We've disabled the halving of payments for now, perhaps that will at least make the payments for non-BTC coins stable
Thanks. So far I have mined NOTE, VIA, PTC, DGB, DGC, MZC, MYR and DASH. Only had the transaction halving issue on NOTE and VIA. Big pending balance on PTC whilst the pool mines enough of it to pay. The delayed payment (transactions without txId) might be occurring whilst the system is waiting for transactions to confirm (had that quite a lot attempting to mine DASH). Had a small 0.45 DGB transaction that didn't get a txId when other payments where going through. Not sure what happened to that. It seems that mining coins that are regularly mined across multiple algos' works quite well on the whole. Then I can send them to exchange for another coin without incurring high BTC transaction charges. I hope you manage to get to the bottom of the issue, I find mining DGB payments is good coin for sending to exchanges quickly. In the meantime, the system seems to be indicating that I am around 4 NOTE and 10 VIA down. Can you PM the address's you want NOTE and VIA sent to? Also... have you been mining non BTC coins still? Has it been paying out as you'd expect now? Thanks
|
|
|
We've just added MindCoin (MND) and Bantam (BNT) to the x11 port.
Cheers!
|
|
|
TAKcoin seems to have been taken off coinwarz It was only on Cryptsy and we all know what state they are in. Might be a good time to search out another exchange to get listed on.
|
|
|
Might be helpful to add a known issue, that join will not run more than one instance on a single machine... We currently mine J on www.zpool.ca on the x13 algo. Can you add it to the OP? Thanks!
|
|
|
Thank you for the explanation. That worked. Got a VIA payement, but it was halved and there has be no readjustment to for over 6 hours. Pool says 30.5 VIA payed, only 21 received. I hope crackfoo can resolve this issue soon. i think the pool calculated, you get 30.5 via, but the pool has only 21 spendable coins. you will receive the remainder coins after the pool got the imature coins. There definitely seems to be some issue with the block half payment re-credit system. Last payment was for around 11 VIA, halved to 5.5 VIA. VIA account is now flat and other 5 VIA blocks have now been confirmed. We've disabled the halving of payments for now, perhaps that will at least make the payments for non-BTC coins stable.
|
|
|
$ limecoinx-cli listaccounts { "" : 0.00000000, "0" : 5020.49782200 } ~/.limecoinx$ limecoinx-cli sendfrom 0 iF7dAGNmy8HkESMoPTA3GoZt2K3f4qMFQq 5000 error: {"code":-4,"message":"Insufficient funds."} ~/.limecoinx$ Any idea how I can move my coins to another wallet?
|
|
|
Followed those instructions... but I get: { "overall" : "Successfully started 0 masternodes, failed to start 1, total 1", "detail" : { "status" : { "alias" : "MN01", "result" : "failed", "errorMessage" : "could not allocate vin" } } } debug shows: 2016-01-05 14:55:14 CActiveMasternode::GetMasterNodeVin - Could not locate valid vin 2016-01-05 14:55:14 CActiveMasternode::Register() - Error: could not allocate vin This message say, he can not find the wallet with the coin. You need for every wallet a separate folder and local ip. But all I did was move the the masternode config from the limecoinx.conf into the masternode.conf. The wallet is the same one....
|
|
|
crackfoo, ^^^^^ that is cool. thanks for posting
Forgot to mention that the listaddressgroupings command is to be run on the old v1 wallet and the other/import on the v2 wallet and the commands likely only work on a linux based machine. Ahmed helped with the first one as I couldn't seem to find any accounts that actually had my balances so that magic was his. That said.. I'm still missing nearly 4mil GRE.... :\ You definitely shouldn't be missing 4M GRE so we can try to help you find them. I've run through the script again and seemed to get almost all of my addresses... except for 80 or so. Now only missing 1.3M
|
|
|
Can anyone provide me active nodes (addnode) to CrevaCoin? Thanks!
Can give these a try: "addr" : "54.93.35.41:22440", "addr" : "211.110.139.240:22440", "addr" : "85.25.198.151:22440", "addr" : "178.33.223.187:22440",
|
|
|
And the fact they they are rarely even paying out BTC now. We've totally removed Cryptsy from everything we run because of the questionable state.
