DeadTerra,
I have not put in a request for withdrawal, but it is not fair to those who have to strip them of their higher priority.
Months ago, I asked you to focus on the GBF instead of getting distracted by various IPOs.
You agreed (and thus I invested) back then, yet you then proceeded to waste your time and our bitcoins on various unrelated scammy/gimmicky nonsense projects.
You never updated the OP to reflect the recent negative returns. You don't even update the google docs weekly.
We now have no idea how many of our bitcoins you've lost!
Your constant excuses of "I'm too tired, I'm too busy, I'm too sick" are childish and unacceptable.
You have plenty of time for the latest shiny things that catch your attention, but not for your investment fund? Again, not acceptable.
And now, despite owing your long-suffering investors 1000s of bitcoins, you are buying overpriced silver bullion from a Jr Member in another thread!
Am I the only one that finds such behavior galling?
I don't want to be payed back in drips and dribbles. And I don't want to hear about how wonderful your intentions were.
Your actions are those of a con artist, especially the latest excuse of "circumstances have changed, so withdrawal requests are retroactively being dishonored."
The GBF should have been your highest, if not only, priority. Instead you have been treating it (and us investors) as an afterthought, not worthy of FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITY.
You seem to be completely unfamiliar with the concept, so here is an excellent, concise definition:
http://www.efmoody.com/arbitration/fiduciary.htmlIn the handling of money and when one acts as a corporate or individual trustee, there is a fiduciary responsibility owed to the principal party.
It is defined as a relationship imposed by law where someone has voluntarily agreed to act in the capacity of a "caretaker" of another's rights, assets and/or well being.
The fiduciary owes an obligation to carry out the responsibilities with the utmost degree of "good faith, honesty, integrity, loyalty and undivided service of the beneficiaries interest."
The good faith has been interpreted to impose an obligation to act reasonably in order to avoid negligent handling of the beneficiary's interests as well the duty not to favor ANYONE ELSE'S INTEREST (INCLUDING THE TRUSTEES OWN INTEREST) over that of the beneficiary.
Further, if the agent should find him/herself in a position of conflicting interests, the agent must disclose the dual agency (acting for two parties at the same time) or risk being accused of constructive fraud in regards to both or either principals.
Good day, sir!