Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 03:12:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 [498] 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 »
9941  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 06, 2012, 11:45:34 PM
Customer assets are customer assets.  It doesn't matter if they are dollars, bitcoins or bananas.  If BitFloor does not have reserves (and that was reported in OP) or any other way to make customers whole, then this is a bankruptcy case.  This exchange is operating in the U.S., there are very specific laws as to how to proceed.

Disbursing funds to some customers and not others would be a criminal act under those.

I believe a court order (injunction) should be filed to help ensure the exchange operator proceeds as prescribed by law.

Bitcoins were stolen, not cash. That cash is not Bitfloors to distribute to other customers. It's mine.

Doesn't work that way in the U.S.

A quick search and I couldn't find the exact description about how customer funds are pooled (giving a net balance), regardless if the account had a balance of securities or cash, then disbursed. 

Here's from Canada, which is pretty much the same in the U.S.

^^^What total idiocy.  Next time, listen to your intellectual superiors instead of the low-information voices in your hollow shell of a head thing.   Wink

After careful consideration, ACH withdrawals of USD from Bitfloor will soon be re-enabled, with details to be posted on bitfloor.com.

cheers,
~Roman


Bwah-haha-hahaha!  Gornick jurisprudence FTW!!1!

Please Steve, tell everyone "how it works in the U.S." again.  Share some more of your hilarious 'Canadian legal wisdom.' 

I could use another good laugh at your (thieving communist) expense.   Grin
9942  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Entire World Just Found Out about Bitcoin! on: September 06, 2012, 11:18:56 PM
tomorrow we should see the explosion:



We're seeing liftoff today.  Stage 2 starts when newb funds make their way into the exchanges. 

Stage 3 happens when Greece dumps the Euro and we leave Earth orbit, bound for the moon!

9943  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Entire World Just Found Out about Bitcoin! on: September 06, 2012, 07:38:11 PM
[PROPOSAL]

Mittcoin: a btc fork backed by the value of keeping Romney's tax returns secret. 

Romney must control 51% of the network for the docs to remain encrypted in the blockchain.

BarryCoin:  Same thing, using Obama's foreign Muslim student transcripts.
9944  Economy / Goods / Re: Selling Negro for BTC on: September 06, 2012, 07:28:15 PM
funny thread!

Halloween just can't come soon enough! 
9945  Economy / Goods / Re: Selling Negro for BTC on: September 06, 2012, 09:54:43 AM
clicked to see if silkroad expanded into human trafficking   Wink

somebody plz send a link to senator chucky "house negro" Schumer, I'm sure he'll love it.

plus it drives the price up when he throws a hissy fit and grandstands at anti-BTC press conferences  Grin
9946  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Entire World Just Found Out about Bitcoin! on: September 05, 2012, 10:36:53 PM
In B4

9947  Economy / Services / Re: btc-e.com - opinions from people that have used it? on: September 05, 2012, 06:24:12 AM
btc-e is a great exchange, I use them all the time.
9948  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: 20 x 1Oz Silver bars AT SPOT for LTC, FREE Shipping, Price is fixed daily on: September 05, 2012, 05:33:30 AM
Got offers with total of 11 bars sold.
four left.


I'll take the last 4!

*transfers BTC -> BTC-E*
9949  Other / Off-topic / Re: payb.tc's list of retards on: September 05, 2012, 05:05:41 AM
Hey payb.tc, please add me to your list.

Because I was retarded to think you would be willing to pass-through to pirate, account details of your pirate pass-through operation.

Oh, and add yourself.  For being unable to move past the first stage of grief (denial).

Quote
Pirate:  My BS&T has defaulted, please send me PPT user lists to allow a fair and safer wind-down.

Quote
payb.tc: Huh?  What does "default" mean?  I won't accept it!  I insist nothing change, and refuse to pass through to pirate any helpful information.  Default, schmefault!  La-la-la I can't hear you!
9950  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Preparation for the inevitable on: September 05, 2012, 04:54:51 AM
If the amount of people using bitcoin continues to go up as it has along with corresponding increase in services, at some point it will become an honest threat to the sovereignty of the state. At this point, the states (the powerful ones anyway) will have no choice but to intervene and shut down all of the services (mtgox, glbse, bitinstant, this forum etc) that users depend on in order to facilitate exchange within and between currencies. My question is: Is it possible for this decentralized currency to build out an equally robust and decentralized service infrastructure? If not, what is the contingency plan for when this happens?

If they attack our infrastructure we attack theirs.  If they take down GLBSE we take down NYSE and NASDAQ.  We can make battle cries that will really be heard around the world.



Yes, yes, and yes!

Viva Satoshi!
9951  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Bonuspool - Discussion on: September 05, 2012, 04:43:19 AM
I don't understand Bonuspool these days, the terms are confusing and change frequently.

Can someone explain them in a couple of short, clear, and precise sentences or paragraphs?

I'm genuinely interested in going back, but want to know exactly what I'm getting into.

