|
BTC has arrived - that's not the problem.
But one of their daemons are down or has forked.
Try to find this transaction: c78ca968d690ab5979f0a0fd46a8e0781430ecb2d99b9f6664b0b7dfed722049 ;-)
You will find newer transactions, but not this one. Interesting.
|
|
|
|
blockchain.info on a bad fork?
Can anyone confirm? Cannot see my transaction.
Edit: Last block: 4h 25 minutes in the past.
PM me the Zeit Address you sent from and the one you sent to .  Its BTC, not Zeit. |
|
|
|
|
blockchain.info on a bad fork?
Can anyone confirm? Cannot see my transaction.
Edit: Last block: 4h 25 minutes in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome Sir Atronite, welcome Sir uki.
|
|
|
|
I downloaded a new purse, but it is not synchronized. What to do? before there was even an old version 1.0 did not use them for almost a year.
www.zeit-coin.net/update |
|
|
|
I have 250k coins that are now 21 days matured in wallet, still no staking. Is this normal?
yes, it is perfectly normal. What counts for staking is maturity age and number of coins. First of all, you have to have the minimum maturity age required (which is your case) to be able to compete with other blocks for a stake. Once you enter the competition, the bigger the number of coins the higher the chance of getting stake. This means that with 250k, you will have to wait a bit longer till you win and get your PoS coins. Thank you for your explanation uki. But my wallet says no blocks ready for minting, I thought it would say minting by now, even if it wasn't time for a reward. Maybe this helps: unsigned int nStakeMinAge = 60 * 60 * 24 * 20; // minimum age for coin age: 20d
unsigned int nStakeMaxAge = 60 * 60 * 24 * 40; // stake age of full weight: 40d |
|
|
|
|
All knights have access to the war room.
Ebolansk's account has been activated.
Sorry for the late reply.
Cheerz
|
|
|
|
So yesterday before I went to bed it was 99.60% synced
Woke up tjhis morning and it was at 99.35% ??!?
Restart asap, all staking coins will be orphans the longer you wait, just had the same recently. No need for asap. POS orphans are harmless. a) The person who creates a PoS block gets it propagated the fastest across the network first. (Has more confirms, gets accepted as being the next block in the chain)
OR
b) Who ever has a better PoS hash (more difficult target) that created that block wins when they happen at exactly the same time.
So lots of people are minting PoS blocks at the same time. If you only have 8 connections to peers, and someone else has 35 connections to peers, chances are their PoS block will be accepted by more peercoin nodes than yours.
If you are minting, I think it is a good idea to increase your maxconnections=35 or some thing like that in your ppcoin.conf file. Also configure your router to allow inbound tcp 9901 to point to your ppcoin host so you can allow more than just the standard 8 peers...
So it will be normal to find a PoS block, and have it orphaned if you are not connected to enough peers. I don't say they cause any harm, you just don't recieve them, which is bad enough right  You receive them later - with more stake. There is no lost. |
|
|
|
So yesterday before I went to bed it was 99.60% synced
Woke up tjhis morning and it was at 99.35% ??!?
Restart asap, all staking coins will be orphans the longer you wait, just had the same recently. No need for asap. POS orphans are harmless. a) The person who creates a PoS block gets it propagated the fastest across the network first. (Has more confirms, gets accepted as being the next block in the chain)
OR
b) Who ever has a better PoS hash (more difficult target) that created that block wins when they happen at exactly the same time.
So lots of people are minting PoS blocks at the same time. If you only have 8 connections to peers, and someone else has 35 connections to peers, chances are their PoS block will be accepted by more peercoin nodes than yours.
If you are minting, I think it is a good idea to increase your maxconnections=35 or some thing like that in your ppcoin.conf file. Also configure your router to allow inbound tcp 9901 to point to your ppcoin host so you can allow more than just the standard 8 peers...
So it will be normal to find a PoS block, and have it orphaned if you are not connected to enough peers. |
|
|
|
So yesterday before I went to bed it was 99.60% synced
Woke up tjhis morning and it was at 99.35% ??!?
Percentage value doesn't say anything about a completion status - it recalculates with every new block. All depends on quality and quantity of your connections, MemoryMaxOrphanvalue etc... Wallet restart would help. |
|
|
|
Sir Ray,
Sir Solarion arrives at 11.
Good to know  Thanks. Things flagged for March:1. New OP / cleanup 2. Chinese / Spanish translation of OP |
|
|
|
I really have better things to do that combine my block myself with coincontrol everyday to avoid having soo much small block.
And I have better things to do than adding such a feature ;-) POS has some security issues which are top on my list. I was never using (manual) coincontrol and my wallet is running since the very first day. It's minting 24h a day without any break - that's exactly what I want. I don't care about it. I have a real coin age chaos in my wallet which hopefully protects our network.  |
|
|
|
Q3: It's as safe than us doing this manually with coin control
Q4: It's like when we use coin control to merge our coin to form bigger blocks, but automatic ^^
I don't agree; a rule based code cannot have the same security like manual randomized actions - but I will have a look at Tranz' code. For the moment the evidently POS chaos makes sense for me. Whatever, 2.0.1.6 will not have such a feature - but it's bookmarked... ;-) wait you're asking us? Who else should I ask? I'm no magician, if someone wants a "autocombine" feature he should be able to explain how it works Cheers |
|
|
|
|
Some questions:
Q1: What exactly is autocombine? Is it a minting feature? If true, what happens to normal transactions (100 coin faucets as an example)?
Q2: How can it work without setting tons of coin blocks to zero age and without losing interest?
Q3: Is it safe to let a wallet make auto-transactions without any approval (wallet is not encrypted then) ?
Q4: Is it an external feature or an intervention in the blockchain.
Q5: How safe is our network if a possible attacker knows the rules (from the source code)?
Cheers
|
|
|
|
Wallet update will be available within the next two days: Smaller modifications/fixes: Sync-checkpoint master key changed Checkpoint added for year #2 (fixes: 'Checkpoint is too old' message) checkindex default value = 500 It is not mandatory. |
|
|
|
In any case, you're right but you don't lose any coins and you could solve it with a -rescan. |
|
|
|
|
That's not the problem, kiklo.
If you send coins with computer 1, computer 2 does not know a possible new generated change (back) address. After some time, you have 2 different wallets with a different coin amount and many different key pairs. It ends up in chaos.
A wallet is a container for many private and public keys - like a key chain. Amount of coins is a summation of all addresses.
Just the opposite:
NXT has one private and one public key. You can use it where ever you want - simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
Caution. Please - never use the same wallet on different devices. They will drift and you will lose coins. Sharing a wallet among multiple computers ends up going badly. After 100 addresses, a wallet generates 100 further random addresses. You can use ONE wallet on an external device - but never copy the wallet to different devices.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
