I just setup to mine lbry and BTCD came up. be back when fixed.
 did you put c=LBC in your password??? ccminer1.8.exe -a lbry -i 23 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3334 -u bQKiFYHeTd9fmLLu9LeJ88WBYonUTt91dP -p c=lbry -d 0,1,2 -i 23,19,23 LBC, the ticker on the market is not lbry.... |
|
|
|
I had to point my antminer at nicehash. Too much instability and fuss. Ill wait for it to get more stable.
Haven't seen much of any problems with sha256... you can see the graphs are now smooth with only 1 or 2 drops in the last 24 hours... |
|
|
|
I just setup to mine lbry and BTCD came up. be back when fixed.
did you put c=LBC in your password??? |
|
|
|
Ok Crackfoo working again ...good on all algo's ....I don't use sha256 and scrypt algo's of course.  ok good. I'm going to go with this setup I think. Also note, that I've changed the stratum servers to a per-algo name. -o stratum+tcp://<algo>.mine.zpool.ca:<PORT> -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p <OPTIONS>] They all (except sha/scrypt) point to the original server anyway but in the future if I need to peel an algo off that server, it will be much simpler. Thanks |
|
|
|
yes but i did not mining only one coin i want pool find for me best and then paid me at btc
what port i must put?
3433 |
|
|
|
Same port as usual, 3433. You can see the list of ports in the table in the upper right... Thanks |
|
|
|
Ok, I've decided to change the stratum config around. Now, sha256 and scrypt will be on their own so need to use their new hostname: SHA miners use: -o stratum+tcp://sha256.mine.zpool.ca:<PORT> -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p <OPTIONS>] SCRYPT miners us: -o stratum+tcp://scrypt.mine.zpool.ca:<PORT> -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p <OPTIONS>] All other algos will remain at their original locations using mine.zpool.ca Hope this works a bit better on the miners side. Things did seem to be working great on this side... |
|
|
|
you should lower the fee until you get this ironed out. i had intermitent connection for 4 hours last night mining on lyra2v2 mine.zpool.ca. it seems that it was up and down 50/50.
Even with the difficulties I have seen on zpool I am still able to make more profit here than anywhere else. That along with an operator that is knowledgeable, active and willing to make things better makes me want to stay. From NH
Quark not able to connect to 104.209.141.79:4033
Nist5 able to connect on 149.56.122.79:3833
Things seem better now Perhaps, Azure is part of the problem... which is what 104.209.141.79 is... |
|
|
|
skein no connection ether Crackfoo on 2 different rigs.. there just sitting with the command window open.
did you try restarting them? They may not like the DNS change... Yes still no good. and now myr-gr not working. most the algo's are down...what did you do? ? time for bed .... can you try mine1 and mine2 and see which is failing? All I did was setup another stratum server and add that IP to mine.zpool.ca.... shoulnd't have really affected much... mine1 is the original server and mine2 is the new one.... |
|
|
|
skein no connection ether Crackfoo on 2 different rigs.. there just sitting with the command window open.
did you try restarting them? They may not like the DNS change... Yes still no good. and now myr-gr not working. can you try mine1 and mine2 and see which is failing? |
|
|
|
skein no connection ether Crackfoo on 2 different rigs.. there just sitting with the command window open.
did you try restarting them? They may not like the DNS change... |
|
|
|
for the unbelievers: LBRY block came with just 400 Mh/s
I know eh! geeez, which more miners would pick it up. Another block. Lets keep the momentum going! |
|
|
|
I can no longer make a connection to lyra2v2 using mine.zpool.ca, mine1.zpool.ca worked.
can you try again? as well as mine2? Same problem here, with lyra2v2 and x11evo. Both working in mine1. Don't test in mine2, sorry. In both algos, apparently no block received from server (or no connection) It could be DNS related. the "mine" host now resolves to the 2 IP's from mine1 and mine2 so, it really shouldn't be any different. But can only tell which server is the problem if you try mine1 and mine2 and let me know which didn't work. But I see all ports on each server have active miners, so it should work for all. Only other difference is mine2 is hosted by a different provider. That said.... I've not seen any reset or segfaults on either stratum server yet and it's been nearly 6 hours and the graphs are smooth to confirm. fingers crossed that this will help in the long run. |
|
|
|
I can no longer make a connection to lyra2v2 using mine.zpool.ca, mine1.zpool.ca worked.
can you try again? as well as mine2? |
|
|
|
What about responsive layout? Should I ask tpruvot? Maybe I could help with that.
I been throwing around the idea for a new front end, but just haven't had the time. I'm not sure its something that would be high on the priority list for him... |
|
|
|
...but I know crackfoo is still trying to get the sha256 stratums more stable which, with either method, could potentially solve all the problems.
Yeah, I haven't totally given up. A 17.7TH/s miner (an S9 with four B4 blades) put on a low difficulty coin is fun to watch.  Ok. I have two servers now handling the stratum loads. you can either continue to use mine.zpool.ca (preferred) which will randomly direct you to one of them or you can try your luck and find out which one works best for you by using either mine1.zpool.ca or mine2.zpool.ca |
|
|
|
nice and stable with...
If it ain't stable for an S9 using ckproxy, it ain't stable for an S9.  I'm provisioning a new standalone stratum server now to see if there is any improvement running on a high performance ssd vps. |
|
|
|
for the unbelievers: LBRY block came with just 400 Mh/s
I know eh! geeez, which more miners would pick it up. |
|
|
|
Hi, Due to the issues with the blockchain/network abuse, we've dropped BTM from the miners multipool: www.zpool.caCheers |
|
|
|
I don't use nova or alcurex... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
