Sam, this is a breaking news, thanks, the app looks very nice and informative; community will love to see magi on the app.
The following are links I have collected so far:

Website:
http://www.cryptomagic.com/

Bitcointalk thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735170.0

twitter:
https://twitter.com/CoinMagi

facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/CoinMagi

Exchanges:
https://cryptoine.com/trade/xmg_btc
https://c-cex.com/?p=xmg-btc
https://c-cex.com/?p=xmg-usd
https://www.swisscex.com/market/XMG_BTC
(got two exchanges added us today)

Block explorer:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg

I do not get coin swap! When?

“Greed, hatred and ignorance rise endlessly, I vow to abandon them” - Zen chat

I agree, I sent you a tip for your wise words.  I think in general that community and harmony will let us go farther faster and self-restraint will be helpful.  The rules of the game are changing and thankfully so – many people are waking up to this. 

However, I do think we have to give each other a break there are so many old habit energies that are hard for us to break – greed, stealing, and doing what is not of benefit even to ourselves in the long run.  We really have know idea what someone's situation is; perhaps they are the 81 richest person in the world and they need just a little bit more to get in with the 80 people who's combined wealth equals that of the lower half of humanity.  Perhaps they need to get the heck out of some terrible situation.  Who are we to deprive them of their chance to earn more magic coins?

There is no real long term scarcity in cryptocoins - new coins are popping up every day some numbering in the billions - whats tough is to find is good community of supporters that are willing to put some value into the product they are building together and help each other out.  We have a common goal and people working together can do wonderful things, I think toleration, generosity and incentives can work better than greed and ignorance in the long run. 

XMG: 9Romi8ZpevAwcu218gNsuCrv8i9Li6oarj

Hey Coin Magi Community,

We should really try to get this coin listed early on in the release of www.coinmarketapp.com  
which is launching on the 29th of this month - check it out https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=792912.20

As a community, we already achieved to get listed on 'Coin Market Cap' which was the very same day, thanks to all of us +1ing it..
I think we should collaborate on what links should be listed in this app.. in order to help the community find info without digging through hundreds of hours of threads.

Dev what do you think? Community?  I think this is a smart play, we all are early investors here with CoinMagi... and its just the beginning...

If this app takes off and magi is listed in the TOP 10 or even top 20 position, guess how much publicity Coin Magi will continue to get?
Yeah, exactly...   I'm doing all I can to help, but we need the community to continue their efforts to work together.

I tried to mine coin this but i could not get the miner working.
i tried 3 miners and 2 pools and it just crashes.

then for kicks i checked out the pools hash rates and its botnet city

I know that you employer will not be happy for sure.

But i agree.
Dev, Please don't do this and forget what said.

can any1 post the latest windows 64bit miner plz

Re: Opinions on the state of play.

Restricting the source code and restricting hasrate by brute force is the wrong way to go and unlikely to win friends. Excessive tinkering at this point would be unwise and it seems good the way it is right now imho. Far better to simply get the message across to the miners with over say 1 Mh/s at their disposal that they are actually the problem. These miners need to realize that they could be throwing far far less hashing at it and get much higher rewards. Yeah - it's counter-intuitive and people need to wise up. Perhaps this particular feature requires greater emphasis in publications. From a few back-of-a-cigarette-packet calculations I reckon miners should be aiming for a maximum 200 Kh/s each, then we can see how the totals work out in more detail. The only problem I see with this approach is that self-restraint in not general human nature while greed is generally the norm. XMG is different - greed should not be rewarded.

Maybe you want a block-explorer?

https://bchain.info/XMG/

This sounds positive. Good comments on the second Magicoin XMG Thread.

I had the same error on a Gentoo install when I compiled from source. The issue was that I have multiple versions of libdb and needed to specify witch version to use.

Very interesting! After building from source I ran the resulting file once and it worked just fine.  When I tried using the original version ubuntu_14_amd64_magi-qt_v1.0.0 after this it gave the database error and won't start.  Now the only thing that will work on my system is the new file I just compiled using the magi-qt-or.pro

original version ubuntu_14_amd64_magi-qt_v1.0.0 after

Thanks for help, I'm happy to report that it builds and runs fine with magi-qt-or.pro under Ubuntu 14.04 with qt5.2.1.  (the other file magi-qt.pro gives the errors I posted)  I'm not sure what to suggest for the problem with the database though, everything works fine for me.

Maybe I need to install different library versions but I keep trying to build under Ubuntu 14 but get these errors, so I've been using the provide file: 

overviewpage.cpp:49: error: 'qVariantCanConvert' was not declared in this scope
         if(qVariantCanConvert<QColor>(value))
            ^
overviewpage.cpp:49: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
         if(qVariantCanConvert<QColor>(value))
                                     ^

Please Help with ubuntu_14_amd64_magi-qt_v1.0.0.2. I'm getting the following error:
Removing everything form .magi dosen't help. Here is my debug.log:
Here is my db.log

Sounds like a lot of work and I really don't think your going to change the situation much or limit the hash rate per person if that is the intent.  There is nothing that prevents the same person from making multiple accounts on the pool and sending payments to multiple wallet addresses.  Even a limit of one worker per ip address won't really change anything for someone the least bit technical.  Plus open source helps everyone have confidence in the coin so that things like this are less likely: http://blog.cryptsy.com/post/84830322907/asiacoin I trust you guys but I shouldn't have too.  

In many ways this is really nice right now, price is high, large community involvement, enough hash rate to secure the coin, I would just leave it as is.

Yea, but that's not the way... it's like trying to stop diseases by limiting access to medicine ;-)