For those who are not on slack:
This is the first crypto to use Tim Berner Lee's (founder of WWW) Solid for decentralized storage. Melvin Carvalho also worked extensively on Solid if you check on github.
It's coming...
thanks for the pointless update. |
|
|
|
irrelevant if they're scamming the blockchain. No mention of any orphan fix in there or explanation. It's a waste of peoples resources. |
|
|
|
The guy is legit and this is not just another altcoin. It's just that he doesn't care about marketing.
and doesn't care about the miners obviously, perhaps it's because he's controlling the blocks and/or polo has a play in it.. anyway, no trust left in this coin, I wouldn't waste your time or energy with it. |
|
|
|
compiled it and just syncing now, but I see that gbt isn't active so I don't think I'll be able to mine it.
I know there has been conversation about this before, but I've not been able to find out if merge mining NMC has been fixed or if it actually works anymore. I've scanned the NMC forum but can't find any definate answer, so can only presume that if HUCcore is based on NMCcore then merge mining will also be broken with HUC also? That sucks if I'm correct. As far as I know, merge-mining with neither NMC nor the new HUC client is "broken". GBT is disabled at the moment since it caused difficulties with a planned change in NMC and seems pointless for merge-mining, but apparently people are still using it for controlling their mining. See discussion in https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin-core/issues/98. It will probably be re-enabled "soon" and then become available also in HUC. ok. ahh I see... I guess I did use a fork of the nmc-core that put gbt back in.... #git config --get remote.origin.url https://github.com/UNOMP/namecoin-core.git# namecoin-cli getblocktemplate { "capabilities": [ "proposal" ], "version": 65540, "previousblockhash": "7855b6ca1a16d8b2bd3eb068d7c86efa032ce2af0214534c822206e0de0a700a", "transactions": [ ], "coinbaseaux": { "flags": "" }, "coinbasevalue": 2500000000, "longpollid": "7855b6ca1a16d8b2bd3eb068d7c86efa032ce2af0214534c822206e0de0a700a1517", "target": "00000000000000000929fa000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "mintime": 1481303155, "mutable": [ "time", "transactions", "prevblock" ], "noncerange": "00000000ffffffff", "sigoplimit": 20000, "sizelimit": 1000000, "curtime": 1481306175, "bits": "180929fa", "height": 317508 } |
|
|
|
coins never show up on cryptopia...
Anyone else with same problem?
Have you submitted a ticket? They are quite responsive usually. just tried again today and seems there working now... |
|
|
|
|
anyone have any fresh nodes?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
compiled it and just syncing now, but I see that gbt isn't active so I don't think I'll be able to mine it.
I know there has been conversation about this before, but I've not been able to find out if merge mining NMC has been fixed or if it actually works anymore. I've scanned the NMC forum but can't find any definate answer, so can only presume that if HUCcore is based on NMCcore then merge mining will also be broken with HUC also? That sucks if I'm correct. I'm using NMC on my pool now without issues, but yes, in the past it didn't work either.... Hi crackfoo, Do you know if merge mining with p2pool is working again? that.... I'm not sure of. I've never looked into p2p... |
|
|
|
compiled it and just syncing now, but I see that gbt isn't active so I don't think I'll be able to mine it.
I know there has been conversation about this before, but I've not been able to find out if merge mining NMC has been fixed or if it actually works anymore. I've scanned the NMC forum but can't find any definate answer, so can only presume that if HUCcore is based on NMCcore then merge mining will also be broken with HUC also? That sucks if I'm correct. I'm using NMC on my pool now without issues, but yes, in the past it didn't work either.... |
|
|
|
When will huntercore be ready for mining? Does it have submitblock and getblocktemplate functions?
i think it has but are disabled (I will let domob respond). atm we don't recommend mining with it until after the fork. but if you want to help test some, that would be great. -- -- I've uploaded here a windows installer without the pruned chain - it will sync from scratch. should take 24hours on a decent connection and decent machine. it will be extremely slow from blocks 70-240k but will then be much faster.
https://mega.nz/#!MB9ngSAR!eDSc2VUXJ9qufOEj1lof1H6Uy1u-_6PgS8X-6wPjLEcdon't use the prune option yet please - or you may lose some hunters compiled it and just syncing now, but I see that gbt isn't active so I don't think I'll be able to mine it. submitblock seems to be there though. |
|
|
|
|
When will huntercore be ready for mining? Does it have submitblock and getblocktemplate functions?
|
|
|
|
Do you think this is related to Cryptopia adding it to their Mineshaft or something else?
I'll open an issue as well on our github.
I doubt it, do they have that much hash? Seems the past 10-12 hours they've settled down now... Not sure what may have been happening before... |
|
|
|
|
Recently started seeing a lot of rejects and errors in the debug log:
2016-12-07 18:44:48 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork : AUX proof of work failed
2016-12-07 18:44:48 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: Consensus::CheckBlockHeader: 7c3cf2cfb3da10fab44f1b2cbdc503d9035eb335dbb34aa7c8956e3a30f37bbc, high-hash, proof of work failed (code 16)
2016-12-07 18:44:48 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED
2016-12-07 18:44:48 keypool return 16285
2016-12-07 18:44:50 connect() to 204.45.253.21:13333 failed after select(): No route to host (113)
2016-12-07 18:45:02 keypool reserve 16285
2016-12-07 18:45:02 keypool return 16285
2016-12-07 18:45:06 keypool reserve 16285
2016-12-07 18:45:06 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork : AUX proof of work failed
2016-12-07 18:45:06 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: Consensus::CheckBlockHeader: 7c3cf2cfb3da10fab44f1b2cbdc503d9035eb335dbb34aa7c8956e3a30f37bbc, high-hash, proof of work failed (code 16)
2016-12-07 18:45:06 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED
2016-12-07 18:45:06 keypool return 16285
2016-12-07 18:45:13 keypool reserve 16285
2016-12-07 18:45:13 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork : AUX proof of work failed
2016-12-07 18:45:13 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: Consensus::CheckBlockHeader: 7c3cf2cfb3da10fab44f1b2cbdc503d9035eb335dbb34aa7c8956e3a30f37bbc, high-hash, proof of work failed (code 16)
2016-12-07 18:45:13 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED
|
|
|
|
Is this altcoin worthy to purchase for long term?
no. the blockchain is under control of one person. any public pools can only generate orphans and the dev doesn't acknowledge or fix it. |
|
|
|
|
coins never show up on cryptopia...
Anyone else with same problem?
|
|
|
|
|
cryptopia not working with HAL anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
