Spinner is pretty nice and really easy to use, but did you know that BCCAPI server implementation isnt opensource? ;-)
Wow! So you will release a Spinner client that works with them? I hope that they will release BCCAPI server source code after this.
|
|
|
oh, good to know! thank you
|
|
|
It's $3, but many markets are updating and giving new features
|
|
|
Good and simple, I like it
|
|
|
[conspiracy] They are trying many ways to get him out [/conspiracy]
|
|
|
Good! Thank you for your service
|
|
|
The totally sum of the three retweets is 0.02034 btc2 Retweets of 0.00513 btc each 1 Retweet of 0.01008 btcI know that it's nothing valuable, but this seems a bug
|
|
|
-If someone retweets without any BTC address, the earnings pile up in the account and will be released to the user as soon as he enters a btc address OR an email address (we can pay out to emails)
Sorry for my bad english Anyway, this is my twitter account ( registered to your service ) twitter.com/hostfat this is the btc address that I used: http://blockexplorer.com/address/1HostFatgTXWdRmVoneC8M6ErhiuQ7An5oI did 3 retweets, but I added the BTC address only after the second retweet. I can be wrong, but I only see the last transaction ( the third retweet ) ... I can't see the sum of the two that I did before entering the BTC address.
|
|
|
You can use also search rss to gtalk on Google
|
|
|
I think that it doesn't matter, it can be viewed as sign that he is a very good player ... so he makes many hungry players.
I'm trying to find a good rule to easy catch a cheater from all the statistics, and make very difficult and taking time to build a reputation.
The IP limit and proxy list ( also, with everything else ) can be another good way. If I see a table with many warning ( many players with the same IP and/or behind proxy, from the shared proxy list ) ... than I'll think 10 times before entering on the table.
|
|
|
Even if I see some problems, I'm not saying that someone will be able to see all the rating of every user to another. I mean, if I ask to see the +1 of an user, I will be able only to see the +1 of the user that I trust ( added as a friend )
Example: If a scammer create 100000 fake account/address, and +1 himself from all of them ... if I haven't any of these fake account on my friend addresses list, I wont be able to see any of these +1. If I have one of these fake account on my friend list, than I will be able to see its +1 only! So creating fake addresses and +1 wont be so useful to scam. ( to see 1000 +1 of this scammer I must have 1000 of his fake addresses on my "friend" list )
Example: After that, we can give some rules as Bitcoin: less than 6 confirmation can be dangerous Poker: less than +5 can be dangerous.
Anyway, I see the problem of the +1 as you said ... people will +1 others from many stupid and useless reasons. I still think that a community driver system is the solution, but I'll try to find another way to get the point.
The blacklisting can still be useful as it is on market like silk road, everyone is anonymous, but they still have a reputation.
Another idea: Instead of the +1, we can have only the -1. All remaining statistics can be: - Match played - Match played with friend "A" ( from friend list ) - Match played with friend "B" ( from friend list ) - Match played with different players ( the distribution of match, to see if someone usually play only with his "friends" / fake accounts ) - How much time he played ( with the NTPs help ) - -1 ( bad votes ) received from all the community - -1 ( bad votes ) received from friend "A" ( from friend list )
There are many other statistics that can be public ( or friend list related ) and useful to find a scammer and wont go against the anonymity.
|
|
|
Idea:Can you add a p2p database where every user can give a +1/-1 to others? This DB will be common between all peers, and everyone will have a private key and public key. Then if I chose to give a +1 to another one, I will be able to see his +1 and -1. So I'll chose make my choices to enter or not in a table by seeing these votes. I'm thinking about a community driven poker system ( decentralized/serverless/anonymous ) You wont have a perfect solution to go against the problem, but you will give to the community all the tools to protect itself and blacklisting bad players. Example:After the first installation, there will be some automatic filters and advice, and one can be: "Who is the first player that you trust and you want to add as a friend? Add his address" I hope that you get the line of my idea ( I get this idea from the Osiris Anarchy forum rules )
|
|
|
Orisis and Iris: Iris docs are in Italian. The darn thing is close source and dynamically compiled to an X11 so can't run on a server! I think that it's quiet easy to install Isis, I'll write somewhere how to do it. You can run an Osiris client on a cheap VPS, but even 2/3 peers are enough to maintain it online ( see the anarchy bitcoin forum ... ) About sources, they said that it will be open ... I like to say that I know them ( not face 2 face ), but I can guarantee that if they said it will be open source ... then it will be.
|
|
|
I hope that will be found a way to totally avoid escrows ( totally decentralized and disconnected from thirty party ). Is BIP_0011 the first step?
|
|
|
Are there any news about this project? It seems an atomic bomb
|
|
|
|