Good idea. What alternative with a broad variety of PoW altcoins and enough liquidity is available? We have a broad range at www.zpool.caCheers I mean what exchange you will use as an alternative to Cryptsy. Most exchanges either don't have the suitable coins listed or no volume. Bittrex and Poloniex, combined, cover most of the coins Cryptsy has. But there are a few that are only on Cryptsy. There are actually a decent number of coins on there I wouldn't mind mining again so hopefully another exchange picks them up. But we're happy to not have to deal with the BS of Cryptsy and we're still profitable.
|
|
|
crackfoo, ^^^^^ that is cool. thanks for posting
Forgot to mention that the listaddressgroupings command is to be run on the old v1 wallet and the other/import on the v2 wallet and the commands likely only work on a linux based machine. Ahmed helped with the first one as I couldn't seem to find any accounts that actually had my balances so that magic was his. That said.. I'm still missing nearly 4mil GRE.... :\
|
|
|
Instructions: Windows users. Open My Computer and in the address bar type %APPDATA% and hit enter Look for the folder called GreencoinV2 and delete every file except wallet.dat Now you can download run the new greencoinv2 client New Client Windows Link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/94bfex1or76ip19/greencoin.zip?dl=0To perform the swap over, click help, debug window and then console on the V1 QT client Do this for all of your greencoin v1 addresses: run the command: dumpprivkey <Your GRE V1 Address Here (Without the brackets)> You should get a response such as: RhGsLCi4ckTfv9zMtq1WFhDukw2Z1HBUebH8EzoyeFXLh5pCTqqJ Note all of these down On the GREv2 client click help, debug window and then console for each of the private keys from the V1 wallet run the command: importprivkey <private key> e.g. importprivkey RhGsLCi4ckTfv9zMtq1WFhDukw2Z1HBUebH8EzoyeFXLh5pCTqqJ The wallet will appear to hang for a few minutes as it re-scans the blockchain. Once completed you should see your coins in your wallet Ahmed Ahmed mentioned to me you can also run: greencoind -rescan -reindex and not have to dump the privkey to ASCII, if that's a concern I tried to do that with my v1 wallet and it crashed. I ended up dumping all the privkeys for all addresses and scripted the import of all of them as I had 3k+ Exported them to a file: ./greencoind listaddressgroupings | grep '"' | sed s/' "'//g | sed s/'",'//g | xargs -n1 -I{} -P16 ./greencoind dumpprivkey {} > privkeys.txt Then created the script: for i in `cat privkeys.txt`; do echo "./greencoind importprivkey $i \"\" false" >>greimport.sh; done then in the greimport.sh file, go to the last line and change the false to true... then run the script and all your private keys will be imported...
|
|
|
Can I have my pools added to the wiki? I can edit pages but I can't add new ones. www.zpool.cawww.xpool.caI can edit them after they're created... Also Triplemining is now defunt Thanks!
|
|
|
Followed those instructions... but I get: { "overall" : "Successfully started 0 masternodes, failed to start 1, total 1", "detail" : { "status" : { "alias" : "MN01", "result" : "failed", "errorMessage" : "could not allocate vin" } } } debug shows: 2016-01-05 14:55:14 CActiveMasternode::GetMasterNodeVin - Could not locate valid vin 2016-01-05 14:55:14 CActiveMasternode::Register() - Error: could not allocate vin
|
|
|
[ASK] guys... i have GTX 970 and mining with ccminer. which one from this two give better pay? suprnova or pool.mn? pool.mn had only 4 miners (5 with me) meanwhile suprnova already had a few. already try mining for 2 hours in suprnova and get about 20 coin, and i already put it in my wallet. so... more miner = more profit or... better with least miner? In the end... it will generally work out the same. with more miners, you'll get smaller payouts more often, while with less miners, you'll get bigger payouts but not as often... Feel free to test/compare by mining MND on www.zpool.caCheers thanks. i'm trying to get "found block" so i will get that 250 reward, in this case... less miner will get me better chance... correct? never get a block before... haha. curious curious.... Working in a pool... you only get your share of the block reward. It's only possible to get the full reward should you try and solo mine or you happen to be on a pool with no miners.
|
|
|
chrysophylax... you wanted to hear from me?
|
|
|
[ASK] guys... i have GTX 970 and mining with ccminer. which one from this two give better pay? suprnova or pool.mn? pool.mn had only 4 miners (5 with me) meanwhile suprnova already had a few. already try mining for 2 hours in suprnova and get about 20 coin, and i already put it in my wallet. so... more miner = more profit or... better with least miner? In the end... it will generally work out the same. with more miners, you'll get smaller payouts more often, while with less miners, you'll get bigger payouts but not as often... Feel free to test/compare by mining MND on www.zpool.caCheers
|
|
|
The color orange is not adequate IMO for a "dark" coin, should be rather blue or similar (blue-green?, blue-black?, blue-violet?), dark color anyway, orange is too "bright" (just my personal taste).
