Press will be interested again on ATH. Then they will talk about volatility instead.

Yes, as we've said, exchange listing is something that is critical to the project because we need the ability to buy at market to support the price, using a slice of funds every time a customer makes a purchase. We do hope to do that through Waves' DEX, for a start, though don't want to limit ourselves to that of course.

In other news, take a look at https://icotech.me/ if you haven't already. Pete took quite a lot of effort to develop our ICO tech, which is a lot more secure than anything else around. We've had plenty of interest in businesses licensing it, starting with Tokes. There will be others and we have at least one signed up for the near future. These will be 'Customer zero' for Incent. While Pete finishes the wallet and integrates with the first merchants (like Sure Green) later this quarter, these are the guys who will place early external demand on the Incent market. Every time someone deposits to the ICO, 1% is used to buy Incent as rewards. So Incent is baked right in, which is pretty cool - a kind of 'Incent Inside' initiative.

Anyways, just to let you know that we're right where we planned on being at this point. We should have some more updates for you soon, but we can't confirm the ICO that's happening next until they announce it themselves.

I think your post history gives a fair impression of how much attention people should give to your opinion.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=334882;sa=showPosts

You are kidding, right? 0.4 BTC panic sell and we're done? I think most people are better informed than this.

You mean ico area?
If there's a problem, come over to Slack and Pete will address it. You'll get more updates and information too.

Are you for real? We have a lot going on. Maybe you just need to make the effort to read about it up-thread, on Slack and on our blog.

No, Bittrex gave us a timeline of 2 months. If/when they add it is ultimately up to them. We don't make promises on their behalf.

Hmmm, not sure. Probably a display issue of some sort. You didn't withdraw from ico yet?

Well thanks for the mental picture.
I think the 800s will be sticky all the same.

Maybe. The rising price/falling volume makes me a little nervous about which direction the next move will be.
Normally I wouldn't care too much but I get paid tomorrow for 3 months work and it's going to make a difference 

I do not like the falling volume.

This discussion used to annoy me a lot. But I'm increasingly minded that the market will sort it out. Ultimately, bitcoin will fit into whatever niche the market deems it suits best. I don't think it will ever (for many years) be irrelevant, but it will settle into the place it deserves.
Big blocks, small blocks, the market doesn't care. If there's an application that is required and bitcoin doesn't suit that, something else will take its place for that sector. Bitcoin as it stands will become whatever it is best suited for. My best guess at the moment is that it will be a store of value and currency of settlement between other protocols that are more specialised, thanks to its network effect and proven security.
There's a saying you get the politicians you deserve. I feel it's much the same for bitcoin.

Folks, we're working on this. The reality is that some wheels just grind slowly.
Notwithstanding, our schedule for rollout is unchanged and we're right where we want to be at this point. Within Q1 we're hoping to have the first active merchant integrations. That means exchange listing and - as importantly - buy support from merchants who are actually using Incent. Every time a customer makes a purchase, a % of that amount will be diverted and used to buy Incent at market prices in real time.
Until then, Incent has speculative value only, and BTC's bull run has meant that just about everything else has been dumped. People are selling the Incent they bought or earned through bounties for pennies on the dollar. That's up to them but by the end of Q2 if not sooner I'm guessing they will look back and regret it.

So long as there's not been any fractional reserve shenanigans (which would, admittedly, surprise me but seems to have been the case from the reports so far) then this shouldn't make too much difference? Wash volume shouldn't move price, and ultimately if you can withdraw BTC and sell them elsewhere then price should take care of itself.

The reality is that fiat money only has value because the government accepts it for taxes. Take that away and you are literally asking people to trade against pieces of paper. That works so long as there is confidence: if people agree something is money, it is money. But if people start suggesting the emperor is running around in the buff, it's going to fall apart pretty fast.
Of course, the emperor is running around in the buff and things are going to fall apart. It will just take a little longer whilst the government is able to enforce the value of fiat.

The problem is that you have to trust every other member of society to honour the value of that non-government-backed cash. It's like a massive game of Prisoners' Dilemma. Personally I wouldn't trust other people to maintain the value of my wealth (any more than I'd trust the government). Unless it has some sort of very widely recognised/intrinsic value, you're playing a very dangerous game.

Have you raised it with Peter on Slack? He's working through some edge cases right now.

If you don't behave yourself igorr will appear with his favourite chart of the downtrend.

Well that got out of hand pretty fast.
Is China even awake?

Jorge Stolfi has sold his stash of 1 million BTC that he mined from 2009-2011.