Thanks in advance!
9952  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 05, 2012, 01:36:08 AM
Roman is trying to do the right thing, with all the information he has available. You guys with USD on the site, please be patient. You can see he tried to let you withdraw, but probably thought it better to make sure he wasn't doing anything illegal as Stephen kept reiterating. There's nothing shady about that. Hopefully he will continue with that soon.

Every dealing I've had with Roman has been both pleasant and very professional. His exchange was by far the best Bitcoin exchange we currently have available to us. I never left holdings there, I just bought and withdrew, so I don't have an immediate financial stake in what happens next. But I implore those of you that are owed USD and BTC to give him chance to settle things in such a way that won't destroy his exchange. Selling securities is one option that could solve this. 24k BTC is a lot but it's not an unrecoverable amount.

How poorly things go from here on out will depend on more than just Roman. Please consider your demands and actions carefully.

I am very willing to wait to withdraw my USD until BitFloor.com has been audited and secured.  That is a perfectly reasonable and desirable course of action.

I am not willing to wait to withdraw my USD while overpaid Marxist lawyers debate whether my property is, in fact, actually mine or simply a means to a communal end.

Common sense, common law, and common decency say that the presumption of ownership remains with the original USD depositors.

That is why I have no patience with anyone willing to entertain/support the amoral, collectivist Marxist lawyer POV of negotiable property rights.
9953  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 05, 2012, 01:19:22 AM
I am pretty sure my order did not go through. Just ACH me the amount that I deposited the other day.

Thank you.
Unlikely to occur unless/until BitFloor's legal counsel advises them to proceed.  There is a possibility that this will go to courts to determine what BitFloor's liabilities are and how much (if anything) you will get.

If my order never went through then the money is still 100 percent mine.
You can hope so, but until the Terms Of Service are reviewed and all legal options are considered BitFloor isn't likely to agree with you.

That is bullshit. I have a lot of money held up in this MISTAKE. I am trying really hard not to be one of the bad buys but it is a lot of money Sad In my eyes that is.

Also I TRUST BITCOIN. Just the coin.

Don't worry unclemantis, we USD owners are not the bad guys.  The Marxist lawyers infesting our legal system, and their enabling apologists here, are the bad guys. 

Are we going to let them tell us we have no property rights, "because bitcoin" or "because MFGlobal?"  I say Hell No!

If BitFloor (Roman) doesn't stop listening to them and keeps our USD without our consent, he becomes a bad guy as well.   Undecided

Let's hope he decides to respect common law, common sense, and common decency by returning all USD to the rightful owners ASAP.

No court is going to grant bitcoins equal status to USD.  Bitcoins are ephemeral virtual tokens produced in an experiment which requires willful, voluntary participation (and thus assumption of associated risks/outcomes).

OTOH, USD are the legal tender of the US.  It is beyond ridiculous for BitFloor to steal our USD because of unrelated, unfortunate events pertaining to bitcoins.

Everyone owed USD by BitFloor should let them know we aren't playing, by sending him a Letter of Demand.  You don't have to have/be a lawyer to write/send one.

Until there is an official bankruptcy filing, no legal shield exists (besides TOS?) to insulate BitFloor from our lawful demands.
9954  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 04, 2012, 10:51:05 PM
Not sure where people get the idea that bitfloor "can't" repay USD account holders.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraudulent_conveyance

Quote
A transfer will be fraudulent if made with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud any creditor. Thus, if a transfer is made with the specific intent to avoid satisfying a specific liability, then actual intent is present. However, when a debtor prefers to pay one creditor instead of another that is not a fraudulent transfer.[1]

Given that both Bitcoin and USD creditors "could" sue bitfloor and considering the relatively likelihood of each lawsuit and the relative likelihood of being successful the prudent thing for bitfloor to do would be to repay those creditors who essentially have an open and shut case when it comes to a lawsuit. 


^^This^^

Well put, thank you D&T for clearly making the point I've been struggling to establish.

In case it's not clear to the dimwit collectivists, the "creditors who essentially have an open and shut case when it comes to a lawsuit" are we who have USD held by BitFloor, not the magical internetnerd token owners.
9955  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 04, 2012, 10:44:45 PM
Quote
Those are my USD, not yours . . .

This is not at all clear under US law, which would presumably apply given Bitfloor's ties to the US.

Au contraire, US law is perfectly clear on the matter:

Quote
No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


These are all things for the legal council (and if it goes to U.S. court, the judge) to decide in order to figure out what actions are appropriate. That's where the "due process of law" comes in. You're entitled to your process, BitFloor is entitled to theirs. BitFloor seeking legal council is where he ensures that he is acting in a way most within the law. Your process would be serving BitFloor and/or suing them.

Things are not that simple that withdrawals can happen just for the solvent parts of the business held; welcome to the world of BitCoin, where everything is without absolute legal precedent (yet). If a legal precedent can be set that the BTC has value, it would be illegal for them to use any portion of the assets (including remaining balances held for what wasn't hacked) to pay out to anybody until the appropriate process on reimbursing has been determined in court.

This WILL not be a quick process. The only quick process would be if the coins were returned by the hacker, or if someone invested BTC in BitFloor in exchange for ownership (or a portion of). I'd imagine this case (albeit not a likely one) is the one that BitFloor is hoping for the most.

