That qualifies him for political office. I THINK? he still has his personal bitcoin right? so likely he is living a far better lifestyle then myself now this could change with charges etc but from what I gather he is kinda off the hook on the 'stupid' defense as of now? (not been keeping up any update appreciated) It's strange how he lost everyone's bitcoins except his own. |
|
|
|
thanks for your support. been working more like 18 hrs/day 28 days a month, but I have been doing this for 7 yrs now, the prior 6 was pre-crypto but I seem to have gained some skills from all that coding. I will probably become one of the few coders who writes over a million lines of code.
I decided to put a cool new module into BTCD, it will then become a valuable service provider for the rest of the SuperNET. This is a brand new tech that I have been working on the last two days and it enables the proper solving of many currently unsolved problems and could allow for a much wider appeal.
So, if you have faith in me HODL. If not, please sell.
James
Alright, I'll take the bait. What is this cool new tech of which you speak?  I posted in slack the details Been checking the different slack channels, don't see it .... (?) I think it is blockchain compression. That would be a really big plus. |
|
|
|
+64% and rising
Happy new year. It's one of the few things having a big rise today. |
|
|
|
The actual number doesnt matter. Bitcoin can be divided into smaller units which work usually fine.
If you are talking in terms of inflation, some believe that a currency with a supply cap may lead to other problems.
What problems? I ask because there are coins like Nxt with a fixed quantity of coins from day one. |
|
|
|
What a sad bunch of people you are...
 You will see after last stage airdrop.  When is that? |
|
|
|
See the sad this about this is that DOGE could have put a hard cap 100 billion + merge mined with LTC for just the transaction fees, but now these LTC miners get 5.2 billion coins per year for *drum roll* $0 more electricity per year. They are going to dump DOGE in order to try to support the coin they are mining. They would have mined it for the tiny little bits of free coins + the large advertising community without the 5.2 billion coin intensive.
It still blows me away
If the idea of a harder cap is sound and gets enugh support it might be implemented. Didn't the devs refuse to reconsider the idea? |
|
|
|
i think final winner will Dollar
because forex and commodity markets are closed on 1st jan and it seems almost impossible for bitcoin to increase approx 16%
+1 There's almost no trading activity on the bitcoin exchanges at present so $100 Bill probably wins. |
|
|
|
if i have only 50 clams its very hard to stake now in my own wallet? is it better to move to just-dice to stake?
It's safer to retain control of your private keys. |
|
|
|
Happy new year from holland!  Happy new year. I'm not in holland but I wish I was. |
|
|
|
|
Lets hope 2015 is a great year for Qora.
|
|
|
|
why are ppl mining this  The one person mining it is probably hoping to dump if it hits an exchange. |
|
|
|
Here to a wish a happy new year to everyone!! $GEEK is getting really close to launch, next month will be great! Everyone registered on www.geekkos.com will be hearing about it first. See ya! Happy new year |
|
|
|
well users who simply got Bitcoin without too much of a cost, what will they do?
Some like the bearwhale will dump but others like Satoshi will hold. |
|
|
|
300$
Today is 31st, and the price is already 318 $. The thread title asks what will be the price of Bitcoin on Dec 31, 2015. It's only Dec 31, 2014 today. The thread's asking for price predictions at this time next year. |
|
|
|
What is the secret behind the recent explosion in MZC prices? I just bought 0.5BTC and it is not showing any signs of stopping!
Today's total volume was $ 333 so you must have contributed half of that by buying 0.5 bitcoin's worth. |
|
|
|
please explain to me how further delay of something that people are eagerly anticipating for a boost in prices is positive. Clearly their last submission was not approved or they would not need to submit another one. Clearly this pushes back the timeline. At best it's neutral if you were not expecting an imminent launch. The whole news article was complete misrepresentation and omitted most of the facts. That is spinning ... or just piss poor journalism, probably the latter  Here is a diff of this latest amended proposal (version 5) and the previous one (version 4): http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2qxgah/diff_of_the_newest_winklevoss_filing_here/They update some data about the state of bitcoin (e.g. adoption) and change the State where the fund is incorporated, from New York to Delaware. Would this change improve the chances of approval? The plan is still to trade the fund on NASDAQ anyway. Could the state change be tied to the licensing issue. Delaware is the traditional state for incorporation so that would normally be neutral, but the fact that they changed it this late in the game suggests something is the matter. yup,they don't like it atm,changes required before approval Yea, and that is not a small change at all. That is a structural change, not just shifting a little bit of wording around. Tough to know because we aren't prevue to the discussions, but just my two cents as a lawyer. as you know a couple of words mean a lot,crossing the t's etc, i'm sure they want it to proceed but with what limitations IMO this change proves the ETF will be approved sooner or later. How the f--- did you come to that conclusion, exactly? They've fundamentally changed their filing -- they didn't just cross a "t" or dot an "i." No, they subjected themselves to an entirely different state of incorporation at the umpteenth hour. Logical reasoning is not a core criterion for becoming a Bitcoiner, is it? If the SEC had decided they wouldn't approve a math-based assets ETF they would've made it clear to the Winklevoss instead of suggesting corrections to their filings. Logic would suggest that no amount of countless lawyers hours at a hefty price should be spent further pursuing a hopeless goal. Clearly the Winks have some indications that following due process their project has a chance and will ultimately be approved. I don't like the timing of the revision. Christmas is a good time to bury bad news. I'll wait to find out the reasons behind the revision before making up my mind about its implications. |
|
|
|
please explain to me how further delay of something that people are eagerly anticipating for a boost in prices is positive. Clearly their last submission was not approved or they would not need to submit another one. Clearly this pushes back the timeline. At best it's neutral if you were not expecting an imminent launch. The whole news article was complete misrepresentation and omitted most of the facts. That is spinning ... or just piss poor journalism, probably the latter Here is a diff of this latest amended proposal (version 5) and the previous one (version 4): http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2qxgah/diff_of_the_newest_winklevoss_filing_here/They update some data about the state of bitcoin (e.g. adoption) and change the State where the fund is incorporated, from New York to Delaware. Would this change improve the chances of approval? The plan is still to trade the fund on NASDAQ anyway. Could the state change be tied to the licensing issue. Delaware is the traditional state for incorporation so that would normally be neutral, but the fact that they changed it this late in the game suggests something is the matter. yup,they don't like it atm,changes required before approval Yea, and that is not a small change at all. That is a structural change, not just shifting a little bit of wording around. Tough to know because we aren't prevue to the discussions, but just my two cents as a lawyer. as you know a couple of words mean a lot,crossing the t's etc, i'm sure they want it to proceed but with what limitations IMO this change proves the ETF will be approved sooner or later. Is the change likely to delay things considerably? The approval process seems to have moved at a glacial pace to date. |
|
|
|
|
Happy new year and thanks Team Kalisto for all the work you did in 2014.
|
|
|
|
it is just a simple POW coin or there is anything different in this when compared to other coins
we need coin with innovation,not just a clone
Yes, this is being ninja launched on new years eve when everyone is getting pissed. The difficulty will be sky high by the time most people's hangovers have worn off and they notice its been launched. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
