I've never used "sockpuppet" accounts here
Nice try, but your avatar is clearly a sockpuppet. Can't fool me. |
|
|
|
|
Online, occasionally, in real life, no.
|
|
|
|
|
Why is this in the "Gambling" section if this is not a ponzi scheme? You claim payment is through ad revenue from these clicks, so why is a deposit necessary? How does a user's deposit have any influence on the revenue you, the owner, receive per click?
|
|
|
|
Also you have to be careful designing them. If you say "first bet to win at 10%" it'll be someone betting 0 BTC. If you say "get your stake refunded", everyone bets at 98.99%. Etc. People are very smart at working out how best to benefit from incentives.
It would not be smart to bet 0 in this case, since there is a 3 second delay in between bets at this point. You would have much higher odds spamming a moderately high bet. |
|
|
|
It's been a long time i haven't seen a thread with so much action  Must have missed the goat thread. |
|
|
|
Now its 2 to 1
Brazil got the penalty kick
I think though that the ref misread that call but I will let someone else define if that was a good call.
If you watch the replay, it was a blatant dive. Obviously, it would be hard for the ref to see that without the images we saw, but still a bad call, since it was wrong. |
|
|
|
Since dooglus is on my trust list your trust is still positive with me, I just hope he isn't your 20 btc investor.
It isn't me. I just posted negative trust for Klye saying: > Klye is an addicted gambler. If you trust him with any coins there's a reasonable chance that he will gamble them away. I think he's a good guy, with a gambling problem. Because of that I wouldn't trust him with any Bitcoin that I wasn't prepared to lose. In the same way I wouldn't trust my dog to look after my dinner for me. You didn't delete your positive trust rating for him, which still counts. |
|
|
|
All deposits will not be credited to users accounts until they receive 1 confirmation from now on.
This is in response to a recent double spend attack. No users funds were lost however.
Thanks for understanding  Was this coming from those accounts with random character names making a single bet of .1 (or however much it was if there were more that weren't on the high rollers list)? |
|
|
|
Honestly, that does not mean much. Whoever the owner is created this account purely for running this site, hence the name. He most likely is an active user on another account. |
|
|
|
Debt owner is Gurrty and borrower is Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย With this contract it will be equal to 5762 bitcoin in debt. The debt will be used for the bot and other potential revenue generating projects. The specific investments which the debt are used for will not be disclosed specifically. This language from the contract, or at least the draft posted here, seems to imply that while the loan will be paid back through, and used for, various investments, it is not an investment itself, just a loan. You are either a sock or new here but clearly it was not a loan. He did not give me BTC. This was mostly in response to your assertion that since Gurrty chose to not take a payout immediately, and instead make a "risky investment" in order to profit, you are not obligated to pay him back since the investment did not work out. My point is the contract that we have access to seems to state that this is a loan, not an investment, with the investment aspect being your explanation for how you will pay back the loan. Yes, he did not give you BTC, he gave you bonds, but they were assessed in terms of their value in BTC, and the contract states that you will pay him back in BTC, regardless of BTC's relative value to these bonds. The loan will be repaid back 1% plus 1% interest each week. I don't know how you can argue that this wasn't a loan, when these are you own words from the contract. Anyway, you stated earlier that what has been posted is only a draft of the contract, not the final thing. If the final contract differs significantly from what has been posted, I apologize, since I am making my argument based on the draft that I have access to. |
|
|
|
Debt owner is Gurrty and borrower is Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย With this contract it will be equal to 5762 bitcoin in debt. The debt will be used for the bot and other potential revenue generating projects. The specific investments which the debt are used for will not be disclosed specifically. This language from the contract, or at least the draft posted here, seems to imply that while the loan will be paid back through, and used for, various investments, it is not an investment itself, just a loan. |
|
|
|
|
Not saying the OP isn't right, but my cashouts from the have come through the 15yC address before, meaning that it might be one of the site's hot wallets, which would explain why all these coins go through it. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if your theory was correct, at the very least there is a high probability that Giftcoins/zeeshan are one and the same.
|
|
|
|
We've been encountering quite a few bugs particularly with PVP that we are working on ironing out before launching. Something I'm thinking about adding is a "Streak" feature on the auto-bet tool. I've noticed tons of players that will bet 0BTC many times until they reach a loss streak of 3-5 in a row or so. With the streak option this could be done automatically. This doesn't quite change the odds but I know a lot of people still feel more comfortable by fulfilling certain superstitions.
On another note, there's been a massive delay on launching this. I firmly believed it would have been ready for late January. please bear with us while we try and perfect this for your enjoyment!
-Stunna
Since auto-bet features still seem to be in the works, would it be possible to add the option to limit the % of your bankroll you commit to an auto-bet run? Right now any increase on loss system usually leads to losing your entire deposit, which is a hassle, since it means a lot of depositing/withdrawing compared to adding an option like this. |
|
|
|
Besides JD and PD, I like dicenow because it has great autobet feature (can do 10k bets in <30 seconds), low edge (1%), and seems to be provably fair, although I haven't looked into it any more than JD or PD, so it's up to you to decide I guess. Successfully withdrew today so there's that as well. |
|
|
|
then You doble your bitcoins.
Seems legit. Also, stop spamming Primedice chat, no one is going to your site. |
|
|
|
Is it your own site and your sending doge to yourself?
That is correct, in that entire "proof" picture, there are only 2 addresses sending/receiving.  |
|
|
|
|
The site is now back up, looks exactly the same except it runs on "Perfect Money" now. How about letting us withdraw what we had in our accounts since you're clearly still around?
|
|
|
|
|
Fun games tonight, felt good to play some CE again. Confirming I did get paid by the way, which was a nice bonus. Solid server/connection, hope to play some more games soon. Would be nice if Blood Gulch and/or Snipers were added into the rotation in the future, and maybe a pistol start on Battle Creek instead of plasma pistols. Still, ran excellently for this being the first day of this being up.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