Best case for USD holders (and worst case for BTC holders) is that his legal council (or the court system) determines that BTC will be considered "worthless" and that USD should be distributed to account holders as it's the only part of BitFloor that needs to be legally held solvent. However, I can just about guarantee that if this happens, anyone holding a large amount of BTC will file an injunction and appeal, which will almost certainly prevent payout of USD funds from happening quickly.

Hang on folks, this is likely to be an interesting one, especially since it's occurring in the oh-so-litigious US.

You are assuming facts not in evidence:

1)  Bitcoins have not been legally recognized as anything other than magical internetnerd tokens.

2)  Bitcoin is an experiment, there is no implied warranty or service-level agreement.

3)  BitFloor has not formally declared bankruptcy, which is the only way they can legally hold USD without the owners' consent.

4)  While bitcoin is uncharted legal territory, regulations for transactions regarding USD are well known and quite settled.  You can't detain or steal legally-recognized USD "because bitcoin."
9956  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 04, 2012, 10:36:52 PM


Au contraire, US law is perfectly clear on the matter:

Quote
No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_tSates_Constitution



US insolvency requirements are "due process of law".  It's up to those who don't believe that US insolvency law should be applied in this case to petition the court with on point arguments and case law supporting that assertion - the cost of defending against any such actions will come out of the bankrupt estate.  Unless USD holders can establish that they're secured or preferential creditors as defined by US insolvency law, there are no legal grounds on which they can be paid in full in preference to other unsecured creditors without the agreement of those other creditors.


Please show me where BitFloor has filed for bankruptcy, and then you might have a point.  Otherwise your post is non sequitur.
9957  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 04, 2012, 10:34:39 PM
So last week I deposited about $1000 in bitfloor and hadn't even yet made a single trade with it. While it was extra savings money and I can survive without it, I am quite upset about not being able to pull my money out....

Didn't you know that your $1000 instantly became part of the BitFloor collective the moment you deposited it?

Oh wait, that's not a reasonable interpretation of US law at all.  Sorry, the communists here are starting to confuse me.   Roll Eyes



9958  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 04, 2012, 10:29:59 PM
Holding our USD without our consent is illegal.  BitFloor must start accepting and processing USD withdrawals ASAP.
Unfortunately for those of us who had significant USD balances at Bitfloor, what others are saying is correct: Roman must now cease all activity — even activity that many of us would consider "the right thing to do" — and seek legal counsel. Assuming everything is handled sanely in the court system (a big assumption), we might expect a refund of our USD balances in a few months — either all or in part, depending on whether the balances were legally segregated and allocated, which I doubt they were.

Wrong.  Presumption of ownership goes to the segregated account holders.

BitFloor will be sued successfully for holding USD without their OWNER'S consent, unless there is a clause in the TOS stating that any USD deposited into BitFloor automatically becomes part of a single pool of assets with shared liability.

If the communist scumbag Corzine supporters wish to claw back USD that never belonged to them, they are welcome to try AFTER the rightful owners get paid, not before.
I understand your frustration, but your anger will not help anything here.

Accusing me of "anger" is not the best way to rebut anything I've claimed.  The ALLCAPS are for emphasis, not rageposting.

Note that not a single exclamation point was used in my post.  I'll use bold next time, so as not to further confuse you.   Cool
9959  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 04, 2012, 10:26:32 PM
Quote
Those are my USD, not yours . . .

This is not at all clear under US law, which would presumably apply given Bitfloor's ties to the US.

Au contraire, US law is perfectly clear on the matter:

Quote
No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Actually, that clause is exactly the problem.  Until due process of law, it is not legally clear whether any of the USD controlled by bitfloor is the property of those who had BTC on deposit, the property of bitfloor, or solely the property of those who have USD on deposit with bitfloor.  Bitfloor therefore cannot legally give USD to anyone until due process determines exactly whose property each and every $0.01 is.

That would depend on BitFloor's TOS.  I admit to never reading it, but who would be dumb enough to use an exchange that enforces communist bankster Corzine-style pooled accounts and shared liability for losses?  (Me, maybe...  Cheesy
9960  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: bitfloor needs your help! on: September 04, 2012, 10:23:04 PM
Holding our USD without our consent is illegal.  BitFloor must start accepting and processing USD withdrawals ASAP.
Unfortunately for those of us who had significant USD balances at Bitfloor, what others are saying is correct: Roman must now cease all activity — even activity that many of us would consider "the right thing to do" — and seek legal counsel. Assuming everything is handled sanely in the court system (a big assumption), we might expect a refund of our USD balances in a few months — either all or in part, depending on whether the balances were legally segregated and allocated, which I doubt they were.

Wrong.  Presumption of ownership goes to the segregated account holders.

BitFloor will be sued successfully for holding USD without their OWNER'S consent, unless there is a clause in the TOS stating that any USD deposited into BitFloor automatically becomes part of a single pool of assets with shared liability.

If the communist scumbag Corzine supporters wish to claw back USD that never belonged to them, they are welcome to try AFTER the rightful owners get paid, not before.
Pages: « 1 ... 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 [498] 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!