Indeed:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=20333.0

The policy to not remove anything worked when the forum was small. Now that we have thousands of posts a day, we can't afford 50% of them being junk. The moderators are now instructed to be less tolerant of low-value posts.

Some guidelines:

1. Free speech - you can say anything as long as it is relevant and presented in a calm and polite manner. Swearing, SHOUTING etc. make your post more likely to be removed.
2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
3. No pointless or uninteresting threads.
4. No referral code spam
5. No NSFW content

Reported - as I said "this is a campaign" and if you want to end up on the "wrong side" that is entirely up to you.

As I stated - I would be happy enough if we just get the forum "cleaned up" so don't miss that point please (and people with "ad sigs should not really be replying" to this).

You are warned not to reply again unless you really have something relevant to add (or you will be reported - your above post was basically *crap* but I'll let that one slide).

Anyone can have whatever  he want in his signature , I'm with you when you told the useless posts are increasing . But there are  users don't post  "rubbish"  ; so finally I think "ban" the sig. campaign is pointless .

Although I know the mods are trying their best to "weed out the ever increasing amount of crap posts" we are seeing due to "paid sig posting campaigns" I see more such campaigns being created and more and more rubbish posts being posted.

Please consider clicking the Report to Admin link on any "useless post" posted by someone with an "ad sig" (whether or not you know it is part of a "paid sig posting campaign" because if the post is "rubbish" then it is more than likely than not that is why it is there annoying you).

If enough of us do this then either it'll result in "a clean up of the forum" or a "banning of paid sig posting campaigns" (the latter being my preference but either result would be better than the current situation).

La campagna è ora gestita da dooglus, trovi più info qui: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=778953.0

Siamo in 29 e dooglus ha 5 BTC in escrow, penso ce la farà a pagare tutti in ogni caso

I have repeated my position over and over. I will pay if the DB guys don't.

This user given him negative feedback
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67058

You have negative trust rating.You cannot participate in this campaign

Let me guess OP bought at $1200?

The one with perfect system which can't be replaced of any other coin is the product made by many engineers. We should not call it a failure at any time, though it is in low. For speculators, there is no success or failure of Bitcoin, any condition is just the low point or high point for them to consider if buy and sell or not.

Accidentally sent Redsn0w .3 worth of Paypal instead of .03, was immediately refunded the difference.  Very trustworthy

Who has the authority to block people?

But how do you publicly prove that you've destroyed the private key?

All designs of mine will fit in a signature space.

Is it possible to generate a 'provably un-spendable' public address?

If yes, you could create one and then send all coins to this address.

Hey mate,

I've sent you a pm about buying 1 invite.

Cheers

I recently witnessed badbear post this completely unsubstantial post.


What safety measures are put in place so admins/moderators do not abuse the forum with spam and shitposts like this? I'm proposing some new implementation in the forum that when a mod/admin makes a post regular users are allowed to vote on if it should be deleted or not or if they should be suspended from posting or not. That can ensure that they do not spam. Or you could make a higher class of moderator to discipline them but then again who would moderate that higher class? I think my system I thought up is most efficient.

I ended up removing him from my list, but until he leaves feedback that someone disputes, it doesn't really matter.