing.
|
|
|
|
I would love to see if these ARBs can even stand up in court. I have a feeling they won't....And if they did win the arbs and got a judgment, all you would have to do is write the Credit Report agency and dispute it as a fraud. The Credit reports would send for proof of documents in wet ink, if they can not produce them they will be dropped off credit reports. Anyone wet sign a document for btcjam  The arbitration awards is accepted in something like 144 countries worldwide and there is collecting agencys taking people to court based on those awards every month now. One of them mentioned that they had recovered 70% of the bought debts and collected the debt from 14 persons that had defalted p2p loans already the first month they were doing P2P debt collection for example. Good to know, but I'm not really sure it was worth bumping a 5 month thread to share this. It doesn't really add to the discussion, since the guy's chargebacks were apparently already decided in the OP's favor. |
|
|
|
The transaction fee would be higher than one of those sticker capsules. Anyway, good luck selling, and you should give some indication of what % of market you're looking to sell these for.
I know, I just wanna get rid of the sticker capsules to be honest.  For the market %, what do you think most people sell for? Thanks. I'd aim for 70% of market, most people won't pay more than that. |
|
|
|
Now you are evading a ban, THEYMOS UNLEASH THE BAN HAMMER ON THIS BITCOIN PEASANT!
You're allowed to create an alt to post in Meta. |
|
|
|
|
The transaction fee would be higher than one of those sticker capsules. Anyway, good luck selling, and you should give some indication of what % of market you're looking to sell these for.
|
|
|
|
I'm sure if he paid Squall back he might have his ban removed. That's a lot of stuff he could sell if he wasn't so greedy. Not to mention the motorbike he can't ride.  I was under the impression that the forums didn't moderate scamming, I'm not sure why his payment to squall would be factored into his ban. I don't think it was. dank constantly posts nonsense threads. I think the mods just got sick of it. According to dank, he was warned twice already. I understand that, I was responding to your idea that if he repays squall he might get unbanned. I don't see that happening, since his ban should have been for unrelated reasons. |
|
|
|
I'm sure if he paid Squall back he might have his ban removed. That's a lot of stuff he could sell if he wasn't so greedy. Not to mention the motorbike he can't ride. I was under the impression that the forums didn't moderate scamming, I'm not sure why his payment to squall would be factored into his ban. |
|
|
|
To play devil's advocate here, people also said he should stop at +15 btc, but he didn't, and ended up winning twice as much. It's easy once he has actually lost to say "ha, what an idiot, he should have stopped while he was ahead", since you have the benefit of knowing when he was actually at his peak. At the time, no one knew.
Yes, thats true maybe he should have. Staying ahead could also mean a profit of 1 btc  , and would have been a good move to stop then also. But, my point is, that if the strategy was martingale all along, then why risk so much of a bankroll, when it is obvious that martingale fails all the time over a long time. Why bother gambling if your expected return is negative. Sometimes you get lucky and profit more than you should, sometimes you lose. Being up 33 btc, his decision to keep playing should be the same as his decision to play when he was up 0 btc, past results don't matter in the future. |
|
|
|
told ya if you kept playing you'd lose it back, you might aswell just share the system and quit while ahead before it gets ugly.
He already shared it: he uses the built-in martingale bot. That just makes him look more stupid here. Its because, he posted that he programmed the bot to use an advanced strategy which was +EV as it only lost 20% of the times. And if he had some brains, he should have known that martingale has never succeeded for anyone in the long run. Once he was +33 BTC, he should have stopped. To play devil's advocate here, people also said he should stop at +15 btc, but he didn't, and ended up winning twice as much. It's easy once he has actually lost to say "ha, what an idiot, he should have stopped while he was ahead", since you have the benefit of knowing when he was actually at his peak. At the time, no one knew. |
|
|
|
|
Username: ZZZ
Also, would be cool if I could receive 20% affiliate.
|
|
|
|
House edge: 1%
The house edge is clearly 2%, not 1%. A 50% chance bet returns 1.96x, when 1% edge would be 1.98x. |
|
|
|
cmon stunna. you know how to promote stuff.
Yes, he does know how to promote stuff, which is why he knows he doesn't need to do this type of promotion. PD is by far the preeminent dice site at the moment, he has no real competition, why do you think the sig campaign ended? |
|
|
|
|
Have you tried PMing BadBear, or did you make this thread as soon as you saw the rating? I'm sure BadBear would be glad to show you whatever evidence he has, I don't think he would make an accusation like this without proof. This could have been resolved much more easily in PM than through a public thread like this, which is probably going to be filled with pointless posts.
|
|
|
|
No reply or respond from the thread starter lols?. This thread had been inactive since August until someone bumped it a few days ago, it isn't surprising that the OP has stopped checking the thread. |
|
|
|
|
It appears that a large number of staff are chosen for their language skills, which allow them to moderate regional boards.
|
|
|
|
digital goods, not goods
wrong section fyi
I feel like it isn't incorrect to leave it in this section, they are offering physical cards as well. |
|
|
|
I remember winning .1 for a round of flappy, would love to see rewards that high again haha. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