I think the colour is good. But I do enjoy fanta and orange crush so perhaps I'm biased. The logo looks like it already incorporates the B and D but just not so obvious. I don't believe BTCD is meant to attract and primarily be used in 'dark' markets or want to give the impression that it is all it can be used for. It's much much bigger than that.
|
|
|
I think the SHA256 share % vs pool hashrate is pretty far off.
Running ~20TH; pool reports 45; share value ~35%...
5Th; ~1/5 pool reported hashrate; share value ~13%
maybe a math error somewhere in the code? (browser FF, shouldnt make a difference for this I would think)
yeah, I haven't really grasped the values the pool presents sometimes. They do seem to fluctuate. I've tried to see why sometimes they are like that but do manual calculations seems to work out. A lot of the calculations are pulled from memcache so there may be times it's off/old/stale/reset? BTC in the pocket seems to be consistent so I don't want to start mucking with it. but... I've yet to see the hashrates I'm renting, be that far off but I haven't rented SHA in a while.
|
|
|
Happy New Year crackfoo and zpool miners.
I've been mining some DGB and that seems to have worked OK, so it looks like the issue was NOTE specific (dusty wallet perhaps?). One thing I have noticed is that the 2 hourly payments don't always get immediately sent and don't have a transaction id. Eventually they get sent in a bunch. I assume the system is optimising the payments by waiting for a sufficient amount of miners transactions to be sent? I have the last remaining 3 DGB payments. Do I have to wait for other miners of DGB to mine enough DGB to release the transaction, or is there a time limit in which the transaction will eventually be sent? I'm wondering about this because I might have to mine some unpopular coins to reach the minimum orders size to dump them on an exchange.
Regarding the NOTE issues, I also have 2 small transactions that have not yet been sent for some time (hence the above query). I also have a pending balance on some digital credits that don't seem to have matured (this coin has matured under the later DGB mine, so there seems to be a bit of an issue.) Digital Credits (sha256) 0.000011 DGCS 0.1804% 0.000000 2d ago Immature (6366) Digital Credits (sha256) 0.000019 DGCS 0.1078% 0.000000 2d ago Immature (7291) Digital Credits (sha256) 0.000000 DGCS 0.0792% 0.000000 2d ago Immature (7337) In total I'm missing approx 4 NOTE and have some unconfirmed dust. I've left the wallet running, but my intention is that when this issue is sorted is to send the funds to an exchange to dump and decommission my wallet. It's got over 50 inputs and no coin control so the fee could be horrendous (never sent a NOTE transaction before).
Mining alt coins that the pool solves regularly could be a good way for me to obtain dash, ltc, doge etc. I can combine all my DGB inputs fee free quite quickly and send that to the exchange fee free, saving on the BTC exchange rate and high BTC transaction fees when the BTC network is busy.
Have a good day and I hope you can look into the NOTE issue when you can.
Thanks, getting back into this now. Payments are generated every ~2 hours and inserted into the DB. Then they'll actually get sent usually ~10-20mins after that. So there will be a period of time where the payment will be listed as paid, but no tx, as it has yet to actually be sent. If the payment was actually created, it means there was already enough balance in the wallet to pay miners. If there wasn't, it would not get created until there is and your balance would simply continue to grow until it can be paid. At the same time, coins are not being sent to the exchange until the outstanding balances can be paid. The min payouts are 0.001 every 2 hours and 0.0001+ (on sundays). It is a global minimum so it may take a long time if you're mining a coin that already has only micro block rewards. The majority of coins shouldn't be a problem. I'm not sure why the tx's that was 1/2'd didn't get readjusted. I'll check into the balance and send off what you're owed. The code is designed to send 1/2 if the full balance couldn't be but should re-adjust the final balance accordingly... something we'll look into.
|
|
|
|